BamaD -> RE: Banned from School Grounds for a legal activity... (11/8/2013 8:18:02 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MasterCaneman quote:
ORIGINAL: igor2003 quote:
ORIGINAL: MasterCaneman quote:
ORIGINAL: kalikshama Ya, what do the rest of you think about her posting her CC permit on FB? I think it shows lack of judgement. I agree it does show a lack of judgement on her part. The idea behind a CC is for people to NOT know you're carrying a firearm. I will admit, due to my posting of the fact I have a CCW here along with my pic is probably not the wisest thing to do, but CM is nowhere near to FB in its reach and scope. When I got mine issued (in this state, I've had them in others before), I told three people, total. What she did in posting it to the world was to, in effect, make herself a target, either for what happened at her kid's school, or for some enterprising individual who now has a solid lead that someone's got firearms and ammo at their house. Just because someone has a CC permit does NOT necessarily mean that they carry one all or even most of the time. Yes, for SOME people the main issue is to not have it be known. For others it doesn't mean diddly shit either way. Just because this woman didn't see things in your "one twue way" doesn't automatically mean she had any lack of judgement. It just means that she doesn't have the same issues that you do. Me, personally, I don't know what information could be seen in the photo. Did it show her address? I don't know. Do you know? And without her address, then what difference does it make that anyone knows she has a gun and ammunition. Besides...if anyone DID gain knowledge of her address, they now know that that house is protected by a firearm. Kinda works both ways, doesn't it? You raise several valid points there. It's true, not all permit holders carry all the time, and it would seem counter-intuitive to seek out a home where you know there's at least one armed resident, wouldn't it? And even if she did blur or obscure her name and address on the image, I'll bet she's using her real name on her FB page. Nowadays, it doesn't take a lot to start putting things together until you come up with a street address. Going back to the 'not carrying all the time' point you made-if she's not home, but her weapon is, that's where the payoff is. It's why there was a big stink when they started publishing NYS permit holders's addresses a while back. You can't stay home all the time, and it's impractical to take everything that goes bang with you all the time. Sooner or later, someone's going to get in and no matter how good your security is, if they have enough time and the right tools, they will get it. What she essentially did was put a big red flag on herself when she posted it online. When I took my course, the instructor told us repeatedly not to tell everyone in earshot we had one for that very reason. And I'm not "twue" anything. I call 'em like I see 'em, and she screwed the pooch on this one in a number of ways. It goes to the very concept of concealed carry: no one knows you have a weapon on your person except yourself. If she'd have checked her attitude and remembered what OPSEC stood for (she is an Army vet, after all), this would be a non-issue. But, as others have mentioned above, there's more to all of this than what's being reported, I'm quite sure. Don't let them sidetrack you about whether she should have made the post. Her carrying doesn't seem to be an issue. If she was carrying that's all the principal would have had to say. Disrupting classes may mean that whenever she was able to get to the school she insisted on talking to the teacher, even if they were in class. Doesn't want her kid pushed around sounds like her kid was possibly being bullied.
|
|
|
|