NuevaVida -> RE: Conditional love and BDSM (6/1/2013 10:56:06 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Kana Daaayyyuuum Gal, this is just awesome. Totally agree. Love with strings attached isn't love at all. And really it's the only way to go. Love someone with expectations and, sooner or later, by virtue of being human, they gonna let you down. But love for the sake of loving alone, then one can never be hurt. They might return my love. They might not. They might return it in ways I find acceptable. They might not. But getting something back, that ain't the point. I love without reservations and it gives me joyous freedom. Better yet, in loving without seeking reciprocity, I become a loving man. And that's pretty cool stuff there Thanks, Kana and kallisto. I would disagree that one can never be hurt, though. There are always *some* expectations (like don't hurt those I love, etc., or don't violate certain boundaries), but I know you're talking about the strings attached stuff - "I will love you if...." Love with outlined conditions. For me, I love because I love to love, and because who that person is brings out feelings of love in me. When I say love is NOT unconditional, it's because for me, love is not always a forever thing. And that's totally ok. Saying love must be forever is actually putting a condition on it, isn't it? Sometimes I just no longer feel love for someone I once felt love for. There are conditions, but that just means if certain conditions are met (like a math equation), love blossoms, or love wilts. Hope that makes sense. But I don't give much merit to defining what's "true", what various "conditions" are, or anything like that. If it doesn't serve me well to continue loving, I move away from it. That's the "condition" I'm talking about.
|
|
|
|