DesideriScuri
Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: butternutsquash I'm not sure what the rationale was. Were they concerned that he might have been carrying a weapon? Granted, if the principal was motivated by some ideological bullshit, then let's castrate him with a butter-knife, but I would really like to know what the fuck is going on here. Does the school have a recent history of violence? From the story, girls are allowed to carry purses during school. So, if the only way for the administrator to be consistent would be to ban anyone from carrying purses or bookbags/backpacks, unless there is a history of violence with only this kid. quote:
ORIGINAL: Zonie63 quote:
ORIGINAL: ChatteParfaitt Then the stupid ass suspended the boy, in my mind flying straight in the face of discrimination and giving *his* parents nice grounds for a lawsuit. Yes, it looks like they have a good case, but what always frosts me about things like that is the person who actually made the decision in this case won't be the one paying for the lawsuit. The district and taxpayers will end up paying for it, while the assistant principal who caused the whole thing won't have to pay anything. He won't have to pay anything directly towards the cost of the lawsuit, but I'd be surprised if he didn't pay with his job.
_____________________________
What I support: - A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
- Personal Responsibility
- Help for the truly needy
- Limited Government
- Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)
|