Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: gun control and tragedies


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: gun control and tragedies Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: gun control and tragedies - 3/11/2013 1:45:56 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
The ABS defines assault as the direct infliction of force, injury or violence upon a person, including attempts or threats. It excludes sexual assault.

FBI definitions...

Aggravated assault―An unlawful attack by one person upon another for the purpose of inflicting severe or aggravated bodily injury. This type of assault usually is accompanied by the use of a weapon or by means likely to produce death or great bodily harm. Simple assaults are excluded.

Other assaults (simple)―Assaults and attempted assaults where no weapon was used or no serious or aggravated injury resulted to the victim. Stalking, intimidation, coercion, and hazing are included.


Australia includes both, the US doesnt.

Its always nice to know what you are comparing.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Focus50)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: gun control and tragedies - 3/11/2013 5:40:40 AM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
quote:

How do you like the way your gun ban is working out?


It's working out wonderfully thank you very much. Introducing a ban on high powered weapons was probably the best thing the Howard Govt ever did IMHO. It was introduced following the slaughter of 35 innocent people by a deranged shooter in Tasmania. There hasn't been a single case of mass slaughter since. Sadly the American experience doesn't quite mirror that perfect record does it?

Re; the chart presented earlier in the thread about assault figures here in Australia. The implication - that the rise was due to the changes in the gun laws - is about as childishly stupid a suggestion as I have seen since I began posting here. Even if the figures are accurate, there is no evidence that assault figures were in any way affected by the changes in gun laws. Any suggestion that there is a link, on basis of that evidence is merely conjecture - wishful thinking.

However, if that is the argument you wish to present, please present some evidence to suggest a causal link from gun control to the incidence of assaults. Otherwise the figures are meaningless, and quite irrelevant to the topic of this thread.

In fact the assault figures are a matter of concern here, but just about every analysis I've seen demonstrates direct links between alcohol consumption and assaults. During the period in question, licensing laws were liberalised, allowing pubs to stay open much later, enabling increased alcohol consumption .

This strikes me as a far more plausible explanation of the stats in the chart. . One study found that assaults after dark fell by 29% following the introduction of a trial period of stricter licensing laws in Newcastle. "Doctors, nurses, ambulance officers and police are calling for action and for similar measures to be rolled out statewide. It’s time to tackle the epidemic of alcohol-related violence once and for all."
http://www.keepourcops.org.au/file.php?file=/mediacentre.html


< Message edited by tweakabelle -- 3/11/2013 6:30:14 AM >


_____________________________



(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: gun control and tragedies - 3/11/2013 6:01:58 AM   
Yachtie


Posts: 3593
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

just about every analysis I've seen demonstrates direct links between alcohol consumption and assaults.



Guess it's time to ban alcohol. In time the world can be so sterilized the safety factor should be phenomenal.


< Message edited by Yachtie -- 3/11/2013 6:03:04 AM >


_____________________________

“We all know it’s going to end badly, but in the meantime we can make some money.” - Jim Cramer, CNBC

“Those who ‘abjure’ violence can only do so because others are committing violence on their behalf.” - George Orwell

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: gun control and tragedies - 3/11/2013 6:26:53 AM   
Nosathro


Posts: 3319
Joined: 9/25/2005
From: Orange County, California
Status: offline
Here is a few facts to consider about alcohol and crime..from NACDD

5.3 million adults − 36% of those under correctional supervision at the time − were drinking at the time of their conviction offense

Excessive drinking leads to criminal behavior:

The US Department of Justice (DOJ) estimated that a majority of criminal offenders were under the influence of alcohol alone when they committed their crimes.

Federal research shows that for the 40% of convicted murderers being held in either jail or State prison, alcohol use was a factor in the homicide.

Alcohol is a factor in 40% of all violent crimes today

About 3 million violent crimes occur each year in which victims perceive the offender to have been drinking. Crimes include: rape, sexual assault, robbery, aggravated and simple assault. About two-thirds of violent crimes are characterized as simple assaults.

Based on victim reports, alcohol use by the offender was a factor in:
•37% of rapes and sexual assaults
•15% of robberies
•27% of aggravated assaults, and
•25% of simple

(in reply to Yachtie)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: gun control and tragedies - 3/11/2013 6:37:23 AM   
Nosathro


Posts: 3319
Joined: 9/25/2005
From: Orange County, California
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: Focus50

Lmao, love the irony!

Thanks. How do you like the way your gun ban is working out?



Kewl, eh?

K.



As always you distort and misrepresent, information to support your view, then use your fabrications to attack someone elses point of view. This report says nothing about guns, just you. Firearms related death in Australia in 2011 per 100,000 1.05, The US is 10.2 for the same year. Reported by UNODC. Seems Australias' gun ban is doing very well.

< Message edited by Nosathro -- 3/11/2013 7:06:50 AM >

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: gun control and tragedies - 3/11/2013 7:13:27 AM   
Rule


Posts: 10479
Joined: 12/5/2005
Status: offline
FR

I am opposed to an alcohol ban. Sure, it would prevent lots of crimes, but... Savages walk amongst us, i.e. people who can go at a moment's notice from normal to the red zone of rage and viciousness, and other people who are not savages but who are without a conscience. These characteristics are in their genes and they pass those on to future generations when they reproduce. Alcohol reveals to females who those savages and those without a conscience are and they may consequently choose to not have children by them, and in this way cleanse the future gene pools from their animal genes. Therefore in societies where alcohol is not prohibited, we must expect as the generations pass, to see an increase in the percentage of decent people, whereas in societies where alcohol is prohibited as the centuries and millennia pass the percentage of savages and peoples without a conscience must be expected to not change and even take a turn for the worse.

_____________________________

"I tend to pay attention when Rule speaks" - Aswad

"You are sweet, kind, and ever so smart, Rule. You ALWAYS stretch my mind and make me think further than I might have on my own" - Duskypearls

Si vis pacem, para bellum.

(in reply to Nosathro)
Profile   Post #: 86
RE: gun control and tragedies - 3/11/2013 8:10:28 AM   
freedomdwarf1


Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule
I am opposed to an alcohol ban. Sure, it would prevent lots of crimes, but...

I think most people would be.

But... there are places to drink.
You can drink at home too - hence supermarket and off-license sales so people can do that.

In the streets where there are kids and 'sensible' well-behaved people??
I don't like seeing it.
I also don't like the resultant bad language and the disturbances it leads to.
I also don't like the idea that it costs us in taxes and extra rates to pay for the extra police, ambulance/paramedic people to deal with the inevitable consequences and the time taken up in ER to deal with the unnecessary inuries.

Not to mention the poor innocent bystanders that happen to get in the way.
Then the additional expenses of the nearby premises that need emergency repairs because of the damage and vandalism that inherently goes with the territory.

Why the fuck should it cost ME extra money just to cater for these nasty, inconsiderate asshats who want to drink on the streets and spoil it for everyone around them??

There are several pilot schemes over here where pedestrian and high-street areas have a total ban on drinking alcohol in the streets and parks - which I approve of.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule
Savages walk amongst us, i.e. people who can go at a moment's notice from normal to the red zone of rage and viciousness, and other people who are not savages but who are without a conscience. These characteristics are in their genes and they pass those on to future generations when they reproduce.

Do you honestly believe that clap-trap??

It's not in your genes whether you choose to drink and be an asshat in public.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule
Alcohol reveals to females who those savages and those without a conscience are and they may consequently choose to not have children by them

And that would be a good decision IMHO
Nothing worse than unruly, drunken kids who have learned insolent and destructive behaviour from bad parents.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule
...and in this way cleanse the future gene pools from their animal genes. Therefore in societies where alcohol is not prohibited, we must expect as the generations pass, to see an increase in the percentage of decent people, whereas in societies where alcohol is prohibited as the centuries and millennia pass the percentage of savages and peoples without a conscience must be expected to not change and even take a turn for the worse.

Do you have any sensible reference points to support this PoV??

There are many tribes who, as a matter of daily routine, chew and smoke extremely potent halucinagenic plants and drink very nasty concoctions. Do you see their society slowly going down the pan because of their 'genes' being carried forward through many generations??
No, you don't. Their tribe continues to thrive and doesn't get any worse for their adventures and over many millenia have not taken a turn for the worse.

You really only see this sort of degenerate behaviour amongst 'civilised' societies where alcohol is in abundance and is left unchecked and/or poorly regulated.


Now, as for gun control.... If you add guns into the mix of degenerate behaviour caused by asshats who drink too much in public, you are bound to get tragedies in abundance.
The only way to avoid such awful consequences is to remove those things that cause the tragedies.
Take away the guns so they can't shoot anyone.
Then regulate how much they can drink whilst in the presence of Joe Public.

(in reply to Rule)
Profile   Post #: 87
RE: gun control and tragedies - 3/11/2013 8:13:12 AM   
Hillwilliam


Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: Focus50

Lmao, love the irony!

Thanks. How do you like the way your gun ban is working out?



Kewl, eh?

K.



As always you distort and misrepresent, information to support your view, then use your fabrications to attack someone elses point of view. This report says nothing about guns, just you. Firearms related death in Australia in 2011 per 100,000 1.05, The US is 10.2 for the same year. Reported by UNODC. Seems Australias' gun ban is doing very well.

He was pointing out that since the gun ban in austrailia, assaults have increased.
No misrepresentation or distortion there.
The number on the right side of the graph is bigger than the one on the left side.

_____________________________

Kinkier than a cheap garden hose.

Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio.

Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.

(in reply to Nosathro)
Profile   Post #: 88
RE: gun control and tragedies - 3/11/2013 8:27:51 AM   
Yachtie


Posts: 3593
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Then why make it "liberal" ideology?



Because it is. The progressive agenda is of the liberal left.



Progressive means it sits in subcommittee for years?

Thats progressive?



Damn Tazzy! Of course not. Sitting in subcommittee is mere tactics. Allows the perception that at least it's being considered.

_____________________________

“We all know it’s going to end badly, but in the meantime we can make some money.” - Jim Cramer, CNBC

“Those who ‘abjure’ violence can only do so because others are committing violence on their behalf.” - George Orwell

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 89
RE: gun control and tragedies - 3/11/2013 8:36:02 AM   
Nosathro


Posts: 3319
Joined: 9/25/2005
From: Orange County, California
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: Focus50

Lmao, love the irony!

Thanks. How do you like the way your gun ban is working out?



Kewl, eh?

K.



As always you distort and misrepresent, information to support your view, then use your fabrications to attack someone elses point of view. This report says nothing about guns, just you. Firearms related death in Australia in 2011 per 100,000 1.05, The US is 10.2 for the same year. Reported by UNODC. Seems Australias' gun ban is doing very well.

He was pointing out that since the gun ban in austrailia, assaults have increased.
No misrepresentation or distortion there.
The number on the right side of the graph is bigger than the one on the left side.


Oh he did misrepresent and I quote "Thanks. How do you like the way your gun ban is working out?"
The chart only shows assaults but not of a specific type, nothing about guns. Assaults can be from a hand, stick baseball bat, etc, does not have to be just a gun.

And if you want to just talk about assaults in general, should be talking at all.

Australia 7.02459 per 1000 people US 7.55923 per 1000 people

http://www.scribd.com/doc/21674/Crime-Statistics-Assaults

< Message edited by Nosathro -- 3/11/2013 8:49:46 AM >

(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 90
RE: gun control and tragedies - 3/11/2013 8:43:10 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
Those numbers do not reflect how many were aggravated assaults or how many are considered simple assaults.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 91
RE: gun control and tragedies - 3/11/2013 8:44:42 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Then why make it "liberal" ideology?



Because it is. The progressive agenda is of the liberal left.



Progressive means it sits in subcommittee for years?

Thats progressive?



Damn Tazzy! Of course not. Sitting in subcommittee is mere tactics. Allows the perception that at least it's being considered.


While doing nothing to change the status quo.. very much a conservative ideology.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Yachtie)
Profile   Post #: 92
RE: gun control and tragedies - 3/11/2013 8:55:51 AM   
Hillwilliam


Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro


Oh he did misrepresent and I quote "Thanks. How do you like the way your gun ban is working out?"
The chart only shows assaults but not of a specific type, nothing about guns. Assaults can be from a hand, stick baseball bat, etc, does not have to be just a gun.


That's correct. An assault of whatever type does not have to be a gun.
His point is that since the ban on firearms, ALL assaults are up.

He wasn't comparing Aussie to the US. He was comparing Aussie pre and post ban.

Guns were banned and assaults increased. I'm not pointing out causality. I'm pointing out correlation.
Since 1996, assaults (of all kinds) have nearly doubled.

_____________________________

Kinkier than a cheap garden hose.

Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio.

Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.

(in reply to Nosathro)
Profile   Post #: 93
RE: gun control and tragedies - 3/11/2013 8:58:24 AM   
Yachtie


Posts: 3593
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Then why make it "liberal" ideology?



Because it is. The progressive agenda is of the liberal left.



Progressive means it sits in subcommittee for years?

Thats progressive?



Damn Tazzy! Of course not. Sitting in subcommittee is mere tactics. Allows the perception that at least it's being considered.


While doing nothing to change the status quo.. very much a conservative ideology.


They're all of the same cloth.

_____________________________

“We all know it’s going to end badly, but in the meantime we can make some money.” - Jim Cramer, CNBC

“Those who ‘abjure’ violence can only do so because others are committing violence on their behalf.” - George Orwell

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 94
RE: gun control and tragedies - 3/11/2013 9:07:02 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
LOL

Convenient fall back position. You do love to back peddle.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Yachtie)
Profile   Post #: 95
RE: gun control and tragedies - 3/11/2013 10:21:34 AM   
Nosathro


Posts: 3319
Joined: 9/25/2005
From: Orange County, California
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro


Oh he did misrepresent and I quote "Thanks. How do you like the way your gun ban is working out?"
The chart only shows assaults but not of a specific type, nothing about guns. Assaults can be from a hand, stick baseball bat, etc, does not have to be just a gun.


That's correct. An assault of whatever type does not have to be a gun.
His point is that since the ban on firearms,
ALL assaults are up.

He wasn't comparing Aussie to the US. He was comparing Aussie pre and post ban.

Guns were banned and assaults increased. I'm not pointing out causality. I'm pointing out correlation.
Since 1996, assaults (of all kinds) have nearly doubled.


And your wrong again, firearms were not baned in Austrlia.

Under the 1996 National Agreement on Firearms. Anyone wishing to possess or use a firearm must have a Firearms Licence and, with some exceptions, be over the age of 18. Owners must have secure storage for their firearms.
Before someone can buy a firearm, he or she must obtain a Permit To Acquire. The first permit has a mandatory 28-day delay before it is first issued. In some states (e.g., Queensland, Victoria, and New South Wales), this is waived for second and subsequent firearms of the same class. For each firearm a "Genuine Reason" must be given, relating to pest control, hunting, target shooting, or collecting. Self-defense is not accepted as a reason for issuing a license, even though it may be legal under certain circumstances to use a legally held firearm for self-defense

And there has been some postive results:

Between 1991 and 2001, the number of firearm-related deaths in Australia declined 47%.[25] According to a 2011 report from the Australian government, "...the number of victims of homicide has been in decline since 1996". There were 354 victims in 1996, but only 260 victims in 2010, a decrease of 27 percent. Also, "The proportion of homicide victims killed by offenders using firearms in 2009–10 represented a decrease of 18 percentage points from the peak of 31 percent in 1995–96 )."

Firearm suicides have fallen from about 22% of all suicides in 1992[26] to 7% of all suicides in 2005.

The number of guns stolen has fallen from an average 4,195 per year from 1994 to 2000 to 1,526 in 2006–2007.

Some interesting facts about the assaults as well

Where the relationship between victim and offender was stated, 81% of female victims of assault knew the offender, compared with 49% of male victims.

Assaults against females were more than twice as likely to be perpetrated by a family member as those against males.

Recorded assaults occurred most frequently in dwellings (42%).

It is very possible that Austrilia would have a growing domestic violence problem more that say an assault in an attempt to steal a walet.

Also, males and females aged 15 to 24 experienced assault at the highest rates after this age period it declines to almost nothing by 65.
And again the Austrlia are still behind our level of assaults.

< Message edited by Nosathro -- 3/11/2013 10:41:20 AM >

(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 96
RE: gun control and tragedies - 3/11/2013 10:54:11 AM   
Hillwilliam


Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro


Oh he did misrepresent and I quote "Thanks. How do you like the way your gun ban is working out?"
The chart only shows assaults but not of a specific type, nothing about guns. Assaults can be from a hand, stick baseball bat, etc, does not have to be just a gun.


That's correct. An assault of whatever type does not have to be a gun.
His point is that since the ban on firearms,
ALL assaults are up.

He wasn't comparing Aussie to the US. He was comparing Aussie pre and post ban.

Guns were banned and assaults increased. I'm not pointing out causality. I'm pointing out correlation.
Since 1996, assaults (of all kinds) have nearly doubled.


And your wrong again, firearms were not baned in Austrlia.


Ok, since the regulations became incredibly strict. Some folk both here and there refer to it as the "Gun Ban"
As for the rest of the cut and paste you put up (know how I could tell it was cut and paste? it was all spelled correctly and in literate english)
It had NOTHING to do with the subject of this particular conversation which is "since the new firearms regulations passed in 1996, assaults of all kinds have almost doubled".
The numbers are bigger now than they were then for those who CLAIM A's in statistics.

_____________________________

Kinkier than a cheap garden hose.

Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio.

Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.

(in reply to Nosathro)
Profile   Post #: 97
RE: gun control and tragedies - 3/11/2013 11:41:14 AM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

It's working out wonderfully thank you very much.

Homicides rates have been falling in both the U.S. and Australia in recent years, but any claim that the reduction is due to gun laws is obviously false. For the first five years after Australia enacted its restrictive gun laws, there was no significant difference in the homicide rate:

Period          rate/100,000

2001:           1.55
1999/2000:      1.6
1998/1999:      1.7
1997/1998:      1.6
1996/1997:      1.6


Meanwhile, the recent decline in U.S. homicide rates has been accompanied by soaring rates of gun ownership. In addition, despite the fact that Australia's restrictive gun laws were sold to the public on a wave of outrage over mass-shootings, there is no evidence that restrictive gun laws have any effect on the phenomenon:

The current paper examines the incidence of mass shootings in Australia and New Zealand (a country that is socioeconomically similar to Australia, but with a different approach to firearms regulation) over a 30 year period. It does not find support for the hypothesis that Australia’s prohibition of certain types of firearms has prevented mass shootings, with New Zealand not experiencing a mass shooting since 1997 despite the availability in that country of firearms banned in Australia.

And not everyone is as pleased as you are.

K.


Sources:

GunPolicy.org - Australia
Mass Shootings in Australia and New Zealand



< Message edited by Kirata -- 3/11/2013 12:13:05 PM >

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 98
RE: gun control and tragedies - 3/11/2013 1:43:11 PM   
Focus50


Posts: 3962
Joined: 12/28/2004
From: Newcastle, Australia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

Ok, since the regulations became incredibly strict. Some folk both here and there refer to it as the "Gun Ban"


Well yeah, I call it a "Gun Ban", too, but it's not that - beyond being a simple means of expressing the changes.

I've got guns and anyone *without* a criminal record can apply for a licence. But you do need a vallid reason - it's not some ancient right of passage like the US 2nd....

Focus.


_____________________________

Never underestimate the persuasive power of stupid people in large groups. <unknown>

Your food is for eating, not torturing. <my mum> (Errm, when I was a kid)

(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 99
RE: gun control and tragedies - 3/11/2013 2:56:18 PM   
Nosathro


Posts: 3319
Joined: 9/25/2005
From: Orange County, California
Status: offline
Brooklyn should get it or even better sue the NRA

http://tv.msnbc.com/2013/02/19/yo-brooklynites-demand-apology-from-nra-big-mouth-huh-fuhgetaboutit/

(in reply to FunCouple5280)
Profile   Post #: 100
Page:   <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: gun control and tragedies Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125