RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Edwynn -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/16/2013 6:54:06 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kana
quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn

I think that there is still this law on the books in Cali that a woman is prohibited from wearing her bathrobe while driving a car.

You keep making all this Hullabaloo about the law, and how the jury upheld the law in place as it is, at this moment.

If you know anything of history, anything at all, then you might be acquainted with the instance of the law and actual justice only having coincidental coincidence at various points throughout history.

Even at this time.

"Law" is the most permeable of things in a society.

Considering a verifiably mentally unastable armed nut case's shooting of a teenager as this same society's intended implementation of "justice" is another matter entirely.


quote:

quote:

Errr,I see this through a legal perspective because it's, you know, a criminal case.


So then, not a case of justice, nor any interest in that aspect whatsoever. Thanks for confirmation of my supposition.

quote:

In fact,my main interest in it at this point is because I'm watching the justice system be subverted in a way that's incredible.


OK, but I thought that I had just heard input from you and others that the jury did the only right thing here. How does the jury rendering a verdict such as matches your expectations so perfectly constitute this justice system being "subverted"?

Are you alright, man?

quote:

And where does the verifiable mental unstable come from?


From police records.

http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/03/27/10894561-zimmerman-accused-of-domestic-violence-fighting-with-a-police-officer?lite


quote:

But you know perfectly well that Fargle was being sarcastic and using black and white as synonyms for inferior and superior because that is how racists tend to think.


Which, according to your theory that we are all racists (one with which I pretty much agree,purely BTW) means that we all think that way,including you.

This sweeping generalization, man, it's painting with too broad a brush. It lessens your argument. And defending fargle is a pipedream, the man is full scale looney tunes. It's like trying to defend Manson's sanity at a board hearing-just a truly hopeless cause :-)


Aside from my pointing out that Fargle is (indisputably) the biggest bigot on the planet on numerous occasions previously, the above post or its quote as proposed have nothing whatsoever to do with anything I myself ever said.

Your confuzzlement therein explains a lot.







dcnovice -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/16/2013 7:02:01 PM)

FR

Saw this on Facebook today. Not sure I totally agree, but the perspective intrigued me.

Dear George Zimmerman... For the rest of your life you are now going to feel what its like to be a Black man in America.

You will feel people stare at you. Judging you for what you think are unfair reasons. You will lose out on getting jobs for something you feel is outside of your control. You will believe yourself to be an upstanding citizen and wonder why people choose to not see that. People will cross the street when they see you coming. They will call you hurtful names. It will drive you so insane some days that you'll want to scream at the top of your lungs. But you will have to wake up the next day, put on firm look and push through life.

I bet you never thought that by shooting a black male you'd end up inheriting all of his struggles. Enjoy your "freedom."




Phydeaux -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/16/2013 7:02:26 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux
Ah .. we've now located the entire source of the problem. You don't understand what 'evidence' means. Zimmerman breathing heavy might be evidence of being out of shape - but it is conjecture (guessing, wild-assed speculation) to call it pursuit.

Zimmerman admitted to pursuing Martin on the call to the police. He also admitted after he killed Martin that he didn't stop when the dispatcher told him to.





A following not pursuing

B if Zimmerman should have ignored police advice to carry a gun as you said how does ignoring advice not to follow make him a murderer?



Uh Duh: Because

1. Following is not murdering. They have two different definitions. Look them up if unclear. Zimmerman had a right to be there, just as M did.
2a. The dispcher didn't tell him to stop FOLLOWING M; he said "we don't need you to do that".
3. By parsing your words, you are trying to suggest that Zimmerman stalked Martin and then shot him. There is no evidence to support that. None.
4. The correct line of events is

4a. Zimmerman calls in martin.
4b. At some point Zimmerman 'loses' martin; and the police dispatcher tells him we don't need you to follow him. Zimmerman says "OK" and heads back to his truck.
4c. The alteration occurs.
This is what the preponderance of the evidence suggest, as confirmed by the jury verdict.
5. Self Defense. By definition its not murder.
6. Reasonable doubt. Even if what you said were true, the prosecutor has to be able to prove it. He came nowhere near that standard.

Anyone remember Bernie Goetz?





Edwynn -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/16/2013 7:18:51 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kana
quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn

I think that there is still this law on the books in Cali that a woman is prohibited from wearing her bathrobe while driving a car.

You keep making all this Hullabaloo about the law, and how the jury upheld the law in place as it is, at this moment.

If you know anything of history, anything at all, then you might be acquainted with the instance of the law and actual justice only having coincidental coincidence at various points throughout history.

Even at this time.

"Law" is the most permeable of things in a society.

Considering a verifiably mentally unastable armed nut case's shooting of a teenager as this same society's intended implementation of "justice" is another matter entirely.


quote:

quote:

Errr,I see this through a legal perspective because it's, you know, a criminal case.


So then, not a case of justice, nor any interest in that aspect whatsoever. Thanks for confirmation of my supposition.

quote:

In fact,my main interest in it at this point is because I'm watching the justice system be subverted in a way that's incredible.


OK, but I thought that I had just heard input from you and others that the jury did the only right thing here. How does the jury rendering a verdict such as matches your expectations so perfectly constitute this justice system being "subverted"?

Are you alright, man?

quote:

And where does the verifiable mental unstable come from?


From police records.

http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/03/27/10894561-zimmerman-accused-of-domestic-violence-fighting-with-a-police-officer?lite


quote:

But you know perfectly well that Fargle was being sarcastic and using black and white as synonyms for inferior and superior because that is how racists tend to think.


Which, according to your theory that we are all racists (one with which I pretty much agree,purely BTW) means that we all think that way,including you.

This sweeping generalization, man, it's painting with too broad a brush. It lessens your argument. And defending fargle is a pipedream, the man is full scale looney tunes. It's like trying to defend Manson's sanity at a board hearing-just a truly hopeless cause :-)


Aside from my pointing out that Fargle is (indisputably) the biggest bigot on the planet on numerous occasions previously, the above post or its quote as proposed have nothing whatsoever to do with anything I myself ever said.

Your confuzzlement therein explains a lot.








Phydeaux -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/16/2013 7:26:36 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn

From police records.

http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/03/27/10894561-zimmerman-accused-of-domestic-violence-fighting-with-a-police-officer?lite




Ok. So you made up yet another claim about a link thats is a waste of time to debunk. You know, if Zimmerman wanted to, he could probably sue you.
There is no evidence in that link of mental instability. You just flat out made it up.

Do you understand that an allegation of ANYTHING has no probitive value unless corroborated. In other words I could allege that you were a lazy homosexual that like to wear ladies underwear and smoke pipes while eating corn in public.

Absent evidence IT MEANS NOTHING.




Kana -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/16/2013 7:33:15 PM)

quote:

OK, but I thought that I had just heard input from you and others that the jury did the only right thing here. How does the jury rendering a verdict such as matches your expectations so perfectly constitute this justice system being "subverted"?

Are you alright, man?


Err, never said that.In fact,I've never used the words "right thing" in discussing this case once.I don't see a right thing in this. I see a fucked up tragedy where two people made mistakes and one ended up dead and the others life is ruined.
What I am on record as saying, consistently, is that I don't see how any reading of the facts removes reasonable doubt. I thought the case was flawed from the start, should never have been prosecuted (The chief agrees. In an interview he discusses how he would get a daily call from a different council member demanding an arrest. Each time he would explain due process, that police agencies have to have pesky little things like evidence, and then the next day he would get a new call. That should scare piss out of you.), that the prosecutors not only fucked up a dog of a case but that they may well have tried to hide evidence, that they overcharged, that they've fired a whistleblower who came forward with the evidence that they attempted to conceal, and that justice, and the justice system, has been subverted to an alarming degree to appease shrill political opportunists.
Moreover,I've never taken any side .Not Z's.Not M's. I've stated that my official position is that I dunno what happened that night, you dunno what happened,nobody but God, Z and M know, and that anyone who says otherwise is a self proven liar.
What we do know is that what evidence there is supported Z's version of events, that his life has been run through a microscopic investigation few could undergo, and that a jury of his peers found him not guilty.

But right thing? Nah man.There ain't no right thing here. As of now, we all lost.
quote:

From police records.

http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/03/27/10894561-zimmerman-accused-of-domestic-violence-fighting-with-a-police-officer?lite

How does a speeding ticket, a youthful drunken altercation with a cop and dual restraining orders (one for the man,one for the woman-sadly, not an uncommon thing nowadays in a relationship gone bad) make for "verified mental unstable?"
If they prosecution thought that was the case, they would have pounded that baby into the ground. Further, you can bet your ass that if there were any indication Z was truly verifiably mentally unstable" the anti-gun lobby would be blasting that fact from every corner, attacking Florida's CCW statutes and all gun legalization in general.
Instead, their silence is deafening.
You're making mountains out of molehills, finding things that aren't there. Again, the feds sent 45, count em, 45 agents to go through Z's life with a fine tooth comb. They came back empty handed.
You're chasing things that just aren't there.

ETA-Sorry bout tagging you with the Fargle quote Edwynn.I cut that from one of MarcB's posts and missed getting the name too. Not trying to implicate you in any way.My apologies :-)




Kana -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/16/2013 7:42:36 PM)

quote:

In other words I could allege that you were a lazy homosexual that like to wear ladies underwear and smoke pipes while eating corn in public.

Hey.Remember where we are.That could be his kink!




Edwynn -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/16/2013 7:43:58 PM)


If you read the police record concerning GZ, and read the logs of his 46 calls to the police, understand that he was kicked out of community college because of being such a danger to the other students, etc., and still think that this is someone we want to have as implementing "justice" in our society, then the fact that you concur with this explains a f*ck of a lot about what's seriously wrong with this society.

If you think that slapping his ex-fiance around on numerous occasions is such a minor matter, and actually promotes his interest as 'neighborhood watchman,' how about if I just slap you around, bitch?


Yeah, let's see how that works.

I'm hired now, right?





Powergamz1 -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/16/2013 7:49:33 PM)

quote:

Again, the feds sent 45, count em, 45 agents to go through Z's life with a fine tooth comb. They came back empty handed.


Things that make you go hmmmm.




Kana -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/16/2013 7:49:46 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn


If you read the police record concerning GZ, and read the logs of his 46 calls to the police, and still think that this is someone we want to have as implementing "justice" in our society, then the fact that you concur with this explains a f*ck of a lot about what's seriously wrong with this society.

I never said I concur.You're putting words in my mouth. I said I saw no way any jury could find him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.In fact, I think my exacts words were something like, "A second year law student could try this case. If a real lawyer tries it and can't raise reasonable doubt, they should be disbarred for incompetence."
It was open and shut. That ain't just my opinion.Di Maio, a defense witness with all the reasons in the world to spend lots of time investigating,billed Z's team only $2,400, six hours at $400 per. When the prosecution asked him why so little time,he said that forensically it was a simple straightforward case.
Most importantly, there was no evidence or substantial eyewitness to disprove Z's version of events. That was the critical thing. There was enough reasonable doubt to drive a squadron of Panzer tanks through.

And again, don't you think that if Z were that dangerous, the Feds report would have mentioned that little tidbit somewhere. Or are you suggesting that Obama and Holder conspired to withhold evidence that may have implicated Z? Please tell me so, because that would simply be too juicy for words...




tazzygirl -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/16/2013 7:53:15 PM)

quote:

Di Maio, a defense witness with all the reasons in the world to spend lots of time investigating,billed Z's team only $2,400, six hours at $400 per. When the prosecution asked him why so little time,he said that forensically it was a simple straightforward case.


Considering his explanations on many things were extremely simplistic... ahem... he didnt deserve that much.




BBBTBW -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/16/2013 7:53:22 PM)

The sad thing about this and the racial tension it has caused is that, IF this was a kid of ANY race that he killed, people would still be up in arms. However, because it was a black kid, black people automatically become the enemy because we are angry that a killer got off. Regardless of the reasons Mr. Zimmerman gave for killing Mr. Martin, Mr. Zimmerman caused the altercation by not doing what he was told by the 911 operator and taking matters into his own hands. Putting race and motive aside it seems very few people are considering that maybe Mr. Martin felt threatened because he was being followed in the dark. Fortunately or unfortunately he wasn't armed and couldn't effectively protect himself from a vigilante with a gun.




tazzygirl -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/16/2013 7:55:51 PM)

I agree. I never thought the issue was one of race between the two.




Powergamz1 -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/16/2013 7:56:41 PM)

The only thing that could have helped the prosecution's case, would have been for them to quit asking questions.

People think Corey was taken off this case? I think she threw her team under the bus.

The only way this was winnable would have been with the West Memphis 3 jury and judge.



quote:

ORIGINAL: Kana

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn


If you read the police record concerning GZ, and read the logs of his 46 calls to the police, and still think that this is someone we want to have as implementing "justice" in our society, then the fact that you concur with this explains a f*ck of a lot about what's seriously wrong with this society.

I never said I concur.You're putting words in my mouth. I said I saw no way any jury could find him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.In fact, I think my exacts words were something like, "A second year law student could try this case. If a real lawyer tries it and can't raise reasonable doubt, they should be disbarred for incompetence."
It was open and shut. That ain't just my opinion.Di Maio, a defense witness with all the reasons in the world to spend lots of time investigating,billed Z's team only $2,400, six hours at $400 per. When the prosecution asked him why so little time,he said that forensically it was a simple straightforward case.
Most importantly, there was no evidence or substantial eyewitness to disprove Z's version of events. That was the critical thing. There was enough reasonable doubt to drive a squadron of Panzer tanks through.

And again, don't you think that if Z were that dangerous, the Feds report would have mentioned that little tidbit somewhere. Or are you suggesting that Obama and Holder conspired to withhold evidence that may have implicated Z? Please tell me so, because that would simply be too juicy for words...





Kana -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/16/2013 8:01:36 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BBBTBW

The sad thing about this and the racial tension it has caused is that, IF this was a kid of ANY race that he killed, people would still be up in arms. However, because it was a black kid, black people automatically become the enemy because we are angry that a killer got off. Regardless of the reasons Mr. Zimmerman gave for killing Mr. Martin, Mr. Zimmerman caused the altercation by not doing what he was told by the 911 operator and taking matters into his own hands. Putting race and motive aside it seems very few people are considering that maybe Mr. Martin felt threatened because he was being followed in the dark. Fortunately or unfortunately he wasn't armed and couldn't effectively protect himself from a vigilante with a gun.


1-We don't know that Z "took the matter into his own hands."All available evidence suggests that he was attacked. To suggest that Z acted in a vigilante fashion is to manufacture false facts.
2-Last I checked, as far as I know, in America there are lots of ways to respond to someone following you,none of which involve assault (or, to placate the whackos and hairsplitters, A&B). You can go home (The easiest and best solution), call the cops (What most citizens would do), try to lose the pursuer, or just go about your damn business (Cuz, you know, it's a public area-Z has as much right to be there as M.And vice versa).
The one thing you don't do is assault the person.The second you do that you've shifted from possible victim to, depending on the nature of the attack, felon.

Here's what I wonder?
Had Martin had been a white kid, would people be howling about how Z's civil liberties were being trampled, a poor latin trying to do the right thing, crushed underneath the jackboot of an overzealous prosecution?
I wonder...

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

I agree. I never thought the issue was one of race between the two.

100% agree.
As did the jury.
As did the Sanford Police.
As did the FBI.

Which is why its absurd to try and make this case about race.




Edwynn -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/16/2013 8:08:15 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kana

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn


If you read the police record concerning GZ, and read the logs of his 46 calls to the police, and still think that this is someone we want to have as implementing "justice" in our society, then the fact that you concur with this explains a f*ck of a lot about what's seriously wrong with this society.

I never said I concur.You're putting words in my mouth. I said I saw no way any jury could find him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.In fact, I think my exacts words were something like, "A second year law student could try this case. If a real lawyer tries it and can't raise reasonable doubt, they should be disbarred for incompetence."
It was open and shut. That ain't just my opinion.Di Maio, a defense witness with all the reasons in the world to spend lots of time investigating,billed Z's team only $2,400, six hours at $400 per. When the prosecution asked him why so little time,he said that forensically it was a simple straightforward case.
Most importantly, there was no evidence or substantial eyewitness to disprove Z's version of events. That was the critical thing. There was enough reasonable doubt to drive a squadron of Panzer tanks through.

And again, don't you think that if Z were that dangerous, the Feds report would have mentioned that little tidbit somewhere. Or are you suggesting that Obama and Holder conspired to withhold evidence that may have implicated Z? Please tell me so, because that would simply be too juicy for words...



"Blah blah, blah blah, etc. ...."

Thanks for pounding your emphasis at every opportunity that you are incapable of understanding the distinction or difference between the law and actual justice.

The verdict was inevitable, because they had to adjure to whatever bogus law was presented to them.

If the law does not provide justice, then the law does not provide justice.

If you want to proclaim that justice, as to your taste, is provided by slapping girlfriends repeatedly and shooting a teenager, then just say so.






Phydeaux -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/16/2013 8:14:41 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn


If you read the police record concerning GZ, and read the logs of his 46 calls to the police, understand that he was kicked out of community college because of being such a danger to the other students, etc., and still think that this is someone we want to have as implementing "justice" in our society, then the fact that you concur with this explains a f*ck of a lot about what's seriously wrong with this society.

If you think that slapping his ex-fiance around on numerous occasions is such a minor matter, and actually promotes his interest as 'neighborhood watchman,' how about if I just slap you around, bitch?


Yeah, let's see how that works.

I'm hired now, right?





Edwyn,

No one has said a damn thing that Z would impliment justice. Nor do police. Nor do neighborhood watch.
Justice is not the same as law.

Regarding slapping his fiance around - again these are allegations that are not proved. And both gf and zimmerman had restraining orders issued against them.
You have to stop confusing allegations with evidence, and you have to start understanding the legal process.

The law has a lot less to do with justice than you think it does. Its the law you have to pay taxes. Is that justice?
Its the law that you have to register for the draft. That has nothing to do with justice.






tazzygirl -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/16/2013 8:14:44 PM)

I doubt the Federal findings will change. I do know they wont take on a case they arent sure they can win. That doesnt mean there arent racial undertones. We are still dealing with a case here in regards to all that.

Some people are blaming race... others are blaming the system. I get the feeling too many are expecting, and only hearing race, so thats the part they jump on. People fear a reversal in the times. I can understand that fear. They wont sit by idly and wait for that moment to come.

What we see now is hyper vigilance. You may not like it. You can definitely speak out against it. But you wont stop it.




DarkSteven -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/16/2013 8:15:20 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn

Thanks for pounding your emphasis at every opportunity that you are incapable of understanding the distinction or difference between the law and actual justice.



You've brought it up. So explain it. What IS the difference? I believe we all agree on what the law is - what is "actual justice"?




Powergamz1 -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/16/2013 8:18:21 PM)

Way too many people under the age of 18 have been shot to death in the last year, I'm not seeing the 'up in arms' so much. That is also sad.

There is every reason to believe that if Zimmerman had gotten back in his truck more quickly, things would likely have ended on a less lethal note. If he had chosen to interpret the dispatcher's "let me know if he does anything else", and the location request differently, and stayed in the truck, things would have resolved at another level.

But he didn't. Was it because he finally screwed up the courage to become a killer? That's a possibility at one end of the spectrum' Was it because he was trying so hard to be the good citizen together with his weight loss, training, and schooling that he thought he would be safe? That's another possibility.

But nobody except George and maybe his closest confidantes, will ever know for sure.

Same thing when it came down to the last seconds of Trayvon Martin's life.

Did Zimmerman panic after getting bopped in the nose (or become angry), and shoot... followed by repeating the mantra heard in so many self defense parlors, TV shows, and gun ranges? 'Fear for my life'?
Or did he feel himself starting to get blurry from the pounding and in the struggle really think that his gun would be taken and used against him?

Again only 1 person knows that for sure.

And for sure is why the jury followed the law and voted the way they did. Because they took an oath not to substitute 20/20 hindsight for their instructions.



quote:

ORIGINAL: BBBTBW

The sad thing about this and the racial tension it has caused is that, IF this was a kid of ANY race that he killed, people would still be up in arms. However, because it was a black kid, black people automatically become the enemy because we are angry that a killer got off. Regardless of the reasons Mr. Zimmerman gave for killing Mr. Martin, Mr. Zimmerman caused the altercation by not doing what he was told by the 911 operator and taking matters into his own hands. Putting race and motive aside it seems very few people are considering that maybe Mr. Martin felt threatened because he was being followed in the dark. Fortunately or unfortunately he wasn't armed and couldn't effectively protect himself from a vigilante with a gun.





Page: <<   < prev  84 85 [86] 87 88   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.078125