Powergamz1 -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/17/2013 2:41:44 PM)
|
What all your posts in the aggregate make crystal clear, is that you are advocating a double standard in the legal system. You want the Constitution for yourself, but not for Zimmerman. And the 'reasons' you give for Zimmerman to be denied his rights turn out to be specious (adjudicated a danger, when in fact, he's just on a common prescription meds, etc.), that leaves the suspicion that there is something else fueling your contempt for Zimmerman, other than the truth and the facts. The transcripts of the phone calls are posted, the testimony was heard by millions, the lies have all been debunked, the honestly rendered verdict that no murder was done is confirmed... and here you are repeating falsehood after falsehood. Unless you know Zimmerman personally, your axe to grind is based on something about him. Is it his clothes? Or are you just upset that these @$*!%s always get away? quote:
ORIGINAL: Edwynn Which affirmation of is just what transpired here. You were claiming that I wanted pitch forks, etc. Being that there was nothing to indicate that as my intention in the matter, I just called you out on your idiocy or otherwise lack of comprehension 'skills.' Yeah, I take that back; what you said was not 'kinda' fucked up, just completely fucked up. Who needs pitchforks, after this? What is established by all this is that you are entitled to go looking for whatever trouble you seek, and who needs a pitchfork. They give guns to people with a well established record of violence and pathological antisocial behavior. Which is a strike against every responsible gun owner. Even if I had the intent you presume, I could get any gun I wanted for the purpose. Who needs a freakin' pitchfork? Just because you openly advocate mentally unstable people carrying guns and harassing everyday citizens as a matter of course does not mean that people opposed to that dystopian scenario are carrying pitchforks. Project much? Ciao.
|
|
|
|