|
Edwynn -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/16/2013 3:26:11 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Kana
quote:
ORIGINAL: Marc2b
quote:
You see post history as you want... I see it differently....
http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4322857
I fail to see how your example (which deals with sexism, not racism) disproves my point that Fargle, despite his outlandish rhetoric, is anti-racist (and anti-sexist for that matter).
I think that people who constantly make things about race, whether they are or not, are racists. I don't think I'm alone in that here.
This isn't a racial case.In never was.never should have been seen as such.
The jury sure didn't:
"While the George Zimmerman second-degree murder trial was viewed as racially charged, an anonymous juror told CNN's Anderson Cooper Monday night that the issue of race didn't come up during deliberations.
"I thought all of us did not think race played a role" in 17-year-old Trayvon Martin's death, a juror known as B37 told Cooper"
But a certain embedded element with the media and here seem to be obsessed with race (In fargles case,lynching) and have done everything within their power to make this a racial case.
Which is bizarre,because as has been beaten to death,Z is half latin,maybe has a black grandma-how white folk got dragged into this is beyond me...
I think that there is still this law on the books in Cali that a woman is prohibited from wearing her bathrobe while driving a car.
You keep making all this Hullabaloo about the law, and how the jury upheld the law in place as it is, at this moment.
If you know anything of history, anything at all, then you might be acquainted with the instance of the law and actual justice only having coincidental coincidence at various points throughout history.
Even at this time.
"Law" is the most permeable of things in a society.
Considering a verifiably mentally unastable armed nut case's shooting of a teenager as this same society's intended implementation of "justice" is another matter entirely.
|
|
|
|
