Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Kerry On Syria


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Kerry On Syria Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Kerry On Syria - 8/31/2013 8:45:47 PM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline
fr
I got this in my email today. It's long but I found it interesting and thought others might also

town hall

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: Kerry On Syria - 8/31/2013 8:56:56 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline
Did you seriously just post a blind link to Move-on.org, Boi?

_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: Kerry On Syria - 9/1/2013 4:26:19 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline
I don't know. First you will have to tell me what a blind link is.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: Kerry On Syria - 9/1/2013 6:24:07 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic
Did you seriously just post a blind link to Move-on.org, Boi?


Yes, it was.

Now, here is an interesting link on that page...

http://petitions.moveon.org/sign/president-obama-dont-18
(This petition calls on President Obama to seek explicit congressional authorization before taking military action in Syria.)

Apparently, MoveOn.org backs the idea that the President should go through Congress for authorization.
    quote:

    To be delivered to: The United States House of Representatives, The United States Senate, and President Barack Obama

    PETITION STATEMENT
      President Obama must seek explicit Congressional authorization before taking military action in Syria, as required by the U.S. Constitution and the War Powers Resolution. Congress must insist that Congressional debate and vote precede any military action.

    Petition Background
    On Sunday, August 25, Republican Sen. Bob Corker and Rep. Eliot Engel - a Democrat who voted for the Iraq war - told Fox News that President Obama should strike Syria first and get Congressional approval afterwards.
    That's not how the U.S. Constitution says it should go. That's not how the War Powers Resolution says it should go. The Constitution and the War Powers Resolution say that absent an attack on the United States, Congress must approve military action before it takes place.
    According to a recent Reuters/Ipsos poll, 60 percent of Americans surveyed said the U.S. should not intervene in Syria's sectarian civil war, while just 9 percent thought President Obama should act. Even if Assad's forces used chemical weapons to attack civilians - an allegation which has not been proved, and didn't hold up in the past - only 25 percent of Americans would support U.S. intervention, while 46 percent would oppose it.
    On July 24, the House approved an amendment by voice vote that would prohibit funding of any military action that violates the War Powers Resolution.
    If President Obama can get us into war in Syria without Congressional approval, it will set a terrible precedent: a future president can get us into war in Iran without Congressional approval.
    Tell President Obama not to take any military action in Syria without Congressional approval, and tell Congress to stand up for the U.S. Constitution and the War Powers Resolution.
    Links for the above information can be found here:
    http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/08/26/1233940/-President-Obama-Don-t-Strike-Syria-Without-Congressional-Approval
[emphasis mine]

I find it interesting that the GOP is be decried for their insistence that the President get authorization prior to action, yet an openly progressive organization completely agrees with that stance.

_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: Kerry On Syria - 9/1/2013 6:40:14 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
The link had a rather long discussion about the situation. from a progressive pov with five people. and inserts from emails, messages etc, it was interesting , thankyou Boi...


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: Kerry On Syria - 9/1/2013 6:47:25 AM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

I don't know. First you will have to tell me what a blind link is.



A link you click, without knowing where it will take you.

This is a blind link

This is an open link:
https://www.google.com/

I use the blinds all the time, especially with very long addresses, as do a lot of people, but there is an element of trust involved, and there should be a bit of courtesy, when it comes to heavily partisan sites, or common virus carriers like the LA Times.

_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: Kerry On Syria - 9/1/2013 7:37:35 AM   
Zonie63


Posts: 2826
Joined: 4/25/2011
From: The Old Pueblo
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

I don't know. First you will have to tell me what a blind link is.



A link you click, without knowing where it will take you.

This is a blind link

This is an open link:
https://www.google.com/

I use the blinds all the time, especially with very long addresses, as do a lot of people, but there is an element of trust involved, and there should be a bit of courtesy, when it comes to heavily partisan sites, or common virus carriers like the LA Times.


Actually, if you mouse over the link, your browser will display where it goes even without clicking on it (at least for links here in this forum) so it's never totally a blind link. I do that in order to avoid clicking on links to YouTube, since every time I click on a YouTube link lately, my browser crashes. Not sure why.

I agree it would be nice to preface any posted link with a couple lines of explanation. I've seen some posts where there's just a link and nothing else, and those are the ones I'm less likely to click on (even if it's not a blind link).

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: Kerry On Syria - 9/1/2013 7:41:54 AM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline
Depends on the browser, Zonie. Mine just highlights a bit, and underlines to show it as something active.

_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to Zonie63)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: Kerry On Syria - 9/1/2013 7:51:01 AM   
Zonie63


Posts: 2826
Joined: 4/25/2011
From: The Old Pueblo
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
I find it interesting that the GOP is be decried for their insistence that the President get authorization prior to action, yet an openly progressive organization completely agrees with that stance.


I don't know much about "Move On" specifically, but I think if an individual or organization defines their principles and sticks by them, then there's nothing particularly surprising about that.

But if one's principles keep shifting or changing based on whichever party controls Congress or the White House, then that's what people might decry (and I see it happening on both sides).


(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: Kerry On Syria - 9/1/2013 9:12:59 PM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

I don't know. First you will have to tell me what a blind link is.



A link you click, without knowing where it will take you.

This is a blind link

This is an open link:
https://www.google.com/

I use the blinds all the time, especially with very long addresses, as do a lot of people, but there is an element of trust involved, and there should be a bit of courtesy, when it comes to heavily partisan sites, or common virus carriers like the LA Times.



ok, thanks for the heads up

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: Kerry On Syria - 9/1/2013 9:51:29 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline
HuffnPoo is the worst. Crashes this computer every single time. If something looks really worthwhile, I'll use another device to get there.

_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 71
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Kerry On Syria Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078