freedomdwarf1
Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: jlf1961 Actually, since you failed to notice, I said it was one of two things, either you forgot about the revolution, or you are practicing that well noted Brit tactic of believing that the way you do it in the UK is the way everyone should do things. No, we don't jlf. What we say is that the US way of doing things ain't working. That's pretty obvious for anyone and everyone to see... and they do. quote:
ORIGINAL: jlf1961 Of course your myopic ability to only grasp one of the two things I stated is rather normal from what I have seen. This holier than thou crap preached to the rest of the world by Brits is getting rather old. Especially since you dont seem to do a fucking bit of research on what the fuck you are talking about. Umm... but our government did precisely that and came up with banning guns. As did the Australian government. And guess what? They came up with the same solution. And the figures show that it worked and continues to work. What doesn't work, however, is the half-hearted measures the US try and in little areas. quote:
ORIGINAL: jlf1961 So, how about I explain a few facts to you. 1) 68 percent of school shooters acquired the weapon from their own home or from a relative, meaning the firearms were not secured very well to allow a teenager access to them. And again, if they didn't have the friggin guns, they wouldn't be the #1 choice of revenge and wouldn't be readilly available to steal. quote:
ORIGINAL: jlf1961 2) 75 percent of school shooters felt bullied, persecuted or threatened by others. Probably not much different to any civilized nation of the first world. Difference is, only in the US are guns so plentiful. Shouldn't that be a big red clue to you? quote:
ORIGINAL: jlf1961 3) 90 percent of school shootings over more than a decade have been linked to a widely prescribed type of antidepressant called selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors or SSRIs. Now I am sure that none of those things matter much to you and your "ban guns" mentality, but it makes a point to some of the rest of us, who want to know what has changed that students are driven to such actions. I think a lot of students are driven to do all sorts of weird and nasty things to fellow students, teachers, parents, and anyone in authority. However, only in the US are guns so prevalent and easilly obtainable, by any route. quote:
ORIGINAL: jlf1961 To address point one, school shootings rarely occur in states that require trigger locks or some other strict gun storage laws. I think the biggest problem is making sure everyone obeys the laws that are already there. quote:
ORIGINAL: jlf1961 However, since you brits know everything, and the way everything should be, how about reading this. We don't claim to know everything. What we do claim (as do those in Oz), is a 99% cure for gun deaths. We made it law, countrywide; it works. quote:
ORIGINAL: jlf1961 If you dont want to, try the following: quote:
Sociologists have found that school shooting rampages are usually committed by perpetrators who feel a sense of "aggrieved entitlement". <snip> And then there is this little tidbit, that everyone and their pet dog seems to be ignoring. quote:
The new school shooting paradigm <snip> Seems to me that clearly something has changed, perhaps that is one of the issues we should be looking at, not just the fucking guns. I mean if there is something wrong shouldn't all aspects of the problem be looked at, not just the fucking tool that was used? We all know that shooters are derranged in some form. That's a given. Nobody in their right mind goes on a shooting spree. The point is, the weapon of choice, and the availability of such a weapon, is certainly a deep cause for concern. And that is why there is such a focus on the weapon - because of the availability of it. Until society can find a cure for those derranged depressives and fix the cause, the only thing left is the weapon. quote:
ORIGINAL: jlf1961 In other words people, quite looking at the fucking tree and look at the fucking forest. If there were two kids bashing each other with baseball bats, what do you do? Anyone responsible just removes the baseball bats from the fray. If they want to continue fighting, let them do it without any weapons. That's we are saying. The problem is, jlf, that for every sane and sensible law-abiding gun owner out there, there appears to be just as many irresponsible ones that allow this sort of thing to happen. I can remember when as a kid, I really enjoyed watching soccer standing in the stands and watching my local heroes do their bit - all up close and almost personal. But, because of a stupid minority (a very small minority), we now have to have seats and fencing to protect out heroes. It spoilt my enjoyment and I don't go any more. I don't blame the clubs, FIFA, or the lawmakers, to keep my heroes safe; only the asshats that caused such a law to be what it is today. Sometimes, just sometimes, really drastic measures need to be put into law for the general safety of those that can't stay within the law or act sensibly. We aren't advocating a complete ban as you keep quoting us as saying, just a lot more restrictions on actually having one in the first place. Background checks and ballistic databases won't stop the guns being stolen and used in the first place. What needs to be done is to ensure there aren't so fucking many of them that it takes no effort at all to grab one.
|