RE: The feminist version of equality (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Moonhead -> RE: The feminist version of equality (3/20/2013 5:40:44 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: naughtynick81
Plenty of people usually just use men/white men as a scapegoat for their own failings. It's utter sexist and racist against white men.

So how do the unemployment figures for victimised white men compare to those for the affirmative action empowered black guy, then?




LookieNoNookie -> RE: The feminist version of equality (3/20/2013 6:45:45 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead


quote:

ORIGINAL: naughtynick81
Neither is blaming men for this but no one questions that.

So who's blaming men for anything in this thread, pray tell? All I see is you blaming the evil feminist conspiracy for something bad that you're refusing to name or provide any evidence for.


Except for the fact that if a woman enters a mans locker room, she'll be asked to stay....a man...arrested.

I just heard the other night that "women are being exponentially affected by the internet in that women will read the entire fora/post/web page....men will read the first paragraph or 2 and call it a day".

Ergo...women have to spend "up to 9 times longer to excerpt data from web searches".

Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!

RIGHT....so, the message was that women are far more concerned about facts, ergo, better informed, ergo, better constituents....etc.

Or...it could just simply be...men are quite clear...the essence is in fact in the first few paragaphs...and if it isn't....it's a waste of my gawdamned time....let's move the fuck along.

And we have shit to do like kill things, make sure the bills get paid...etc.

(That doesn't matter...women are always better).

So...yeah....women are better, once again, by virtue of the fact that we dawdle while you gals absorb all the pertinent shit.

Yeah....doesn't matter all that much what the specifics are does it? Guys are stooooopit.

Period.

Fact.

I have one basic question: If women make up 57% of the voting populace (and they do)....how the fuck is it that men end up dealing with all the shit/being in the majority of the electoral gig? If you chics are in the majority (and a LOT of us guys vote for wimmens),,,how the fuck is it that you wimmens don't own the gig?

Funny thing is...men don't bitch about this kinda shit (we don't have time)....we just move on and solve shit....and then read about women bitching about shit...and when we're done...we get back to fixing shit.

(Hey....ladies...don't like it, wanna complain about how we're {men} NOT fixing shit? ELECT MORE WIMMENS!!!!!!).

Or.....you could just shut the fuck up.




Lucylastic -> RE: The feminist version of equality (3/20/2013 7:00:09 PM)

There there dear*pats you on the head*
Fix shit? LOL ahuh of course you do....[;)]




RottenJohnny -> RE: The feminist version of equality (3/20/2013 8:08:03 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie

Funny thing is...men don't bitch about this kinda shit (we don't have time)....we just move on and solve shit....and then read about women bitching about shit...and when we're done...we get back to fixing shit.

(Hey....ladies...don't like it, wanna complain about how we're {men} NOT fixing shit? ELECT MORE WIMMENS!!!!!!).

Or.....you could just shut the fuck up.



Amen.




MrRodgers -> RE: The feminist version of equality (3/21/2013 2:39:00 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: naughtynick81

http://imgur.com/pBYOHnF

This poor chap goes to a top university where the women are just as qualified as the men, and outnumber the men. It bothers him that despite this fact, the women still receive preferential treatment in job recruitment.

Yes but unfortunately it's usually not always but most often because they are offered less money and they take it.




Owner59 -> RE: The feminist version of equality (3/21/2013 3:57:31 AM)

I wonder if the "poor chap" would trade positions/roles....if being female is all that advantageous over being male?


Doubt it.




tazzygirl -> RE: The feminist version of equality (3/21/2013 6:03:28 AM)

quote:

Hey....ladies...don't like it, wanna complain about how we're {men} NOT fixing shit? ELECT MORE WIMMENS!!!!!!


We are [:D]




Zonie63 -> RE: The feminist version of equality (3/21/2013 10:48:15 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie
Funny thing is...men don't bitch about this kinda shit (we don't have time)....we just move on and solve shit....and then read about women bitching about shit...and when we're done...we get back to fixing shit.



Trouble is, we don't really fix shit, we just jerry-rig it somehow. WD-40 and duct tape; that's how things get fixed. [;)]




Lucylastic -> RE: The feminist version of equality (3/21/2013 11:08:24 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63


quote:

ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie
Funny thing is...men don't bitch about this kinda shit (we don't have time)....we just move on and solve shit....and then read about women bitching about shit...and when we're done...we get back to fixing shit.



Trouble is, we don't really fix shit, we just jerry-rig it somehow. WD-40 and duct tape; that's how things get fixed. [;)]

dont forget the correct application of a hammer:)




jlf1961 -> RE: The feminist version of equality (3/21/2013 11:11:27 AM)

Uh, when a woman can stand and piss while writing her name in the snow.....

Look, there is a problem with feminism, too many feminists fall into the category of over demanding nut jobs. They have to have more opportunities than men because they are women, and it is a man's world where men make the rules.

If I hear "He got the job because he is a man." one more time, I think I might either spank someone or strangle them. Yes it happens, but not as much as it used to, but it is not always the case. Besides if you can prove a woman was more qualified, that is what courts are for.

As for college financial aid packages, there are scholarships and grants that are specifically for women... the same is true for men.

In other words, grow a pair and quit your whining.




thompsonx -> RE: The feminist version of equality (3/21/2013 11:44:33 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: TricklessMagic

Women and minorities get treated better than white men by women and minorities.


Would you happen to have any validation for this moronic tripe?


quote:

Not what is best to achieve, but what is best to drag the top down to the bottom so everyone is equal.

Why do you assume that equality means draging the top to the bottom? Wouldn't dragging the bottom to the top cause equality also?




thompsonx -> RE: The feminist version of equality (3/21/2013 11:47:52 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: naughtynick81


You feminists and leftists either make up any excuse under the sun for why it should be okay for men to be discriminated against or you just totally deny it. Only a bigot has this mindset.





To not discriminate against women does not ipsofacto discriminate against men.
But then you already knew that didn't you?




thompsonx -> RE: The feminist version of equality (3/21/2013 11:49:31 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Baroana

Alright, I am going to say it.

OP, think you are one of those sub guys that says stupid shit in order to get off on being humiliated for it.

Some are more perceptive than others.




thompsonx -> RE: The feminist version of equality (3/21/2013 11:51:08 AM)

quote:

Or.....you could just shut the fuck up.


Physician heal thyself.




Moonhead -> RE: The feminist version of equality (3/21/2013 1:38:56 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


quote:

ORIGINAL: naughtynick81


You feminists and leftists either make up any excuse under the sun for why it should be okay for men to be discriminated against or you just totally deny it. Only a bigot has this mindset.





To not discriminate against women does not ipsofacto discriminate against men.
But then you already knew that didn't you?


It's that stupidity about there only being a finite amount of entitlement, so you can't give somebody a legally protected right except by taking another right away from somebody else.
Ludicrous notion, if we're honest, but one that seems oddly popular with a certain type of poster on here...




LookieNoNookie -> RE: The feminist version of equality (3/21/2013 4:52:14 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: naughtynick81

Ok, this reply is going to be a real quicky as time is not my friend today.

quote:

You are kidding me, right? The US has had how many female presidents?


Yes, discrimination does exist but to generalise men and have prejudice against men for blaming them entirely for this is being sexist against men within it's self.

People like you seem to ignore that women with children on a general basis choose family over career which is why there are far less women climbing up the career ladder than men.

The whole point is about "choices". This leads to less females compared to males going for these higher positions. So therefore, it's inevitable that the outcome will be that it will most likely be a male who will fill these positions. If there are 10 males and 5 females going for the same position, who is more likely going to get it? A male or female?

The us department of labour study explains this theory about women's choices. Feminists are too busy blaming men for the choices women are making.


http://www.consad.com/content/reports/Gender%20Wage%20Gap%20Final%20Report.pdf

quote:

Also look at who is most affected by poverty globally by FARRRRRRRRRRR. Mostly women and children


Globally in other countries, you have a point but not in the US or Australia or other western nations.

For example, as explained in this study, men take up most of the lowest paying jobs.

http://www.warrenfarrell.com/labor_day_art.htm

Also, who are the majority of homeless? Oh could it be men?

Ignorance is bliss in a feminist minded person.

I am in no denial that there would be some men/white men out there that will discriminate others who are different. But it bothers me how some women and some people from minority groups use this excuse every single time they fail in getting somewhere they want to be. Plenty of people usually just use men/white men as a scapegoat for their own failings. It's utter sexist and racist against white men. But people are so damn blind to that brand of sexism and racism.

I would like to carry on but I need to get the fuck out of here. Have fun grinding your teeth over the truth.



EXCELLENT links!!!!




tazzygirl -> RE: The feminist version of equality (3/21/2013 5:09:05 PM)

Too bad its not true.


quote:

The Glass Cellar allows us to predict that virtually 100% of the firefighters and police officers who gave their lives at the World Trade Center would be men;


http://www.warrenfarrell.com/labor_day_art.htm

Also less known is that women were among the firefighters, police officers and rescue workers. As the media kept talking about "firemen" and "policemen," the existence of these women became invisible. There might have been more: women (and minority racial groups) have long alleged discrimination that's kept many women from serving in the New York City police and fire departments. Among those who died were:

Captain Kathy Mazza, Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Police Department
Moira Smith, Police Officer, New York City Police Department
Yamel Merino, EMT


http://womenshistory.about.com/library/weekly/aa020909a.htm

In fact....

Table 1. Characteristics of the confirmed WTC responder deaths, 2001-2009
N %
Sex
Male 710 87.2 (percent)
Female 104 12.8 (percent)


http://www.health.ny.gov/environmental/investigations/wtc/health_studies/docs/wtc_responders_report.pdf




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875