Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Let me see if I have this straight


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Let me see if I have this straight Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Let me see if I have this straight - 12/29/2013 7:30:04 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Now how does that work?



It doesn't. Let me 'splain. The birthers were idiots provided with media attention and exposure far beyond their numbers or relevance. They never had a point, or a leg to stand on, and their only illusion of credibility, at any time, was a result of the media fixation on them. Strawman by proxy. Find the biggest idiot in the room, stick all the cameras and microphones in his face, and pretend he's the norm.

I can think of all sorts of reasons to not be interested in Senator Cruz trying to occupy a political office with a prohibition on naturalized citizenship, without looking to the circumstances of his birth, exactly as I had plenty of reasons to think candidate Obama was wholly unqualified for the position he ultimately obtained, none of which involved Kenya.



_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Let me see if I have this straight - 12/29/2013 7:48:47 PM   
EdBowie


Posts: 875
Joined: 8/11/2013
Status: offline
I'd like to thank the OP.

I'm finding this thread quite useful for sorting out which pigeons go in which holes... birther, gullible, and so forth.



_____________________________

Reading for understanding, instead of for argumentation, has its advantages.

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Let me see if I have this straight - 12/29/2013 9:00:46 PM   
LookieNoNookie


Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Ted Cruz
1) One parent American Citizen, one parent a foreign national.
2) Not born in the US.
3) IS a US Citizen.

Barrack Obama
1) One parent an American Citizen, one parent a foreign national.
2) Born in the US.
3) Is NOT an American citizen.

Now how does that work?


(WTF?)

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Let me see if I have this straight - 12/29/2013 10:50:19 PM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
- FR -

Generally I don't have high expectations of the looney Right. But even by those generously low standards, bringing up this long-dead-and-buried issue gets a 'Fail".

Guys, you are too late. Way too late. At least 6 years late. The time to question Obama's qualifications was before he got elected, not after he has been in the White House for 6 years.

The only things revealed by your obsessive exhumation of this issue are just how far removed from day- to-day reality your political focus is, and how ill-informed and misdirected the 'thoughts' of the looney Right truly are.

< Message edited by tweakabelle -- 12/29/2013 10:56:22 PM >


_____________________________



(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Let me see if I have this straight - 12/29/2013 11:58:08 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux
c). When Obama "released" a birth certificate - I downloaded it - and it is absolutely clear that the information was a blatant forgery. Anyone that knows anything about Adobe knows that you can take cut and pastes and superimpose these over the actual fields in the adobe document. And this is what had been done in his 'supposed' document. It was not only fake - it was a fake that was so incompetent I don't know how to explain it. I still don't.

I am actually an expert on photoshop and on scanning documents. the random layers you see in the BC are artifacts of being scanned not of photoshop manipulation.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthers/birthcertificate.asp


The document that was possible to download from the website, which I did, did not have "random layers" when opened in illustrator.

When opened in Adobe Acrobat Professional, there are fields into which data is entered. Superimposed over some of these fields, were other fields with different values.

Personally, I think the document was just meant to be viewed in hardcopy form. The release of the document was a mistake.
Now.

I make no representations as to Obama's birth certificate. But there is no chance that what was released was an undoctored document.

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Let me see if I have this straight - 12/30/2013 2:39:55 AM   
FellowSlave


Posts: 97
Joined: 11/23/2013
Status: offline
quote:

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Ted Cruz
1) One parent American Citizen, one parent a foreign national.
2) Not born in the US.
3) IS a US Citizen.

Barrack Obama
1) One parent an American Citizen, one parent a foreign national.
2) Born in the US.
3) Is NOT an American citizen.

Now how does that work?


Nobody questions Obama US citizenship(he has US passport), the problem is the place of birth (he presented a fake birth certificate).
In case T. Cruz was not born in the US he is not eligible to run for president. One does not need US parents to be a citizen.
BTW: Recent suspicious "accidental" death of the person in Hawaii who certified Obama fake BC adds spice into the matter.
The fact that just investigating the matter gets you in deep trouble (Ariz. sheriff) is very strange.

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Let me see if I have this straight - 12/30/2013 2:40:33 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
And you are full of it. Adobe acrobat pro???utter bollocks

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Let me see if I have this straight - 12/30/2013 4:04:13 AM   
MsMJAY


Posts: 515
Joined: 3/17/2013
Status: offline
This is the elephant in the room that no one in the US really wants to talk about. It is also the reason why so many are so hardcore against any type of gun control. They are convinced that the evil black Manchurian is trying to take away their guns so that they will be defenseless when he carries out his programming to institute communism in the US. We have politicians and organizations promoting this kind of thinking and for those who believe it, it all makes perfect sense to them. Then they try to convince everyone that this line of thinking has nothing at all to do with the President's race.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

And you are full of it. Adobe acrobat pro???utter bollocks


(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Let me see if I have this straight - 12/30/2013 4:34:58 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
Can you imagine if Obamas old man had been a cuban???
The ugliness, anger and ignorance ooozes from every pore of more than a few of the haters, and they have nothing to show for it but their rancid little posts.
Im a happy sadist, but this is is a hard limit. I have more self respect than to try to reason with them..just cal em on their bullshit n watch them drool

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to MsMJAY)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Let me see if I have this straight - 12/30/2013 5:57:13 AM   
truckinslave


Posts: 3897
Joined: 6/16/2004
Status: offline
[quote It is also the reason why so many are so hardcore against any type of gun control. They are convinced that the evil black Manchurian is trying to take away their guns ][/quote]

That's the least sensible thing I have seen you write.
We've been against "gun control" since 1776......

The world does not revolve around 0bama0 (or communism, for that matter).

_____________________________

1. Islam and sharia are indivisible.
2. Sharia is barbaric, homophobic, violent, and inimical to the most basic Western values (including free speech and freedom of religion). (Yeah, I know: SEE: Irony 101).
ERGO: Islam has no place in America.

(in reply to MsMJAY)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Let me see if I have this straight - 12/30/2013 6:14:26 AM   
MsMJAY


Posts: 515
Joined: 3/17/2013
Status: offline
Really? THIS is the least sensible thing you have seen me write in this thread? Seriously? Nothing strange about any of that other stuff I posted huh? wow....just wow. BTW- here are my sources.

Gun sales soar after Obama re-election

After Obama gun owners cling to 2nd Amendment

65 million gun sales since Obama took office

NRA reveals Obama's secret plan to destroy 2nd Amendment


quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

[quote It is also the reason why so many are so hardcore against any type of gun control. They are convinced that the evil black Manchurian is trying to take away their guns ]


That's the least sensible thing I have seen you write.
We've been against "gun control" since 1776......

The world does not revolve around 0bama0 (or communism, for that matter).


(in reply to truckinslave)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Let me see if I have this straight - 12/30/2013 6:21:11 AM   
truckinslave


Posts: 3897
Joined: 6/16/2004
Status: offline
A quick glance at your links shows nothing related to a "black Manchurian candidate"
Those of us who support the 2nd Amsndment get upset anytime a Din takes the WH
The same headlines can be found throughout the Clinton years (there was a primer shortage then too, btw)

It's because he's a Dim, and all these gun-grabbing/registration/banned schemes come about during Dim admins.
Being from Chicago adds to the concern, not his race......

_____________________________

1. Islam and sharia are indivisible.
2. Sharia is barbaric, homophobic, violent, and inimical to the most basic Western values (including free speech and freedom of religion). (Yeah, I know: SEE: Irony 101).
ERGO: Islam has no place in America.

(in reply to MsMJAY)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Let me see if I have this straight - 12/30/2013 6:39:12 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
So, when Reagan stumped for the Brady and Assault Weapons Ban, and the outlaw of any new automatic weapons in private ownership after May 19th 1986,  that was not a nutsackerism?  Or his gun control in California?

Nixon urging congress to pass a ban on saturday night specials?

Couple of W quotes:
I did think we ought to extend the assault weapons ban and was told the bill was never going to move. I believe law-abiding citizens ought to be able to own a gun. I believe in background checks. The best way to protect our citizens from guns is to prosecute those who commit crimes with guns.

Law-abiding citizens ought to be allowed to protect their families. We ought to keep guns out of the hands of people who shouldn’t have them. That’s why I’m for instant background checks at gun shows. I’m for trigger locks. I think we ought to raise the age at which juveniles can have a gun. I also believe that the best way to make sure that we keep our society safe is to hold people accountable for breaking the law. If we catch somebody illegally selling a gun, there needs to be a consequence. The federal government can help.


Bush has said he would sign a law requiring trigger locks with handgun sales but wouldn’t push such legislation. Bush has endorsed outlawing the import of certain high-capacity ammunition clips. Bush also would raise the legal age for handgun purchases from 18 to 21.


So, looks to me like nutsackers are dead in the middle of it.


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to truckinslave)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Let me see if I have this straight - 12/30/2013 6:51:54 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux
c). When Obama "released" a birth certificate - I downloaded it - and it is absolutely clear that the information was a blatant forgery. Anyone that knows anything about Adobe knows that you can take cut and pastes and superimpose these over the actual fields in the adobe document. And this is what had been done in his 'supposed' document. It was not only fake - it was a fake that was so incompetent I don't know how to explain it. I still don't.

I am actually an expert on photoshop and on scanning documents. the random layers you see in the BC are artifacts of being scanned not of photoshop manipulation.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthers/birthcertificate.asp


The document that was possible to download from the website, which I did, did not have "random layers" when opened in illustrator.

When opened in Adobe Acrobat Professional, there are fields into which data is entered. Superimposed over some of these fields, were other fields with different values.

Personally, I think the document was just meant to be viewed in hardcopy form. The release of the document was a mistake.
Now.

I make no representations as to Obama's birth certificate. But there is no chance that what was released was an undoctored document.


Bullshit. The document has been downloaded and examined by thousands and the layers are random scanning artifacts.

You simply made up that crap.

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Let me see if I have this straight - 12/30/2013 6:55:50 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
- FR -
Generally I don't have high expectations of the looney Right. But even by those generously low standards, bringing up this long-dead-and-buried issue gets a 'Fail".
Guys, you are too late. Way too late. At least 6 years late. The time to question Obama's qualifications was before he got elected, not after he has been in the White House for 6 years.
The only things revealed by your obsessive exhumation of this issue are just how far removed from day- to-day reality your political focus is, and how ill-informed and misdirected the 'thoughts' of the looney Right truly are.


Now, just as a general FYI, the "birthers" were making noise during the 2008 campaign. That is, they were making these claims prior to Obama getting elected. Most of the media didn't report it as credible, or even potentially credible. Candidate Obama didn't put it to rest, either.

Keeping a veil of secrecy only invites people to guess at what's being hidden.

I don't think jlf started this, though, to question Obama's legitimacy to be President, but to point out an apparent hypocrisy of those who claimed (especially those that still do) Obama didn't meet the requirement, but support Cruz's legitimacy to be President.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Let me see if I have this straight - 12/30/2013 6:58:18 AM   
MsMJAY


Posts: 515
Joined: 3/17/2013
Status: offline
So if I understand you correctly, you object to me saying its about race?

But you do not deny that there are politicians and organizations (like the NRA) promoting this type of thinking in the US, right?
Just that it has anything to do with his race? Although when these organizations get together they put up leadership and speakers (Ted Nugent, David Duke, Jim Porter etc.) who make racial slurs against the president, blacks and other minorities and/or refer to the Civil War as "The War of Northern Aggression."

But you have no idea why anyone would believe it has anything to do with race, huh? ok. Gotcha.



quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

A quick glance at your links shows nothing related to a "black Manchurian candidate"
Those of us who support the 2nd Amsndment get upset anytime a Din takes the WH
The same headlines can be found throughout the Clinton years (there was a primer shortage then too, btw)

It's because he's a Dim, and all these gun-grabbing/registration/banned schemes come about during Dim admins.
Being from Chicago adds to the concern, not his race......


(in reply to truckinslave)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Let me see if I have this straight - 12/30/2013 7:03:44 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Now how does that work?



It doesn't. Let me 'splain. The birthers were idiots provided with media attention and exposure far beyond their numbers or relevance. They never had a point, or a leg to stand on, and their only illusion of credibility, at any time, was a result of the media fixation on them. Strawman by proxy. Find the biggest idiot in the room, stick all the cameras and microphones in his face, and pretend he's the norm.

I can think of all sorts of reasons to not be interested in Senator Cruz trying to occupy a political office with a prohibition on naturalized citizenship, without looking to the circumstances of his birth, exactly as I had plenty of reasons to think candidate Obama was wholly unqualified for the position he ultimately obtained, none of which involved Kenya.





While that is true, like the right has the birthers, the left also has a small group who just can't wrap their heads around the fact that some people might not like him because of what he stands for and not the color of his skin. They will scream "they are racist" just as fast as the birthers will scream "he isn't a citizen" Both groups need to grow the fuck up and get over themselves. But I guess they don't realize how ignorant they sound when they get started.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Let me see if I have this straight - 12/30/2013 7:05:31 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MsMJAY

Really? THIS is the least sensible thing you have seen me write in this thread? Seriously? Nothing strange about any of that other stuff I posted huh? wow....just wow. BTW- here are my sources.

Gun sales soar after Obama re-election

After Obama gun owners cling to 2nd Amendment

65 million gun sales since Obama took office

NRA reveals Obama's secret plan to destroy 2nd Amendment


quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

[quote It is also the reason why so many are so hardcore against any type of gun control. They are convinced that the evil black Manchurian is trying to take away their guns ]


That's the least sensible thing I have seen you write.
We've been against "gun control" since 1776......

The world does not revolve around 0bama0 (or communism, for that matter).



Further proof comes from the indisputable fact that the entire "fast & furious" pseudo scandal was created by a far right wing lunatic blogger whose premise was the Obama administration was going to use gun running to Mexico as an excuse to outlaw gun sales.

(in reply to MsMJAY)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Let me see if I have this straight - 12/30/2013 7:07:17 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
- FR -
Generally I don't have high expectations of the looney Right. But even by those generously low standards, bringing up this long-dead-and-buried issue gets a 'Fail".
Guys, you are too late. Way too late. At least 6 years late. The time to question Obama's qualifications was before he got elected, not after he has been in the White House for 6 years.
The only things revealed by your obsessive exhumation of this issue are just how far removed from day- to-day reality your political focus is, and how ill-informed and misdirected the 'thoughts' of the looney Right truly are.


Now, just as a general FYI, the "birthers" were making noise during the 2008 campaign. That is, they were making these claims prior to Obama getting elected. Most of the media didn't report it as credible, or even potentially credible. Candidate Obama didn't put it to rest, either.

Yes, he did. He released his Hawaiian birth certificate. the racist loons refused to accept that it was real.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Let me see if I have this straight - 12/30/2013 7:07:35 AM   
MsMJAY


Posts: 515
Joined: 3/17/2013
Status: offline
And yet, no one accused those Presidents of being communists, forging their birth certificates or conspiring to abolish the 2nd Amendment. Wonder why?

Reagan's gun control was in California during the time the Black Panthers chose to exercise their 2nd Amendment Right to Open Carry weapons. Ironically the NRA supported gun control legislation at this time.

"At this time, the NRA and conservative elected officials directly supported a ban on assault weapons in order to maintain order and keep firearms out of the hands of activist groups, such as communist organizations and the Black Panther Party."

LINK
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

So, when Reagan stumped for the Brady and Assault Weapons Ban, and the outlaw of any new automatic weapons in private ownership after May 19th 1986,  that was not a nutsackerism?  Or his gun control in California?

Nixon urging congress to pass a ban on saturday night specials?

Couple of W quotes:
I did think we ought to extend the assault weapons ban and was told the bill was never going to move. I believe law-abiding citizens ought to be able to own a gun. I believe in background checks. The best way to protect our citizens from guns is to prosecute those who commit crimes with guns.

Law-abiding citizens ought to be allowed to protect their families. We ought to keep guns out of the hands of people who shouldn’t have them. That’s why I’m for instant background checks at gun shows. I’m for trigger locks. I think we ought to raise the age at which juveniles can have a gun. I also believe that the best way to make sure that we keep our society safe is to hold people accountable for breaking the law. If we catch somebody illegally selling a gun, there needs to be a consequence. The federal government can help.


Bush has said he would sign a law requiring trigger locks with handgun sales but wouldn’t push such legislation. Bush has endorsed outlawing the import of certain high-capacity ammunition clips. Bush also would raise the legal age for handgun purchases from 18 to 21.


So, looks to me like nutsackers are dead in the middle of it.



(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Let me see if I have this straight Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125