Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Republicans who can save the party in 2016


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Republicans who can save the party in 2016 Page: <<   < prev  3 4 5 [6] 7   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Republicans who can save the party in 2016 - 6/25/2013 5:32:13 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

The end justifies the means unless a conservative does it.
I am not talking about his qualifications I am talking about how the Dems decided in advance that whoever was nominated the would destroy him personally.


Its always been that process. Confirmation hearings have always abeen a point of contention... and rarely agreed upon by both parties. Why this shocks you, I have no clue. However, the warning was for Reagan, not for the person they nominated.

You do realize that Bork was pretty much a shoe in for nomination even before being nominated considering his role in the Nixon affairs. Bork was considered before when Scalia was chosen. So to say they didnt even know who would be given the nod? They had a damn good clue.



_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 101
RE: Republicans who can save the party in 2016 - 6/25/2013 5:34:01 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

Not providing protection for an American diplomat is nothing?


There was no protection?

No Marines no automatic weapons just two ex-military who volunteered, you call that protection.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 102
RE: Republicans who can save the party in 2016 - 6/25/2013 5:34:03 PM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline
quote:

I am not talking about his qualifications I am talking about how the Dems decided in advance that whoever was nominated the would destroy him personally.

What's your source for saying that the opposition was planned in advance of the candidate's being announced?

It's a bit hard to square that claim with the fact that the Senate had already confirmed three Reagan appointees: O'Connor, Rehnquist (elevation to chief justice), and Scalia. O'Connor and Scalia were confirmed unanimously. Rehnquist was a bit more contentious.

_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 103
RE: Republicans who can save the party in 2016 - 6/25/2013 5:35:49 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

quote:

I am not talking about his qualifications I am talking about how the Dems decided in advance that whoever was nominated the would destroy him personally.

What's your source for saying that the opposition was planned in advance of the candidate's being announced?

It's a bit hard to square that claim with the fact that the Senate had already confirmed three Reagan appointees: O'Connor, Rehnquist (elevation to chief justice), and Scalia. O'Connor and Scalia were confirmed unanimously. Rehnquist was a bit more contentious.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Bork

(in reply to dcnovice)
Profile   Post #: 104
RE: Republicans who can save the party in 2016 - 6/25/2013 5:39:11 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

Not providing protection for an American diplomat is nothing?


There was no protection?

No Marines no automatic weapons just two ex-military who volunteered, you call that protection.


Could have sworn there were 9 security officers.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 105
RE: Republicans who can save the party in 2016 - 6/25/2013 5:41:29 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
Try here....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Bork_Supreme_Court_nomination

Btw, the source for the reference doesnt seem to exist.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to dcnovice)
Profile   Post #: 106
RE: Republicans who can save the party in 2016 - 6/25/2013 5:55:51 PM   
Hillwilliam


Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

That may be what you mean but it isn't what you say

Don't presume to know what I'm thinking.

Even if you knew it, you couldn't comprehend it.

Reread my post I was not presuming to know what you think.
And thank you for displaying the renown civility of liberals

When was the last time you saw a liberal call Obama "The most ineffective president in generations" as I have done repeatedly?

so much for that fucking theory.

< Message edited by Hillwilliam -- 6/25/2013 5:56:46 PM >


_____________________________

Kinkier than a cheap garden hose.

Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio.

Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 107
RE: Republicans who can save the party in 2016 - 6/25/2013 5:59:01 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
Many liberals have voiced their complaints on these boards about Obama....

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 108
RE: Republicans who can save the party in 2016 - 6/25/2013 6:02:24 PM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline
quote:

Btw, the source for the reference doesnt seem to exist.

The WSJ opinion (I think) piece that Wikipedia cited? I couldn't access that either.

I looked at a bunch of Bork obits, none of which mentioned the pre-nomination opposition. Neither did an NPR piece on the nomination battle. Interesting.

_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 109
RE: Republicans who can save the party in 2016 - 6/25/2013 6:10:18 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
IF it is true.....Bork as a potential was not unknown on the Hill... they knew what they were getting with him.. and they were ready.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to dcnovice)
Profile   Post #: 110
RE: Republicans who can save the party in 2016 - 6/25/2013 7:22:51 PM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline
quote:

Bork as a potential was not unknown on the Hill...

True. I've read that part of the opposition to the nomination stemmed from Reagan's replacing a moderate (Lewis Powell) with an uberconservative. Bork's role in the Saturday Night Massacre didn't help either.

_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 111
RE: Republicans who can save the party in 2016 - 6/25/2013 8:00:43 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

Not providing protection for an American diplomat is nothing?


There was no protection?

No Marines no automatic weapons just two ex-military who volunteered, you call that protection.


Could have sworn there were 9 security officers.

Even 9 is only reasonable in someplace like London.
Paris had 40 marines in addition to civilian security.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 112
RE: Republicans who can save the party in 2016 - 6/25/2013 8:02:10 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

quote:

Btw, the source for the reference doesnt seem to exist.

The WSJ opinion (I think) piece that Wikipedia cited? I couldn't access that either.

I looked at a bunch of Bork obits, none of which mentioned the pre-nomination opposition. Neither did an NPR piece on the nomination battle. Interesting.

And NPR is a well known right wing organization.

(in reply to dcnovice)
Profile   Post #: 113
RE: Republicans who can save the party in 2016 - 6/25/2013 8:03:29 PM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline
quote:

And NPR is a well known right wing organization.

Far from it. But at least the NPR piece was accessible.

_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 114
RE: Republicans who can save the party in 2016 - 6/25/2013 8:05:01 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

IF it is true.....Bork as a potential was not unknown on the Hill... they knew what they were getting with him.. and they were ready.

If you want true incivility check out Thad Stevens 1859.
That was perpetrated by a Democrat and a slave holder to boot.
If you thing that today is uncivil read about the John Quincy Adams administration.

< Message edited by BamaD -- 6/25/2013 8:06:07 PM >

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 115
RE: Republicans who can save the party in 2016 - 6/25/2013 8:13:57 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Thank you. And its something I do not agree with, the premise. I feel a moderate Republican can put a Democrat in an extremely tight race.

But what are the chances of a moderate running? And, against Clinton if she decides to run.... its not looking good... maybe Christie, to be honest... possibly Ryan... I cant see the rest of them holding up to that race.

Thank god for the Republican primary process...a process designed to deliver unto the Democratic Party the Oval Office for ,at the least,the next cycle ,maybe two.

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 116
RE: Republicans who can save the party in 2016 - 6/25/2013 8:32:58 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Try here....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Bork_Supreme_Court_nomination

Btw, the source for the reference doesnt seem to exist.

Strange cause I read it just before posting it.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 117
RE: Republicans who can save the party in 2016 - 6/25/2013 8:35:14 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

quote:

And NPR is a well known right wing organization.

Far from it. But at least the NPR piece was accessible.

Just found it for the 3rd time this evening
wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Bork

(in reply to dcnovice)
Profile   Post #: 118
RE: Republicans who can save the party in 2016 - 6/25/2013 11:12:25 PM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline
quote:

Just found it for the 3rd time this evening
wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Bork

The Wiki link works fine. But I haven't been able to access the WSJ article cited as a source therein.


_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 119
RE: Republicans who can save the party in 2016 - 6/26/2013 1:01:27 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

IF it is true.....Bork as a potential was not unknown on the Hill... they knew what they were getting with him.. and they were ready.

If you want true incivility check out Thad Stevens 1859.
That was perpetrated by a Democrat and a slave holder to boot.
If you thing that today is uncivil read about the John Quincy Adams administration.


What does my post have to do with Stevens?


_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 120
Page:   <<   < prev  3 4 5 [6] 7   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Republicans who can save the party in 2016 Page: <<   < prev  3 4 5 [6] 7   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109