Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

0 + 0


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> 0 + 0 Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
0 + 0 - 12/4/2013 11:47:23 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline
Ahhh how lovely.

The tide turns against the junk science that was global warming.

Of course, the fact that people are experiencing a cold winter helps. The fact that anarctic ice is at the highest level in 35 years (and possbly much much longer) helps to.

But I like this quote for the week of 10/17.

Zero papers published in support of global warming.
Zero people showed up in California in a rally organized by dimocrats in support of ending climate change.

And it looks quite plausible that spending on climate science will be slashed in the US.
A good week indeed.
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: 0 + 0 - 12/5/2013 3:17:16 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
Article supporting global warming published on 10-15 (that was Tuesday. 10-17 was Thursday)
http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001683

Why do you repeat such dumbass lies?

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: 0 + 0 - 12/5/2013 3:50:16 AM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
Yes DK, the concept of 'Theory of Climate Change' is totally lost on this and many other conservatives. An when they spread crap like this, all they are doing is helping Democrats win public office across the nation. Doesn't take much convincing towards the moderates that they are more likely to get stuff accomplished by siding with Democrats then then Republican/Tea Party when showing material like Phydeaux.....

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: 0 + 0 - 12/5/2013 5:52:55 AM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline
Look, I am doing my best to invalidate the "global warming" stuff by taking over control of HARP and starting another ice age. I mean, the science that the climate change theory is based on is valid, but I figure that if I can start another ice age, everyone will shit their pants.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: 0 + 0 - 12/5/2013 5:58:17 AM   
servantforuse


Posts: 6363
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline
The best part for me is an absent Al Gore. That nut case has been quiet for quite some time.

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: 0 + 0 - 12/5/2013 9:19:32 AM   
subrob1967


Posts: 4591
Joined: 9/13/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

Yes DK, the concept of 'Theory of Climate Change' is totally lost on this and many other conservatives. An when they spread crap like this, all they are doing is helping Democrats win public office across the nation. Doesn't take much convincing towards the moderates that they are more likely to get stuff accomplished by siding with Democrats then then Republican/Tea Party when showing material like Phydeaux.....




Bullshit, conservatives don't deny the climate is changing, we just deny the bullshit progressive claim that man is the cause of the change. You progressives have put junk science up on a pedestal, and refuse to see the truth that the climate is going to change, always has, and always will. It's the nature of the universe.

Man can neither accelerate nor decelerate the changing climate, and the only people who say otherwise are making money hand over fist convincing progressives that man is the cause of all climate changes.

Sooner or later you guys will leave Storybrooke and return to sanity.

_____________________________

http://www.extra-life.org/

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: 0 + 0 - 12/5/2013 9:40:17 AM   
RottenJohnny


Posts: 1677
Joined: 5/5/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse
The best part for me is an absent Al Gore. That nut case has been quiet for quite some time.

Last I heard, he was trying to build a national healthcare website after inventing the internet. I guess it's keeping him busy.

_____________________________

"I find your arguments strewn with gaping defects in logic." - Mr. Spock

"Give me liberty or give me death." - Patrick Henry

I believe in common sense, not common opinions. - Me

(in reply to servantforuse)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: 0 + 0 - 12/5/2013 9:42:51 AM   
RottenJohnny


Posts: 1677
Joined: 5/5/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Look, I am doing my best to invalidate the "global warming" stuff by taking over control of HARP and starting another ice age. I mean, the science that the climate change theory is based on is valid, but I figure that if I can start another ice age, everyone will shit their pants.

Well, I really liked the atmospheric light show they managed to create. Hopefully, you'll have better luck at getting it to actually do something useful.

_____________________________

"I find your arguments strewn with gaping defects in logic." - Mr. Spock

"Give me liberty or give me death." - Patrick Henry

I believe in common sense, not common opinions. - Me

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: 0 + 0 - 12/5/2013 9:52:17 AM   
truckinslave


Posts: 3897
Joined: 6/16/2004
Status: offline
Ruh-roh.

It seems that scientists not only are jumping off the sinking global warming canoe, they are boarding the global cooling ship.

Enjoy

_____________________________

1. Islam and sharia are indivisible.
2. Sharia is barbaric, homophobic, violent, and inimical to the most basic Western values (including free speech and freedom of religion). (Yeah, I know: SEE: Irony 101).
ERGO: Islam has no place in America.

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: 0 + 0 - 12/5/2013 10:00:08 AM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline
What I don’t understand is the resistance to the actions called for to reduce global warming when they will only make this earth a better place to live…Even if there is no human contribution to global warming.

Otherwise clean air and a healthy environment are necessary requirements for our species to survive so lets do it and if it slows or stops global warming it will just be icing on the cake….If not at least we can breath fresh air….What is the downside?

Why are we so hung up on who is right or wrong when there is no wrong when it comes to what we must do to keep our quality of life.

Butch

< Message edited by kdsub -- 12/5/2013 10:06:12 AM >


_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: 0 + 0 - 12/5/2013 11:19:25 AM   
Yachtie


Posts: 3593
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

What I don’t understand is the resistance to the actions called for to reduce global warming when they will only make this earth a better place to live…Even if there is no human contribution to global warming.

Otherwise clean air and a healthy environment are necessary requirements for our species to survive so lets do it and if it slows or stops global warming it will just be icing on the cake….If not at least we can breath fresh air….What is the downside?




Cost. Not a small detail that.

_____________________________

“We all know it’s going to end badly, but in the meantime we can make some money.” - Jim Cramer, CNBC

“Those who ‘abjure’ violence can only do so because others are committing violence on their behalf.” - George Orwell

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: 0 + 0 - 12/5/2013 11:24:09 AM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

What I don’t understand is the resistance to the actions called for to reduce global warming when they will only make this earth a better place to live…Even if there is no human contribution to global warming.

Otherwise clean air and a healthy environment are necessary requirements for our species to survive so lets do it and if it slows or stops global warming it will just be icing on the cake….If not at least we can breath fresh air….What is the downside?

Reducing C02 emissions has nothing to do with promoting clean fresh healthy air.

K.

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: 0 + 0 - 12/5/2013 11:30:30 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

What I don’t understand is the resistance to the actions called for to reduce global warming when they will only make this earth a better place to live…Even if there is no human contribution to global warming.

Otherwise clean air and a healthy environment are necessary requirements for our species to survive so lets do it and if it slows or stops global warming it will just be icing on the cake….If not at least we can breath fresh air….What is the downside?

Why are we so hung up on who is right or wrong when there is no wrong when it comes to what we must do to keep our quality of life.

Butch


They taught us in girl scouts and school over 40 years ago to respect the planet and try to stop pollution as much as possible. I don't have a problem with that. It is just common sense to me. I do have a problem with people lying about it and trying to impose taxes based on those lies. But exaggeration and outright lying seem to be standard with politicians so I don't expect much from them.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: 0 + 0 - 12/5/2013 12:24:59 PM   
truckinslave


Posts: 3897
Joined: 6/16/2004
Status: offline
The entire international purpose of carbon dioxide (i.e plant food) control/curtailment is to destroy the United States economy and enrich theirs, if not in fact, then by comparison.

It's all about ending American dominance... and destroying our quality of life.

We're not talking about acid rain, or PBAs, or poison of any sort. We're talking about carbon dioxide, a substance created every few seconds by all breathing life on earth, a substance absolutely essential to life itself....

_____________________________

1. Islam and sharia are indivisible.
2. Sharia is barbaric, homophobic, violent, and inimical to the most basic Western values (including free speech and freedom of religion). (Yeah, I know: SEE: Irony 101).
ERGO: Islam has no place in America.

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: 0 + 0 - 12/5/2013 1:27:29 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
But not ours.  You will not thrive, and may not survive, in an atmosphere of C02.

Global warming is strictly a nutsacker meme. 

Climate change is real, now; the question is, whether colder or warmer. and not whether nutsackers have any fuckin clue, because of course; they are shiteating imbeciles.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to truckinslave)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: 0 + 0 - 12/5/2013 1:31:35 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

Article supporting global warming published on 10-15 (that was Tuesday. 10-17 was Thursday)
http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001683

Why do you repeat such dumbass lies?


Just because I like teasing the village idi - er 'green energy activist'. What part exactly do you consider a lie?
Do you doubt the quote exists?

As for your article, I didn't say there weren't idiots that had written blogs about global warming. I didnt idiots hadn't created photo collages. I'm sure somewhere a second grader made a science report on it too.

I repeated a quote that no papers were published on it. You know, peer reviewed, 'science'. And frankly if the authors are wrong that somewhere someone wrote an obscure piece of science it makes not a hill of beans difference to me. Because the thrust of client science is clear. As I reported 6 months ago, scientists are abandoning the fiction of global warming in droves.

I do give you credit - you're going to be one of the last to cling to one of the biggest delusions of the 20th century. My personal prediction is that 2014 will be the last year that we hear any real mention of 'global warming'. By the end of 2015 all the talk will be of global cooling.

And frankly, the evidence for that is a damn sight more convincing than the evidence for global warming ever was.



(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: 0 + 0 - 12/5/2013 1:35:55 PM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
I read Jonathon Chase's article and all his concern about the oceans. My first reaction was: hell, the oceans have withstood climate change many times before the advent of the Anthropocene so what's the big deal?

In a broader view, there have been five major catastrophic extinctions of species during the history of life on this planet. It is only our narrow conceit that permits us to think that our species will survive, that our destiny is to reign on this rock forever.

In the meanwhile we can try to make life easier for ourselves by promoting peace and green but I am not so optimistic that we have the ethical urge to work it out especially in the face of a rapidly growing world population where everyone wants a share and the opportunities for corruption are too numerous.

If it matters, we can hope there are some amongst us who already carry the genome best adapted to the next environment. However, my money is on the roaches. . . .

or on the Rapture . . . whichever comes first.

(in reply to truckinslave)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: 0 + 0 - 12/5/2013 1:38:23 PM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

Ahhh how lovely.

The tide turns against the junk science that was global warming.

Of course, the fact that people are experiencing a cold winter helps. The fact that anarctic ice is at the highest level in 35 years (and possbly much much longer) helps to.

But I like this quote for the week of 10/17.

Zero papers published in support of global warming.
Zero people showed up in California in a rally organized by dimocrats in support of ending climate change.

And it looks quite plausible that spending on climate science will be slashed in the US.
A good week indeed.


I knew the PPL mouth breathers were in trouble when they stopped saying "global warming" (because the evidence didn't support it) and started saying "climate change" (for which there is plenty of evidence but, it only proves that the world is behaving as it always has)

quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

The best part for me is an absent Al Gore. That nut case has been quiet for quite some time.



Damn it! You beat me to it. The poor dumb bastard hasn't been relevant since his wife made all that noise with the PMRC, thirty years ago. The poor guy needs a job. Maybe another joke from this thread is very accurate:

quote:

ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny

quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

The best part for me is an absent Al Gore. That nut case has been quiet for quite some time.



Last I heard, he was trying to build a national healthcare website after inventing the internet. I guess it's keeping him busy.



Well played, Johnny!

quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

The entire international purpose of carbon dioxide (i.e plant food) control/curtailment is to destroy the United States economy and enrich theirs, if not in fact, then by comparison.

It's all about ending American dominance... and destroying our quality of life.

We're not talking about acid rain, or PBAs, or poison of any sort. We're talking about carbon dioxide, a substance created every few seconds by all breathing life on earth, a substance absolutely essential to life itself....



QFT





_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: 0 + 0 - 12/5/2013 3:25:21 PM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: subrob1967
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
Yes DK, the concept of 'Theory of Climate Change' is totally lost on this and many other conservatives. An when they spread crap like this, all they are doing is helping Democrats win public office across the nation. Doesn't take much convincing towards the moderates that they are more likely to get stuff accomplished by siding with Democrats then then Republican/Tea Party when showing material like Phydeaux.....

Bullshit, conservatives don't deny the climate is changing, we just deny the bullshit progressive claim that man is the cause of the change. You progressives have put junk science up on a pedestal, and refuse to see the truth that the climate is going to change, always has, and always will. It's the nature of the universe.


1 ) A very good sum of conservatives do not even know WHAT the Theory of Climate Change even tries to explain. The remainder are broken into a few sub groups: A ) Those that keep believing the conservative misinformation machine that the scientists have not gone beyond this phase. B ) The scientists are still debating the causes of Climate Change. And C ) Those that know how its taking place and are still LYING about its effects even though the evidence is solid and well verified.

2 ) The Theory of Climate Change is not as you put it 'junk science'. Unless your going to them call 'biology', 'chemistry', and 'physics' all junk sciences. Since a theory is one of the most important concepts in science. Something doesn't become a theory because its a guess at things. Unfortunately there exists to many conservatives with absolutely no foundation to understand any of the sciences. In effect, they handle science at a 6th grade level when most scientists are speaking at the Ph.D. levels.

3 ) When one sits down with a good understanding of science and then walks through a long process of understanding the evidence supporting the theory, it does become apparent there is something to all the observations. The problem scientists have is trying to dumb down the information without losing the core concepts that help define the circumstances. One such individual that is highly respected in the sciences is Bill Nye. Unfortunately, some people need things dumbed down several times and STILL have no clue what is being explained to them. The guy does explain things on a level that those in middle school (grades 6-8) can understand, yet pile loads of adults who are conservative just have no ability to the basics of science.

But you seem to think you know better than all the scientists on the planet, subrob. Perhaps you can give us the full explanation of nature of the universe (you know, the stuff we don't currently know). I require it to be in a good scientific journal format. An if its ground breaking stuff, I'll give it to some actual physicist that I know. Who knows you could be next year's Nobel Prize winner!

quote:

ORIGINAL: subrob1967
Man can neither accelerate nor decelerate the changing climate, and the only people who say otherwise are making money hand over fist convincing progressives that man is the cause of all climate changes.


So I suppose a nuclear winter can ONLY come about by nature means, right? The amount of 'stupid' in this line of yours would explain to ANYONE with a basic understanding of science how little you understand the concepts found in the Theory of Climate Change. There exists a fair amount of evidence out there.

However you have taken things as some sort of 'Political Test of Wills' pushing the material outside of science into the political arena. In this arena you can so what ever the hell you want, including total lies. Unfortunately, anyone that has spent time in both STILL know how full of shit you really are. In other words, you lack any level including 'remote levels' of credibility on this topic.

(in reply to subrob1967)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: 0 + 0 - 12/5/2013 3:39:39 PM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave
The entire international purpose of carbon dioxide (i.e plant food) control/curtailment is to destroy the United States economy and enrich theirs, if not in fact, then by comparison.

It's all about ending American dominance... and destroying our quality of life.

We're not talking about acid rain, or PBAs, or poison of any sort. We're talking about carbon dioxide, a substance created every few seconds by all breathing life on earth, a substance absolutely essential to life itself....


If that was REALLY true, they should take material straight out of the Republican/Tea Party playbook. Last I checked they were the most successful in shutting down the United States recently. An WHO voted these whackos that almost brought the country into a hellish economic downfall? Oh....its all you conservatives. So if your so 'concern' about someone trying to destroy the United States you need not look any farther than your own mirror!

(in reply to truckinslave)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> 0 + 0 Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.096