RE: Politics and consumerism (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


DaddySatyr -> RE: Politics and consumerism (5/5/2013 11:28:22 PM)

I seem to remember a lot of PPLs in this country not only boycotting but costing a company money when they didn't agree with their policies. It seems like that's somehow more desirable than simply not spending your money there. Fucking hypocrisy! Ya gotta love it.

Ordering Water at Chik-Fil-A

quote:

FROM THE LINK (emphasis mine)

As you might remember, Chick-Fil-A came under fire when the Jim Henson Company–and the Muppets!–pulled out of a toy deal with the restaurant chain because they donate to anti-gay causes and organizations. Since then, a lot of LGBT-friendly groups and people (including us!) have stopped dining out at Chick-Fil-A, because eating there is, in essence, giving money to hate. But Jackson Pearce has an even better idea: Instead of simply not giving money to hate, why not take some money away from it, too?





Peace and comfort,



Michael




DomKen -> RE: Politics and consumerism (5/6/2013 12:39:19 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TricklessMagic

Okay, help me out here, I've admitted that stores can choose to not allow people with lawful firearms on their premises. So the problem you all have, is that I prefer to give my business to a store that does allow me to lawfully carry a firearm on their premises. You have a problem with my freedom of choice because I take issue with another person's choice and simply choose to not encourage it with my hard earned money. Is that what we are getting at?

No. My problem is where you claim to also try and deter others from doing business with said business. That is not your freedom of choice that is pressuring others, who don't share your belief or you wouldn't have to tell them about it, to support your belief.




Edwynn -> RE: Politics and consumerism (5/6/2013 1:51:38 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LizDeluxe

I have a question for anyone who cares to answer. Let's suppose there is a business in your area who is the very best in your area for whatever product or service they provide. For the purposes of this discussion it really doesn't matter what their business is. Could be a restaurant or an automobile repair shop or a florist. They provide the best service and price and product. Maybe you've never shopped there before or maybe you are already a regular customer. Nobody else in town can touch them.

One day you find out that the owner's political affiliations and beliefs are the polar opposite of yours. We're not talking about them doing anything unethical or immoral or illegal in the course of their business. Nothing like racism or prejudice. Just their basic political views. The sort of stuff we discuss here in P&R.

Would you decline doing business with them or cease doing any further business with them simply because they had different political beliefs than you even if there was nobody in your area who could provide the same quality product or service who was cut from the same political fabric as you? Truthfully, unless you carefully voir dire every prospective business you patronize you probably already do business with someone who is the polar opposite of you politically.

Just curious.



This quite the disingenuous (or naive) proposal, being that the question of the day does not concern "political beliefs" per se but strong statements on social issues. There are Democratic and Republican voters who are against 'gay rights' and likewise others from both parties in favor of same. Such as with gun control, etc.

The fact is that Chic Filet does not make the best chicken sandwich in town, nor Dominos the best pizza in town, nor does Cracker Barrel make the best industrial-grade 'home cooking' in town, so the false premise proposed here doesn't come into play in any event.

Is there a clear consensus in your city or town as to who makes the best particular product or provides the best particular service?

Don't hold out on us here.





SpanishMatMaster -> RE: Politics and consumerism (5/6/2013 2:10:03 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LizDeluxe

I have a question for anyone who cares to answer. Let's suppose there is a business in your area who is the very best in your area for whatever product or service they provide. For the purposes of this discussion it really doesn't matter what their business is. Could be a restaurant or an automobile repair shop or a florist. They provide the best service and price and product. Maybe you've never shopped there before or maybe you are already a regular customer. Nobody else in town can touch them.

One day you find out that the owner's political affiliations and beliefs are the polar opposite of yours. We're not talking about them doing anything unethical or immoral or illegal in the course of their business. Nothing like racism or prejudice. Just their basic political views. The sort of stuff we discuss here in P&R.

Would you decline doing business with them or cease doing any further business with them simply because they had different political beliefs than you even if there was nobody in your area who could provide the same quality product or service who was cut from the same political fabric as you? Truthfully, unless you carefully voir dire every prospective business you patronize you probably already do business with someone who is the polar opposite of you politically.

Just curious.

It depends on the distance between that business and the next best one, as well as on the importance of my consume related to his survival, and on the important of his product / service to me.

If I am making more damage to me as to him by buying elsewhere, then I would probably buy by him anyway (but maybe be a customer who likes to chat about politics).

If I am making more damage to him as to me, I would probably buy somewhere else, explaining him beforehand why I do this, as respectful as I could.

That's it.




Edwynn -> RE: Politics and consumerism (5/6/2013 2:15:23 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TricklessMagic

Politics makes a different.


Priceless.

quote:

A big jewelry chain around here doesn't allow law abiding folks to carry concealed weapons on there premises.

... I politely explained I don't do business with anti-American companies.



Hilarious.

So then, a business owner who wishes to protect his customers and allow them to shop in a worry-free environment safe from nut cases carrying guns in public is "anti-American."





Powergamz1 -> RE: Politics and consumerism (5/6/2013 8:28:16 AM)

This makes no sense, even posted twice. The OP didn't say anything about Chick-Fil-A, and certainly didn't make a proposal in the sense of taking a specific action... they quite clearly specified a service or store that 'nobody else could touch', creating a dilemma . An example was given earlier of the only cancer treatment center in the area. Or, how about the only dealer in town factory authorized to work on something you own? Are you going to take your pre-war Martin D-28 to the Home Depot to be worked on if you and the Martin trained luthier don't agree on the best candidates?

I don't see how people are making the leap from the OP question to boycotting whole chains.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn

quote:

ORIGINAL: LizDeluxe

I have a question for anyone who cares to answer. Let's suppose there is a business in your area who is the very best in your area for whatever product or service they provide. For the purposes of this discussion it really doesn't matter what their business is. Could be a restaurant or an automobile repair shop or a florist. They provide the best service and price and product. Maybe you've never shopped there before or maybe you are already a regular customer. Nobody else in town can touch them.

One day you find out that the owner's political affiliations and beliefs are the polar opposite of yours. We're not talking about them doing anything unethical or immoral or illegal in the course of their business. Nothing like racism or prejudice. Just their basic political views. The sort of stuff we discuss here in P&R.

Would you decline doing business with them or cease doing any further business with them simply because they had different political beliefs than you even if there was nobody in your area who could provide the same quality product or service who was cut from the same political fabric as you? Truthfully, unless you carefully voir dire every prospective business you patronize you probably already do business with someone who is the polar opposite of you politically.

Just curious.



This quite the disingenuous (or naive) proposal, being that the question of the day does not concern "political beliefs" per se but strong statements on social issues. There are Democratic and Republican voters who are against 'gay rights' and likewise others from both parties in favor of same. Such as with gun control, etc.

The fact is that Chic Filet does not make the best chicken sandwich in town, nor Dominos the best pizza in town, nor does Cracker Barrel make the best industrial-grade 'home cooking' in town, so the false premise proposed here doesn't come into play to any degree of relevance in any event.

Is there a clear consensus in your city or town as to who makes the best particular product or provides the best particular service?

Don't hold out on us here.









DesideriScuri -> RE: Politics and consumerism (5/6/2013 8:42:37 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn
quote:

ORIGINAL: LizDeluxe
I have a question for anyone who cares to answer. Let's suppose there is a business in your area who is the very best in your area for whatever product or service they provide. For the purposes of this discussion it really doesn't matter what their business is. Could be a restaurant or an automobile repair shop or a florist. They provide the best service and price and product. Maybe you've never shopped there before or maybe you are already a regular customer. Nobody else in town can touch them.
One day you find out that the owner's political affiliations and beliefs are the polar opposite of yours. We're not talking about them doing anything unethical or immoral or illegal in the course of their business. Nothing like racism or prejudice. Just their basic political views. The sort of stuff we discuss here in P&R.
Would you decline doing business with them or cease doing any further business with them simply because they had different political beliefs than you even if there was nobody in your area who could provide the same quality product or service who was cut from the same political fabric as you? Truthfully, unless you carefully voir dire every prospective business you patronize you probably already do business with someone who is the polar opposite of you politically.
Just curious.

This quite the disingenuous (or naive) proposal, being that the question of the day does not concern "political beliefs" per se but strong statements on social issues. There are Democratic and Republican voters who are against 'gay rights' and likewise others from both parties in favor of same. Such as with gun control, etc.
The fact is that Chic Filet does not make the best chicken sandwich in town, nor Dominos the best pizza in town, nor does Cracker Barrel make the best industrial-grade 'home cooking' in town, so the false premise proposed here doesn't come into play to any degree of relevance in any event.
Is there a clear consensus in your city or town as to who makes the best particular product or provides the best particular service?
Don't hold out on us here.


I think you are making a mistake here. LizDeluxe posted the "assumptions" everyone was supposed to craft their answers around. That others brought up Chik-fil-A, Dominos, Cracker Barrel, etc. has nothing to do with the assumptions you are supposed to answer to.

You must have missed this though it's quoted by you:
    quote:

    For the purposes of this discussion it really doesn't matter what their business is.






FunCouple5280 -> RE: Politics and consumerism (5/6/2013 2:03:01 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LizDeluxe

I have a question for anyone who cares to answer. Let's suppose there is a business in your area who is the very best in your area for whatever product or service they provide. For the purposes of this discussion it really doesn't matter what their business is. Could be a restaurant or an automobile repair shop or a florist. They provide the best service and price and product. Maybe you've never shopped there before or maybe you are already a regular customer. Nobody else in town can touch them.

One day you find out that the owner's political affiliations and beliefs are the polar opposite of yours. We're not talking about them doing anything unethical or immoral or illegal in the course of their business. Nothing like racism or prejudice. Just their basic political views. The sort of stuff we discuss here in P&R.

Would you decline doing business with them or cease doing any further business with them simply because they had different political beliefs than you even if there was nobody in your area who could provide the same quality product or service who was cut from the same political fabric as you? Truthfully, unless you carefully voir dire every prospective business you patronize you probably already do business with someone who is the polar opposite of you politically.

Just curious.



Yes, but I take a different approach. I avoid businesses that are openly political, regardless of whether I agree or disagree. I think, when you own a business as I had once, you stay the fuck out. Religion and Politics have no place in business. While I may have strong views on certain issues, I didn't want to exclude any possible market segment. The only exception I can think of would be a store or business that catered to some loony section of the population like a head shop or christian book store. I feel that way simply because I don't like business playing to big a role in politics either. So, if they know that by being political, they loose my business maybe they will shut up and focus on me the customer and what makes me happy. This also goes for a lot of media too. I really hate ultra-political musicians. Someone with hardly the IQ of monkey should just shut up and sing not preach.

Anecdotally, I did like to know the politics of my customers as a contractor. That told me more than anything. Sometimes I wouldn't take jobs or avoid doing business with them based on that info. For example: Fundy Christians were cheap-asses who complained a lot and didn't pay, so I rarely even submitted bids once I knew they were that type. Ex-military republicans always paid and on time, but you better do a damn good job and follow the schedule. Free spirited liberals liked to change their minds and not pay for the changes, and complain that you couldn't just do it for them, but would pay after negotiations. I like blue-collar union types, clear expectations, paid and respected and any labor troubles you had. Gun nut hunter types, had no sense of style or class but paid well. Society blue blood liberals where cash cows because they over spent on crazy fanshionable stuff and paid whatever it took to get it done yesterday.




LizDeluxe -> RE: Politics and consumerism (5/6/2013 3:47:46 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TricklessMagic
Okay, help me out here, I've admitted that stores can choose to not allow people with lawful firearms on their premises. So the problem you all have, is that I prefer to give my business to a store that does allow me to lawfully carry a firearm on their premises.


Just an observation but I cannot think of a single gun dealer or firing range in my area that permits loaded firearms to be brought on the premises. I understand the basis of your position but I was wondering how the quandary created by my observation above would impact you. Would you simply add all of those gun dealers and shooting ranges to your 'do not patronize' list? They are some of the staunchest supporters of your right to bear arms.





kalikshama -> RE: Politics and consumerism (5/6/2013 4:03:38 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LizDeluxe

quote:

ORIGINAL: TricklessMagic
Okay, help me out here, I've admitted that stores can choose to not allow people with lawful firearms on their premises. So the problem you all have, is that I prefer to give my business to a store that does allow me to lawfully carry a firearm on their premises.


Just an observation but I cannot think of a single gun dealer or firing range in my area that permits loaded firearms to be brought on the premises. I understand the basis of your position but I was wondering how the quandary created by my observation above would impact you. Would you simply add all of those gun dealers and shooting ranges to your 'do not patronize' list? They are some of the staunchest supporters of your right to bear arms.


Ya, the last time I went shooting we had to surrender our weapons at the door and they sent them up to the range separately. This was at a Bass Pro in Florida.




LizDeluxe -> RE: Politics and consumerism (5/6/2013 4:14:04 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn
This quite the disingenuous (or naive) proposal, being that the question of the day does not concern "political beliefs" per se but strong statements on social issues. There are Democratic and Republican voters who are against 'gay rights' and likewise others from both parties in favor of same. Such as with gun control, etc.

The fact is that Chic Filet does not make the best chicken sandwich in town, nor Dominos the best pizza in town, nor does Cracker Barrel make the best industrial-grade 'home cooking' in town, so the false premise proposed here doesn't come into play in any event.

Is there a clear consensus in your city or town as to who makes the best particular product or provides the best particular service?

Don't hold out on us here.


Political beliefs and social issues are often so closely intermingled that you are basically splitting hairs.

Where is your proof in the form of clinical studies that shows that Chick-Fil-A, Dominos and Cracker Barrel do not make the best of their respective products? You called it facts - you must have proof. It's not a false premise until you provide scientific proof to the contrary. I'll wait.

Consensus doesn't even really matter here. This could be a simply personal decision. You can decide that Company A is the best in town in your opinion for that particular product. Then you find out that they hold a ardently different viewpoint on some issue that is important to you. At that point would you continue to patronize them or would you look elsewhere even though you prefer their product? I thought it was a simple question. That nobody else seemed to stumble over it would indicate that I was correct in that thought.





kalikshama -> RE: Politics and consumerism (5/6/2013 4:28:51 PM)

quote:

Let's suppose there is a business in your area who is the very best in your area for whatever product or service they provide. For the purposes of this discussion it really doesn't matter what their business is. Could be a restaurant or an automobile repair shop or a florist. They provide the best service and price and product. Maybe you've never shopped there before or maybe you are already a regular customer. Nobody else in town can touch them.


I don't 100% boycott Walmart but most of the time I will make an effort to drive a little further to a store whose prices are not quite as good. I post petitions like Walmart can stop the next tragedy in Bangladesh.

I believe the way most pork is raised in this country is especially inhumane and have a strict policy of not eating it at restaurants except for ones like Chipotles. Read about their Food with Integrity policy. I rarely eat beef out either; in fact, I rarely eat out at all and so I can spend more at the grocery store for brands like Nature's Promise.

When I lived four miles away from a Whole Foods, I did a lot of my shopping there, despite there being a Publix 1/2 miles away. Now I'm 30 miles from a Whole Foods and do the best I can at supermarkets.




kalikshama -> RE: Politics and consumerism (5/6/2013 4:47:58 PM)

quote:

This makes no sense, even posted twice. The OP didn't say anything about Chick-Fil-A, and certainly didn't make a proposal in the sense of taking a specific action... they quite clearly specified a service or store that 'nobody else could touch', creating a dilemma . An example was given earlier of the only cancer treatment center in the area. Or, how about the only dealer in town factory authorized to work on something you own? Are you going to take your pre-war Martin D-28 to the Home Depot to be worked on if you and the Martin trained luthier don't agree on the best candidates?

I don't see how people are making the leap from the OP question to boycotting whole chains.


There HAVE been boycotts of whole chains, including Chick-Fil-A which made corporate donations to anti gay hate groups and Dominos, whose founder supports Operator rescue and more recently for unfair labor practices.

While I am willing to vote with my pocketbook and be a little inconvenienced, I wouldn't boycott the local cancer treatment center for their political views.





LizDeluxe -> RE: Politics and consumerism (5/6/2013 7:07:26 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: FunCouple5280
Yes, but I take a different approach. I avoid businesses that are openly political, regardless of whether I agree or disagree. I think, when you own a business as I had once, you stay the fuck out. Religion and Politics have no place in business. While I may have strong views on certain issues, I didn't want to exclude any possible market segment. The only exception I can think of would be a store or business that catered to some loony section of the population like a head shop or christian book store. I feel that way simply because I don't like business playing to big a role in politics either. So, if they know that by being political, they loose my business maybe they will shut up and focus on me the customer and what makes me happy. This also goes for a lot of media too. I really hate ultra-political musicians. Someone with hardly the IQ of monkey should just shut up and sing not preach.

Anecdotally, I did like to know the politics of my customers as a contractor. That told me more than anything. Sometimes I wouldn't take jobs or avoid doing business with them based on that info. For example: Fundy Christians were cheap-asses who complained a lot and didn't pay, so I rarely even submitted bids once I knew they were that type. Ex-military republicans always paid and on time, but you better do a damn good job and follow the schedule. Free spirited liberals liked to change their minds and not pay for the changes, and complain that you couldn't just do it for them, but would pay after negotiations. I like blue-collar union types, clear expectations, paid and respected and any labor troubles you had. Gun nut hunter types, had no sense of style or class but paid well. Society blue blood liberals where cash cows because they over spent on crazy fashionable stuff and paid whatever it took to get it done yesterday.


That's an interesting perspective from the other side of the cash register. Thank you for sharing that. I think most businesspersons (particularly smaller ones) probably follow that strategy and play their own cards pretty close to their vest so as not to alienate any potential customers. I guess if you are as big as Chick-Fil-A you can afford to be more vocal about things especially if it's a topic that breaks down the middle. You tend to gain a customer for every one you lose.




FunCouple5280 -> RE: Politics and consumerism (5/6/2013 7:14:08 PM)

That is true if they are willing to go on a limb, but if you look at many major corps they donate to both parties equally. They like a seat at the table no matter who is power. Wall-street usually waits a bit to see who is likely to win and then shift their money behind the winner. They want the official to owe them, so they can keep raping and pillaging.




MrRodgers -> RE: Politics and consumerism (5/6/2013 8:18:21 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: WantsOfTheFlesh

quote:

ORIGINAL: LizDeluxe
One day you find out that the owner's political affiliations and beliefs are the polar opposite of yours. We're not talking about them doing anything unethical or immoral or illegal in the course of their business. Nothing like racism or prejudice. Just their basic political views. The sort of stuff we discuss here in P&R.

i reckon it would be discriminatory to take patronage from folks ya disagree wit. goes against tha pluralist principles of democracy.

Yes, it would be and its perfectly legal discrimination. That's what a boycott is...discrimination from a personal, political or economic motive. As a result it fits right in the spirit of freedom and has little to do with democracy.




tj444 -> RE: Politics and consumerism (5/6/2013 8:36:14 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: kalikshama
I wouldn't boycott the local cancer treatment center for their political views.

what about when Susan G. Komen cut funding to Planned Parenthood due to their political & religious views? having political/religious views are one thing, but changing who you give donated money to and who you dont cuz of those views is another thing all together.. They lost a certain amount of public support over that, peoples perception of them changed.. as I recall..




DesideriScuri -> RE: Politics and consumerism (5/6/2013 9:13:50 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444
quote:

ORIGINAL: kalikshama
I wouldn't boycott the local cancer treatment center for their political views.

what about when Susan G. Komen cut funding to Planned Parenthood due to their political & religious views? having political/religious views are one thing, but changing who you give donated money to and who you dont cuz of those views is another thing all together.. They lost a certain amount of public support over that, peoples perception of them changed.. as I recall..


SGK Foundation made the claim that they give financial support to mammogram providers. Since PP doesn't actually provide the mammograms, PP wasn't eligible for funding, iirc. SGK lost some supporters because there was a furor put out about their not supporting PP.




LadyPact -> RE: Politics and consumerism (5/7/2013 12:16:50 AM)

On the original, I can't say that I do. There aren't really many options in this small town to begin with. Many businesses here might be the only game in town and the closest competitor is a hundred miles away. There are very few types of businesses that have multiple options. Restaurants, gas, auto parts, and liquor are the only ones I can think of off of the top of My head. Just about anything else including medical supply, pharmacy, nail shop, craft supplies, etc, you have two choices. Here or the city.




tj444 -> RE: Politics and consumerism (5/7/2013 6:07:53 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444
quote:

ORIGINAL: kalikshama
I wouldn't boycott the local cancer treatment center for their political views.

what about when Susan G. Komen cut funding to Planned Parenthood due to their political & religious views? having political/religious views are one thing, but changing who you give donated money to and who you dont cuz of those views is another thing all together.. They lost a certain amount of public support over that, peoples perception of them changed.. as I recall..


SGK Foundation made the claim that they give financial support to mammogram providers. Since PP doesn't actually provide the mammograms, PP wasn't eligible for funding, iirc. SGK lost some supporters because there was a furor put out about their not supporting PP.


It depends on whose article you read, I guess.. I sorta distrust the media stories now cuz too many times they dont get the facts right..

I have never really understood the point of charities that collect donations and then divide up the money to other charities.. why do you need a "middleman"? if you want to give to some cause, then give it directly to those charities, imo.. I also dont like businesses that collect for specific charities.. my money, my decision on which charities i support.. not some corp wanting some free feel good PR.. I dislike being asked to donate at the check-out each time I buy something, putting your customers on the spot like that, making them uncomfortable isnt good for business.. I have stopped shopping at stores that do that..




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
4.882813E-02