Phydeaux
Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: vincentML quote:
Areas become colonies (or client states) voluntarily as well. For example the US (and britain, to some extent) set up the hashemites as kings in Saudia Arabia and Jordan. And while our influence with these client states is fading - nonetheless this has been a profitable for both countries. Fine. But this does not describe the intrusion of Zionism into the Levant during the early part of the 20th C. Nor does it speak to the religious zealotry that drives the continuing oppression of Palestinians in the West Bank by the settlement movement and the IDF, destroying vast amounts of olive orchards and shooting randomly and wantonly to terrorize small villages. You theories of statescraft are blind to the immoral activities taking place on the ground. I never said that it does describe the renewed presence of zionism in the levant. How is the introduction of zionism into the levant different than the introductions of muslims into Europe in any substantive way? Short answer: It isn't. Nor is it different than the croats oppressing the serbs in yugoslavia, and the serbs then breaking apart and forming their own nation. Nor is it different from the serbian attempts at genocide against the albanians (kosovo) croats and bosnians. "My theories of statecraft are blind to the immoral activities taking place on the ground." Absolutely right. I've said it many times - statecraft and morality are almost completely unrelated. Its hardly an original thought. "The Prince" said it well. Morally, I'd like everyone to live in peace and harmony and have 1.8 children. I'd like an end to nuclear war, weapons of mass destruction. Do I think its a goal worth working towards? Perhaps. Do I see it happening - hell no. I see muslim nations hell bent on acquiring nuclear weapons. Read the writings of KQ Khan father of nuclear pakistan (as well as nuclear NK, and nuclear aspirations in iran, libya, syria) if you want some real chilling, scary stuff. I see Turkey, Egypt, Kyrgistan, chechniya falling into muslim extremism. I see the rize of NGO actors that are capable with technology of unleashing hell with impunity, either with the aid of state actors or independently. I see China attempting forceable expansion by claiming border areas with india, vietnam,philipines, korea, japan. I see a soviet union as a rapidly failing state, although most (including putin) don't see it yet. Soviet energy & mineral exports are declining due to their political system not making capital investments positive. They are losing control of their nether regions which identify increasingly as part of a muslim ideology and not part of a russian/soviet ideology. I see a nation where alcoholism approaches 50%. Soooo returning to the original topic. Is any nation morally pure. Hmm. no. Has the american century been relatively benign. Hmm. Yes. Do I think America was particularly guilty of colonialism. Hmm no. Do I think the behavior of Americans has been particularly bad. Hmm no. Take palestine where we have tried many times to broker an arab /israeli peace. Compare that to oh - say the mongol invasion of the caliphate states. The japanese invasion of china. The persian war against the Greeks. The ottoman rape of constantinople. In war Americans take a lot of steps to preclude enemy civilian casualties. Always successful - no. But, generally more humane than whatever nation tweak favors. Yes, probably so.
< Message edited by Phydeaux -- 6/26/2013 3:22:38 PM >
|