Powergamz1 -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/17/2013 8:25:51 AM)
|
Open to interpretation. The dispatcher said 'Let me know if he does anything else, OK?'. That could be interpreted as 'If he leaves the sidewalk and heads towards some dwellings, let me know'. Or it could be interpreted as 'If he does anything else '*to you*, let me know'. Then there were questions from the dispatcher regarding location, which way the police should turn, etc. Contrary to popular belief, Zimmerman's position in the NW, was simply to keep a telephone tree, and direct people's questions to the right place. There is no evidence that he had years of patrolling every inch of the subdivision with a spot light, writing up security reports for every address, so getting out to verify building numbers is plausible. That leaves the distinct possibility that Zimmerman read it as 'Get us the information we need so that this time, 'they' don't get away'. Then the dispatcher said the 'We don't need you to...' line. Despite all the hype, that isn't an order anywhere in the nation. It is a stock phrase so that when someone gets in the way, or gets hurt, they can't come back and say 'The dispatcher told me to tackle the guy'. When a dispatcher needs someone to stay in the car, they are going to say 'Sir, I need you to stay in your car'. And every indication is that when the 'We don't need...' sunk in, Zimmerman slowed his roll, and at some point may have been headed back to his car. My guess would be that Zimmerman heard what he wanted to hear, thought he was 'assisting' the cops by deploying his tactical flashlight, thought he was safe because of his CCW, and ended up on the ground because of it. But not complying with orders had nothing to do with it. quote:
ORIGINAL: Raiikun quote:
ORIGINAL: BBBTBW 2. Mr. Zimmerman instigated this encounter by not complying with what he was asked to do by the 911 operator. Had he complied, this whole incident would never have happened. There is evidence to prove that. False. There is no evidence that George continued to follow after agreeing not to, and in fact, the encounter started at the same place that George agreed to stop following.
|
|
|
|