RE: Anotther school shooting. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


truckinslave -> RE: Anotther school shooting. (12/22/2013 10:59:55 AM)

quote:

I just think a federal requirement in all states for ownership is important.


I take exactly the opposite approach: repeal the 16th Amendment.

Those who wanted to do so could live in Mass, which would presumably be gun-free; I could remain in WV (and push for laws requiring all citizens to carry); we could both remain American.

Repealing the 16th also works for abortion and a host of other divisive national issues. The States were not intende to be carbon copies of each other dictated to by the feds.

While we're at it we can repeal the 17th also...




EdBowie -> RE: Anotther school shooting. (12/22/2013 11:27:35 AM)

Quit the non-stop lying, I argued against a semi-auto ban by pointing out that very thing..
quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

FR

The shooting event which prompted this particular discussion was carried out by someone armed with a manual action shotgun, molotov cocktails, and a machete. What does a semi-auto ban have to do with anything?





BamaD -> RE: Anotther school shooting. (12/22/2013 12:38:28 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: EdBowie

Why do you think that 20 - 30 is an unreasonable number to have carry permits?

I'm not envisioning the little red schoolhouse, I'm talking about a school of 1,000 or more kids, and a hundred or more employees.

As far as track record, I only know that Arkansas passed such a law, and most schools in that state opted out on a faculty vote.


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

You're probably right about spending the money. If we dropped the gun free zones designations and just let school employees who have permits carry, there wouldn't be any additional costs. However if this is adopted by most schools, I'm sure some Zimmerman type of fuck up would eventually happen though certainly nothing to the extent of 30 teachers running around waving guns.

Now I'm curious what the history has been with the 3 states and parts of Texas that have been allowing concealed carry in their schools. I believe Utah has recently approved it and it's under consideration in other states.



Statistically with 100 teachers no more than 4 or 5 would be expected to have permits.
When you consider that educators tend to be liberal it could be even less.




EdBowie -> RE: Anotther school shooting. (12/22/2013 12:49:51 PM)

And for every hundred teachers, how many coaches, bus drivers, maintenance people, clerical staff, and so on?

The worst case scenario is still undesirable with even a handful of untrained people, especially the very people who would think that their 16 hours CCW class equipped the to be effective is n active shooter situation.

Part of the overall US gun culture is a widespread belief that all American males are born experts at driving, lovemaking, holding their liquor, and conquering evil in a crisis...

Reality disagrees.


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: EdBowie

Why do you think that 20 - 30 is an unreasonable number to have carry permits?

I'm not envisioning the little red schoolhouse, I'm talking about a school of 1,000 or more kids, and a hundred or more employees.

As far as track record, I only know that Arkansas passed such a law, and most schools in that state opted out on a faculty vote.


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

You're probably right about spending the money. If we dropped the gun free zones designations and just let school employees who have permits carry, there wouldn't be any additional costs. However if this is adopted by most schools, I'm sure some Zimmerman type of fuck up would eventually happen though certainly nothing to the extent of 30 teachers running around waving guns.

Now I'm curious what the history has been with the 3 states and parts of Texas that have been allowing concealed carry in their schools. I believe Utah has recently approved it and it's under consideration in other states.



Statistically with 100 teachers no more than 4 or 5 would be expected to have permits.
When you consider that educators tend to be liberal it could be even less.





BamaD -> RE: Anotther school shooting. (12/22/2013 1:05:03 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: EdBowie

And for every hundred teachers, how many coaches, bus drivers, maintenance people, clerical staff, and so on?

The worst case scenario is still undesirable with even a handful of untrained people, especially the very people who would think that their 16 hours CCW class equipped the to be effective is n active shooter situation.

Part of the overall US gun culture is a widespread belief that all American males are born experts at driving, lovemaking, holding their liquor, and conquering evil in a crisis...

Reality disagrees.


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: EdBowie

Why do you think that 20 - 30 is an unreasonable number to have carry permits?

I'm not envisioning the little red schoolhouse, I'm talking about a school of 1,000 or more kids, and a hundred or more employees.

As far as track record, I only know that Arkansas passed such a law, and most schools in that state opted out on a faculty vote.


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

You're probably right about spending the money. If we dropped the gun free zones designations and just let school employees who have permits carry, there wouldn't be any additional costs. However if this is adopted by most schools, I'm sure some Zimmerman type of fuck up would eventually happen though certainly nothing to the extent of 30 teachers running around waving guns.

Now I'm curious what the history has been with the 3 states and parts of Texas that have been allowing concealed carry in their schools. I believe Utah has recently approved it and it's under consideration in other states.



Statistically with 100 teachers no more than 4 or 5 would be expected to have permits.
When you consider that educators tend to be liberal it could be even less.



For starters with 1000 students you would have not more than 40 teachers, to be generous 1 dozen more for clerical and maintenance , bus drivers don't count.
That gives us 52 people. Only about 5% of people get permits so you have maybe 3.




EdBowie -> RE: Anotther school shooting. (12/22/2013 1:15:25 PM)

Try 80 teachers per 1,000 students (schools teach more than one subject these days), plus administrators, plus the people I listed below. 12 to run the cafeteria, the physical plant, transportation, and all clerical? Nope, doesn't add up.

And bus drivers, etc. aren't employees? Says who?

And none of that addresses the fact that even a smaller pool of armed people with only CCW training, are more dangerous to everyone else during an active shooter situation.


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: EdBowie

And for every hundred teachers, how many coaches, bus drivers, maintenance people, clerical staff, and so on?

The worst case scenario is still undesirable with even a handful of untrained people, especially the very people who would think that their 16 hours CCW class equipped the to be effective is n active shooter situation.

Part of the overall US gun culture is a widespread belief that all American males are born experts at driving, lovemaking, holding their liquor, and conquering evil in a crisis...

Reality disagrees.


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: EdBowie

Why do you think that 20 - 30 is an unreasonable number to have carry permits?

I'm not envisioning the little red schoolhouse, I'm talking about a school of 1,000 or more kids, and a hundred or more employees.

As far as track record, I only know that Arkansas passed such a law, and most schools in that state opted out on a faculty vote.


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

You're probably right about spending the money. If we dropped the gun free zones designations and just let school employees who have permits carry, there wouldn't be any additional costs. However if this is adopted by most schools, I'm sure some Zimmerman type of fuck up would eventually happen though certainly nothing to the extent of 30 teachers running around waving guns.

Now I'm curious what the history has been with the 3 states and parts of Texas that have been allowing concealed carry in their schools. I believe Utah has recently approved it and it's under consideration in other states.



Statistically with 100 teachers no more than 4 or 5 would be expected to have permits.
When you consider that educators tend to be liberal it could be even less.



For starters with 1000 students you would have not more than 40 teachers, to be generous 1 dozen more for clerical and maintenance , bus drivers don't count.
That gives us 52 people. Only about 5% of people get permits so you have maybe 3.





lovmuffin -> RE: Anotther school shooting. (12/22/2013 1:49:24 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL:

Part of the overall US gun culture is a widespread belief that all American males are born experts at driving, lovemaking, holding their liquor, and conquering evil in a crisis...


Crap, if I only had the holding my liquor one. [8D]




truckinslave -> RE: Anotther school shooting. (12/22/2013 3:05:44 PM)

quote:

Statistically with 100 teachers no more than 4 or 5 would be expected to have permits.


One armed responder is better than none.




MsMJAY -> RE: Anotther school shooting. (12/22/2013 3:27:22 PM)

I think some people are not considering the complete chaos that happens when a school shooting occurs.
When an officer arrives on an active shooter scene he or she has no idea who the shooter is. He doesn't know if the shooter is an outsider, a student or a faculty member. There are people running and screaming, people laying on the floor injured or dead and sometimes alarm bells or partial power outages that screw with the officer's hearing and visibility. Plus he is going to be at a heightened state of arousal because he is going into a life threatening situation.

The only way the officer(s) will know who the shooter is, is the fact that the shooter is in civilian clothes and has a gun. They have no other means of identifying him or her. That means if a teacher or principal is walking through the building with a gun when a school shooting is in progress, he or she will most likely get shot by the police. And given the situation, if a teacher or principal shoots at the active shooter, they have just as much chance of hitting an innocent student as they have of hitting the active shooter.

I am not saying they should or should not be armed. I am only saying that we should consider the multitude of risk factors that play into it.


quote:

ORIGINAL: EdBowie

And none of that addresses the fact that even a smaller pool of armed people with only CCW training, are more dangerous to everyone else during an active shooter situation.


quote:





Darkdog -> RE: Anotther school shooting. (12/22/2013 3:31:28 PM)

Yes, in the "everyone is armed" scenario, there would be a lot of do-gooders shooting at each other.




igor2003 -> RE: Anotther school shooting. (12/22/2013 4:22:19 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: EdBowie

For the 3rd time, that was brought up in the context of American spree shootings of the type currently making headlines, not all shootings, ever. I haven't made the absolute claim that no one has ever been shot on a private campus, I'm examining the large difference in frequency.


quote:

ORIGINAL: igor2003


The arguments to which I was responding, both pro and con, were based around whether private schools were safer and whether private schools do or do not suffer from shootings. I was simply pointing out that shootings do occur at private schools. Kids, teachers, parents, etc. all still do get disgruntled at private schools, just like public school, and sometimes do turn to guns as a means of expressing their ire. As EdBowie tries to argue in his response to my post, private schools, so far, for the most part have not suffered from "spree" killings, though as in the case of Oikos, with, I believe, 7 dead, even private schools have that problem too. Just because there haven't been "a lot" of spree killings at private schools is probably just a matter of numbers as much as anything else. There are many more public schools, with many more students, teachers, and families involved, making them much more likely to have been the site for any shootings, including spree killings. As far as private schools being "safe" from shootings...that, to me, appears to be a myth.

So...in response to BamaD...there are fewer shootings at private schools, but I think in large part that is simply because there are not nearly as many people involved.

And in response to EdBowie...Private schools do have spree shootings, as shown by Oikos. There may be others. What I provided was the results of a very quick search, and is in no way presented as a complete list. I'm relatively certain that more examples might be found if a person wanted to take the time to look for them.

For anyone to say that my short list "proves" anyone's point (other than to show that private school shootings do exist) is ridiculous.




Please take a comprehensive reading course. My original post was not directed at YOU specifically or ANYTHING YOU POSTED. It was directed at the general debate over the safety of private schools versus public schools and whether or not gun violence took place at private schools. I know you probably want everything to be about you, but I assure you...this wasn't. So, whether it is the 3rd, 4th, or 100th time...THIS WAS NOT ABOUT YOU.




Phydeaux -> RE: Anotther school shooting. (12/22/2013 7:19:56 PM)

I don't know why you're arguing with me. I don't think armed guards are workable.
But I don't think they cause the problems you paint either. Memory says there have been armed civilians at several of the recent incidents.




quote:

ORIGINAL: EdBowie

Zimmerman didn't attack a school.

And I don't know when the last time you were inside a school, but they also have employees like bus drivers, maintenance and janitorial crew, lunch room and clerical staff.... I highly doubt these people are 8-1 anti-gun.

In any case, the untrained CCW holder shooting the wrong person worst case scenario would hold true with even a small number .

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

Teachers at the college level break 8-1 democrat. At the highschool level its not as bad - in the neighborhood of 4:1.
Most teachers are women.

The demographics are such that even in a school of 50-100 teachers you will have probably at most 2-3 people with permits. Mostly in rural areas, or women that have been victimized before. I just do not see a situation occurring where you will have 20-30, unless you are paying for guards - and no school district can afford that much per school anyway.

This is why even in when they vote mandatory carry, most schools opt out.

Regarding the zimmerman kind of fuck up.
If you wanted to mandate that schools were concealed carry - it might work. It would lower the chance of random zimmerman types attacking.

But I don't think it solves the fact that the biggest cause of this kind of violence is student -on - student bullying or violence.

Which more or less I think occurs because we take juvenile delinquents and force them into school. Hard to expect them to become angels.

My proposed solution:

A). Carry law - as above.
B). Small juvie schools oriented around vocational training. Wood, Metal shop etc.
C). Better screening.




quote:

ORIGINAL: EdBowie

Why do you think that 20 - 30 is an unreasonable number to have carry permits?

I'm not envisioning the little red schoolhouse, I'm talking about a school of 1,000 or more kids, and a hundred or more employees.

As far as track record, I only know that Arkansas passed such a law, and most schools in that state opted out on a faculty vote.


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

You're probably right about spending the money. If we dropped the gun free zones designations and just let school employees who have permits carry, there wouldn't be any additional costs. However if this is adopted by most schools, I'm sure some Zimmerman type of fuck up would eventually happen though certainly nothing to the extent of 30 teachers running around waving guns.

Now I'm curious what the history has been with the 3 states and parts of Texas that have been allowing concealed carry in their schools. I believe Utah has recently approved it and it's under consideration in other states.











Phydeaux -> RE: Anotther school shooting. (12/22/2013 7:22:38 PM)

Butch,

I noticed you very carefully did not reply to my query on your position.
Is it therefore OK to give a mental health exam to a woman that wants an abortion?

I mean its the same standard, no? Both the gun owner and the person seeking an abortion want to engage in a constitutionally protected activity.

I bring this up to give you some insight on just how repugnant your suggestion is.




truckinslave -> RE: Anotther school shooting. (12/22/2013 7:29:47 PM)

quote:

The only way the officer(s) will know who the shooter is, is the fact that the shooter is in civilian clothes and has a gun. They have no other means of identifying him or her. That means if a teacher or principal is walking through the building with a gun when a school shooting is in progress, he or she will most likely get shot by the police. And given the situation, if a teacher or principal shoots at the active shooter, they have just as much chance of hitting an innocent student as they have of hitting the active shooter.


This is also a problem for detectives and, especially, for those undercover officers who cannot/do not carry shields. They can be anywhere at any time...
Officers responding to a school shooting should, however, know that their school district allows armed teachers and that they may encounter armed Good Samaritans.
It does complicate the situation; there's no getting around that, but there are ways to ameliorate it. Having officers meet faculty, etc....




MsMJAY -> RE: Anotther school shooting. (12/22/2013 7:47:33 PM)

This is true, but detectives receive a high level of training for their situations and accept a very high level of risk as a natural consequence of their jobs. Teachers and Principals will not have that level of training. How many of them are going to want to assume that level of risk as a "natural consequence" of their jobs? Maybe some will, but it is really a lot to ask of someone whose job is an educator.

quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

quote:

The only way the officer(s) will know who the shooter is, is the fact that the shooter is in civilian clothes and has a gun. They have no other means of identifying him or her. That means if a teacher or principal is walking through the building with a gun when a school shooting is in progress, he or she will most likely get shot by the police. And given the situation, if a teacher or principal shoots at the active shooter, they have just as much chance of hitting an innocent student as they have of hitting the active shooter.


This is also a problem for detectives and, especially, for those undercover officers who cannot/do not carry shields. They can be anywhere at any time...
Officers responding to a school shooting should, however, know that their school district allows armed teachers and that they may encounter armed Good Samaritans.
It does complicate the situation; there's no getting around that, but there are ways to ameliorate it. Having officers meet faculty, etc....





truckinslave -> RE: Anotther school shooting. (12/22/2013 7:58:01 PM)

quote:

How many of them are going to want to assume that level of risk as a "natural consequence" of their jobs? Maybe some will, but it is really a lot to ask of someone whose job is an educator.


AFAIK, the discussion is not about asking anyone to assume any risk whatsoever; rather it is about allowing those who wish to assume that risk to do so legally.




kdsub -> RE: Anotther school shooting. (12/22/2013 8:29:31 PM)

quote:

Is it therefore OK to give a mental health exam to a woman that wants an abortion?

I mean its the same standard, no? Both the gun owner and the person seeking an abortion want to engage in a constitutionally protected activity.


Apples and oranges...she can't shoot someone, or herself, with her baby. They are not the same standard and you are wrong to say, in my opinion, the dangerously mentally ill have a constitutional right to bear arms. Just as the blind cannot legally drive a vehicle the mentally ill should not legally own a weapon.
It has nothing to do with constitutional rights it is simply a safety issue. If by some medical procedure the blind regain their sight they would be eligible for a drivers license as would the mentally ill regain the right to own firearms if they were deemed competent.

When you apply for a drivers license you must take and pass a vision test...nothing unconstitutional in that so why would a mental competency test for gun ownership be any different?

Butch




MsMJAY -> RE: Anotther school shooting. (12/22/2013 8:42:53 PM)

No matter how I worded it, it doesn't change the fact that it is a very high level of risk for a non-law enforcement employee to assume as part of their job.

quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

quote:

How many of them are going to want to assume that level of risk as a "natural consequence" of their jobs? Maybe some will, but it is really a lot to ask of someone whose job is an educator.


AFAIK, the discussion is not about asking anyone to assume any risk whatsoever; rather it is about allowing those who wish to assume that risk to do so legally.





igor2003 -> RE: Anotther school shooting. (12/22/2013 9:24:09 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MsMJAY

No matter how I worded it, it doesn't change the fact that it is a very high level of risk for a non-law enforcement employee to assume as part of their job.

quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

quote:

How many of them are going to want to assume that level of risk as a "natural consequence" of their jobs? Maybe some will, but it is really a lot to ask of someone whose job is an educator.


AFAIK, the discussion is not about asking anyone to assume any risk whatsoever; rather it is about allowing those who wish to assume that risk to do so legally.




In going back through the posts it looks like the "risk" you are talking about is the risk of being shot by a police officer if the officer sees them with a gun...is that right? Do you really think THAT risk is greater than sitting in classroom, trying to shield a bunch of kids when the shooter walks up to them, puts a gun in their face, and pulls the trigger? Nope...no risk there. And next to no way at all of putting up any kind of defense, for themselves, or for the kids they are trying to protect.




truckinslave -> RE: Anotther school shooting. (12/22/2013 9:29:12 PM)

quote:

it is a very high level of risk for a non-law enforcement employee to assume as part of their job.


No one, anywhere, has suggested that being armed should/would/could be " part of their job"

Again, we are discussing allowing teachers to go armed; you are the only one discussing requiring them to do so.

I can explain it to you; I cannot understand it for you.




Page: <<   < prev  22 23 [24] 25 26   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875