freedomdwarf1
Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: BamaD quote:
ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1 quote:
ORIGINAL: Yachtie The same mantra, over and over again. I can't prove one damn thing as to your crap above. But I damn well know an armed victim has a better chance than an unarmed one. So much has been posted on that and people like you continually ignore it. No, we continually prove to you that a pro-gun culture creates a vast number of unnecessary deaths by guns. The figures bear that out no matter where you look comparing other countries - even war-torn ones. It is you that are ignoring that glaring fact. ETA: Even your early presidents finally realised that a growing number of war weapons (particularly nuclear ones) was a futile exercise. Why won't the individual Americans realise the same thing?? There were no nukes during the era of our early presidents Oh really?? Wiki: "The atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and the end of World War II quickly followed the Trinity test, and the Little Boy device was detonated over the Japanese city of Hiroshima on 6 August 1945. Exploding with a yield equivalent to 12,500 tonnes of TNT, the blast and thermal wave of the bomb destroyed nearly 50,000 buildings and killed approximately 75,000 people. Subsequently, the world’s nuclear weapons stockpiles grew." - and - "On June 12, 1982, one million people demonstrated in New York City's Central Park against nuclear weapons and for an end to the cold war arms race. It was the largest anti-nuclear protest and the largest political demonstration in American history" So no nukes, huh??
|