Level -> RE: What influences world opinion on the US...does it mattter? (7/4/2006 6:26:47 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LTRsubNW quote:
ORIGINAL: Level bluize, I have to disagree with you as regards the UN. It may fail, but I think the idea of nations working together is vital; we do need to get the corruption out, as well as the mamby-pamby hand-holding that allowed Cuba and Pakistan to be on the Human Rights council. Don't be naive. Put 100 billion dollars on the table, add into the mix that without Saudi oil our economy halts, add into it the issue of our allegiance to Israel and the fact that we don't have the option of recalcitrance and you very quickly realize that corruption is part of the policy that runs nations. The question isn't "how can we rid ourselves (the world) of corruption", but rather, how can we as a nation, moreover as a world leader take ours to the level that allows other nations to rule themselves, even as they might not understand what that means? Moreover, how can we ally ourselves with other nations such that when our financial ability to follow through (such as with Iraq, or Vietnam as examples) doesn't comport with our desire or intent....that the intent of democracy (if indeed that is the best plan) can be carried out? There was a man many years ago that said..."kids today, they have such unusual language, such odd clothing....it scares me to imagine that someday they'll take over the world...but I know that soon they'll be the conquering voices". That was Socrates. Nothing's changed in our world and Socrates is just one example among thousands to show that history, with all its nuance is just a mirror. Murder, mayhem and war are the norm. We all wish it were otherwise...but it's not. Every generation before us has wished that our elders had some sense. Every generation before us has wished that someone would wake up and realize that war is not conducive to growth. Spending our time wishing the human condition will change is wasteful. It is the human condition. It won't change in our lifetime, or in any other. As soon as peace is the norm, some faction will determine that they have been unjustly demoralized and demand retribution. What could change, however is our understanding of the benefits of war. No one could argue more effectively than if they argued that there are none. Someone once told me that Americans have an imperialist attitude as to the world. I don't believe that's true. I believe our leaders do, but I don't think you and I do. Our parents, in the 60's believed they could change the world. I think they were right...they were just off a few generations. It starts with acceptance (and yes, there are some who simply do not understand this concept...and therein lies the ongoing saga of why war exists and why it will continue long after we're gone). I wasn't talking about ridding the world of corruption; I was talking about the UN. Not likely to happen, but it's possible. The world advances, then falls back, like a tide. Things are better now for more people than at any time in history, which of course is not to say all is hunky dory. I am far from naive, but I see no reason to set my hope aside. Yet.
|
|
|
|