Raiikun -> RE: Shellie Zimmerman say she feels alone. (8/29/2013 12:35:20 PM)
|
In the perjury PCA, the State wrote: Q: And you mentioned also, in terms of the ability of your husband to make a bond amount, that you all had no money, is that correct? A: To my knowledge, that is correct. Q: Were you aware of the website that Mr. Zimmerman or somebody on his behalf created? A: I’m aware of that website. Q: How much money is in that website right now? How much money as a result of that website was— A: Currently, I do not know. Q: Do you have any estimate as to how much money has already been obtained or collected? A: I do not. Ironically, the affidavit is misleading as it edits Shelley's testimony without any mention of the edit. The actual exchange at the bond hearing went like this: Q: How much money is in that website right now? How much money as a result of that website was — A: Currently, I do not know. Q: Who would know that? A: That would be my brother-in-law. Q: And is he — I know he’s not in the same room as you, but is he available so we can speak to him, too, or the Court can inquire through the State or the Defense? A: I’m sure that we could probably get him on the phone. Q: Okay. So he’s not there now. A: No, he is not, sir. Q: Do you have any estimate as to how much money has already been obtained or collected? A: I do not. Let’s step through each question-and-answer pair, and see if we can find any evidence of perjury. Quote: Q: How much money is in that website right now? How much money as a result of that website was — A: Currently, I do not know. Is this a lie? Does the State know for a fact that Shellie Zimmerman knew the exact amount of money in the PayPal account on 20 April 2012? Quote: Q: Who would know that? A: That would be my brother-in-law. Sounds like a truthful statement to me. And she's volunteering the person who can give the State the monetary amount they are asking for. Quote: Q: And is he — I know he’s not in the same room as you, but is he available so we can speak to him, too, or the Court can inquire through the State or the Defense? A: I’m sure that we could probably get him on the phone. Truthful. Quote: Q: Okay. So he’s not there now. A: No, he is not, sir. Ditto. Quote: Q: Do you have any estimate as to how much money has already been obtained or collected? A: I do not. Does the State have any evidence that Shellie did, in fact, have an “estimate”? Note also: by asking for an “estimate” here, BDLR pretty much gives up the right to claim that she was committing perjury here, because an “estimate” is a statement of opinion, and not of objective fact, and therefore not subject to perjury. Once upon a time I had case law in Florida of a perjury conviction being overturned for the same reason.
|
|
|
|