BamaD -> RE: gun control and tragedies (3/15/2013 10:29:19 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Musicmystery Yet liberal NY had the lowest gun murder rate in 2012 -- due to getting guns off the streets. Deciding whether that's a good idea or not is one thing; pretending that looser laws inherently create lower murder rates is just not true. quote:
Bloomberg compared New York’s murder rate — the lowest rate per 100,000 residents amongst the 25 most populated cities — to other famous cities in the country. If the city had the murder rate of Chicago, cops would be investigating more than 1,400 homicides this year, Bloomberg said. If the city had Detroit’s murder rate, cops would be called to more than 4,400 killings this year, he added. Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly said that the drop in murders and shootings stem from a wide range of strategies that include deploying more officers in crime-ridden areas and the controversial stop-and-frisk tactic. “We’re taking 8,000 weapons annually out of the hands of people we stop, 800 of them illegal guns,” Kelly said. Guns are the leading cause of murders in the city this year, killing 237 people. Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/murders-fall-record-city-article-1.1229273#ixzz2NcnEHmDJ I have previously mentioned that NYC is an exception to the rule. The flaw in Bloombergs argument is that they passed the Sullivan act in the early 20th century, the masive upsurge in crime there came while they had the strictest gun laws in the country. The turnaround came when Guliani instituted a zero tolorence crime policy. Condemded by liberals as harrasment they enforced laws strictly down to vandalism with plain cloths patrolls in problem areas, being proactive on crime and focusing on nailing criminals not harrasing the innocent. Keep in mind that Bloomberg thinks he can tell you how big a soda you can buy, those 20 ounce cokes are murder.
|
|
|
|