Sinergy -> RE: Weaponry, protecting what's yours (7/10/2006 10:07:57 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Tikkiee Personally, I find it quite sad that everyone has taken what started out as a perfectly good and fun thread, and turned it into something of a battleground. I think everyone should just agree to disagree becasue there are no right answers and there are no wrong answers. Hello A/all, I apologize Tikkiee, I was simply discussing some of the things I do professionally and apparently some think I am some anti-gun, anti-police, granola eating lunatic. The statistically most common assault of any type is a single, unarmed male assailant. Assailants tend to assault other's within their own racial and socioeconomic strata, despite what Clear Channel would have you believe. The ones reported on the news are the exceptions: multiple attacker home invasions, race A beating up on or raping race B, etc. The gun owner who successfully shoots their intruder is the one who makes the news. The burglar who shoots the homeowner generally doesnt, probably because he erases his fingerprints from the weapon and leaves. I have and do training in the field of adrenalin response self-defense as well as verbal self defense. However, I also have a lot of training in a dozen or so martial arts (several extensively) which I view as being essentially worthless in a fight for various reasons. My point was that I dont own a gun. I know why I dont own a gun. You want to own a gun, knock yourself out. I think people who think that buying a six shot .38 special at K-Mart and loading it with bullets will make them immune from a heavily armed and planned home invasion style robbery (which is statistically considered an outlier) by people who have experience are delusional. However, that is just me, and I could be wrong. Sinergy
|
|
|
|