Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: All Quiet on Benghazi


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: All Quiet on Benghazi Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: All Quiet on Benghazi - 1/16/2014 8:10:19 PM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
What I find so curious about this issue comes in two forms:

1 ) That Republicans really have NOTHING to offer the people in the United States that is helpful and useful to them. If they did, they wouldn't be bring this up EVERY FREAKING DAY of the year. It simply is stunning that across the board, on dozens of possible issues, problems, and events, Republicans really have nothing better to do, then bitch about the events half a world a way that killed four Americans. Yeah, a thousand times that died in another place called Iraq while searching for those "Massive Stockpiles" of "Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq".

2 ) The Thirteen 'Benghazi' attacks during former President George W. Bush's two terms in office. Imagine, the depth and motivation Republicans have on this issue towards a Democrat President going towards one of their own party in any of those thirteen moments of US History. That holding their own party to the same level of accountability and responsibility as they slam the current President on each of those thirteen events. And that they pursue all avenue's of 'justice' to find 'the truth' and 'facts' while holding the Republican President fully accountable and responsible of each of those events. Would Benghazi have ever taken place? Doesn't anyone find that just.....a bit.....curious?

Yes, Benghazi was preventable.....

....so was 9/11......

Neither President could have ever known the events that would lead up to either moment in history. I don't see anyone in any of the parties or political viewpoints blaming former President G. W. Bush for the events leading up to 9/11. So why is it conservatives are blaming the current President on an event on a considerably smaller scale? Oh that's right, because they too, like the people they vote into office, ALSO, have NOTHING to offer this nation worth of note.

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: All Quiet on Benghazi - 1/16/2014 8:18:18 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline
Ah that favorite of liberal rejoinders..

Lets all join hands and blame bush!!!!

Solar energy doesn't work - its bushes fault.
Global warming isn't happening - its bushes fault.
Ethanol isn't good for the country - its bushes fault.
Record numbers of people unemployed - its bushes fault.
No one went to jail in the banking scandal - yep, bushes fault.
Fast & Furious. IRS scandals. Bengahze - yep its still bushes fault!

Perhaps you can use that as an excuse when you fail a college science exam.
I'm sure your professor will give you partial credit when you explain its all bushes fault.....


Oh - and as for 13 attacks on Benghazi under bushes watch... how many americans died exactly?




quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

What I find so curious about this issue comes in two forms:

1 ) That Republicans really have NOTHING to offer the people in the United States that is helpful and useful to them. If they did, they wouldn't be bring this up EVERY FREAKING DAY of the year. It simply is stunning that across the board, on dozens of possible issues, problems, and events, Republicans really have nothing better to do, then bitch about the events half a world a way that killed four Americans. Yeah, a thousand times that died in another place called Iraq while searching for those "Massive Stockpiles" of "Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq".

2 ) The Thirteen 'Benghazi' attacks during former President George W. Bush's two terms in office. Imagine, the depth and motivation Republicans have on this issue towards a Democrat President going towards one of their own party in any of those thirteen moments of US History. That holding their own party to the same level of accountability and responsibility as they slam the current President on each of those thirteen events. And that they pursue all avenue's of 'justice' to find 'the truth' and 'facts' while holding the Republican President fully accountable and responsible of each of those events. Would Benghazi have ever taken place? Doesn't anyone find that just.....a bit.....curious?

Yes, Benghazi was preventable.....

....so was 9/11......

Neither President could have ever known the events that would lead up to either moment in history. I don't see anyone in any of the parties or political viewpoints blaming former President G. W. Bush for the events leading up to 9/11. So why is it conservatives are blaming the current President on an event on a considerably smaller scale? Oh that's right, because they too, like the people they vote into office, ALSO, have NOTHING to offer this nation worth of note.


(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: All Quiet on Benghazi - 1/16/2014 8:58:24 PM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

Ah that favorite of liberal rejoinders..

Lets all join hands and blame bush!!!!

Solar energy doesn't work - its bushes fault.
Global warming isn't happening - its bushes fault.
Ethanol isn't good for the country - its bushes fault.
Record numbers of people unemployed - its bushes fault.
No one went to jail in the banking scandal - yep, bushes fault.
Fast & Furious. IRS scandals. Bengahze - yep its still bushes fault!


Seriously......grow up!

This sort of 'junior high school' attitude wins you no points in my book. If anything it shows you are not 18 years of mental or emotional age and should therefore not be considers a US Citizen with all the rights it gives. I'm sure the founding fathers would agree that those of physical age behaving as children should never be allowed into the adult's conversations nor the benefits.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux
Oh - and as for 13 attacks on Benghazi under bushes watch... how many americans died exactly?


From the source that you FAILED to read.....

May 12, 2003. Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Armed al Qaeda terrorists storm the diplomatic compound, killing 36 people including nine Americans. The assailants committed suicide by detonating a truck bomb.

March 2, 2006. Karachi, Pakistan again. Suicide bomber attacks the U.S. Consulate killing four people, including U.S. diplomat David Foy who was directly targeted by the attackers. (I wonder if Lindsey Graham or Fox News would even recognize the name "David Foy." This is the third Karachi terrorist attack in four years on what's considered American soil.)

Even though in several instances there were others killed and injured, but you don't seem to care about that. I guess that doesn't matter to you?

So, since I answered your question, answer mine.

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: All Quiet on Benghazi - 1/16/2014 9:23:38 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline
I will *happily* answer your question, which I can do from rote, since you are copying and pasting an erroneous piece of democrat talking points.

The correct answer to your question is ZERO, since your source is in error.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riyadh_compound_bombings

Your erroneous piece claims that al-qaieda stormed the diplomatic compound. When in fact the compounds in question were not, are not, and never have been diplomatic compounds.

They were an oasis village etc for private companies doing business in Saudi Arabia.

The Karachi attack was outside the Marriot Hotel parking lot. Not, once again, an attack on a diplomatic compound.

So once again, democrats lie in order to say Obama must be ok because the same things happened under bush by creating the appearance of a false equivalency.

Secondly, you asked does the death of Americans matter. Absolutely they matter. Which is why you should join with me to request a full and complete hearing on Benghazi. Where were the military support aircraft?

Why were people removed from command?
Why wasn't the promised air support delivered? Daugherty was painting the target with a laser illuminator in order to light the target up for missiles from air support that was promised but never delivered.

Don't you see this is criminial? Or does your partisan hacksmanship trump your sense of fairness to americans that died?

Do the americans that died in Saudi Arabia matter? Sure they do. But as far as I know, there was a full investigation of the events. There wasn't any failure of the US government to protect its own. There was no lying about it - and no coverup.

So now that you got the answer to your question - how do you like it?




quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

Ah that favorite of liberal rejoinders..

Lets all join hands and blame bush!!!!

Solar energy doesn't work - its bushes fault.
Global warming isn't happening - its bushes fault.
Ethanol isn't good for the country - its bushes fault.
Record numbers of people unemployed - its bushes fault.
No one went to jail in the banking scandal - yep, bushes fault.
Fast & Furious. IRS scandals. Bengahze - yep its still bushes fault!


Seriously......grow up!

This sort of 'junior high school' attitude wins you no points in my book. If anything it shows you are not 18 years of mental or emotional age and should therefore not be considers a US Citizen with all the rights it gives. I'm sure the founding fathers would agree that those of physical age behaving as children should never be allowed into the adult's conversations nor the benefits.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux
Oh - and as for 13 attacks on Benghazi under bushes watch... how many americans died exactly?


From the source that you FAILED to read.....

May 12, 2003. Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Armed al Qaeda terrorists storm the diplomatic compound, killing 36 people including nine Americans. The assailants committed suicide by detonating a truck bomb.

March 2, 2006. Karachi, Pakistan again. Suicide bomber attacks the U.S. Consulate killing four people, including U.S. diplomat David Foy who was directly targeted by the attackers. (I wonder if Lindsey Graham or Fox News would even recognize the name "David Foy." This is the third Karachi terrorist attack in four years on what's considered American soil.)

Even though in several instances there were others killed and injured, but you don't seem to care about that. I guess that doesn't matter to you?

So, since I answered your question, answer mine.


(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: All Quiet on Benghazi - 1/17/2014 7:23:56 AM   
graceadieu


Posts: 1518
Joined: 3/20/2008
From: Maryland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic


quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy
Crickets from the right wing. Instead of discussing what's in the NYT report



Are you this clueless? NOBODY GIVES A SHIT WHAT IT SAYS.


You're absolutely right. The partisan right doesn't give a shit what the facts say about Benghazi, only about attacking Hillary Clinton.

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: All Quiet on Benghazi - 1/17/2014 7:38:25 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
The good news, having exposed the conspiracy of Islam in america, benghazi, the convict issa will now expose the non-extant security risks in the sign-up website.


So, another flash in the pan, he says stupid shit for a couple weeks and he and it fade into ignominity.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 86
RE: All Quiet on Benghazi - 1/17/2014 9:50:16 AM   
papassion


Posts: 487
Joined: 3/28/2012
Status: offline
Even if the web site was 100% secure (which it isn't) How secure can your information be when it is given to people who haven't been given backround checks and in some cases, have felony convictions in their past?

Oh, thats right, the Obama gang says its cool, so it must be ok!

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 87
RE: All Quiet on Benghazi - 1/17/2014 10:16:15 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Yeah, I mean Issa is a convict, that's government for you.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to papassion)
Profile   Post #: 88
RE: All Quiet on Benghazi - 1/17/2014 11:33:51 AM   
papassion


Posts: 487
Joined: 3/28/2012
Status: offline
Reread the first few pages where the Obama sheeple were proclaiming the TIMES article saying Al Quida was not involved and the Republicans were just trying to show Hillary as an incompetant Head of State. Oh how sweet for the Obama sheep!

Then, BOOM, comes the BIPARTISAN report saying El Quida was involved, The video had nothing to do with it, and the whole thing could have been prevented, especially with all the warnings that the State Department were given. Of course Hillary, like Obama, didn't know anything, didn't see anything, she is only the HEAD of the State Department.

Of course Hillary will use her "experience" (of not knowing anything) in her run for President resume.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 89
RE: All Quiet on Benghazi - 1/17/2014 11:37:36 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Was there anywhere in there where they showed the nutsackers cutting security?  cuz they did. 

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to papassion)
Profile   Post #: 90
RE: All Quiet on Benghazi - 1/17/2014 2:58:21 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Was there anywhere in there where they showed the nutsackers cutting security?  cuz they did. 


The budget for security was cut - just as the budget for many things were cut under sequestration. It is still up to the SoS to allocate to responsibly allocate the resources available.

Ie. Do we really need 16 marines in Paris - when we only have 4 outsourced security consultants in Benghazi.. Really?

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 91
RE: All Quiet on Benghazi - 1/17/2014 3:01:58 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
I dont know, I can't get to this in depth, still wondering what we are going to do about the coverup in Iraq with W and the coverup in Iran with St. Wrinklemeat, the coverup in Cambodia with Nixon, and the fact that Ford should have had his head covered.



_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 92
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: All Quiet on Benghazi Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.093