DesideriScuri
Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: RemoteUser Apologies if someone has asked this before: I haven't seen it through happenstance or the search function. Is it important to you whether the leader of your country (wherever you are) is a citizen of your country? This is not about "birthers", or whether you have a parent who is a citizen, but someone who wasn't born in your country and whose parents are not citizens, either. In case you're wondering why I'm asking such a bizarre question, it occurs to me that someone can know a country by being raised there from a young age, and that leaderships qualities do not rely on where your mom broke her water. So, why apply the caveat that someone must be born within, or related to a person, within a specific geographical area to best understand and govern the people who live there? I haven't decided firmly where I sit on this, although I lean towards wanting a good leader regardless of where they come from (and I would qualify that by saying I personally think they should intimately understand the land they are going to govern, to be effective). I'm interested in hearing other views, and the thoughts that drive them, on the topic. The only reason I care, is because them's the rules. I wouldn't stand against an Amendment to drop that rule. I would, personally, think that there would need to be a rule that the majority of the person's life would have to have been spent in the US, maybe even make it 35 years (as that is the minimum age for a Citizen to be eligible to be the President), and those years would have had to have been the most recent years, too.
_____________________________
What I support: - A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
- Personal Responsibility
- Help for the truly needy
- Limited Government
- Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)
|