Bearlee
Posts: 2311
Joined: 10/25/2004 From: South Central CO Status: offline
|
Okay, I’m going to use a quote from another thread (Levels of Submissives). Perhaps I’ll be flamed again; but it seems to me to be a wonderful example of what the OP is discussing. When I read this ‘explanation’…I was so stunned, I couldn’t even reply. I’ll give it a try here. quote:
ORIGINAL: juliaoceania Bearlee, you seem to be trying to define submissiveness in a different way than I do. I will give you my view, not that it is more valid than any other mind you. Take two people calling themselves submissives involved in power exchanges. One to the outsider “looks” like the ideal cooperative submissive. She never talks back and always does as is told. She is also very insecure, from an abusive household, and she has no personal power of her own to give to anyone, she is not a “doormat” even, she is just a broken person that has little choice internally. (I am not saying cooperative obedient subs have been abused btw) Take the next submissive… she is high functioning, fiery, seems to be in charge most of the time, and her dom doesn’t tell her what to do very often, preferring her the way she is naturally, taking joy in her strong personality. He never has her serve others, preferring to keep her all to himself, and when they are alone he dominates her completely sexually and she serves him well not just that way, but is an asset to him in other ways. From the outside the first woman looks submissive. The second does not. Personally, in my opinion I cannot understand a power exchange with someone that does not have their own mind and personal power.. it seems like it could not happen. I do understand power exchange can be a subtle thing that could almost be missed by an outsider. The second lady had more power to give than the first… just my way of looking at it IMHO (YMMV), this was one of the most ridiculous examples of ‘what is a submissive’ I’ve ever seen. We had been discussing saying ‘No’…this reply seems to me to also be addressing that; and manners, as well. That no one even commented on the post, floored me; that someone could see a polite submissive as insecure and broken. I would suggest an insecure, abused, broken person with no power…mentally ill, not submissive. Perhaps that’s what the writer meant… I dunno. Okay, I’ve finally decided that, in this world, if you wanna call yourself ‘submissive’ …then you just ARE. I wish it worked for flying airplanes, though; that would be fun. I wanna be a pilot! Still, what I see as submissive is not necessarily what others see as submissive. That, for me, one who plays at being submissive (mostly in the bedroom) is just a person who likes the game. For me, submissiveness is more than pulling hair and kinky sex. But, I’ve discovered at last, that it upsets bedroom submissives to say that they aren’t ‘real' or 'true’ submissives; and heck…perhaps they are …by their definition. I no longer care. They can call themselves pink, too; it matters not. Having said all this…I am the kind of person who knows a bit about many things; I can carry on a conversation with just about anybody. I am passionate about my world and many things in it; and I can entertain myself without feeling the need for drama or rocking the boat. I have a strong personality, I enjoy teasing and playing and innuendo…and I can disagree with my (or any other) Dominant. However, I am submissive; given a directive by my Dominant…I will not say ‘No’. Okay…BEFORE I gave him control of me, I would have spent a long time getting to know him. I would have discerned beforehand that he WOULDN’T ask me to sign over my home, nor my paycheck…and that he wouldn’t be sharing me with strangers. I could go on and on about the things I hold as ‘hard limits’, but the point is…once I have submitted to this man, I will not say ‘No’. Should he ask me to do something so extraordinary as to be something I didn’t plan on having to consider…and couldn’t do…my ‘No’ would be a taking back of my power; leaving me no longer submissive to him. It’s a “Power Exchange”… not a power-loan. In my world, one cannot pick and choose when and where they choose to be compliant. This thread is about courtesy…for me, politeness is common decency toward just about everybody and in a D/s setting (time spent with others involved in this ‘lifestyle’) it includes using polite honorifics of ‘Sir’ and ‘Maam’ for Dominants (though, actually, I use them for all persons of ‘authority’…even the clerk in a store who tells me where to find the artichoke hearts…go figure). But to me, it also includes being compliant to my Dominant. Being compliant does not mean broken and abused. Being compliant can also include teasing and bantering, and disagreeing in heated conversation; but it also includes doing as told; doing what you agreed when you exchanged power and gave him/her control over yourself. I do not see play and innuendo as impossible without respectfulness. A strong, bright, capable person can interlace it all. I think that because I’m strong and opinionated, yet very submissive to my Dominant, is what some often find attractive. I think many Dominants find submissiveness in a strong-willed person…exciting. Perhaps that is what makes the Geisha so pleasing to men; she is well educated, entertaining, bright and fiery; yet very, very submissive. And polite.
|