DesideriScuri
Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: mnottertail You are the one harping to stay on the subject. As for stick and move, you don't have anything that sticks, and you never address the subject directly, you always move. We are talking about 13 Benghazis that W covered up without a peep from the teabaggers or teabagger media. I assumed wrongly that you were addressing the subject and that these 13 Benghazis were because of a youtube video. So, I guess you need to work on your schtick some, because it is looking rather pathetic in its uncraftiness, as usual, and you gotta come up with something else. Sorry, Ron, but you keep dodging. Obama and Administration blamed a youtube video for the Benghazi attack. Without the video - what had nothing to do with it - what would the cause be, and what would the administration have stated as the reason behind the attack? The OP claimed there were 13 "Benghazi's" under W's tenure. For any of them to be "Benghazi's" that Fox News Channel didn't peep about, there is a need for Bush to have made claims that the attacks were for reasons other than the truth. And, upon challenge, not a single one you has shown how any one of those 13 falls into that category. I'm on topic. You aren't diverting me.
_____________________________
What I support: - A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
- Personal Responsibility
- Help for the truly needy
- Limited Government
- Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)
|