Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Is rape about power?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Is rape about power? Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Is rape about power? - 5/18/2013 3:27:26 PM   
Aswad


Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess

There are plenty of men who rape who are attractive personable guys.


Yup. Some of them are even married. As I'm sure you're aware, spouses and dates are among the primary perpetrators. Kind of by definition, they don't have access to the sex they want from their partner (when they have access, that's not called rape, but rather just 'sex'), and they're supposed to be monogamous.

Or are you only talking about assault by strangers, the rarest kind of all?

quote:

Do people on this thread really think that the only men who rape are unattractive, with uninteresting personalities and with no prospects, whose only hope of having sex with another human being is to force them? Really?


Nope. Do you think only single men rape?

quote:

And what about self-control as part of this equation?


Self control varies. I try to restrict my social circles to people with proven self control.

Most men have adequate self control; some do not. Most men have decent views of women; some do not.

quote:

If people believe that men lack self-control, I'm surprised more people aren't converting to Islam because it does seem to imply that a woman, simply by virtue of being a woman, poses a sexual threat to men, a threat that they are completely unable to control.


Why must everything be black and white?

quote:

Are men like that really so rare?


Don't go overboard. The highest statistics I've ever seen puts it at less than half the male population having raped anyone, ever, and I have my doubts about the definition used in that query. That means, by a worst case estimate, a majority aren't rapists. Hence, 'rare' is simply not appropriate in any way.

quote:

And I would argue that most rapists are not one time rapists.


Locales may vary on this point, so I shan't contest the claim.

IWYW,
— Aswad.


_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to fucktoyprincess)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: Is rape about power? - 5/18/2013 3:32:32 PM   
Aswad


Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Powergamz1

If you don't get that a law enforcement arrest is a prime example of coercive power, then you either aren't equipped to have this discussion, or you are trolling for another pointless internet argument about semantics and strawmen.


Oh, I get that, I'm simply saying that it's pointless to say "law enforcement is about power", compared to e.g. "law enforcement is about social order". We don't create a police force for power, we create one from a motive, and power is secondary. Similarly, when police brutality happens, we don't write it off by saying "well, police are all about power, and that's all that needs to be said", but rather delve into the issues leading to the problem and attempt to address them.

IWYW,
— Aswad.


_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to Powergamz1)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: Is rape about power? - 5/18/2013 3:35:35 PM   
Aswad


Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

Got to love the head in the sand comment. Rape is wrong, it cant be justified. Talking about why it happens wont exonerate it. Simly put, it IS all about bullying the victim.


I'm not interested in exonerating anything, nor trying to justify anything.

I'm trying to understand rape in a manner that's useful in dealing with it, and I'm not certain the 'bullying' perspective fits that bill.

IWYW,
— Aswad.


_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: Is rape about power? - 5/18/2013 4:50:30 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
Intimidation may be a better word than bullying.

(in reply to Aswad)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: Is rape about power? - 5/18/2013 5:14:56 PM   
Tantriqu


Posts: 2026
Joined: 12/29/2006
Status: offline
Missing from the debate so far is that some rapists, like some bullies, are sadists and are sexually aroused by the thought and act of degrading, controlling and overwhelming their victims.

_____________________________

"Then I did the simplest thing in the world. I leaned down... and kissed him. And the world cracked open." - Agnes de Mille

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: Is rape about power? - 5/18/2013 5:20:45 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
Lack of control over areas of life in the "non consentual rapist," leads to need/anger/ hate/control over a "weaker" person to debase/humilate/regain control .




_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: Is rape about power? - 5/18/2013 6:55:09 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CeMeDihwyrg

_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: Is rape about power? - 5/19/2013 8:01:37 AM   
egern


Posts: 537
Joined: 1/11/2013
Status: offline
vinventML thank you for interesting notes and a good link :-)

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: Is rape about power? - 5/19/2013 8:13:24 AM   
egern


Posts: 537
Joined: 1/11/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Freund et al. (1983) stated that most rapists do not have a preference for rape over consensual sex,[33]



If the above is true, as stated, then why rape (given that rape is a crime and consensual sex is not)? I don't mean to be simplistic with this question, but I am just trying to understand. If rape gives nothing more sexually than consensual sex, then obviously there is something else that it gives the rapist, or else why engage in it at all? And it seems to me that what it gives is a power trip that for a man who has rapist tendencies that consensual sex can't give.

I have two herbs in front of me that give exactly the same high and after effects. But one is legal and the other is illegal. Which one do I choose?

And if I consistently choose the illegal herb even though I could have the same effects legally, doesn't this suggest I have a preference for the illegal herb? So much so, that I am willing to commit what I know to be a crime?

And doesn't this imply that the illegal herb has some other effect on me for which I am willing to commit a crime? Perhaps even the excitement of doing something illegal? (Which is, of course, a power trip, in and of itself).




As I understand it, part of the problem is who can get a partner? If you are bad at it, or live in a culture where free sex is not allowed, or you have a spouse who will not comply and you are sufficiently callous or deranged or have a bad attitude towards women, then you might end up forcing yourself on someone.

I read somewhere about a survey where quite many men admitted forcing themselves on women, but they did not all consider themselves rapists! I believe that something could be done with that group in terms of awareness. Many have finally grasped that a no is a no, but there are still many who does not understand that you need a coherent yes as well.

I think more debate about gender roles might be useful too, especially the masculine role, again with a thought to the rapists who do not think they are, but also peer pressure among men in terms of behavior.

As for the cases with rape in college and sports idols, surely in time that kind of attitude can and should be changed.



(in reply to fucktoyprincess)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: Is rape about power? - 5/19/2013 8:17:51 AM   
egern


Posts: 537
Joined: 1/11/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: FelineRanger


quote:

ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Freund et al. (1983) stated that most rapists do not have a preference for rape over consensual sex,[33]



If the above is true, as stated, then why rape (given that rape is a crime and consensual sex is not)? I don't mean to be simplistic with this question, but I am just trying to understand. If rape gives nothing more sexually than consensual sex, then obviously there is something else that it gives the rapist, or else why engage in it at all? And it seems to me that what it gives is a power trip that for a man who has rapist tendencies that consensual sex can't give.

I have two herbs in front of me that give exactly the same high and after effects. But one is legal and the other is illegal. Which one do I choose?

And if I consistently choose the illegal herb even though I could have the same effects legally, doesn't this suggest I have a preference for the illegal herb? So much so, that I am willing to commit what I know to be a crime?

And doesn't this imply that the illegal herb has some other effect on me for which I am willing to commit a crime? Perhaps even the excitement of doing something illegal? (Which is, of course, a power trip, in and of itself).




I suspect Freund limited his research to physiological responses rather than motivations. I mentioned briefly in another thread that I did time in prison. Part of my sentence involved participation in group therapy with other inmates, many of whom committed sexual offenses including rape. Every one who committed rape said there was a major part of his life where he had no control. Not having control in that part of his life was a driving force in the commission of his crime. One other thing I found interesting is that I was the only one in my group and one of only three in the entire prison who did not have an extensive history of childhood abuse. I'm well aware that discussing what I know on this subject and how I know it may well make me a pariah, but this is something I do know well enough to speak authoritatively.


So your thought is that persons who have been abused as children have little self-respect and less for others? Sounds uncomfortable logical. Do you think such a group can be reached?

(in reply to FelineRanger)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: Is rape about power? - 5/19/2013 8:28:15 AM   
egern


Posts: 537
Joined: 1/11/2013
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: njlauren

quote:


Conservatives and the religious right argued when these laws were passed that a husband couldn't rape his wife because giving sex to the husband was her duty, that was a common teaching in Christianity for many years and the evangelicals still cling to it.


Thank you for putting into words my vague ideas about this - I thought there had to be a connection there.

Religious idea and rules remain as influential even when the link to religion is no longer obvious, and I think some ideas about women come from this.

quote:


Rape is not about lust, it is about rage and anger and disrespect. The jock turds in Steubenville, Ohio (enflamed boil on the buttocks of America), weren't out to get laid, they sexually assaulted the girl to humiliate her, and this is a common think. Some dumb ass jocks did the same thing in Glen Ridge, NJ about 25 years ago, they sexually assaulted a mental retarded young women (IQ about 60), and they used broomsticks and baseball bats on her....and their piece of shit lawyer claimed the girl had 'come on to them' (the lawyer should have been disbarred, among other things, for violating rape shield laws)(among other thing, the young woman had a mental age of about 9 or 10, so not likely)....it can be about dominance and power as well, but I personally think it is rage and hatred towards the person they raped. In the case of gay rape, often the person doing it is a self hating gay person who takes out their own anguish at being gay on others.



Isn't there a difference - often - between rape from quite young men and others?? Am thinking that some get to be much more mature later on in life, who were otherwise more or less following such idea and tendencies.

I do not mean these rapists themselves, but other young men, who are more of less thinking like that, but wise up.

Also, seems to me that the colleges themselves have MUCH to learn and about these problems.

(in reply to njlauren)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: Is rape about power? - 5/19/2013 8:55:52 AM   
egern


Posts: 537
Joined: 1/11/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: njlauren


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

fr:
What are the rape stats in places where prostitution is legal.
Look at the rape stats for nevada which has legal prostution in all but about three counties.
I have gone back through the records for more than 20 years and so far I have only found rape to occure in the counties
that do not have legal prostitution.
So my belief is that rape is all about sex,if it was all about power then why fuck them just beat the shit out of them?


I thought prostitution was only legal in three counties in nevada...not in all but three....

I don't think rape rates have anything to do with whether prostitution is legal (that implies that rapists simply need to get their rocks off, they are horny, and that isn't true). It is often cited that societies that have lower rape rates tend to be more open minded about sex (for example, scandinavian countries) and that rape is often highest in sexually repressed societies, like Muslim countries, but that is a false correlation, the reason rape is lower in scandinavian countries is because in their society they have made a big attempt at equality for women and erasing misogyny, whereas traditionalist societies like the Muslim world (talking the shitholes like Saudi and Iran and Iraq) or even in certain quarters of the bible belt, women are considered inferior and that helps set the stage for rape.


The statistics I could find says that rape per 100.000 in 2009 in USA, UK and Australia is about the same about 27-28, Botswana tops with 88.5.

Canada is 1.7, Denmark 6.4, Netherlands 9.2. Sweden is 63.5! Kuwait is 4.0 and many Arabic countries have hardly any rapes according to this..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_statistics

Now these are reported cases, and it is hard to know how many cases are not reported versus countries where many more cases are reported. It has also to do with what is considered rape in various countries, and Sweden has much more strict laws than most.

Does does prostitution make the rape rates go down? It might have some effect, but I doubt it is the most important, I tend to think that the attitude among the sexes weigh much more heavily. I don't think you can say that rape is not - never - about sex, but all normal men can control themselves.

Does porn help (getting it off in front of the computer) or hinder (getting bad ideas)?
Again, I really think that the attitudes between the sexes and sexual freedom in all means more.


(in reply to njlauren)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: Is rape about power? - 5/19/2013 8:56:32 AM   
njlauren


Posts: 1577
Joined: 10/1/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffBC

quote:

ORIGINAL: njlauren
The problem is that you are seeing it as an act of lust, because they use the equipment used for consensual sex...but in reality, what they are doing is using their sex organs as a weapon, to humiliate the victim, to take out their anger and rage on them. Point B is what makes the point, we might be a highly sexual species, but you don't have to be driven by lust to use your penis on someone, or as in the case of some assaults use objects like bottles and such to assault the victim.

Perhaps. But I might also suggest that the problem is you are reading layers and layers of motivation into something when a perfectly clear and obvious solution exists. I'm more going with Occam's razor here.

quote:

A classic example is that homosexual rape was often used to humiliate captives in warfare, to demean them and show them contempt.

I do not understand how this is relevant at all. When one person rapes another there are two outcomes... one in the rapist the other in the victim. What makes you think the rapists gives a rat's ass what the victim felt about it in most cases? Do you really believe rapists are, in general, people with high degrees of empathy? The connection to military interrogations seems specious at best.



The rapist achieves a goal, of humiliating their enemy whom they hate. In the 1990's in the Serbian wars, serb men were raping Muslim women with the intent of getting them pregnant, it was done to humiliate them, pure and simple. Rapists don't need to have empathy, far from it, rape is a weapon of humiliation against someone else, or can be. The problem with Occams razor is it often is filtered through biases i.e rape involves sexual penetration, therefore rape is about sexual desire and lust.

Not all rapes are about power and anger, there are cases where what is technically rape occurs because of alcohol or drug use, or where the 'no signal' is not that clear, there are cases where someone can get out of control...but on the other hand, if they get out of control and think like they have the right to get sex from the other person, losing that empathy, then it is still about power. A classic example of the power issue is with marital rape, it is only within the past 40 years that a spouse can be charged with rape, because especially with men, common tradition was that it was the wife's duty to give men sex, and conservative religious types are still attempting to get that exemption put back into the law...and that is classic power, os a woman doesn't want sex the man can just go and take it?

(in reply to JeffBC)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: Is rape about power? - 5/19/2013 8:58:15 AM   
njlauren


Posts: 1577
Joined: 10/1/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: littlewonder

personally I hate when people say "rape is about power". In my experience, no it's not always the case. Most times it's about horny men who have been rejected time and again and it's the only way they can get fucked. Or it's in response to an anger issue but I don't see it to be anything about power whatsoever.



Sure it is, the guy feels like he has been rejected time and again, and feels like he has the right to get laid...that isn't power, assuming that the other person has no right to consent, that he can just take it? The fact that men are generally stronger than women also plays into this, knowing they have the power to force the other person into being used.

(in reply to littlewonder)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: Is rape about power? - 5/19/2013 9:15:07 AM   
njlauren


Posts: 1577
Joined: 10/1/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aswad

quote:

ORIGINAL: njlauren

That is basically a load of bullshit, it is the same crap that has Muslim women bundled up in Burqhas, because otherwise men will get lust and rape them.


How did you get from A to C here? Cuz I'm not seeing B in there anywhere.

Some people are able to resist impulses, some are not. Excusing a failure to control impulses is insulting. Pretending the salience of the impulse is irrelevant in regard to how many successfully control their impulses is silly. Some people can't resist a sale, literally. Some people can set themselves on fire and sit there until they die. The capacity for impulse control varies, as does the salience of different impulses.

quote:

Some rape scenarios do happen when things get out of hand, in date rape, especially when drinking, it can get out of hand, the girl says no and the guy keeps going, but those are not most cases of rape.


Actually, a complete survey of all cases here shows that the norm is things getting out of hand, by more than one order of magnitude.

quote:

One of the reasons rape shield laws came into being in the US, that forbid defense attorneys from questioning things like a victims sexual history or the way they were dressed, was that evidence came that rape was not about sexual attraction, that it was a crime of violence, not lust, as had been assumed for far too long.


Who cares whether the rapist is attracted or feels lust? Kids that nab stuff at the store feel temptation, too. We still expect them to control this feeling and act properly anyway.

quote:

The Abrahamic religions were all very big on presenting the image of women as seductress, Eve seducing Adam into sin and so forth, that men can't control themselves and it is a woman's fault, but that is complete utter bs


Agreed.

IWYW,
— Aswad.




The problem with claiming it is lust and impulse control alone (besides the obvious, it isn't true), is it doesn't ask why they feel they have the right to do as they do, and it all ties in. Let's assume it is lust, that it is sexual desire run amok, as you say, then let me take you from A to B.

A)Man is horny, hasn't had sex, has been rejected, whatever (blue balls)
B)Woman comes along, he decides he wants her, takes her and forces her to have sex, rapes her.
C)Woman presses rape charges.

Okay, all said and good. 40 years ago, woman did that, and guess what happens? You got it, defense lawyer starts in "So, why were you wearing that dress with heels and a low cut top? You weren't out to find some guy? Why did you go by that particular place, when you knew it was deserted? How sexually active are you?"..and so forth, this was common, in some places still might be.

And what is the lawyer saying? That the guy got all heated up looking at her, and it was her fault for being 'provocative'.......it assumes the man went out of control, and the step C is the assumption, still built into so many, that if the woman weren't so provocative, it wouldn't have happened. Or look at Steubenville, where the Jocks decided they had the right to do what they wanted, they saw the girl as a drunken slut to be violated, and they did, on video.....and the rest of the town, and a lot of people? Take a look, saying it was her fault for getting drunk or having gone off with the boys...leaving out, of course, that she couldn't consent, she was in a drunken stupor..but hey, boys will be boys, right?

When you assume it is impulse control (which it is in some cases, I won't argue, things do get out of hand), or the rapist who targets some women and rapes here, there is still a power issue there. Guy is with a girl, she is out of it, or she is saying no, and he assumes the right, the power to have sex with her, when he takes away that consent, it is using his power and that is still part of the attraction. I don't think it is all about power, I don't think it is the evil man exerting his will and chuckling over it, I think that it is more in the assumption of power (as with marital rape), or with anger and rage at women, or seeing them as inferior or less than human (steubenville, the guy who grabs the girl on the street and rapes her)......whether it is in rage, or something more subtle, the power plays out in "I can do this, I am bigger/stronger, or "my mother was a fucking bitch, all women are like that, so take that" or whatever, it is losing the empaty and respect for the other person, or as in many cases, wanting to show that lack of respect for the person as a human being. The serbs who raped women to get them pregnant were doing that; the guy on a date who won't take no, is saying "I am more powerful then you, I am taking this", and it is that power that overrides the empathy with the other person in the end, what you call lack of impulse control is in reality assuming you have the right to use the power you have to force the other person.

(in reply to Aswad)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: Is rape about power? - 5/19/2013 9:22:26 AM   
njlauren


Posts: 1577
Joined: 10/1/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

FR:
Are the poor oppressed reactionaries now claiming that rape is an old fashioned right that's been removed from them by the terrible liberal conspiracy?



Are you seriously going to try to make rape a right wing thing now too?

Unfuckingbelievable....


Um, I suggest you look at the stupid things the religious right branch of the GOP has been saying, and come back to me. They for example want to remove the laws allowing a husband to be charged with rape, arguing a husband cannot rape his wife, since sex is a wive's duty. These same people make the argument that rape is about lust, that if we just stopped women from wearing provocative clothing, banned sex ed, banned porn, rape wouldn't go on, just like in the 'good ole days'.....there has been a lot written about this all over the place, the attempts to get rid of the marital rape laws, and yes, to remove the rape shield laws so that a women's sexual past, dress style and so forth, are legal grounds to challenge a rape conviction. Put it this way, the people in Steubenville are not exactly NYC, and look at their reaction to the two jocks being convicted of rape, they are outraged, claiming the boys did nothing wrong, that the girl asked for it, etc...you think these were drooling liberals in that town, or conservative?

The right wing, with its law and order, should be outraged at rape and many are, but that also leaves out that the right has been hijacked by the religious right nutjobs, who see everything as lust and the fault of the sexual revolution (course, the fact that rape rates in the good ole days were probably as high as today, only a lot more wasn't reported, doesn't matter, the bible and prayer in schools and sex as something you talked about in private made sure it didn't happen, right)

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: Is rape about power? - 5/19/2013 9:36:28 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: njlauren


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

FR:
Are the poor oppressed reactionaries now claiming that rape is an old fashioned right that's been removed from them by the terrible liberal conspiracy?



Are you seriously going to try to make rape a right wing thing now too?

Unfuckingbelievable....


Um, I suggest you look at the stupid things the religious right branch of the GOP has been saying, and come back to me. They for example want to remove the laws allowing a husband to be charged with rape, arguing a husband cannot rape his wife, since sex is a wive's duty. These same people make the argument that rape is about lust, that if we just stopped women from wearing provocative clothing, banned sex ed, banned porn, rape wouldn't go on, just like in the 'good ole days'.....there has been a lot written about this all over the place, the attempts to get rid of the marital rape laws, and yes, to remove the rape shield laws so that a women's sexual past, dress style and so forth, are legal grounds to challenge a rape conviction. Put it this way, the people in Steubenville are not exactly NYC, and look at their reaction to the two jocks being convicted of rape, they are outraged, claiming the boys did nothing wrong, that the girl asked for it, etc...you think these were drooling liberals in that town, or conservative?

The right wing, with its law and order, should be outraged at rape and many are, but that also leaves out that the right has been hijacked by the religious right nutjobs, who see everything as lust and the fault of the sexual revolution (course, the fact that rape rates in the good ole days were probably as high as today, only a lot more wasn't reported, doesn't matter, the bible and prayer in schools and sex as something you talked about in private made sure it didn't happen, right)



I never claimed that some religious people on the right don't have some really wacked out ideas. I just think it's funny that you always seem to focus on them and totally ignore the religious idiots on the left. I have lived next door to one of the biggest in your face, pro life, anti sex nuts I have ever met and she is far left on the political fence and very religious. In fact the only thing she hates more than the republicans in the neighborhood are the people of color that she claims is ruining the entire city.

Now it is true that the left are not as vocal but they are out there. If they weren't California would have passed prop 8 when Obama was elected.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to njlauren)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: Is rape about power? - 5/19/2013 9:38:26 AM   
egern


Posts: 537
Joined: 1/11/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: njlauren


quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffBC

quote:

ORIGINAL: egern
However, this concept, that all rape is about power, period, has never been proven or, to my knowledge, even researched. It just keep getting repeated as if it were.

Feminism is like that. For me, the idea is ludicrous. Not to put too fine a point on it but last I checked "rape" was about "me fucking some woman who does not want to be fucked". It would appear at a casual glance that "fucking" has to be somewhere in the mix.

For me it's pretty simple...

A) Humans are a highly sexual species
B) Some humans really don't see other humans as meaningful or as having any rights.
C) Society is terribly permissive about this particular form of transgression.

It seems to me that with those three simple ingredients you get what we see in our society. It's only the 3rd point that can be changed and so is interesting at all to me.



The problem is that you are seeing it as an act of lust, because they use the equipment used for consensual sex...but in reality, what they are doing is using their sex organs as a weapon, to humiliate the victim, to take out their anger and rage on them. Point B is what makes the point, we might be a highly sexual species, but you don't have to be driven by lust to use your penis on someone, or as in the case of some assaults use objects like bottles and such to assault the victim.

A classic example is that homosexual rape was often used to humiliate captives in warfare, to demean them and show them contempt.



I have trouble seeing all rapes as hate or rage. Why should that be the case? Why should some men hate all woman with such hate, or men as well? This is what I do not get.

(in reply to njlauren)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: Is rape about power? - 5/19/2013 9:41:27 AM   
egern


Posts: 537
Joined: 1/11/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: sexyred1

quote:

ORIGINAL: FelineRanger

Unfortunately, rape really is about power. Very often, it's a warped attempt to regain power that the rapist feels he has lost in another part of his life.


I agree and will add that it is often insecurity and anger that drives a person to rape; it is ironic that such a show of power simply masks how powerless the man is who commits such an act.

Not to mention that it is also purely sociopathic behavior.



Why should this insecurity and anger be aimed at women??

Sociopath behavior: the really scary problem here is that there are so many countries where it is not considered sociopath behavior!

(in reply to sexyred1)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: Is rape about power? - 5/19/2013 9:45:09 AM   
egern


Posts: 537
Joined: 1/11/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

quote:

ORIGINAL: Powergamz1

Anytime someone gets what they would otherwise not get, by abrogating another person's unwillingness, it is 'about power'.

You can stick your 'she forced me to rape her by making me horny and then holding back' line of crap where it belongs.


quote:

ORIGINAL: littlewonder

personally I hate when people say "rape is about power". In my experience, no it's not always the case. Most times it's about horny men who have been rejected time and again and it's the only way they can get fucked. Or it's in response to an anger issue but I don't see it to be anything about power whatsoever.




Yes Powergamz. Precisely.

By definition, rape is something that occurs where consent for sex is, for whatever reason, absent denied or withheld.

It is a person imposing their will on another unwilling person.

How can that not be about power?



The action is about the power in the sense of overpowering a person, but I am thinking about reasons, motivations.

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Is rape about power? Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109