RE: Banned from School Grounds for a legal activity... (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


thompsonx -> RE: Banned from School Grounds for a legal activity... (11/8/2013 10:56:25 AM)


ORIGINAL: JeffBC
But I'm a lot more troubled about banning a person simply because they have the ability to conceal a handgun on their person elsewhere.

Once again that is not the reason she was banned? Please read the article and see if there is more than one reason for the ban?
Was it that she had been disruptive in the past and now has and brags about her carry permit?
Could it be the combination of these things that caused the ban because that is what the article said.
To obfuscate the issue with this tripe about her "right to carry in public" being infringed is less than honest.






DesideriScuri -> RE: Banned from School Grounds for a legal activity... (11/8/2013 10:58:05 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
There may be more to the story, TJ, which is why I'm looking forward to seeing how this all shakes out.
Concealed Carry Permit or not, guns are banned on school grounds. The story doesn't mention proof of her violating the gun-free zone at the school, nor does it mention her having any intent to do so.
Starbucks, McD's and other government buildings don't prevent people from entering based on their owning a gun, owning a conceal carry permit, or both. According to the article, she was banned because she has got a concealed carry permit, and posted a pic of it on her personal facebook account.
Did the school ban all parents who have a concealed carry permit from that school's property?
I can see them banning her if she brought her gun to the school (unless it was under methodology like Jeff uses), but the article doesn't state that this happened. I restate that I don't think we have heard the entire story yet.

the article says the school said she had been a problem in the past.. that fact (?) also apparently played a part of their decision.. I expect they would rather "be safe than sorry"..
really, what kinda brains does it take to post a pic like that on FB? few people would consider that a smart move.. (no, not illegal, just a really dumb thing to do imo).. dumb people and guns don't mix well.. The school can ban whomever they want to ban.. she didn't like that decision so she pulled her kid and found a new school for her.. (I expect about now that new school is wondering what kinda problems she will be to them!)..


Posting her CC on FB might show that she was proud of getting it, much like posting pics of your (general) kids achieving or sports participation. Not the smartest thing to do, but, still, not illegal.

And, if he issue was with previous issues - which may or may not be true - I can see them not wanting her on the premises for the previous behavior issues.

http://atlanta.cbslocal.com/2013/11/05/army-vet-mother-banned-from-daughters-school-for-posting-concealed-weapons-permit-on-facebook/
    quote:

    Mount said she was told by police that school principal Janina Dallas is scared of her because of her weapons permit.
    Dallas confirmed to WJBF-TV that Mount was banned from the school due to the Facebook post.
    “It is my duty and responsibility as the principal of this school to ensure the safety and security of all of our faculty, staff and students,” Dallas said.
    Dallas cited recent school shootings as why she was alarmed to Mount posting her weapons permit on Facebook.
    “There have been a number of school shootings in our country,” Dallas told WJBF. “And inevitably, people will say they saw signs and things of that nature after the fact.”


No mention of previous issues, just that the FB post was the reason.

The first time I heard this story was on my local drive-home radio show. One of the assistants (not sure if they are officially co-hosts, but they are always part of the show) said the Elem. School the daughter was transferred to is still within the same School District, but I have not seen the name of the new school, so that may or may not be true. If it is true, then the stance of the McBean Elem. Principal is even less solid, imo.

http://www.richmondcountysheriffsoffice.com/concealed-weapons-permit.cfm
    quote:

    It is also unlawful to carry or possess any firearm within 1,000 feet of any school property, on a school bus or other transportation furnished by the school, or at a school function without written authorization from a school official.

    This prohibition shall not apply to: organized sport shooting events, firearms training courses, persons licensed to carry when such person carries or picks up a student, any weapon legally kept in a vehicle in transit through a school zone by any person other than a student, or a firearm in a locked compartment of a motor vehicle or in a locked container or locked firearms rack in a motor vehicle being used by a person over 21 to bring or pick up a student.

    The 1,000 foot zone which extends beyond the actual school property does not apply to persons who reside within the zone, are visiting someone who resides in the zone, or are conducting lawful business within the zone.


I don't know that the school has any authority to ban the lady for obtaining a concealed carry permit.

ETA:
http://www.wjbf.com/story/23845263/richmond-county-mom-banned-from-childs-school?fb_action_ids=613794912012237
    quote:

    Mount's daughter has since transferred to another elementary school in the district and she's gotten her PTO volunteer card back.




DesideriScuri -> RE: Banned from School Grounds for a legal activity... (11/8/2013 11:03:25 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kalikshama
All the articles I've read about this indicate that the picture was not the sole reason.


http://atlanta.cbslocal.com/2013/11/05/army-vet-mother-banned-from-daughters-school-for-posting-concealed-weapons-permit-on-facebook/
    quote:

    Mount said she was told by police that school principal Janina Dallas is scared of her because of her weapons permit.
    Dallas confirmed to WJBF-TV that Mount was banned from the school due to the Facebook post.
    “It is my duty and responsibility as the principal of this school to ensure the safety and security of all of our faculty, staff and students,” Dallas said.
    Dallas cited recent school shootings as why she was alarmed to Mount posting her weapons permit on Facebook.
    “There have been a number of school shootings in our country,” Dallas told WJBF. “And inevitably, people will say they saw signs and things of that nature after the fact.”


From your link (which was the same one in my OP):
    quote:

    A reporter from News Channel 6 tracked down the school's principal and confirmed the no trespass order was issued because Mount had posted a photo of the permit to Facebook.






thompsonx -> RE: Banned from School Grounds for a legal activity... (11/8/2013 11:03:30 AM)

I don't know that the school has any authority to ban the lady for obtaining a concealed carry permit.

The article you posted does not say that. You have been told this several times. Why do you continue to post something that is not true?




thompsonx -> RE: Banned from School Grounds for a legal activity... (11/8/2013 11:09:32 AM)

And, if he issue was with previous issues - which may or may not be true -

Unless you have some verifiable reason to disbelieve the school why the caviat?


I can see them not wanting her on the premises for the previous behavior issues.

Why?
Would it not be prudent,like the school did,to link the two?




joether -> RE: Banned from School Grounds for a legal activity... (11/8/2013 11:19:16 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
Army veteran Mom not allowed on school grounds because of a Facebook pic of her Concealed Carry permit.

Part of me hopes there's more to this story than that she was simply banned because of the pic. But, another part of me hopes that there isn't any other reason (ie. that the woman is an actual danger to the kids).

I look forward to seeing how this all shakes out. I don't know that we've heard the entire story yet.


One thing, it's public property. She or anyone else have a right to be there.


Not if your carrying a gun and your not law enforcement you don't. How many school shootings have there been when a firearm was involved? You can say all you want that someone with a CC would NEVER do something like this. How about the teenager who cold-cocks the CC person on the back of the head, takes the arm and begins shooting because they REALLY have just snapped? I'm sure the idea has already happen in the past.....

That if you come to the school, lock your weapon with the principle first before entering further I could agree on. How intelligent much less wise is it, to allow a parent, whom may become extremely mad at a teacher during a discussion, to 'whipping it out and shooting them' in blind rage? The reason they call it 'blind rage' is the frontal section of the human brain shuts down. That's the area that controls reasoning, thinking, and decision making. When people get REALLY made, they do dumb things they often regret later on. Can you imagine the field day the 'gun control' folks would have if this event were to happen? Would it not make sense to keep the arm out of the school, even in the super unlikely event its used for a school shooting?

Now if the local police chief gives the 'ok' for a civilian to be allowed access into a school with a CC due to unforeseen reasons (the person is targeted by some hate group for example), its then on the chief's responsibility if anything goes wrong. And I'm sure there will be hell to pay if anything went wrong with that arm.




joether -> RE: Banned from School Grounds for a legal activity... (11/8/2013 11:30:02 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
Army veteran Mom not allowed on school grounds because of a Facebook pic of her Concealed Carry permit.

Part of me hopes there's more to this story than that she was simply banned because of the pic. But, another part of me hopes that there isn't any other reason (ie. that the woman is an actual danger to the kids).

I look forward to seeing how this all shakes out. I don't know that we've heard the entire story yet.


There could be circumstances beyond the resources of the reporting that have determined the person in question is ban from the school. I'm not going to speculate on the woman's personal background as it relates to this issue. It could be all be perfectly understandable. Or just a case of 'hyper vigilance' in action. Before leaping to the woman's side 'just cus she has a firearm' shows a distinct lack of common sense. None of us know what this woman's mental and emotional health levels are at. Nor current criminal background if any. Perhaps she has laid threat towards a teacher because her kid was performing badly in school but due to laws could not publically explain the issue.

The point of a Concealable Carry is so the criminal DOESN'T know you are carrying a firearm (....duh!). When you plaster the CC permit on the internet (Facebook of all things!), doesn't exactly.....HIDE.....the idea that you are carrying. Its like saying someone has a concealed gun locker and than posting pictures on Facebook as to where it is located in thier house. Would you take the person seriously upon learning this?




igor2003 -> RE: Banned from School Grounds for a legal activity... (11/8/2013 11:30:33 AM)

--FR--

First, it seems to me that the principal didn't like the fact that this woman had "disrupted" her daughter's class, and so used the Facebook pic as an excuse to keep the woman away from the school.

And as to whether posting the pic was juvenile or not depends on exactly why the pic was posted. Did she post it to say, "Whoopie! See what I got!"? Or did she post it as part of a discussion she was having about what information is shown on the permit? Or....? For those that say she was wrong or stupid for posting it, I would like to know why you think it was so bad.

Also, just because a person has a permit does NOT mean that they carry a weapon at all times. I've had a permit for about 6 or 7 years and have never carried it concealed on my person. I do sometimes take a gun with me concealed in the car, though even that is rare.

Here in Idaho the CCW looks almost exactly like a drivers license, and can be used as a form of photo ID. I don't know what they look like where the subject in the OP is from, but should people be forbidden from coming on the school grounds for having a driver's license? I fail to see the difference.




DesideriScuri -> RE: Banned from School Grounds for a legal activity... (11/8/2013 11:38:01 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
Army veteran Mom not allowed on school grounds because of a Facebook pic of her Concealed Carry permit.
Part of me hopes there's more to this story than that she was simply banned because of the pic. But, another part of me hopes that there isn't any other reason (ie. that the woman is an actual danger to the kids).
I look forward to seeing how this all shakes out. I don't know that we've heard the entire story yet.

One thing, it's public property. She or anyone else have a right to be there.

Not if your carrying a gun and your not law enforcement you don't. How many school shootings have there been when a firearm was involved? You can say all you want that someone with a CC would NEVER do something like this. How about the teenager who cold-cocks the CC person on the back of the head, takes the arm and begins shooting because they REALLY have just snapped? I'm sure the idea has already happen in the past.....
That if you come to the school, lock your weapon with the principle first before entering further I could agree on. How intelligent much less wise is it, to allow a parent, whom may become extremely mad at a teacher during a discussion, to 'whipping it out and shooting them' in blind rage? The reason they call it 'blind rage' is the frontal section of the human brain shuts down. That's the area that controls reasoning, thinking, and decision making. When people get REALLY made, they do dumb things they often regret later on. Can you imagine the field day the 'gun control' folks would have if this event were to happen? Would it not make sense to keep the arm out of the school, even in the super unlikely event its used for a school shooting?
Now if the local police chief gives the 'ok' for a civilian to be allowed access into a school with a CC due to unforeseen reasons (the person is targeted by some hate group for example), its then on the chief's responsibility if anything goes wrong. And I'm sure there will be hell to pay if anything went wrong with that arm.


Here's the problem, though:
    Popeye: "One thing, it's public property. She or anyone else have a right to be there."
    You: "Not if your carrying a gun and your not law enforcement you don't."


Laws are already on the books preventing her from being on school property with a firearm, permit or not (except when certain rules are followed:
http://www.richmondcountysheriffsoffice.com/concealed-weapons-permit.cfm
    quote:

    It is also unlawful to carry or possess any firearm within 1,000 feet of any school property, on a school bus or other transportation furnished by the school, or at a school function without written authorization from a school official.

    This prohibition shall not apply to: organized sport shooting events, firearms training courses, persons licensed to carry when such person carries or picks up a student, any weapon legally kept in a vehicle in transit through a school zone by any person other than a student, or a firearm in a locked compartment of a motor vehicle or in a locked container or locked firearms rack in a motor vehicle being used by a person over 21 to bring or pick up a student.

    The 1,000 foot zone which extends beyond the actual school property does not apply to persons who reside within the zone, are visiting someone who resides in the zone, or are conducting lawful business within the zone.


The Richmond County Sheriff's Dept. has rules and regulations covering weapons in school zones that apply to CC permit holders and non-CC permit holders. The Principal (and principle) in this case is barring one CC permit holder her privileges under County law, not all CC permit holders. And, this only applies to this parent at this Elementary School.




DesideriScuri -> RE: Banned from School Grounds for a legal activity... (11/8/2013 11:48:03 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
Army veteran Mom not allowed on school grounds because of a Facebook pic of her Concealed Carry permit.
Part of me hopes there's more to this story than that she was simply banned because of the pic. But, another part of me hopes that there isn't any other reason (ie. that the woman is an actual danger to the kids).
I look forward to seeing how this all shakes out. I don't know that we've heard the entire story yet.

There could be circumstances beyond the resources of the reporting that have determined the person in question is ban from the school. I'm not going to speculate on the woman's personal background as it relates to this issue. It could be all be perfectly understandable. Or just a case of 'hyper vigilance' in action. Before leaping to the woman's side 'just cus she has a firearm' shows a distinct lack of common sense. None of us know what this woman's mental and emotional health levels are at. Nor current criminal background if any. Perhaps she has laid threat towards a teacher because her kid was performing badly in school but due to laws could not publically explain the issue.


Getting the permit requires a State and Federal background check, so if she just recently got it, then, the background check would be relatively current. If she threatened a teacher, I'd have to think that she could be banned from being on school property with or without having gotten a CC permit.

quote:

The point of a Concealable Carry is so the criminal DOESN'T know you are carrying a firearm (....duh!). When you plaster the CC permit on the internet (Facebook of all things!), doesn't exactly.....HIDE.....the idea that you are carrying. Its like saying someone has a concealed gun locker and than posting pictures on Facebook as to where it is located in thier house. Would you take the person seriously upon learning this?


Your example is not even close to being similar.

Posting a pic of the CC on FB isn't the most intelligent thing. But, posting pics of your minor kids isn't the most intelligent thing, either, is it? Yes, concealed carry is typically done so a potential perp doesn't know if you're armed or not. Open Carry, as was told to me by a HS alum who is a cop in Cleveland, is a great way to have a target painted on you, as they know you're carrying, so the threat you present will be one of the first "neutralized."

As I put forth in the OP, I look forward to seeing how all this shakes out, and that I don't know if we've heard the entire story yet.




thompsonx -> RE: Banned from School Grounds for a legal activity... (11/8/2013 11:58:49 AM)

The Principal (and principle) in this case is barring one CC permit holder her privileges under County law, not all CC permit holders. And, this only applies to this parent at this Elementary School.

Actually the person who posted the op does no seem to be aware of what was in the cite posted.
It clearly does not say the above.
It says that the person in question was banned because of prior issues and the cc permit. To continue to post the fiction that he only reason was the cc permit is less than honest, in fact it is lying.




thompsonx -> RE: Banned from School Grounds for a legal activity... (11/8/2013 12:00:37 PM)

Open Carry, as was told to me by a HS alum who is a cop in Cleveland, is a great way to have a target painted on you, as they know you're carrying, so the threat you present will be one of the first "neutralized."

Would that be the reason that uniform cops "open carry" so that they will be the "first neutralized"?[8|]




thompsonx -> RE: Banned from School Grounds for a legal activity... (11/8/2013 12:09:17 PM)

should people be forbidden from coming on the school grounds for having a driver's license? I fail to see the difference.

Perhaps if you were to read the article referenced you might. She was not banned for having a drivers license.
She was not banned for having a cc permit.
She was banned for having been disruptive in the past and now advertising her status as a cc permit holder.
Now someone tells you,if anyone messes with their kid there will be some repercussions,now they post on face book that they now have a cc permit.
You are the administrator in charge of the safety of many children what would you do?




thompsonx -> RE: Banned from School Grounds for a legal activity... (11/8/2013 12:11:46 PM)

posting pics of your minor kids isn't the most intelligent thing, either, is it?

So now the tens of millions of people who share pictures of their families on social networking sites are stupid according to you[8|]




thompsonx -> RE: Banned from School Grounds for a legal activity... (11/8/2013 12:15:28 PM)

If she threatened a teacher, I'd have to think that she could be banned from being on school property with or without having gotten a CC permit.


Why do you sugest that she threatened a teacher? The article you posted said "disruptive"???[8|]




joether -> RE: Banned from School Grounds for a legal activity... (11/8/2013 12:23:07 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
Army veteran Mom not allowed on school grounds because of a Facebook pic of her Concealed Carry permit.
Part of me hopes there's more to this story than that she was simply banned because of the pic. But, another part of me hopes that there isn't any other reason (ie. that the woman is an actual danger to the kids).
I look forward to seeing how this all shakes out. I don't know that we've heard the entire story yet.

One thing, it's public property. She or anyone else have a right to be there.

Not if your carrying a gun and your not law enforcement you don't. How many school shootings have there been when a firearm was involved? You can say all you want that someone with a CC would NEVER do something like this. How about the teenager who cold-cocks the CC person on the back of the head, takes the arm and begins shooting because they REALLY have just snapped? I'm sure the idea has already happen in the past.....
That if you come to the school, lock your weapon with the principle first before entering further I could agree on. How intelligent much less wise is it, to allow a parent, whom may become extremely mad at a teacher during a discussion, to 'whipping it out and shooting them' in blind rage? The reason they call it 'blind rage' is the frontal section of the human brain shuts down. That's the area that controls reasoning, thinking, and decision making. When people get REALLY made, they do dumb things they often regret later on. Can you imagine the field day the 'gun control' folks would have if this event were to happen? Would it not make sense to keep the arm out of the school, even in the super unlikely event its used for a school shooting?
Now if the local police chief gives the 'ok' for a civilian to be allowed access into a school with a CC due to unforeseen reasons (the person is targeted by some hate group for example), its then on the chief's responsibility if anything goes wrong. And I'm sure there will be hell to pay if anything went wrong with that arm.


Here's the problem, though:
    Popeye: "One thing, it's public property. She or anyone else have a right to be there."
    You: "Not if your carrying a gun and your not law enforcement you don't."


Laws are already on the books preventing her from being on school property with a firearm, permit or not (except when certain rules are followed:
http://www.richmondcountysheriffsoffice.com/concealed-weapons-permit.cfm
    quote:

    It is also unlawful to carry or possess any firearm within 1,000 feet of any school property, on a school bus or other transportation furnished by the school, or at a school function without written authorization from a school official.

    This prohibition shall not apply to: organized sport shooting events, firearms training courses, persons licensed to carry when such person carries or picks up a student, any weapon legally kept in a vehicle in transit through a school zone by any person other than a student, or a firearm in a locked compartment of a motor vehicle or in a locked container or locked firearms rack in a motor vehicle being used by a person over 21 to bring or pick up a student.

    The 1,000 foot zone which extends beyond the actual school property does not apply to persons who reside within the zone, are visiting someone who resides in the zone, or are conducting lawful business within the zone.



I am aware of this law, and thank you for publishing it.

The point here is....if the weapon is concealable....how does one detect if a person is carrying? Short of strip searching or demanding proof (both violations of the 4th amendment), how would school officials know if the person in question was not carrying a firearm? Law enforcement, we both (hopefully) can agree to, have a lawful right to carry a firearm. It could be public (local police) or concealed (i.e. FBI). In either case, the person with the firearm is under a considerable amount of regulations about having that arm in the first place. Are you going to argue to me that the average citizen with a CC permit and arm are under the same level of scrutiny and regulation as a law enforcement person? I believe that could be the argument here. And that due to unforeseen reason(s) the woman is banned from the school. That the photo on Facebook was the metaphorical 'straw that broke the camel's back' with school officials.

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
The Richmond County Sheriff's Dept. has rules and regulations covering weapons in school zones that apply to CC permit holders and non-CC permit holders. The Principal (and principle) in this case is barring one CC permit holder her privileges under County law, not all CC permit holders. And, this only applies to this parent at this Elementary School.


Trust me when I say, there are always exceptions to the laws. No law has ever been created to take into consideration all possible problems that could ever come up due to its existence; I use the '2nd Amendment' as a very good example.




DesideriScuri -> RE: Banned from School Grounds for a legal activity... (11/8/2013 12:32:12 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
The point here is....if the weapon is concealable....how does one detect if a person is carrying? Short of strip searching or demanding proof (both violations of the 4th amendment), how would school officials know if the person in question was not carrying a firearm? Law enforcement, we both (hopefully) can agree to, have a lawful right to carry a firearm. It could be public (local police) or concealed (i.e. FBI). In either case, the person with the firearm is under a considerable amount of regulations about having that arm in the first place. Are you going to argue to me that the average citizen with a CC permit and arm are under the same level of scrutiny and regulation as a law enforcement person? I believe that could be the argument here. And that due to unforeseen reason(s) the woman is banned from the school. That the photo on Facebook was the metaphorical 'straw that broke the camel's back' with school officials.


But, she is the only one that was banned. It wasn't something across the board to all CC permit holders. And, within the law, there are legal ways for one to possess a gun within 1000 feet of a school, even while you have your CC permit.








kdsub -> RE: Banned from School Grounds for a legal activity... (11/8/2013 12:36:42 PM)

I believe this is another example of sensationalistic media reporting. Half truths about controversial subjects designed to sell their product.

Just imagine yourself the principle of the school. Would you or should you legally or morally give out information publicly about past incidents with this mother and child? I wouldn't unless or until required to by law and that is how it should be. Both the mother and the reporting organization knew this and as usual took advantage of the situation one for revenge and the other for money...pitiful.

I would guess you will hear no more of this unless outside instigators such as politicians force the issue... And if this happens the story will end up much different then the jest of the media report.

Butch




OsideGirl -> RE: Banned from School Grounds for a legal activity... (11/8/2013 1:00:58 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: kalikshama

Ya, what do the rest of you think about her posting her CC permit on FB? I think it shows lack of judgement.


I think it shows that she needs to change the privacy setting on her Facebook to friends only. [;)]

Personally, I wouldn't show it simply because the ideal of carry concealed is that the general public doesn't know that you're carrying.

But, it could simply be that she's proud that she passed the course and wanted to mark the achievement.




DomKen -> RE: Banned from School Grounds for a legal activity... (11/8/2013 1:04:31 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: kalikshama
"It is my duty and responsibility as the principal of this school to ensure the safety and security of all of our faculty, staff and students," Principal Janina Dallas told News Channel 6, adding that Mount had occasionally disrupted class in the past and was highly protective of her daughter, which raised warning flags.

A helicopter mom packing heat? Hell yeah I'd ban her from my school if I was a principal.




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625