quote:

ORIGINAL: litleone8620We all know that most people misunderstood the OP, that much is obvious from the first few pages. But you will also notice that the people who flamed the OP haven't come back to defend their posts. Coincidence?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Invictus754
If you were actually curious about the apparent disparity, you would have phrased your question without the "more than the fair share" phrase - this implies that the overweight women are less than  other women.  It is like asking the question "Did you stop beating your wife?" at a party. Neither a yes nor a no can be a good answer, but you can shrug your shoulders and say, "I didn't say anything wrong! I just asked a question!"  You intended to be hurtful with your post. Without flaming you, I do hope you get what you deserve (see my previous post).
 
As to your reference of my missing comma:
First - "I missed a comma out"?  I won't even comment on that. 
Second - my comma is a typographical error, while your apostrophe is grammatical.  Putting an apostrophe at the end of "its" shows you have no idea how an apostrophe is used for possession.  And no, I don't run through every posting and point out mistakes for fun (there is no fun in that - there are too effing many).  The education in America is not at its (notice, no apostophe) zenith, and finding people who care about how they write is almost impossible.  However, for those who intentionally hurt others, I throw your obvious mistakes in grammar into the post at no charge. 
 
Finally, to point out your intent in postings, you magnanimously pointed out you wouldn't stoop to the 'infantile' level - and then you went there.  And my insulting conjecture was not on my behalf.  Please, pull out a dictionary and find out what 'on my behalf' really means.  And yes, my conjecture was from little information - but you didn't try to dispute my points - you only tried to point out that I made a pretty good guess from very little information.  I bet I was a lot closer than you like to admit, sixstrokes.  The only way you would possibly weasel your way around this one and show that your intentions were above board would be to post your picture with a BBW sub kissing your feet.
 
Heh.  I won't hold my breath for that to happen.
 

quote:

ORIGINAL: kc692

quote:

ORIGINAL: MistressOfGa

quote:

The reality is that most men prefer women who are not very overweight in terms of pure physical attraction, this has nothing to do with marketing or clothing sizes.

I would like to know where you get "most men" from. Is this the general public? Men you know? Men in your town? My reality, most of the men I know prefer women who are not size 14 and under, but size 18 and up. I base that on my own experience, not a study or poll. I get alot of letters from men on CM (including Doms) who have complimented me on my photos <shrugs>, they don't know me, they are going purely on the photos that I have posted here, so basically they are basing their opinions on pure physical attraction, which have nothing to do with personality or intelligence.

I wasn't going to back on this thread, and in reality am not commenting on the OPs comment at all.  I just had to remark how well written your reply was MOG.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Invictus754

I was righteously indignant for all the women who sixstrokes maligned, and some people could not see the venom in his cute little question. 

quote:


 
He has yet to say that his intentions were honorable, and that is all I need to know that he meant it otherwise.

quote:

ORIGINAL: doll

Thanks so much for the laugh Level.