Tkman117
Posts: 1353
Joined: 5/21/2012 Status: offline
|
Just because they thought it was a youtube video that instigated the attack does not mean they covered it up, covering it up would be more along the lines of denying terrorists attacked the embassy (which they did admit happened) than offering a REASON as to WHY it happened. Maybe the youtube video wasn't the reason behind why it happened, maybe they were wrong, but does that mean they were trying to cover up what happened? NO! they were trying to find out WHY it happened. How is offering a reason as to why it happened considered a cover up and one worth impeaching the frigging president? You people are grasping at straws. Sure in the 13 embassy attacks under bush there were no people trying to explain WHY it happened, they just thought it was "da muslims being muslims, killing our patriotic american citizens." This time there was an extremely insulting movie released on youtube around the same time, so an initial look at the situation makes one draw certain conclusions, such as the violence being instigated by the video. Are those conclusions right? Not always, no. People aren't perfect, and they sometimes get things wrong, but it doesn't mean we should fire them because they're wrong, it means we learn from their mistakes and move on as best as we can to prevent this sort of stuff from happening. Lastly, the Obama administration DID admit it was a terrorist attack, why do you red neck morons continue to overlook this fact?
|