RE: OBAMA LIED!!!

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: OBAMA LIED!!!

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: OBAMA LIED!!!

Page: << < prev 11 12 13 14 [15]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: OBAMA LIED!!! - 11/6/2013 10:33:12 AM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

Yes, I have it, it is in their conclusion. Learn to read. geysers of stupidity and so on.

a question remains about whether the high public cost of providing pharmacy coverage through Medicare is worth the substantially lower financial benefit derived by beneficiaries...

do the math, hpcoppc-slfbdbb = TAXES or revenues of some type. What proof do you have that these folks on medicare were seniors? Quit augering yourself in here. Moving the goalposts, and introducing more proofless nothings into the factless claims.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to DesideriScuri)

Profile

Post #: 281

RE: OBAMA LIED!!! - 11/6/2013 10:41:18 AM

thompsonx

Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

But there are still those that think that the government is the answer for everything. Bless their li'l' hearts.

If your house cathes on fire you call the govt.
If you are being attacked you call the govt.
If we choose to go to the moon we call the govt.
If we are ignorant we go to the govt.
We the people instituted this government why do you hate it?

(in reply to DaddySatyr)

Profile

Post #: 282

RE: OBAMA LIED!!! - 11/6/2013 10:56:05 AM

DesideriScuri

Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
Yes, I have it, it is in their conclusion. Learn to read. geysers of stupidity and so on.
a question remains about whether the high public cost of providing pharmacy coverage through Medicare is worth the substantially lower financial benefit derived by beneficiaries...
do the math, hpcoppc-slfbdbb = TAXES or revenues of some type. What proof do you have that these folks on medicare were seniors? Quit augering yourself in here. Moving the goalposts, and introducing more proofless nothings into the factless claims.

More geysers. I get it, MN. You can stop with the examples.

My link, my NIH link, concluded that beneficiaries of Medicare Part D had a reduction in the cost of medications they bought. This is my claim, supported by a NIH link I provided.

You, apparently, have a problem with Medicare Part D not because the beneficiaries saved money on medication (ie. purchasing medication was more affordable), but that the costs were simply shifted onto taxpayers without sensible cost containment (let alone cost-cutting) provisions? Did I get that right?

You are also supportive of Obamacare, which, shock of all shocks (not), simply shifts costs onto taxpayers without sensible cost containment (let alone cost-cutting) provisions.

_____________________________

What I support:

A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
Personal Responsibility
Help for the truly needy
Limited Government
Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to mnottertail)

Profile

Post #: 283

RE: OBAMA LIED!!! - 11/6/2013 11:56:38 AM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

My link, my NIH link, concluded that beneficiaries of Medicare Part D had a reduction in the cost of medications they bought. This is my claim, supported by a NIH link I provided.

I quoted the fucking conclusion from your link. It said no such thing. it said that they had a reduction in out-of-pocket expenses. it didnt say reduced costs, at all, in fact it intimated that the opposite was probably true. And that was not your claim, I quoted the fucking thing, you are augering in deeper with your spouting geysers of stupidity, I knew what they were, give me no more examples, I need no practice at seeing them from you.

YOU LIED.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to DesideriScuri)

Profile

Post #: 284

RE: OBAMA LIED!!! - 11/6/2013 12:03:42 PM

cloudboy

Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005
Status: offline

quote:

NIH.gov study isn't credible enough, eh?

He doesn't like the CATO INSTITUTE either on Immigration.

(in reply to mnottertail)

Profile

Post #: 285

RE: OBAMA LIED!!! - 11/6/2013 3:26:14 PM

DesideriScuri

Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy

quote:

NIH.gov study isn't credible enough, eh?

He doesn't like the CATO INSTITUTE either on Immigration.

Actually, the question you quoted was actually of my asking to him. He's not always clear with the quote method.

_____________________________

What I support: