Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

explicit primary photo


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> explicit primary photo Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 11:29:53 AM   
TheLilSquaw


Posts: 2340
Joined: 10/24/2012
From: Middle River, MD
Status: offline 		I wanted to change my primary picture but the label "explicit" made me stop.
That is such a general term IMO.

Although I have changed my primary before it's typically always been a "foot".
The picture that I want to post as my primary, isn't explicit to ME.
However, that doesn't mean the mods would agree or that others would agree.

It is of me and my male slave in mixed wrestling, he's nude but I'm not.

Obviously genitals or gaping holes qualify but where is that line drawn?

< Message edited by TheLilSquaw -- 6/4/2013 11:59:25 AM >

_____________________________

LilSquaw
Lifestyle & ProSwitch
Fetish Model, Producer, and Website Owner

http://www.clips4sale.com/69201
http://www.kinkbomb.com/studio/Sadistic_Babygirl_
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 12:35:34 PM   
searching4mysir


Posts: 2757
Joined: 6/16/2011
Status: offline 		I'm pretty sure it is genitalia, gaping holes, and penetration, but I, too, wonder beyond that.


_____________________________

No longer searching -- found my one and only right here on CM


(in reply to TheLilSquaw)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 12:44:37 PM   
TheLilSquaw


Posts: 2340
Joined: 10/24/2012
From: Middle River, MD
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: searching4mysir

I'm pretty sure it is genitalia, gaping holes, and penetration, but I, too, wonder beyond that.




Exactly those are the obvious things but there is a lot of gray area and I don't want my profile to go POOF because of a picture that I don't consider explicit but someone else might.

_____________________________

LilSquaw
Lifestyle & ProSwitch
Fetish Model, Producer, and Website Owner

http://www.clips4sale.com/69201
http://www.kinkbomb.com/studio/Sadistic_Babygirl_

(in reply to searching4mysir)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 1:03:52 PM   
UllrsIshtar


Posts: 3693
Joined: 7/28/2012
Status: offline 		To me the line is at "in your face genitalia".

So I don't consider a picture of a person just standing there, or engaged in some sort of activity, who also happens to be nude, to be "explicit".

But a picture of that same person, where there objective of the picture seems to be to draw attention specifically to the genitalia, I do consider to be "explicit".

It seems to work for me, because I've never had any of my nude pics pulled, even as a primary picture.

_____________________________

I can be your whore
I am the dirt you created
I am your sinner
And your whore
But let me tell you something baby
You love me for everything you hate me for

(in reply to TheLilSquaw)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 1:12:53 PM   
Arturas


Posts: 3245
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TheLilSquaw

I wanted to change my primary picture but the label "explicit" made me stop.
That is such a general term IMO.

Although I have changed my primary before it's typically always been a "foot".
The picture that I want to post as my primary, isn't explicit to ME.
However, that doesn't mean the mods would agree or that others would agree.

It is of me and my male slave in mixed wrestling, he's nude but I'm not.

Obviously genitals or gaping holes qualify but where is that line drawn?



IF you like showing explicit pictures that's OK for you. If your interested in what attracts a Dom's attention it is not really that. You attract wankers with nude pictures. You attract Dom's with honest eyes. Yearning eyes. Searching eyes. Beautiful eyes. Look at my girl's eyes, you can find out who she is from my profile. It was her eyes that attracted me in her famous side profile shot, I think she still has it on her profile, maybe. From the emails I saw on her account, it attracted many more than just little ole me, her Dom.

< Message edited by Arturas -- 6/4/2013 1:15:29 PM >

_____________________________

"We master Our world."

(in reply to TheLilSquaw)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 1:14:56 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		That is a pretty damn explicit picture of your feet, squaw

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Arturas)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 1:16:22 PM   
TheLilSquaw


Posts: 2340
Joined: 10/24/2012
From: Middle River, MD
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas



IF you like showing explicit pictures that's OK for you. If your interested in what attracts a Dom's attention it is not really that. You attract wankers with nude pictures. You attract Dom's with honest eyes. Yearning eyes. Searching eyes. Beautiful eyes.



Who says I am looking to attract a doms attention? Lol I KNOW my profile or posts don't even elude to that.

IMO you can have explicit pictures that are not nude.
However, other than the obvious gaping holes or genitals what qualifies as explicit?

ETA: Since when do YOU speak for every dom on CM? (just ask'n)

< Message edited by TheLilSquaw -- 6/4/2013 1:19:55 PM >

_____________________________

LilSquaw
Lifestyle & ProSwitch
Fetish Model, Producer, and Website Owner

http://www.clips4sale.com/69201
http://www.kinkbomb.com/studio/Sadistic_Babygirl_

(in reply to Arturas)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 1:17:32 PM   
TheLilSquaw


Posts: 2340
Joined: 10/24/2012
From: Middle River, MD
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

That is a pretty damn explicit picture of your feet, squaw


To a foot guy that could be considered explicit. Lol
It def. qualifies as wank material.

_____________________________

LilSquaw
Lifestyle & ProSwitch
Fetish Model, Producer, and Website Owner

http://www.clips4sale.com/69201
http://www.kinkbomb.com/studio/Sadistic_Babygirl_

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 1:22:15 PM   
JstAnotherSub


Posts: 6174
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TheLilSquaw

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas



IF you like showing explicit pictures that's OK for you. If your interested in what attracts a Dom's attention it is not really that. You attract wankers with nude pictures. You attract Dom's with honest eyes. Yearning eyes. Searching eyes. Beautiful eyes.



Who says I am looking to attract a doms attention? Lol I KNOW my profile or posts don't even elude to that.

IMO you can have explicit pictures that are not nude.
However, other than the obvious gaping holes or genitals what qualifies as explicit?

ETA: Since when do YOU speak for every dom on CM? (just ask'n)


Not just the ones on CM, but all of em worldwide!!!

_____________________________

yep

(in reply to TheLilSquaw)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 1:23:27 PM   
TheLilSquaw


Posts: 2340
Joined: 10/24/2012
From: Middle River, MD
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JstAnotherSub



Not just the ones on CM, but all of em worldwide!!!



DAMN!
I gotta tell my primary that since I know he missed that memo. heheh



Another question.....
If the mods have an issue with a primary photo, do they send a gold letter or just pull a profile?

_____________________________

LilSquaw
Lifestyle & ProSwitch
Fetish Model, Producer, and Website Owner

http://www.clips4sale.com/69201
http://www.kinkbomb.com/studio/Sadistic_Babygirl_

(in reply to JstAnotherSub)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 1:26:47 PM   
Arturas


Posts: 3245
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TheLilSquaw


quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas



IF you like showing explicit pictures that's OK for you. If your interested in what attracts a Dom's attention it is not really that. You attract wankers with nude pictures. You attract Dom's with honest eyes. Yearning eyes. Searching eyes. Beautiful eyes.



Who says I am looking to attract a doms attention? Lol
Btw.. IMO you can have explicit pictures that are not nude.
However, other than the obvious gaping holes or genitals what qualifies as explicit?


..and I don't mean to imply you were. I just added that just in case.

to answer your question, I would suggest a dirty toilet is explicit if you want to be one, blood covered needles if you are into needle play, a horse in heat if you are into, horses. However, again, serious Doms will not be impressed by gapping holes, breasts in their faces or dirty toilets and that is okay if you are not looking to impress but to simply be explicit for your own needs.

_____________________________

"We master Our world."

(in reply to TheLilSquaw)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 1:26:56 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TheLilSquaw


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

That is a pretty damn explicit picture of your feet, squaw


To a foot guy that could be considered explicit. Lol
It def. qualifies as wank material.


Turn around and make full wet lips in fire engine red, I really don't give a shit about feet.  That would be wank material.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to TheLilSquaw)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 1:29:07 PM   
Arturas


Posts: 3245
Status: offline
quote:

ETA: Since when do YOU speak for every dom on CM? (just ask'n)



Never. It is my opinion. Value it as you see fit.

_____________________________

"We master Our world."

(in reply to TheLilSquaw)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 1:30:12 PM   
tsatske


Posts: 2037
Joined: 3/9/2007
From: Louisville, KY
Status: offline 		My secondary pic used to be my primary until I moved it on the advice of some peeps from the forum. You can see it on my profile if you wish. It is of me, standing, wearing naught but heels and a collar. I do have one sub guy who write me constantly wanting to tell me over and over how great my heels are. Anyway, my profile never got pulled and I've never gotten a gold letter.

_____________________________

“If you never did you should. These things are fun and fun is good”
~Dr. Seuss quote

(in reply to TheLilSquaw)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 1:30:27 PM   
TheLilSquaw


Posts: 2340
Joined: 10/24/2012
From: Middle River, MD
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas


..and I don't mean to imply you were. I just added that just in case.

to answer your question, I would suggest a dirty toilet is explicit if you want to be one, blood covered needles if you are into needle play, a horse in heat if you are into, horses. However, again, serious Doms will not be impressed by gapping holes, breasts in their faces or dirty toilets and that is okay if you are not looking to impress but to simply be explicit for your own needs.


Again who are YOU to say what a "serious dom" will be impressed by. You can say what YOU would be impressed by but can you honestly make a general statement that speaks for every other dom? (obviously you can but..)

And again... where did you get the idea that "impressing" a dom was my intent? Heck why would that even get factored in to what qualifies as explicit? Lmfcao


_____________________________

LilSquaw
Lifestyle & ProSwitch
Fetish Model, Producer, and Website Owner

http://www.clips4sale.com/69201
http://www.kinkbomb.com/studio/Sadistic_Babygirl_

(in reply to Arturas)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 1:30:55 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TheLilSquaw

I wanted to change my primary picture but the label "explicit" made me stop.
That is such a general term IMO.

Although I have changed my primary before it's typically always been a "foot".
The picture that I want to post as my primary, isn't explicit to ME.
However, that doesn't mean the mods would agree or that others would agree.

It is of me and my male slave in mixed wrestling, he's nude but I'm not.

Obviously genitals or gaping holes qualify but where is that line drawn?


Primary Explicit... no cock shots, no gaping holes. Penetration by a cock is, obviously, against the rules. No cum shots anywhere.

You can have your submissive and you in a photo, as long as his cock and anus isnt showing, shouldnt be an issue.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to TheLilSquaw)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 1:32:27 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tsatske

My secondary pic used to be my primary until I moved it on the advice of some peeps from the forum. You can see it on my profile if you wish. It is of me, standing, wearing naught but heels and a collar. I do have one sub guy who write me constantly wanting to tell me over and over how great my heels are. Anyway, my profile never got pulled and I've never gotten a gold letter.


Because your secondary would be fine as a primary. Tits on the primary have never been an issue that I saw. You arent showing anything else there.


_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to tsatske)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 1:32:48 PM   
Arturas


Posts: 3245
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheLilSquaw

I wanted to change my primary picture but the label "explicit" made me stop.
That is such a general term IMO.

Although I have changed my primary before it's typically always been a "foot".
The picture that I want to post as my primary, isn't explicit to ME.
However, that doesn't mean the mods would agree or that others would agree.

It is of me and my male slave in mixed wrestling, he's nude but I'm not.

Obviously genitals or gaping holes qualify but where is that line drawn?



IF you like showing explicit pictures that's OK for you. If your interested in what attracts a Dom's attention it is not really that. You attract wankers with nude pictures. You attract Dom's with honest eyes. Yearning eyes. Searching eyes. Beautiful eyes. Look at my girl's eyes, you can find out who she is from my profile. It was her eyes that attracted me in her famous side profile shot, I think she still has it on her profile, maybe. From the emails I saw on her account, it attracted many more than just little ole me, her Dom.


Yes. It is her last picture in order. She is "explicit" in her beauty and her passion. You are "explicit" in foot bottoms.

_____________________________

"We master Our world."

(in reply to Arturas)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 1:33:46 PM   
TheLilSquaw


Posts: 2340
Joined: 10/24/2012
From: Middle River, MD
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tsatske

My secondary pic used to be my primary until I moved it on the advice of some peeps from the forum. You can see it on my profile if you wish. It is of me, standing, wearing naught but heels and a collar. I do have one sub guy who write me constantly wanting to tell me over and over how great my heels are. Anyway, my profile never got pulled and I've never gotten a gold letter.



I like that 2nd picture, but that makes me question even more what qualifies as explicit.


_____________________________

LilSquaw
Lifestyle & ProSwitch
Fetish Model, Producer, and Website Owner

http://www.clips4sale.com/69201
http://www.kinkbomb.com/studio/Sadistic_Babygirl_

(in reply to tsatske)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 1:35:10 PM   
Hillwilliam


Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tsatske

My secondary pic used to be my primary until I moved it on the advice of some peeps from the forum. You can see it on my profile if you wish. It is of me, standing, wearing naught but heels and a collar. I do have one sub guy who write me constantly wanting to tell me over and over how great my heels are. Anyway, my profile never got pulled and I've never gotten a gold letter.

I think the reason they advised you to move that pic was so you would attract fewer wankers.

_____________________________

Kinkier than a cheap garden hose.

Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio.

Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.

(in reply to tsatske)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> explicit primary photo Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094