RE: The depraved paradise? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


vincentML -> RE: The depraved paradise? (4/12/2013 11:26:47 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrBukani

It's not just the deed that gets you there it's the mindset. He leads a pious life for a speck of 80 years to have an eternal murderspree?


Interesting to see how you all make up the rules for entry . . . like you really know [8|]

Well particularly since there is no heaven or hell, I am thinking it's like when you go to sleep and don't dream...nothing. No paradise there.

At least when you go to sleep even if you don't dream you have to get up to pee . . . lol! I don't see that in my future. More like anaesthesia and the Doc went on holiday.[:)]




vincentML -> RE: The depraved paradise? (4/12/2013 11:31:51 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Free Will is an essential doctrine to the religious...

For the non-religious, not so much?

K.


The non religious don't need it as a justification to excuse their chosen God's incompetence, so they treat free will as a fact of life rather than an exercise in theodicy.

You think all the choices you make are not predetermined by the chain of circumstances that have made you who you are and brought you to the moment of choice? Free will? Not so sure of that.




Kirata -> RE: The depraved paradise? (4/12/2013 1:18:42 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML
quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

The non religious don't need it as a justification to excuse their chosen God's incompetence, so they treat free will as a fact of life rather than an exercise in theodicy.

You think all the choices you make are not predetermined by the chain of circumstances that have made you who you are and brought you to the moment of choice? Free will? Not so sure of that.

Well let's pare this down a bit. Certainly our experiences predispose us to certain reactions to situations. But we also have the freedom to count to ten (so to speak) and choose to respond differently. So we do have freedom of choice, not over the environment but over how we choose to respond to it, and I think this is what most people mean by free will. Moreover, they believe it because they experience it, not because they "need" it to justify some preconceived religious notion.

K.




vincentML -> RE: The depraved paradise? (4/13/2013 4:05:18 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML
quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

The non religious don't need it as a justification to excuse their chosen God's incompetence, so they treat free will as a fact of life rather than an exercise in theodicy.

You think all the choices you make are not predetermined by the chain of circumstances that have made you who you are and brought you to the moment of choice? Free will? Not so sure of that.

Well let's pare this down a bit. Certainly our experiences predispose us to certain reactions to situations. But we also have the freedom to count to ten (so to speak) and choose to respond differently. So we do have freedom of choice, not over the environment but over how we choose to respond to it, and I think this is what most people mean by free will. Moreover, they believe it because they experience it, not because they "need" it to justify some preconceived religious notion.

K.


Experiencing is not necessarily the best confirmation of reality, is it? Sometimes our experiences are illusions. Do we not teach children universally that they are responsible for their own agency? Don't we teach free will from early on in a child's life? Therefore, isn't there an expectation of free will? But does that expectation make it a reality?

We are agreed that our experiences predispose us to certain reactions. May I add not only our past experiences of our external world but also the experiences of our emotions and moral codes as well? I put it to you that we make choices and rationalize our behavior afterwards. If we step back as you say and count ten to sort our choices, the choices we weigh are already anchored to our emotional perceptions of internal or external consequences. We have learned what is right or wrong, what will give us satisfaction or pain. Isn't the choice pretty much already made? How far would a man have to stray from a strong moral conviction to act against it? On the other hand, why are some beastly, evil behaviors incorrigible? Why will a child rapist persist in repeating his crime or a serial murderer repeatedly act out his fantasy? Why is it so difficult for them to step back and count to ten as you say and make a more appropriate choice?

I wonder how free our ability to form intent really is.





littlewonder -> RE: The depraved paradise? (4/13/2013 10:11:17 PM)

It takes more than living a good life to get into Heaven such as true worship and belief. You can't just go through the motions to get in.




egern -> RE: The depraved paradise? (4/14/2013 3:01:45 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Jewelcrafter

A thought I had years ago was this. What if a person who really gets off of hurting and killing people actually decides he is going to get into Heaven to live his paradise, torture and murder. He lives a virtual saints life. He never kills, steals, lies; he helps the downtrodden and is a pillar of society, selflessly giving of himself his entire life. He dies.

Now, by definition of being a good and decent person as stated above, he gets into Heaven. Does he get his violent and cruel utopia?

Just a thought. Curious of others thoughts.



Maybe his Heaven is other people's Hell?




Kirata -> RE: The depraved paradise? (4/14/2013 7:09:24 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Experiencing is not necessarily the best confirmation of reality... I wonder how free our ability to form intent really is.

The problem with our ordinary experience of reality is the one you pointed out in the body of your post. Our experience of the world is colored by our previous experiences. Our awareness is constantly being presented with a "processed" version of reality. It is a problem that has been recognized for thousands of years. To bypass this pre-processing and experience reality with immediacy is the goal of Zazen, and the rationale behind the training techniques of many forms of martial arts.

For the average person, the forming of intentions in our interpersonal lives can with a little patience and reflection profitably be guided by the simple wisdoms we learned from our parents as children, or should have. Put yourself in the other person's shoes is always good advice, and it doesn't hurt to remember "sticks and stones" either. Granting there are degrees of freedom, few of us are so terribly damaged by our experiences that we cannot be as free as we take the trouble to become.

K.




vincentML -> RE: The depraved paradise? (4/14/2013 1:08:32 PM)

quote:

The problem with our ordinary experience of reality is the one you pointed out in the body of your post. Our experience of the world is colored by our previous experiences. Our awareness is constantly being presented with a "processed" version of reality. It is a problem that has been recognized for thousands of years. To bypass this pre-processing and experience reality with immediacy is the goal of Zazen, and the rationale behind the training techniques of many forms of martial arts.

I do not know the efficacy of martial arts training techniques so I will defer to you on that. I don't know either how the results might be tested. On the other hand there have been lab experiments that show brain activity before consciousness of decisions. I don't know how well designed they were so I do not hold fast to that research.

quote:

For the average person, the forming of intentions in our interpersonal lives can with a little patience and reflection profitably be guided by the simple wisdoms we learned from our parents as children, or should have. Put yourself in the other person's shoes is always good advice, and it doesn't hurt to remember "sticks and stones" either. Granting there are degrees of freedom, few of us are so terribly damaged by our experiences that we cannot be as free as we take the trouble to become.

Yeah, you offer good advice that may be helpful. I am positing that our emotions are powerful agents in determining the attitudes we develop and inform our choices. The political divide on this Board is a salient example of people clinging to positions out of emotion. I am not talking only of those terribly damaged by past experiences. There may be degrees of freedom. Perhaps some people have the facility to overcome their emotions and make purely rational choices, to go against the grain of what feels good or what terrifies. Perhaps, but I suspect a rather heroic effort is involved. I doubt that in mundane, everyday life people can step out of the box of their internal determinants. Don't you suppose that is why we defend so passionately our positions on politics, sex, and religion?




Kirata -> RE: The depraved paradise? (4/14/2013 4:17:26 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Perhaps some people have the facility to overcome their emotions and make purely rational choices, to go against the grain of what feels good or what terrifies. Perhaps, but I suspect a rather heroic effort is involved. I doubt that in mundane, everyday life people can step out of the box of their internal determinants. Don't you suppose that is why we defend so passionately our positions on politics, sex, and religion?

On the bright side, though, we really can do it. We just have to want to, and, most important of all, persist in the effort. Parents and good role models can give us a head start. Lacking that, it's harder. And yes, for some people it can be very hard indeed. In fact, I wouldn't call it easy for anyone. But I wonder sometimes whether people don't think it's possible, or whether they just don't think it's worth it. While the benefit to society is obvious, the benefit to the individual seems less so: Self-esteem.

K.






vincentML -> RE: The depraved paradise? (4/15/2013 7:47:28 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Perhaps some people have the facility to overcome their emotions and make purely rational choices, to go against the grain of what feels good or what terrifies. Perhaps, but I suspect a rather heroic effort is involved. I doubt that in mundane, everyday life people can step out of the box of their internal determinants. Don't you suppose that is why we defend so passionately our positions on politics, sex, and religion?

On the bright side, though, we really can do it. We just have to want to, and, most important of all, persist in the effort. Parents and good role models can give us a head start. Lacking that, it's harder. And yes, for some people it can be very hard indeed. In fact, I wouldn't call it easy for anyone. But I wonder sometimes whether people don't think it's possible, or whether they just don't think it's worth it. While the benefit to society is obvious, the benefit to the individual seems less so: Self-esteem.

K.




Good points by you, K. Maybe people just don't think.

But, am I wrong? It seems to me that personality is fixed early on [I would not hazard a guess at age] Wasn't it allegedly a Jesuit maxim: "Give me the child for seven years and I will give you the man." Perhaps that confirms your observation that it is damn hard for people to overcome early learning and experiences to enjoy a modicum of free will.

Thanks for your input [:)]




Zonie63 -> RE: The depraved paradise? (4/15/2013 11:32:57 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Perhaps some people have the facility to overcome their emotions and make purely rational choices, to go against the grain of what feels good or what terrifies. Perhaps, but I suspect a rather heroic effort is involved. I doubt that in mundane, everyday life people can step out of the box of their internal determinants. Don't you suppose that is why we defend so passionately our positions on politics, sex, and religion?

On the bright side, though, we really can do it. We just have to want to, and, most important of all, persist in the effort. Parents and good role models can give us a head start. Lacking that, it's harder. And yes, for some people it can be very hard indeed. In fact, I wouldn't call it easy for anyone. But I wonder sometimes whether people don't think it's possible, or whether they just don't think it's worth it. While the benefit to society is obvious, the benefit to the individual seems less so: Self-esteem.

K.



This is an interesting discussion.

I'm not religious, although I've viewed it from the view that we have freedom of choice (and presumably learned knowledge of the consequences and risks behind our choices), limited by the physical laws of the universe and probability.

"Free will" seems to be more in the realm of thoughts and intentions and how they lead up to the choices and actions we may take. I believe I can control my actions and recognize that I must accept the consequences of my actions. However, I can't always control my thoughts or intentions, especially when I'm in a brief state of involuntary emotion. I have to wait until my emotions subside before I can sit down and rationally go over my choices. During that time, I may have taken the Lord's name in vain a dozen times, committed adultery in my heart, coveted my neighbor's oxen, and dishonored my parents - all within my own mind - before I actually take any action which might impact on someone else or that would actually be illegal and would have consequences.

The Seven Deadly Sins are not about the actions that people take, but more about emotional states of being, what's inside one's mind and heart. That's what these religions always say "God knows what's inside your heart." Greed, lust, envy, sloth, wrath, pride, gluttony. These are more internal conditions which may or may not be a result of someone's free will, but they don't necessarily involve making choices which would trespass against or violate the rights of other people. Granted, these are conditions which could lead to serious violations and sins against other people, but in and of themselves, they're mainly internal conditions which may be caused by any number of factors.

"Lust" is just plain unfair. Humans are hardwired for lust, related to our reproductive instincts. God even said to "be fruitful and multiply" and he gives us hormones and all the programming to turn us into lust-crazed poon-hounds, but then turns around and says "Ah-ah-ah-ah! No, no, no, it's a SIN to feel lust!" To top it off, if we do feel lust, then it's supposedly a reflection of our free will, and then it becomes our fault.

"Greed" and "gluttony" might be sins, but let's face it: Given the conditions that God handed us this planet, most of the time, humans went without - hunger, cold, disease, deprivation, storms, earthquakes, etc. This is how we learned to accumulate and stock up during times of plenty, because we had gotten used to being without most of the time. We learned to kill and steal from other humans, too, since God said "be fruitful and multiply" but didn't really leave enough to eat. That's where "envy" and "wrath" probably come from, too.

I don't think people can control these emotions completely, but we can curb them or restrain them so that we can still keep rational control over our choices and actions.

I don't think we have "free will" in the sense that we can control every little thing that might pop into our head. Just the fact that people tend to forget things and have mental lapses - that may be just a matter of faulty hardware, not something that's a reflection of "free will."

Sometimes Free Will is often compared with Predestination, which I also don't believe in (although I was kind of an astrology buff when I was in my teen years). But that may be why astrology is considered a sin, since it implies predestination, which goes against concepts of free will.




Kirata -> RE: The depraved paradise? (4/15/2013 12:40:10 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

But, am I wrong? It seems to me that personality is fixed early on [I would not hazard a guess at age] Wasn't it allegedly a Jesuit maxim: "Give me the child for seven years and I will give you the man."

It seems to me that those two statements contradict each other. On the one hand, yes, we are all individuals with our own unique personalities from the moment of birth, and almost certainly even before. On the other hand, the child-rearing environment would have little effect if our personalities were fixed. I don't know if a Jesuit ever said that, but Watson made essentially the same claim and both are wrong. Because, as your post observes, human beings are not blank slates upon which we may write as we will.

K.




hlen5 -> RE: The depraved paradise? (4/15/2013 3:51:38 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Jewelcrafter

Sh, now there is an interesting fact. This person has done nothing in life to warrant an eternity in Hell. So, what exactly will he be doing there?


You've heard of "lusting in one's heart"? The first event in any action is the thought of it. The potential murderer has committed no crime, but is he virtuous? I don't know. I'm anti-"Minority Report", no thought police, thank you.




vincentML -> RE: The depraved paradise? (4/16/2013 5:21:32 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

But, am I wrong? It seems to me that personality is fixed early on [I would not hazard a guess at age] Wasn't it allegedly a Jesuit maxim: "Give me the child for seven years and I will give you the man."

It seems to me that those two statements contradict each other. On the one hand, yes, we are all individuals with our own unique personalities from the moment of birth, and almost certainly even before. On the other hand, the child-rearing environment would have little effect if our personalities were fixed. I don't know if a Jesuit ever said that, but Watson made essentially the same claim and both are wrong. Because, as your post observes, human beings are not blank slates upon which we may write as we will.

K.


Not a contradiction. I said fixed early on. Not at birth. I believe the child-rearing environment does have some effect. Don't you?




Moonhead -> RE: The depraved paradise? (4/16/2013 5:32:05 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Free Will is an essential doctrine to the religious...

For the non-religious, not so much?

K.


The non religious don't need it as a justification to excuse their chosen God's incompetence, so they treat free will as a fact of life rather than an exercise in theodicy.

You think all the choices you make are not predetermined by the chain of circumstances that have made you who you are and brought you to the moment of choice? Free will? Not so sure of that.

That's a philosophical argument, largely unrelated to my point, which is pretty simple, but apparently still needs clarifying.
Free will is the traditional Christian argument used to justify God's incompetence and/or vindictiveness in explanations of why bad things happen to good people. Without free will as an excuse for His lapses, God is a cunt.
Hence those with no belief in God have less vested in the idea of free will on a metaphysical level, dig?




vincentML -> RE: The depraved paradise? (4/16/2013 7:58:43 AM)

quote:

That's a philosophical argument, largely unrelated to my point, which is pretty simple, but apparently still needs clarifying.
Free will is the traditional Christian argument used to justify God's incompetence and/or vindictiveness in explanations of why bad things happen to good people. Without free will as an excuse for His lapses, God is a cunt.
Hence those with no belief in God have less vested in the idea of free will on a metaphysical level, dig?

Yup.




WantsOfTheFlesh -> RE: The depraved paradise? (4/16/2013 8:17:09 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML
quote:

That's a philosophical argument, largely unrelated to my point, which is pretty simple, but apparently still needs clarifying.
Free will is the traditional Christian argument used to justify God's incompetence and/or vindictiveness in explanations of why bad things happen to good people. Without free will as an excuse for His lapses, God is a cunt.
Hence those with no belief in God have less vested in the idea of free will on a metaphysical level, dig?

Yup.

free will was just assumed coz it gives folks moral freedom. its tha ability to choose right & wrong. morality means nothing without freedom. doubt very much any sorta fancy notion of determinism was popular in pre scientific times.




hlen5 -> RE: The depraved paradise? (4/16/2013 1:47:06 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

.......
That's a philosophical argument, largely unrelated to my point, which is pretty simple, but apparently still needs clarifying.
Free will is the traditional Christian argument used to justify God's incompetence and/or vindictiveness in explanations of why bad things happen to good people. .......


Free will is the right of each person to believe and follow the dictates of his/her conscience. Obiedience to a higher power means nothing without it. Without free will, we are nothing more that automotons.




Moonhead -> RE: The depraved paradise? (4/16/2013 1:57:14 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: hlen5
Free will is the right of each person to believe and follow the dictates of his/her conscience. Obiedience to a higher power means nothing without it. Without free will, we are nothing more that automotons.

That's what Jesuits call "theodicy", dear: without the ability to fuck the world up by acting appallingly, you can't show obedience to a higher power. Therefore all of the shit in the world is the fault of bad people not God, however omnipotent and omniscient he is.
Those of us who are not theologists call this argument by its correct technical term, which is "a pathetic cop out"...

(There's a couple of religions I can think of that do take a strictly determinist/we are all automatons line, btw, which is another form of copping out, if we're honest.)




hlen5 -> RE: The depraved paradise? (4/16/2013 2:06:46 PM)

Thanks for the new term! I find the passion in your response interesting.




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875