PeonForHer
Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008 Status: offline
|
FR In the history of the great discussion about inalienable rights - the essential rights that people believed just *must* be accorded to humans, by virtue of being human - 'God' was often the final arbiter. People couldn't easily accept a moral truth *as* a truth, without reference to anything else at all, in those days. Something 'above or beyond' humans had to be posited as the authority. It's still often the case today: 'Everybody is of equal worth' is a truism for many if not most, but you'll always get some arse, somewhere, who'll argue with it. So when you do, you can just shut him up with the retort, 'You ask why? Because God says so, and that is that. Now fuck off if you don't like it.' The American Constitution uses the line about holding its moral truths to be self-evident, in and of themselves, without anything "higher" validating that - but its writers knew that this wouldn't be enough for some people. Or, at least, that's my impression.
_____________________________
http://www.domme-chronicles.com
|