MasterCaneman -> RE: 3 dead PA town hall meeting (8/6/2013 8:57:00 AM)
|
I've sat in on town board meetings in the village I live, and you'd think you were in D.C. with how "serious" people get, especially about their properties. And just how parochial and cliqueish they can become. Every town has a resident who falls into Newell's description you know. That one guy who has the hoarding problem, and can't afford to get rid of it, but somehow the pile keeps getting higher and higher every month. It was their fault they allowed it to go on for 17 years, and I think it directly tied in to what eventually transpired. If they had the cajones to shut him down in a year or two, he wouldn't have been allowed to build up so much that he couldn't "afford" to have it removed. And living in an '84 Fiero? Utter bullshit. He was living in one of the structures on his land and just claiming to live in the car. People like that have a mental issue that needs to be proactively addressed. The problem is, everyone's afraid of getting sued, so they keep tabling the issue until it reaches crisis proportions. And it doesn't help when people on the board are only there to advance their own agendas, which seems to be the case in a lot of smaller towns. I predict that what will eventually come out is a web of backroom dealings, favoritism, cronyism, and that board's unwillingness to address the real issues smaller municipalities face. The solution to problems like that is to entirely remove that village's responsibility in that area and place it with a larger entity, say the county or state. They can come in and enforce the laws more effectively, and have the resources to better challenge whatever legal argument he would try to make to keep his rat-pile intact. They'd also be in a better position to observe and react to what was apparently a hoarding issue and provide the proper mental health services this guy apparently needs. Which they now have to, as he will be their guest for the next few decades, because that board failed to act accordingly and promptly. We've got a guy just like him, one street over from me. Like Newell, he's on SSI and disability, but somehow he always seems to be able to go out picking and fills his yard up with trash. Our board doesn't want to deal with him, because they'd rather deal with the big developers who're putting in the McMansions south of me. I wonder what kind of motivation they're getting for focusing on those people when me and my neighbors are out shooting rats this guy's shitpile attracts? Dealing with people like that doesn't get you "campaign contributions", I believe. And I'll bet that's what that board was more focused on too, until this problem grew too large to be dealt with quietly.
|
|
|
|