RE: The dumbest interpretation (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


dcnovice -> RE: The dumbest interpretation (7/6/2013 12:02:26 PM)

Same here.




GotSteel -> RE: The dumbest interpretation (7/6/2013 1:31:44 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
read Martin Luther's writings on Jews if you don't believe me.


chatterbox24, this is what he's talking about:

quote:

ORIGINAL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Jews_and_Their_Lies
On the Jews and Their Lies (German: Von den Jüden und iren Lügen; in modern spelling Von den Juden und ihren Lügen) is a 65,000-word antisemitic treatise written in 1543 by the German Reformation leader Martin Luther.

In the treatise, Luther describes Jews as a "base, whoring people, that is, no people of God, and their boast of lineage, circumcision, and law must be accounted as filth."[1] Luther wrote that they are "full of the devil's feces ... which they wallow in like swine,"[2] and the synagogue is an "incorrigible whore and an evil slut".[3]

In the first ten sections of the treatise, Luther expounds, at considerable length, upon his views concerning Jews and Judaism and how these compare against Christians and Christianity. Following this exposition, Section XI of the treatise advises Christians to carry out seven remedial actions. These are

for Jewish synagogues and schools to be burned to the ground, and the remnants buried out of sight;
for houses owned by Jews to be likewise razed, and the owners made to live in agricultural outbuildings;
for their religious writings to be taken away;
for rabbis to be forbidden to preach, and to be executed if they do;
for safe conduct on the roads to be abolished for Jews;
for usury to be prohibited, and for all silver and gold to be removed and "put aside for safekeeping"; and
for the Jewish population to be put to work as agricultural slave laborers.[4]

The prevailing scholarly view[5] since the Second World War is that the treatise exercised a major and persistent influence on Germany's attitude toward its Jewish citizens in the centuries between the Reformation and the Holocaust. Four hundred years after it was written, the Nazis displayed On the Jews and Their Lies during Nuremberg rallies, and the city of Nuremberg presented a first edition to Julius Streicher, editor of the Nazi newspaper Der Stürmer, the newspaper describing it as the most radically antisemitic tract ever published.[6]




OrionTheWolf -> RE: The dumbest interpretation (7/6/2013 1:36:21 PM)

Word choice and when people decide to reply indicates differently. I was unaware that anyone in these forums were trying to force anything. I am specifically talking about the replies directed to other members when they offer an opinion of their belief. It sometimes seems like the "Atheist Great Commission" to get people to not believe.


quote:

ORIGINAL: SimplyMichael


quote:

ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf

~FR~

Why is it so important to Atheists that people of faith stop believing? That is the first thing that jumps to mind when I see discussions like this.


No, I dont care what idiocy people choose to believe, I just start caring when they want public policy based on that idiocy. Like Texas or Iran.




OrionTheWolf -> RE: The dumbest interpretation (7/6/2013 1:38:23 PM)

I don't see that though. I don't see Theist making derogatory topics about those that don't believe. I don't see any Theist insulting those that do not believe. Maybe I missed them.

Could you possibly point some out in this topic?


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf

~FR~

Why is it so important to Atheists that people of faith stop believing? That is the first thing that jumps to mind when I see discussions like this.

Why is it so important to Theists that people of no faith start believing? That is the first thing that jumps to mind when I see discussions like this.




OrionTheWolf -> RE: The dumbest interpretation (7/6/2013 1:46:07 PM)

Maybe it is best because your insults do not lead to any solutions.

Christians is as much a broad label as BDSM is.

Not sure what was made up other than a single poster said they loved science. Someone can love science and still be a believer, no matter what insults or demeaning things you want to say or believe of them.

Some Atheist demean and insult as much as some Christians do back to them. Tit for tat seems rather childish for a group that says to use logic in these things.

quote:

ORIGINAL: SimplyMichael

Yep, clearly christians are science loving, I mean Galileo was celebrated by the church as was Darwin...

Its so fun when you just make shit up. Okay, never should,have,risen...to the bait. I will let the meeting of the flat earth society resume.





GotSteel -> RE: The dumbest interpretation (7/6/2013 2:10:11 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf
Christians is as much a broad label as BDSM is.


Dude, seriously, like everybody gets that not all Christians are the same. As someone who's actually lived under a rock, yeah even I get it. So when you're reading what people say you should probably presume that they understand that Christians aren't all the same. Hey maybe that could even lead to something other than the dumbest possible interpretation of our words.




freedomdwarf1 -> RE: The dumbest interpretation (7/6/2013 3:01:19 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel

quote:

ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf
Christians is as much a broad label as BDSM is.


Dude, seriously, like everybody gets that not all Christians are the same. As someone who's actually lived under a rock, yeah even I get it. So when you're reading what people say you should probably presume that they understand that Christians aren't all the same. Hey maybe that could even lead to something other than the dumbest possible interpretation of our words.

This is probably quite true.

However, due to the way certain things are presented to the world at large, many people are prone to use a generalised label to encompass everyone within the group.

For instance -
How many Jihadists are not muslim?
How many suicide bombers are not muslim?
How many non-muslims declare a fatwa or death sentence on someone for things that are often trivial to most others?
How many non-muslims would rather die of cold than burn a holy book to stay alive? You can always buy another Qoran but you can't buy another life.
How many other major religions have a 'be one of us or you deserve to die' type of ideaology?
So, many people say that muslims will never integrate into western society because of their beliefs and to a great extent that is true; but we all know that isn't true of all muslims.

I didn't mean to pick on the islamics - it just popped in my head as I was typing.
Just as another example, take a look at what happen in Egypt.
Morsi got elected because he stood on a platform of equality for ALL people and religions.
What happened? He was slowly turning it into an Islamic state that the majority of people didn't want.
Now they have removed him from power, his followers are screaming that its an injustice and they are being deprived of their rights against the others.

Christians and other major faiths (and many atheists too) are just as bad in their own ways for many things.
The christian crusades are a prime example.

I think it's inevitable that many will often use a very wide brush to tarr other people with.




MrBukani -> RE: The dumbest interpretation (7/6/2013 3:43:38 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

All right then mister "I defend Christianity with a passion but deny having any faith at all"...

Stop making shit up.

K.


All right then mister "I defend Christianity with a passion but deny having any faith at all" why do you think other people hold religious beliefs in the face of the complete and utter lack of any supporting evidence? Try making a positive claim, no links you can deny agreeing with later, no snark just a straight statement of your opinion, I dare you.



I see the pattern too. While everybody came into the 'Why do you believe' thread with their own statements, this is your entrance at post 14.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

Science. It goes back further than Religion and is provable. end quote.

Science goes back farther than religion? On what planet? And when did Science deliver a negative finding on the existence of a greater reality?

Everything we know about Nature is in accord with the idea that the fundamental process of Nature lies outside space-time ~Henry Stapp

K.

So if people assume you stand somewhere it's only because you don't tell people where you stand.
Why do you do that?
I think it's because you don't like to be wrong.
So what you do is react only, but not act.
Let's use a difficult word so you understand
That's your perogative as it is ours to make the shit up about you, cause you are not makin it clear where you stand.
So we have to guess you believe in a greater reality wich is nothing more or less then something divine or god.

So... do you defend your own reality or just attack the reality of other people?

Take your time, but I think you will give a negative again like DomKen says.







chatterbox24 -> RE: The dumbest interpretation (7/6/2013 3:53:07 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
read Martin Luther's writings on Jews if you don't believe me.


chatterbox24, this is what he's talking about:

quote:

ORIGINAL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Jews_and_Their_Lies
On the Jews and Their Lies (German: Von den Jüden und iren Lügen; in modern spelling Von den Juden und ihren Lügen) is a 65,000-word antisemitic treatise written in 1543 by the German Reformation leader Martin Luther.

In the treatise, Luther describes Jews as a "base, whoring people, that is, no people of God, and their boast of lineage, circumcision, and law must be accounted as filth."[1] Luther wrote that they are "full of the devil's feces ... which they wallow in like swine,"[2] and the synagogue is an "incorrigible whore and an evil slut".[3]

In the first ten sections of the treatise, Luther expounds, at considerable length, upon his views concerning Jews and Judaism and how these compare against Christians and Christianity. Following this exposition, Section XI of the treatise advises Christians to carry out seven remedial actions. These are

for Jewish synagogues and schools to be burned to the ground, and the remnants buried out of sight;
for houses owned by Jews to be likewise razed, and the owners made to live in agricultural outbuildings;
for their religious writings to be taken away;
for rabbis to be forbidden to preach, and to be executed if they do;
for safe conduct on the roads to be abolished for Jews;
for usury to be prohibited, and for all silver and gold to be removed and "put aside for safekeeping"; and
for the Jewish population to be put to work as agricultural slave laborers.[4]

The prevailing scholarly view[5] since the Second World War is that the treatise exercised a major and persistent influence on Germany's attitude toward its Jewish citizens in the centuries between the Reformation and the Holocaust. Four hundred years after it was written, the Nazis displayed On the Jews and Their Lies during Nuremberg rallies, and the city of Nuremberg presented a first edition to Julius Streicher, editor of the Nazi newspaper Der Stürmer, the newspaper describing it as the most radically antisemitic tract ever published.[6]



This man was not a man of God. He was absorbed with his own power, and was in simple terms consumed by evil. Just as Hitler was.
Without going into a religious good Christian bad Christian debate, I will only say I believe in three entities, God, Jesus, and the holy spirit. Jesus himself was a jew, and his own people persecuted him. If you believe the bible, when he rose again, it was not only for his own people but all people in walks faiths and religions, to give forgiveness for our sins and lead us to eternal life through those teachings and messages of God. It is through love not hate that we are enlightened. Faith is not to be questioned, one is only to have it, because it is beyond human understanding. People of God have died horrible deaths or suffered persecution because of that simple belief, or being different, and not conforming. The world of hate, and misled people or cowards let this happen. Evil invades anywhere you let it, including churches or men who want to take God words rearrange them and make them vile rules they have made by misinterpretations to harm others. Its the heart of people that are seen.
IT is never promised for it to be an easy life, and as you can see it can be tragic, nor is perfection expected. God who some people call ( higher being) or other choice names want people to try to live as closely as you can to the moral codes. If you mess up, you are still loved though always hoping you will find your way back. (and he already knows whether you do or not because he knows all things)
This is how I believe far from science, and logical thinking. But Christians can like science too! We like a lot of things, including sometimes things we shouldn't do! Just human.

All my own view, but there are a few who believe it too.




DomKen -> RE: The dumbest interpretation (7/6/2013 4:09:55 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24


quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
read Martin Luther's writings on Jews if you don't believe me.


chatterbox24, this is what he's talking about:

quote:

ORIGINAL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Jews_and_Their_Lies
On the Jews and Their Lies (German: Von den Jüden und iren Lügen; in modern spelling Von den Juden und ihren Lügen) is a 65,000-word antisemitic treatise written in 1543 by the German Reformation leader Martin Luther.

In the treatise, Luther describes Jews as a "base, whoring people, that is, no people of God, and their boast of lineage, circumcision, and law must be accounted as filth."[1] Luther wrote that they are "full of the devil's feces ... which they wallow in like swine,"[2] and the synagogue is an "incorrigible whore and an evil slut".[3]

In the first ten sections of the treatise, Luther expounds, at considerable length, upon his views concerning Jews and Judaism and how these compare against Christians and Christianity. Following this exposition, Section XI of the treatise advises Christians to carry out seven remedial actions. These are

for Jewish synagogues and schools to be burned to the ground, and the remnants buried out of sight;
for houses owned by Jews to be likewise razed, and the owners made to live in agricultural outbuildings;
for their religious writings to be taken away;
for rabbis to be forbidden to preach, and to be executed if they do;
for safe conduct on the roads to be abolished for Jews;
for usury to be prohibited, and for all silver and gold to be removed and "put aside for safekeeping"; and
for the Jewish population to be put to work as agricultural slave laborers.[4]

The prevailing scholarly view[5] since the Second World War is that the treatise exercised a major and persistent influence on Germany's attitude toward its Jewish citizens in the centuries between the Reformation and the Holocaust. Four hundred years after it was written, the Nazis displayed On the Jews and Their Lies during Nuremberg rallies, and the city of Nuremberg presented a first edition to Julius Streicher, editor of the Nazi newspaper Der Stürmer, the newspaper describing it as the most radically antisemitic tract ever published.[6]



This man was not a man of God. He was absorbed with his own power, and was in simple terms consumed by evil. Just as Hitler was.
Without going into a religious good Christian bad Christian debate, I will only say I believe in three entities, God, Jesus, and the holy spirit. Jesus himself was a jew, and his own people persecuted him. If you believe the bible, when he rose again, it was not only for his own people but all people in walks faiths and religions, to give forgiveness for our sins and lead us to eternal life through those teachings and messages of God. It is through love not hate that we are enlightened. Faith is not to be questioned, one is only to have it, because it is beyond human understanding. People of God have died horrible deaths or suffered persecution because of that simple belief, or being different, and not conforming. The world of hate, and misled people or cowards let this happen. Evil invades anywhere you let it, including churches or men who want to take God words rearrange them and make them vile rules they have made by misinterpretations to harm others. Its the heart of people that are seen.
IT is never promised for it to be an easy life, and as you can see it can be tragic, nor is perfection expected. God who some people call ( higher being) or other choice names want people to try to live as closely as you can to the moral codes. If you mess up, you are still loved though always hoping you will find your way back. (and he already knows whether you do or not because he knows all things)
This is how I believe far from science, and logical thinking. But Christians can like science too! We like a lot of things, including sometimes things we shouldn't do! Just human.

All my own view, but there are a few who believe it too.

If you are a Christian and are a Protestant your sect ultimately derives from Martin Luther who is widely viewed as a very holy man. His anti-Semitism was the standard of the day and encouraged by the Roman church as well.




Kirata -> RE: The dumbest interpretation (7/6/2013 4:25:35 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

Issuing "positive statements" about things I don't know and can't possibly know (see above) is your schtick, not mine.

You cannot make a positive statement about your own beliefs? Are you schizophrenic?

Wow. I have no idea where that came from, unless you're speaking from personal experience. Do you need to believe things you don't know and can't possibly know in order to keep yourself from going crazy? I mean, I'm just asking, but it certainly would explain a lot.

K.




DomKen -> RE: The dumbest interpretation (7/6/2013 4:26:23 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf

I don't see that though. I don't see Theist making derogatory topics about those that don't believe. I don't see any Theist insulting those that do not believe. Maybe I missed them.

Could you possibly point some out in this topic?

On this thread sure
http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4488028
http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4489196

As to making entire topics
http://www.collarchat.com/m_4306358/mpage_1/tm.htm
http://www.collarchat.com/m_3449811/mpage_1/tm.htm
http://www.collarchat.com/m_2792449/mpage_1/tm.htm




Rule -> RE: The dumbest interpretation (7/6/2013 4:37:06 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24
quote:

ORIGINAL:
In the first ten sections of the treatise, Luther expounds, at considerable length, upon his views concerning Jews and Judaism and how these compare against Christians and Christianity.

This man was not a man of God. He was absorbed with his own power, and was in simple terms consumed by evil. Just as Hitler was.

Have you read his entire treatise?

quote:

Judge not, that you be not judged.
Matthew 7:1


quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24
If you believe the bible, when he rose again, it was not only for his own people but all people in walks faiths and religions, to give forgiveness for our sins and lead us to eternal life through those teachings and messages of God.

For all people who have or want their progeny to be born with the Holy Spirit. But everybody else are a lost cause.




tazzygirl -> RE: The dumbest interpretation (7/6/2013 4:43:09 PM)

Unless they had defibrillators and crash carts and cardiac monitors, ect ect ect, how did he rise from the dead?




GotSteel -> RE: The dumbest interpretation (7/6/2013 4:47:35 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
If you are a Christian and are a Protestant your sect ultimately derives from Martin Luther who is widely viewed as a very holy man. His anti-Semitism was the standard of the day and encouraged by the Roman church as well.


I was raised as a Congregationalist Christian and was most certainly taught that he was a great man in that context.





DomKen -> RE: The dumbest interpretation (7/6/2013 4:51:49 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

Issuing "positive statements" about things I don't know and can't possibly know (see above) is your schtick, not mine.

You cannot make a positive statement about your own beliefs? Are you schizophrenic?

Wow. I have no idea where that came from, unless you're speaking from personal experience. Do you need to believe things you don't know and can't possibly know in order to keep yourself from going crazy? I mean, I'm just asking, but it certainly would explain a lot.

K.


You wrote
quote:

Issuing "positive statements" about things I don't know and can't possibly know (see above) is your schtick, not mine.

In response to a request that you actually make a positive statement about what you believe. If you don't and can't possibly know what you believe I have to wonder what is wrong with you.

And again, you could get me to stop accusing you of something that clearly annoys you greatly by simply stating in a clear declarative statement what your beliefs are, I dare you.




MrBukani -> RE: The dumbest interpretation (7/6/2013 5:28:18 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic


quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel

When it comes to criticism of certain subjects such as Christianity those not wanting to hear the criticism have a tendency to come to absurdly ridiculous interpretations of what's being said.




I think the same could be said of adherents to any belief system, GotSteel. I get much the same sort of response when I say that atheism is ultimately just as much a faith-based religion as the most radical group of fundies you might round up from anywhere.


It's a pretty good theory about atheism except for one thing. The core of atheism is that the person does not believe, not that the person believes.
Take a simple dog. The dog does not believe because it doesn't know the concept of god.
So it's like somebody says, hey I just saw a pig fly. And the person next to him says I don't believe that. In return the believer says: You believe it's not true.
That's not what he said. He said, I don't believe, not I believe that's bogus.




Rule -> RE: The dumbest interpretation (7/6/2013 5:39:28 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl
Unless they had defibrillators and crash carts and cardiac monitors, ect ect ect, how did he rise from the dead?

He did. And you should not ask so much.

Have you ever asked a magician why there is no pool of blood under the box after he sawed his assistant in two parts? Did he answer?




njlauren -> RE: The dumbest interpretation (7/6/2013 5:50:06 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: SimplyMichael

Its just that unlike most christians, I am not deeply ignorant of history, science, or reality. And as for the insipid "but I am a good christian" dont forget the nazi and the french who drove the jews out were all devout christians too.

be careful, the people in Denmark who helped their Jewish population escape, the people all over Europe who did what they could to try and save the Jews, help them (Raul Wallenberg, for example) were Christian, and there were people like Neimoller and Bonhoeffer who risked their lives and often lost it, trying to do the right thing, and there were Catholic priests, nuns and lay people who laid down their lives to try and resist the Nazis, and all were Christian. That doesn't exonerate the organized religion, despite all the tries by Catholic apologists, the Vatican and the then Pope, Pius XII, not to mention the German Catholic church, were blinded by their own anti semitism and their vision of Germany as a Christian bulwark against the Godless Russians, that they basically did nothing, and what little they did was too little, too late. There was a serious proposal on the table from the Germans to settle the Jews in the US, but it didn't happen, to a large deal because religious leaders like Spellman in NY (head of NY archdiocese) and the bible thumpers from down south and the midwest, threatened political destruction on the government if they settled jews in any kind of numbers here, so I am not making excuses.

And no, I don't put out the dodge that people who did these things really weren't Christians, because obviously they weren't following Christ's teachings. While I cannot argue that, I will argue that the people, and their clergy and leaders, didn't seem to think so, at least not enough to do something. In Denmark, when the Nazis issued their decree that jews wear the yellow star, a large percentage of the population, including the head of the Lutheran Church, the King of Denmark and so forth, put on the yellow star of David and later helped the Jews escape. Unfortunately, most churches stayed silent, the Pope issued 16 encyclicals against actions of the Nazis they deplored, like euthanizing handicapped people and children, but never uttered one word in the Jews defense (in part because the Vatican was led by a bunch of people who were quite anti semitic, Pius XII in writings called them dogs, claimed that Germany when they passed the Nuremberg laws were 'protecting Christian Europe', and even when knowledge of the gas chambers and mass executions came out, the Pope said nothing (and how the church could even think of canonizing someone like Pius XII I don't know; saints are supposed to lead exemplary lives, Pius XII didn't, his record was shameful, whatever the reasons, and his actions after the war was worse, he knew and approved of efforts by Catholic priests in Germany to help sought after war criminals get away under Vatican diplomatic passports), and even after WWII refused to speak out about the Holocaust, did nothing to the church people accused of aiding and abetting the final solution, and while he excommunicated all practicing communists, the church never excommunicated one Catholic accused of war crimes and even convicted of them....

Don't confuse what church leaders do with Christianity, as history has shown they often act more like mobsters and corrupt politicians (think of the current worldwide abuse scandal in the RC), Christianity itself isn't evil, what men do with it may be, but at its core it is not, and a lot of great things were inspired by Christians, the abolitionist movement came from Quakers and congregationalist Christians and unitarians(unfortunately, that wasn't universal, the mainstream churches, the RC, THe Episcopal and so forth,either stayed quiet or supported it,sadly), the civil rights movement caught fire in the churches, and these days there are plenty of churches that are fighting against the evangelical/GOP attempt to forge religion and state together, who support GLBT people and so forth, and in the Catholic Church only about 20% of their membership agrees with the vatican on issues like gays and so forth, and most of the ones who toe the party line are old, many Catholics support LGBT people, while their leadership is more akin to the religious leaders in Europe during the holocaust.

Christianity is a diverse religion, and the idea that every Christian is this evil monster wanting to force their religion on others is a false one, lots of Christians, even evangelical ones, recognize the right to self determination and aren't the obnoxious "you going to hell, boy, if you don't believe in the true Jesus as written about in scripture" or worse.




MrBukani -> RE: The dumbest interpretation (7/6/2013 5:50:50 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl
Unless they had defibrillators and crash carts and cardiac monitors, ect ect ect, how did he rise from the dead?

He did. And you should not ask so much.

Have you ever asked a magician why there is no pool of blood under the box after he sawed his assistant in two parts? Did he answer?

Sawing a Person in Half - Magic's Secrets 1

simsalabim[:D]
google is your best friend.




Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875