RE: "Real" BDSM

RE: "Real" BDSM (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

Copper29 -> RE: "Real" BDSM (12/20/2013 7:29:07 AM)
:) Just taking a break from the forums, guys. Allow me to attempt to clear a few things up. 1. The purpose of this thread had very little to do with me saying "why doesn't the general population of CM find online BDSM real." If it were, that would be the name of the thread. Rather, it was my interest to see how views of BDSM differed, and what people's personal hierarchies were. The topic shifted to exclusively online vs. in person-- which is fine, it's an interesting conversation in and of itself, but wasn't my original intention. 2. I do carry on BDSM relationships offline and in person. However, there's a sort of a filter-- if I meet a person exclusively for the purpose of BDSM online, I do not engage with that person offline. However, there are people that I've met in person that I carry BDSM relationships with both on and offline. I am currently involved in two in person BDSM relationships, though I'll occasionally incorporate online acts. It's never wise to assume. 3. Most of the arguments against online BDSM seem to boil down to "well, it makes a poor substitute for kink in person." I would agree with that. However, my argument is that if you view it as not a substitute but a different kind of experience, why shouldn't it be an equally valid form of BDSM? You don't hit someone with handcuffs when they wanted a crop-- handcuffs make a pretty lousy substitute for that specific purpose. I'm glad so many people have participated in this discussion, and hope that it continues-- as it goes on, it seems to me that more points of view are crawling out of the woodwork, making for some very interesting dialogue. [small edits for clarity]

RedMagic1 -> RE: "Real" BDSM (12/20/2013 7:54:09 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Copper29 equally valid I have no idea what you mean by this.

Copper29 -> RE: "Real" BDSM (12/20/2013 8:05:11 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: RedMagic1 quote: ORIGINAL: Copper29 equally valid I have no idea what you mean by this. That is, seen as 'real' bdsm-- to pull the dictionary definition, existing as a thing or occurring in fact; genuine, not imitation or artificial. (As opposed to real being short for 'real life.')

RedMagic1 -> RE: "Real" BDSM (12/20/2013 8:15:05 AM)
That's an argument that will eventually disappear once technology improves, and it's no longer possible to distinguish cyber sex from the real thing. It's like the abortion debate. Within 25 years, maybe sooner, it will be possible to bring a zygote to term completely outside a human body. Then life really will begin at conception, regardless of anyone's political or religious beliefs. So as far as I'm concerned, the only logical and ethical position to hold is: "Abortion is murder, and it should be free of charge and readily available." (This is also known as the Everyone Line Up to Hate RedMagic Position.) Same thing here. Not everyone is going to validate you, but, over the course of time, cyber anything, including BDSM, will become harder and harder to distinguish from the real thing, for anyone's definition of real.

FrostedFlake -> RE: "Real" BDSM (12/20/2013 10:01:19 AM)
I'm visualizing the "FREE" version of the cyber-sex toys of the probably not sufficiently distant future. "This orgasm brought to you by MONSANTO! Makers of the only thing left to eat, so watch your step! And the Cyber Gym! Browse on over and work you virtual ass off for half off!! Hit up Triple double you dot not even slightly real dot com. All major credit cards accepted! Get to the Cyber Gym, NOW! And JOSTENS! You haven't graduated if you don't have a ring from JOSTENS!" By act of Congress, they won't be able to do that more than one minute in five. So they talk very fast, and then speed it up, for about six seconds every thirty. And of course, they TALK LOUD. Future linguists will trace the male habit of speaking fast and loud to the mid 21st century.

Spiritedsub2 -> RE: "Real" BDSM (12/20/2013 10:56:53 AM)
I think you and RedMagic have read too much Aldous Huxley [:D]

Copper29 -> RE: "Real" BDSM (12/20/2013 11:02:59 AM)
No, more like Idiocracy, maybe. There aren't enough drugs and references to horrific racism to be Aldous Huxley.

Copper29 -> RE: "Real" BDSM (12/20/2013 11:06:29 AM)
Or the adult fanfiction version of WALL-E, I guess.

MasterCaneman -> RE: "Real" BDSM (12/20/2013 11:58:52 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Copper29 Or the adult fanfiction version of WALL-E, I guess. What's scary to think about is that probably exists.

Copper29 -> RE: "Real" BDSM (12/20/2013 12:05:27 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MasterCaneman quote: ORIGINAL: Copper29 Or the adult fanfiction version of WALL-E, I guess. What's scary to think about is that probably exists. https://www.fanfiction.net/s/6329001/1/Mating-101-A-Guide-to-Robot-Love Five seconds on google. You're welcome.

RedMagic1 -> RE: "Real" BDSM (12/20/2013 12:09:46 PM)
http://rule34.paheal.net/

Apocalypso -> RE: "Real" BDSM (12/20/2013 12:16:39 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: RedMagic1 http://rule34.paheal.net/ Apparently Judge Dredd porn does not exist. I have broken the Internet!

HipPoindexter -> RE: "Real" BDSM (12/20/2013 12:35:34 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Apocalypso quote: ORIGINAL: RedMagic1 http://rule34.paheal.net/ Apparently Judge Dredd porn does not exist. I have broken the Internet! we should fix that. PM me. i'll put you in touch with some money dudes.

Apocalypso -> RE: "Real" BDSM (12/20/2013 12:48:13 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: HipPoindexter we should fix that. PM me. i'll put you in touch with some money dudes. As long as we can have a scene with Walter the Wobot, I'm in.

ResidentSadist -> RE: "Real" BDSM (12/20/2013 1:06:20 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Spiritedsub2 I think you and RedMagic have read too much Aldous Huxley [:D] Doors of Perception [:D]

Spiritedsub2 -> RE: "Real" BDSM (12/20/2013 1:55:26 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ResidentSadist quote: ORIGINAL: Spiritedsub2 I think you and RedMagic have read too much Aldous Huxley [:D] Doors of Perception [:D] Oooh. Never heard of this book; it just went into my amazon cart.

MalcolmNathaniel -> RE: "Real" BDSM (12/20/2013 1:57:42 PM)
How to make sex online real: You could modify one of those fake vibrating pussies to be controlled electronically from a joystick held by your partner on the net. The problem is that if your computer crashes it could rip your dick off and fax it to Venezuela. (My apologies to Craig Charles.) Actually it wouldn't be that difficult to create a device that would allow a partner to control such a device over the net. Takes a few seconds to Google it apparently they have already existed for 15 years. They're called Dildonics.

RedMagic1 -> RE: "Real" BDSM (12/20/2013 2:07:21 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MalcolmNathaniel Actually it wouldn't be that difficult to create a device that would allow a partner to control such a device over the net. Takes a few seconds to Google it apparently they have already existed for 15 years. They're called Dildonics. Yeah. They aren't any kind of substitute for the real deal though. But fifty, one hundred years out, just think. You and your partner put on motion capture suits (like Gollum in the Lord of the Rings) and do the nasty in multiple ways. Then, when you're alone, you can enter some kind of suit, or goo chamber, where you have a physical interaction with a 3D image of your partner. Or soldier and spouse are both in goo chambers, thousands of miles apart, and they make each other come anyway. Still not as good as the real thing. But there will be people who like it better, much as there are people today who choose to do porn or romance novels instead of real relationships.

Spiritedsub2 -> RE: "Real" BDSM (12/20/2013 2:12:22 PM)
The Luddites are sounding pretty smart right about now...

Apocalypso -> RE: "Real" BDSM (12/20/2013 2:29:45 PM)
Any advance in technology that allows me to have a virtual threesome with two other Apocalypsos is one I heartily approve of.

Page: << < prev 2 3 4 [5] 6 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875