RE: Young Men and Mass Violence (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Aswad -> RE: Young Men and Mass Violence (5/7/2013 9:17:37 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Offered just for the fu*k of it. [:D]


Then you might want to offer our actual frame of reference: Earth, a closed, flat surface with a curved geometry. Below us, a finite space, wrapping at the core. Above us, an infinite space, with time passing at highly variable speeds. The sun moves revolves around us, while rotating in place. The other planets move in complex epicycles.

Pretty much a medieval worldview, in other words.

The frames of reference relativize the facts.

IWYW,
— Aswad.

P.S.: Of course you're not walking across cities. The cities are passing under you.




PeonForHer -> RE: Young Men and Mass Violence (5/7/2013 10:36:32 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

At least Peon knows his arse from his elbow

I couldn't say, given the absence of evidence, but you can't tell a strawman from a bus.

K.



If you wanted labelled photocopies of my arse and my elbow, K, you only needed to ask.






Kirata -> RE: Young Men and Mass Violence (5/7/2013 12:13:50 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

If you wanted labelled photocopies of my arse and my elbow, K, you only needed to ask.

In your case, yes, I'd probably need the labels. [:D]

K.




ILustAfterPeon -> RE: Young Men and Mass Violence (5/7/2013 12:26:42 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

If you wanted labelled photocopies of my arse and my elbow, K, you only needed to ask.

In your case, yes, I'd probably need the labels. [:D]

K.


Not being one to miss an opportunity such as this, I offer you Peon's arse. Labels and all.


[image]local://upfiles/1217687/B0A77CE407FB4E84BBA15DCBCDD883F5.jpg[/image]




Kirata -> RE: Young Men and Mass Violence (5/7/2013 12:45:07 PM)


Interesting. Most of the "visually similar images" are female. [:)]

K.




Kirata -> RE: Young Men and Mass Violence (5/7/2013 12:46:43 PM)


Sheesh, lost it the first time.
[image]local://upfiles/235229/8200E91F886F457BAC7FECFEED5E0787.jpg[/image]

K.






PeonForHer -> RE: Young Men and Mass Violence (5/7/2013 12:47:36 PM)

I've always wondered why I had trouble getting out of shoe shops.




PeonForHer -> RE: Young Men and Mass Violence (5/7/2013 12:49:00 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ILustAfterPeon

Not to be one to miss an opportunity such as this, I offer you Peon's arse. Labels and all.



Where have you been??[:D]

[And you forgot to label my elbow. I know it's on the picture somewhere.]




UllrsIshtar -> RE: Young Men and Mass Violence (5/7/2013 1:26:53 PM)

So Peon's ass looks like a woman's front?

Is that a tribute to Peon, or a disgrace for womankind?




vincentML -> RE: Young Men and Mass Violence (5/7/2013 1:29:39 PM)

quote:

P.S.: Of course you're not walking across cities. The cities are passing under you.

Ahhh . . . disappointed. I thought I was leaping tall buildings with a full bladder. Does that make the cities sub-urines then?




Politesub53 -> RE: Young Men and Mass Violence (5/7/2013 4:25:05 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

At least Peon knows his arse from his elbow

I couldn't say, given the absence of evidence, but you can't tell a strawman from a bus.

K.




Americans cant usually tell a bus from a coach. [8D]




Aswad -> RE: Young Men and Mass Violence (5/8/2013 2:23:34 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Does that make the cities sub-urines then?


Sub-urinals, maybe?

I dunno.

IWYW,
— Aswad.





Aswad -> RE: Young Men and Mass Violence (5/8/2013 9:37:06 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

From infancy boys are trained to suppress their feelings and emotions, that expressing these feelings and emotions is (heaven forbid!) unmanly. How can we expect troubled youths to reach out for help when all their lives they have been trained to do the precise opposite? We fill them with the false notion that the very act of reaching out is unmanly, that the feelings and emotions they need to address and talk through are not for sharing, that 'real men' just "grin and bear it" stupidlystoically.


It just occured to me what one of the things that have been nagging me about this part here is.

Above, you described stereotypical Norwegians of either gender, and more than implied it's part of what causes violence, when in fact we're one of the least violent populations in the world, and the trait is most prominent in the areas that have the least violence per capita. The proposed solution is a more American rearing. I don't think I need to explain why this gives me a skeptical gut reaction as far as strategies for reducing violence are concerned.

I've spoken with some Americans on the phone; most of the men have expressed more emotion than the average woman here in Norway does. When Americans visit, a frequent characterization of Norwegians is that we're polite but reserved, that we suppress and hide our feelings and emotions, and sometimes even that we're outright cold. When watching news reports or interviews or the like from America, it never fails to strike us how the Americans shown there tend to be like actors, always exaggerating their emotions, putting it all out there, almost throwing it in your face.

To us, it's a bit akward and embarassing to see that sort of thing from adults, and many assume it's an act.

This is not a criticism of Americans, just an observation of the cultural differences.

Now, out of curiosity, I did a little experiment. I tried to find pictures of a group of adult Norwegians crying. Except for the Oslo terror attacks and the Utøya massacre, my search was quite fruitless. But, yes, we do cry, obviously. In private, where it's appropriate. Sometimes we do it with family and close friends nearby, such as in the hospital or at funerals, usually in silence.

As an example of this characteristic stoicism, a young woman (teens to twenties) was interviewed a day or two after the Utøya massacre, still in the clothes she received from the EMTs on shore. Without crying, without significant pauses, she relates how she had to help an 11 year old boy swim to shore. The boy's father was the first to die, right in front of him, from a point blank headshot. So the boy wonders why "the police" were killing children now, since his father (an actual policeman) had said the police only hurt bad people, and so forth. Her voice is unsteady at times in recounting this, just as when she spoke about the friends she lost, and she points out that she actually cried during that conversation and how she had to blink several times and dunk her head to make it stop.

This isn't suppressing anything. It's basic self control, taught to both genders. And I fail to see what the problem with that is.

Some people don't know their own limits, true, but that's a seperate skill, equally useful.

IWYW,
— Aswad.




vincentML -> RE: Young Men and Mass Violence (5/8/2013 1:07:02 PM)

quote:

Above, you described stereotypical Norwegians of either gender, and more than implied it's part of what causes violence, when in fact we're one of the least violent populations in the world, and the trait is most prominent in the areas that have the least violence per capita. The proposed solution is a more American rearing. I don't think I need to explain why this gives me a skeptical gut reaction as far as strategies for reducing violence are concerned.

It occurred to me while reading your comments that you were describing a streotypical characteristic of all northern Europeans from England northward and around through Germany and Austria. Not sure about Austria but most of the others have roots in the Protestant Revolution, whereas if you swing south and east from Ireland you find the more passionate displaying Catholic stereotypes along southern Europe. Is there validity in my observation?




fucktoyprincess -> RE: Young Men and Mass Violence (5/8/2013 1:20:21 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

Above, you described stereotypical Norwegians of either gender, and more than implied it's part of what causes violence, when in fact we're one of the least violent populations in the world, and the trait is most prominent in the areas that have the least violence per capita. The proposed solution is a more American rearing. I don't think I need to explain why this gives me a skeptical gut reaction as far as strategies for reducing violence are concerned.

It occurred to me while reading your comments that you were describing a streotypical characteristic of all northern Europeans from England northward and around through Germany and Austria. Not sure about Austria but most of the others have roots in the Protestant Revolution, whereas if you swing south and east from Ireland you find the more passionate displaying Catholic stereotypes along southern Europe. Is there validity in my observation?


Given what we know about world history I'm not sure that the reservedness or stoicism of a people allows us to say anything one way or the other about brutality as either a feature of that culture, or brutality as applied to people outside of the culture. But I am thinking off the top of my head. If anyone can think of other patterns that link to "over-emotiveness" or "reservedness" I would be interested. My gut tells me there is no correlation with any other behavior patterns, political outlook, etc.




mnottertail -> RE: Young Men and Mass Violence (5/8/2013 1:28:31 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aswad

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

From infancy boys are trained to suppress their feelings and emotions, that expressing these feelings and emotions is (heaven forbid!) unmanly. How can we expect troubled youths to reach out for help when all their lives they have been trained to do the precise opposite? We fill them with the false notion that the very act of reaching out is unmanly, that the feelings and emotions they need to address and talk through are not for sharing, that 'real men' just "grin and bear it" stupidlystoically.


It just occured to me what one of the things that have been nagging me about this part here is.

Above, you described stereotypical Norwegians of either gender, and more than implied it's part of what causes violence, when in fact we're one of the least violent populations in the world, and the trait is most prominent in the areas that have the least violence per capita. The proposed solution is a more American rearing. I don't think I need to explain why this gives me a skeptical gut reaction as far as strategies for reducing violence are concerned.

I've spoken with some Americans on the phone; most of the men have expressed more emotion than the average woman here in Norway does. When Americans visit, a frequent characterization of Norwegians is that we're polite but reserved, that we suppress and hide our feelings and emotions, and sometimes even that we're outright cold. When watching news reports or interviews or the like from America, it never fails to strike us how the Americans shown there tend to be like actors, always exaggerating their emotions, putting it all out there, almost throwing it in your face.

To us, it's a bit akward and embarassing to see that sort of thing from adults, and many assume it's an act.

This is not a criticism of Americans, just an observation of the cultural differences.

Now, out of curiosity, I did a little experiment. I tried to find pictures of a group of adult Norwegians crying. Except for the Oslo terror attacks and the Utøya massacre, my search was quite fruitless. But, yes, we do cry, obviously. In private, where it's appropriate. Sometimes we do it with family and close friends nearby, such as in the hospital or at funerals, usually in silence.

As an example of this characteristic stoicism, a young woman (teens to twenties) was interviewed a day or two after the Utøya massacre, still in the clothes she received from the EMTs on shore. Without crying, without significant pauses, she relates how she had to help an 11 year old boy swim to shore. The boy's father was the first to die, right in front of him, from a point blank headshot. So the boy wonders why "the police" were killing children now, since his father (an actual policeman) had said the police only hurt bad people, and so forth. Her voice is unsteady at times in recounting this, just as when she spoke about the friends she lost, and she points out that she actually cried during that conversation and how she had to blink several times and dunk her head to make it stop.

This isn't suppressing anything. It's basic self control, taught to both genders. And I fail to see what the problem with that is.

Some people don't know their own limits, true, but that's a seperate skill, equally useful.

IWYW,
— Aswad.



Ja, with a scandinavian heritage of some 95% of our state, we are called Minnesota nice.   Stoic is a very scandinavian trait, and I am sure to al-Aswad I seem more Danish or German than real Norwegian (cuz I have talked to him on the phone) being so far removed from the home country, but you dont know stoic until you know all the inflections of Uff Da.  That's about as gruesome as it gets.






Rule -> RE: Young Men and Mass Violence (5/8/2013 1:32:29 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML
quote:

Above, you described stereotypical Norwegians of either gender, and more than implied it's part of what causes violence, when in fact we're one of the least violent populations in the world, and the trait is most prominent in the areas that have the least violence per capita. The proposed solution is a more American rearing. I don't think I need to explain why this gives me a skeptical gut reaction as far as strategies for reducing violence are concerned.

It occurred to me while reading your comments that you were describing a streotypical characteristic of all northern Europeans from England northward and around through Germany and Austria. Not sure about Austria but most of the others have roots in the Protestant Revolution, whereas if you swing south and east from Ireland you find the more passionate displaying Catholic stereotypes along southern Europe. Is there validity in my observation?

I suspect so. So that may be why them southern people clung to Catholicism: a different set of allele frequencies.




UllrsIshtar -> RE: Young Men and Mass Violence (5/8/2013 1:36:39 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess

Given what we know about world history I'm not sure that the reservedness or stoicism of a people allows us to say anything one way or the other about brutality as either a feature of that culture, or brutality as applied to people outside of the culture. But I am thinking off the top of my head. If anyone can think of other patterns that link to "over-emotiveness" or "reservedness" I would be interested. My gut tells me there is no correlation with any other behavior patterns, political outlook, etc.


The Japanese have a similar reservedness about emotion, do they not?

Though I don't know enough about the prevalence of random violence in Japan to know if they add data to the equation that would support or invalidate Aswad's argument.




mnottertail -> RE: Young Men and Mass Violence (5/8/2013 1:38:12 PM)

Distance from and control of Rome more likely. Or who got there first with the new fairytale.  




fucktoyprincess -> RE: Young Men and Mass Violence (5/8/2013 1:49:19 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: UllrsIshtar


quote:

ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess

Given what we know about world history I'm not sure that the reservedness or stoicism of a people allows us to say anything one way or the other about brutality as either a feature of that culture, or brutality as applied to people outside of the culture. But I am thinking off the top of my head. If anyone can think of other patterns that link to "over-emotiveness" or "reservedness" I would be interested. My gut tells me there is no correlation with any other behavior patterns, political outlook, etc.


The Japanese have a similar reservedness about emotion, do they not?

Though I don't know enough about the prevalence of random violence in Japan to know if they add data to the equation that would support or invalidate Aswad's argument.


They were notoriously brutal, particularly to the Chinese, during WWII.

But as a society today, it is one of the safest places on the face of the planet (I have traveled there a few times). I'm not saying violence does not occur, but they are more likely to turn their violence inward (suicide) than outward. Other than the sarin attack, I'm hard pressed to think of mass attacks in Japan comparable to OKC, CT, etc. They are an unbelievably polite and reserved people (Northern Europeans are not that reserved when compared to the Japanese....everything is relative, I guess)




Page: <<   < prev  13 14 15 [16] 17   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625