Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Iran


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Iran Page: <<   < prev  12 13 14 [15] 16   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Iran - 12/8/2013 11:18:51 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline
Oh .. and gee look..
Less than a week after I said Iran would use the time under the proposed treaty to developits technology, word is out that they are testing a new brand of centerfuges.....


http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/12/07/us-iran-nuclear-enrichment-idUSBRE9B60BI20131207

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 281
RE: Iran - 12/9/2013 1:40:56 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
More scaremongering regards old news. These Centrifuges were installed last February, even your link says the UN inspectors have been informed at it doesnt break last weeks agreement.

Hows your reaearch into when Islam would have conquered the west going...... I fell asleep waiting for a detailed reply.

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 282
RE: Iran - 12/9/2013 1:59:16 PM   
crazyml


Posts: 5568
Joined: 7/3/2007
Status: offline
I think your comment was in response to mine.

But as it was so utterly divorced from the actual truth I decided not to bother responding to it.

The implication of your statement is that the land occupied by israel was lawfully purchased.

Either you are ignorant of the truth or you're deliberately lying, I have no way of knowing which.

_____________________________

Remember.... There's always somewhere on the planet where it's jackass o'clock.

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 283
RE: Iran - 12/9/2013 4:47:10 PM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
Israeli seizures of private Palestinian land are virtually daily occurrences:
http://www.presstv.com/detail/2013/09/10/323122/israel-seizes-more-palestinian-lands/

Often the beneficiaries of these seizures are illegal Israeli 'settlements'/colonies. A favourite tactic is to declare the Palestinian's land a
'closed military zone', which forces the legal owners off their property. After a period of time, the land is then re-allocated to the 'settlers/colonists.

Blatant ethnic cleansing.

< Message edited by tweakabelle -- 12/9/2013 4:49:34 PM >


_____________________________



(in reply to crazyml)
Profile   Post #: 284
RE: Iran - 12/9/2013 6:42:13 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

Israeli seizures of private Palestinian land are virtually daily occurrences:
http://www.presstv.com/detail/2013/09/10/323122/israel-seizes-more-palestinian-lands/

Often the beneficiaries of these seizures are illegal Israeli 'settlements'/colonies. A favourite tactic is to declare the Palestinian's land a
'closed military zone', which forces the legal owners off their property. After a period of time, the land is then re-allocated to the 'settlers/colonists.

Blatant ethnic cleansing.


Not a single answer to my last observations. You can't contest with facts or logic so you blather on.

Do you not understand- Israel conquered those territories. If it so chose it could confiscate *all* the lands and kick all the people out.

These are nations that took arms against Israel, fought against them and lost. And you know what side these people were rooting for. Israel has been far more generous to these people than these people would have been if they had won.

What do you suppose would have happened to Israel if the Arab nations had defeated Israel?

Again, as time goes on, the palestinians (such as that is) will lose more land. Which can either inspire them to war (which they will lose) or inspire them, perhaps to believe that piece might be in their best interest.

So far, we see no sign of the latter.


(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 285
RE: Iran - 12/9/2013 6:45:58 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

More scaremongering regards old news. These Centrifuges were installed last February, even your link says the UN inspectors have been informed at it doesnt break last weeks agreement.

Hows your reaearch into when Islam would have conquered the west going...... I fell asleep waiting for a detailed reply.



quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

More scaremongering regards old news. These Centrifuges were installed last February, even your link says the UN inspectors have been informed at it doesnt break last weeks agreement.

Hows your reaearch into when Islam would have conquered the west going...... I fell asleep waiting for a detailed reply.


Installed.
Now they are *testing*.

Do you see the difference? This is why Iran doesn't mind trading time - it has time on its hands while other components are developed. It needs time for its new long range missile. Needs time for the control systems. They are working on anti-aircraft defenses, and their own drones.

They supposedly were working on bomb design elements as well.

And finally, again - why is this a good idea when Iran is spending 600-700 million to defeat the rebels in Syria? Any answer?

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 286
RE: Iran - 12/10/2013 4:33:07 AM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
so youre suggesting the jihadists should win in Syria...... because you dislike Iran.... got it.

Installed? testing ? ....neither means they have a working weapon, or are anywhere close.

You do see the difference, dont you ?

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 287
RE: Iran - 12/10/2013 7:43:45 AM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline
Will I'm sure glad you decided not to respond.

Butch

_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to crazyml)
Profile   Post #: 288
RE: Iran - 12/29/2013 12:53:34 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline
So more results out from our decision to lift some sanctions in return for ... well, nothing from the Iranians...

http://www.tehrantimes.com/politics/113091-iran-building-new-generation-of-centrifuges-salehi

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 289
RE: Iran - 12/29/2013 8:52:21 PM   
LookieNoNookie


Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

so youre suggesting the jihadists should win in Syria...... because you dislike Iran.... got it.

Installed? testing ? ....neither means they have a working weapon, or are anywhere close.

You do see the difference, dont you ?


You know so much PoliteSub....I'm glad you do.

I'm so glad we can learn from you.

I do appreciate your comments.

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 290
RE: Iran - 12/30/2013 7:30:02 AM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

so youre suggesting the jihadists should win in Syria...... because you dislike Iran.... got it.

Installed? testing ? ....neither means they have a working weapon, or are anywhere close.

You do see the difference, dont you ?


You know so much PoliteSub....I'm glad you do.

I'm so glad we can learn from you.

I do appreciate your comments.


Better than your constant snide digs eh lookie

(in reply to LookieNoNookie)
Profile   Post #: 291
RE: Iran - 1/12/2014 4:05:33 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
So much for the scaremongering.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-25706409

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 292
RE: Iran - 1/12/2014 7:25:36 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline
Oh?

So I suppose you missed this:

"For example, no new centrifuges will be added, no new centrifuges will be produced, and no new facilities will be installed at Arak. We will not expand the quantity of our programme, but we will expand the quality," he said.

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 293
RE: Iran - 1/12/2014 9:38:24 PM   
Blaik


Posts: 3
Joined: 12/14/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

Israeli seizures of private Palestinian land are virtually daily occurrences:
http://www.presstv.com/detail/2013/09/10/323122/israel-seizes-more-palestinian-lands/

Often the beneficiaries of these seizures are illegal Israeli 'settlements'/colonies. A favourite tactic is to declare the Palestinian's land a
'closed military zone', which forces the legal owners off their property. After a period of time, the land is then re-allocated to the 'settlers/colonists.

Blatant ethnic cleansing.


Not a single answer to my last observations. You can't contest with facts or logic so you blather on.

Do you not understand- Israel conquered those territories. If it so chose it could confiscate *all* the lands and kick all the people out.

These are nations that took arms against Israel, fought against them and lost. And you know what side these people were rooting for. Israel has been far more generous to these people than these people would have been if they had won.

What do you suppose would have happened to Israel if the Arab nations had defeated Israel?

Again, as time goes on, the palestinians (such as that is) will lose more land. Which can either inspire them to war (which they will lose) or inspire them, perhaps to believe that piece might be in their best interest.

So far, we see no sign of the latter.




Actually, Israel didn't 'conquer' those lands, Jews were arbitrarily given those lands by Britain to the Rothschilds, who were acting as the leaders of the British Jewish community. In the declaration, one of the caveats was that the civil and religious rights of the non-Jewish communities in the area would be protected. Never happened. Originally Jews and Christians combined were 20% of the population in that area at the time of the Declaration. Seems to me that the underhandedness and skulduggery was not on the part of the Palestinians. They'd live there in peace with the Jews for centuries prior.

The Palestinians were occupied and forced into concentration camps, called settlements. If something like that were to happen here in the US, say to Baptists, wouldn't the most common response that we would logically expect is for them to fight back for their freedom? How is it any different for the Palestinians?

As to Iran, the statements regarding Israel and the US were misrepresented and sensationalized. Ahmadinejad (who now takes the bus to his teaching job, which he did before being elected originally) made it very clear he had no plans to use a nuclear weapon on anyone. He stated it would be suicide, he could launch one that MIGHT make it, but his country would surely be obliterated afterwards. On the other hand, if his country was being invaded by a superior force, a nuke might provide enough deterrent to hold them off, at least for a while. So in reality, Iran having a nuke wouldn't give them any advantage or incentive to strike 300+nuclear weapon owning(many of which were given to them by the US) with the backing of the US and many other 1st world countries Israel. But it would give pause to the warhawks out there that want to invade Iran and have been foaming at the mouth, chomping on the bit to do so for decades.

Want to change Iran? Want to change North Korea? Drop the sanctions, flood them with a globe's worth of culture. They can try to censor, but it will make it through, and it will take hold and it will foment change. And it will bring about change from within, giving the people what they want, their will, not the will of another country who just invaded them, decimated their infrastructure, kill hundreds of thousands of innocents and whose soldiers and mercenaries inflicted horrific injustices against the populace for their amusement(not all mind you, just the truly fucked up few). That will keep said that country's government so busy the LAST thing they'll contemplate is lashing out against another country.

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 294
RE: Iran - 1/12/2014 9:59:10 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline
I'm really unaware of the rothschilds owning land in the middle east.
Can you point out a source that says anything like those lands of egypt, jordan or syria were NOT conquered by israel?

Frankly, no country is dumb enough to invade iran without a nuke. So, adding nukes adds nothing to your equation. But it does let them export nuclear technology to other actors... just like pakistan and north korea did.

And sooner or later, some non-state actor - like hezbolla will smuggle a nuke into israel.

People forget that the US gave Iran technology for the purpose of developing peaceful nuclear energy technology - as it did most of the other signatories to the non nuclear proliferation treaty.

As for change: the number of revolutions that have overturned an entrenched power without outside aid is damn few. And Iran doesn't fit any of the traditional examples of same.

(in reply to Blaik)
Profile   Post #: 295
RE: Iran - 1/13/2014 3:37:23 AM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

Oh?

So I suppose you missed this:

"For example, no new centrifuges will be added, no new centrifuges will be produced, and no new facilities will be installed at Arak. We will not expand the quantity of our programme, but we will expand the quality," he said.


I didnt miss anything, just pointed out whats occuring. Its just a shame its not scaremongering eh.

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 296
RE: Iran - 1/13/2014 11:52:39 AM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

Oh?
"For example, no new centrifuges will be added, no new centrifuges will be produced, and no new facilities will be installed at Arak. We will not expand the quantity of our programme, but we will expand the quality," he said.


I didnt miss anything, just pointed out whats occuring. Its just a shame its not scaremongering eh.



Might I note that I did the same thing.

Iran *is* using the time to further advance its capabilities.
Iran is exporting weapons to the Assad regime. It is sponsoring sectarian attacks in Iraq. It is promoting terror via its client actors. So how can unfreezing half a billion dollars a month be conducive to our interests?
The sanctions were not easily put together - and will not easily be reimposed.

So, what - exactly did the US get? Iran will convert its stockpile of 20% uranium. But the value, as I stated earlier is not in the material, but in the knowledge of how to make the material. It retains the centrifuges, the knowledge, and the materials. Iran has literally given up *nothing*.




< Message edited by Phydeaux -- 1/13/2014 11:53:11 AM >

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 297
RE: Iran - 1/13/2014 1:01:46 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
My oh my, a Republican spouting off about Iraq and not knowing what he is talking about, its 2003 all over again.

Do I really need to remind you the same client actors you mention in Iraq were put in power by those halfwits Bush and Blair. Do I need to point out the majority of the terrorist attacks are carried out by Sunnis with links to AQ, while Iran supports the regime in power ? Seems to me you need to recheck a few things before spouting off.

So, now you are flip flopping from 20% uranium to "Knowing how its made"..... That my friend, is why they are having talks, a point thats way over your head.

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 298
RE: Iran - 1/13/2014 4:36:37 PM   
MrBukani


Posts: 1920
Joined: 4/18/2010
Status: offline
Proved oil reserves in Iran, according to its government, rank third largest in the world at approximately 150 billion barrels (24×109 m3) as of 2007, although it ranks second if Canadian reserves of unconventional oil are excluded.[1] This is roughly 10% of the world's total proven petroleum reserves. At 2006 rates of production, Iran's oil reserves would last 98 years if no new oil was found.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_reserves_in_Iran

I guess they really really are in dire need of nuclear energy.
It's funny you can fill 15 pages with 'arguments' about the intent.
What a bunch of brainiacs!

Maybe just maybe they wanna make isotopes like over here, to cure cancer?

< Message edited by MrBukani -- 1/13/2014 4:37:18 PM >

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 299
RE: Iran - 1/13/2014 4:41:03 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
Maybe they worry about climate change...... or just want to sell the oil overseas and get rich...... Who can tell.

(in reply to MrBukani)
Profile   Post #: 300
Page:   <<   < prev  12 13 14 [15] 16   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Iran Page: <<   < prev  12 13 14 [15] 16   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109