quote:

ORIGINAL: Rawni

Superficial at best... No wonder society suffers so many things it wouldn't have to if people didn't base so many things on so little.

I know men that absolutely love small breasted women. It is a bit more challenging to find women that say they love small cocked men. Still, a great partner with a small cock or a big cocked man that just doesn't fit in other ways... and this old broad is going for the great partner.

I've known some very successful men and women and boob and cock size had little to do with it unless they slept their way to the top. Hell, I've done a few successful men and the surprise in their pocket was a little surprising in a couple of situations, but... they were still successful in life and with me and other women... damn it. So, I guess if you have a small one... you BETTER by successful, but even with that, it may be an in-general thing, because I have known some without a dime, but successful with ladies, that were all personality and had little ones.

Whatever. Emotional health and well being is where it's at for me.

quote:

We've had a number of threads regarding screen names when they are directly related go kink. I have every reason to believe that they are not popular from the threads we have had on the subject on the Ask A Mistress board. A kink related or dick centric screen name is often seen as a person leading with their kink or that they are a one trick pony. I can't say if submissive women feel the same way because I haven't read as many threads on that topic (screen names) on the Ask A Submissive board.

quote:

According to the latest studies I am sorry to inform you most women like big cocks within reason(about 9 inch on average I heard).

quote:

ORIGINAL: kalikshama

quote:

According to the latest studies I am sorry to inform you most women like big cocks within reason(about 9 inch on average I heard).

Studies conducted by whom, Smiling Bob?

9" is way too big for me.

quote:

ORIGINAL: kalikshama

quote:

We've had a number of threads regarding screen names when they are directly related go kink. I have every reason to believe that they are not popular from the threads we have had on the subject on the Ask A Mistress board. A kink related or dick centric screen name is often seen as a person leading with their kink or that they are a one trick pony. I can't say if submissive women feel the same way because I haven't read as many threads on that topic (screen names) on the Ask A Submissive board.

I wouldn't be interested in a man who had "slut" in his nick, for example, "slutseeker." Or anything involving "hucow."

Most of the profiles in my Hide or Block list on the other side happen to include "Master." That's because of the content of their messages or profiles, not for the use of the term in their nick. But if someone leads with that, I am certainly going to be looking to see if their experience matches my expectation of a Master. As so far it never has, using that in a screen name is a red flag for me.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ibegtoeatyourpoo

Hello everyone,

This may seem like a strange question, but having recently chatted to a couple of other weak males with small penis's, I wonder if there is a link between cock size, confidence, success, and power.

I have a very small penis, and I need people to laugh at it, and hurt it (including men with normal sized penis's). I wonder if men with real cocks are more succesful because of the confidence and success with women they have.

This is just curiousity, because as a wimp with a 1 inch willie, I know I will never be more than a toilet and slavepig for my superiors.

Slave dogshit.

xxx

quote:

ORIGINAL: littlewonder

Op, duuude.....get some therapy.

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: littlewonder

Op, duuude.....get some therapy.

Because he thanked me for standing up for him or because he was right about some people having no control over tooth decay?

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

I thanked the poster who backed me up on the issue of bad teeth.

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact
This is where I think they are two different things.

Being exposed to somebody's kink is different than that person trying to incorporate other people into their kink. The best analogy is to compare it to a place space. When I go to a group play party or dungeon, I am accepting that other people are going to be conducting scenes that involve their kinks. That would be similar to the OP and the person who has agreed to provide him with his sph by talking to him about his member, laughing at him or whatever they agreed to within the confines of their negotiation.

Where the difference is would be the attempt to try to include others in the scene without their consent. Overhearing their scene is different than approaching others to try to get them to comment on the size of the OP's member or trying phrases such as "look how small it is" and "this little penis must be why I think I'm less of a man" because even if no reply to the subject is made, it's being projected onto others.

quote:

ORIGINAL: metamorfosis
In that case I'm afraid I still think they're not that different at all. In the thread I linked, the OP was complaining about being incorporated into others kink without consent, not merely being obliged to overhear it. His complaint was that upon entering that chatrooms, the participants started verbally humiliating him. He complained about a number of other things, but I think that particular complaint had merit. If I recall, he said that the male submissives were being referred to as "sperms" as one example. I can easily believe that such things happen in the chatrooms. Running with your analogy, it would be like a person showing up at a play party and having random people with humiliation fetishes constantly referring to them as "vagina" or "dogmeat" without first obtaining their consent. It's not just that it is insulting, it's that... it is their kink and their getting off on it.

Like I said, the position taken by the majority of posters on the two threads seem to contradict each another. Between the two positions, I think the one that says "it's a person's responsibility not to incorporate others into his kink without consent" is the correct one, which is why I took a stand against the OP of this thread.

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: littlewonder

Op, duuude.....get some therapy.

Because he thanked me for standing up for him or because he was right about some people having no control over tooth decay?

quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy

...but in truth he may be asking the most important question all men have.

quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy

That's because you are clearly packing a six gun. Seriously, sometimes we have to think about what is important to others and how they feel. I'm glad the op started this thread, it's been interesting to see others reactions and to think about this issue.

I'm somewhat inclined to be dismissive of Weiner, but I like to hear theories about what underpins his behavior. Also, I'm not a sexual moralist, so I don't ipso facto believe him unqualified for office.