zenofeller -> RE: But I made a commitment??? (6/26/2006 9:49:25 AM)
|
harry : while not a US family law expert, i suspect a divorce for irreconciliable differences must be aquiesced by the other party. if that other party opposes, the petitioner will have to show the court something, and that something will have to be more than "he's rude to the help". i think. we agree that a relationship must fill the needs of all the parties to it. now, since the woman is staying, i will be so bold as to presume her needs are met. if someone outside the relationship intimates to know better, the burden of proof is on that third party, at least in my eyes, to prove he is not ill intended. i belive people are the only ones to judge what's best for them, and i further belive that actions speak above words. therefore, for me to belive a third party's speech over and above the actions of the woman involved would take some more. something that the mist person does not so far provide. now, someone has a right to be a total prick irrespective of whether they are a dominant or anything else. and their wife, bottom, slave or whatever has the right to make her own mind about it and act accordingly. but i still don't see how a slave is entitled to censure the behaviour of the master to third parties. and caring about a friend is fine, but busy bodying is not. mist, i can appreciate the sentiment. maybe in time we can eventually make more sense to each other.
|
|
|
|