RE: Should the United States annex Canada?

RE: Should the United States annex Canada? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity

Message

hlen5 -> RE: Should the United States annex Canada? (2/1/2014 9:49:43 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: hlen5 quote: ORIGINAL: kdsub And anyway... we know all our friends north of the border secretly want to be Americans...you can tell because that's all they can talk about...or at least all they care to talk about. Butch They can't talk about their own politics here. Almost noone south of the border KNOWS Canadian politics (aside from maybe the Mayor of Toronto)! or cares And they're proud of the lack!! [;)][;)]

BamaD -> RE: Should the United States annex Canada? (2/1/2014 9:54:20 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: hlen5 quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: hlen5 quote: ORIGINAL: kdsub And anyway... we know all our friends north of the border secretly want to be Americans...you can tell because that's all they can talk about...or at least all they care to talk about. Butch They can't talk about their own politics here. Almost noone south of the border KNOWS Canadian politics (aside from maybe the Mayor of Toronto)! or cares And they're proud of the lack!! [;)][;)] I just figure it's none of my business, they can run their country any way they want to.

BamaD -> RE: Should the United States annex Canada? (2/1/2014 9:59:38 PM)
FR Maybe we should just annex all of North America.

TheHeretic -> RE: Should the United States annex Canada? (2/2/2014 12:14:57 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Politesub53 Hey Rich, at least if you wish to invade us we really have got WMD`s, thats if you want the same excuse If Bush 3 gets elected. Why the fuck would we want England??? In terms of area, Canada is the largest country on the planet, with about the same number of people as California. It's a high growth potential expansion. England is a miserable, overpopulated, used up island in the North Atlantic. That's before we even get into the costs of supporting your freeloaders, and locking up the hooligans you don't even bother to count in the crime statistics. Nope. Just Canada. What is England going to do about it? You barely managed to get the Falklands back from Argentina.

Marc2b -> RE: Should the United States annex Canada? (2/2/2014 3:38:34 AM)
quote: England is a miserable, overpopulated, used up island in the North Atlantic. You forgot inbred. Don't forget inbred. Have you seen pictures of those people lately? I thank whatever gods there may be that my ancestors had the good sense to get off that benighted isle while the getting was good. Personally, I think if we are going to liberate another country then we should liberate Brazil. I'd love to have me some beach front property in Rio.

Kirata -> RE: Should the United States annex Canada? (2/2/2014 4:07:19 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD Maybe we should just annex all of North America. Well the Mexican government appears to have ceded any practical sovereignty over most of its territory already, so I'd start there. And, too, it would solve our whole immigration problem. Given the mess south of our border, I think it fair to say that a lot of our illegals aren't so much illegal aliens as illegal refugees anyway, and once we clean the place up it wouldn't make any sense "deporting" them to what would just be another part of the United States. K.

Politesub53 -> RE: Should the United States annex Canada? (2/2/2014 4:11:12 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: TheHeretic quote: ORIGINAL: Politesub53 Hey Rich, at least if you wish to invade us we really have got WMD`s, thats if you want the same excuse If Bush 3 gets elected. Why the fuck would we want England??? In terms of area, Canada is the largest country on the planet, with about the same number of people as California. It's a high growth potential expansion. England is a miserable, overpopulated, used up island in the North Atlantic. That's before we even get into the costs of supporting your freeloaders, and locking up the hooligans you don't even bother to count in the crime statistics. Nope. Just Canada. What is England going to do about it? You barely managed to get the Falklands back from Argentina. Now youre getting pissy because you dont have a real Empire. But hey, you already have our laws and our language [;)]

Kirata -> RE: Should the United States annex Canada? (2/2/2014 4:12:49 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Politesub53 hey, you already have our laws and our language [;)] I can think of a few Brits on here who might quibble about the language claim. [:D] K.

Lucylastic -> RE: Should the United States annex Canada? (2/2/2014 4:15:21 AM)
who would do such a terrible thing:)

Laurielee -> RE: Should the United States annex Canada? (2/2/2014 4:15:31 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: TheHeretic England is a miserable, overpopulated, used up island in the North Atlantic. I do so enjoy a well-informed argument. You'll let me know when you're ready for one, won't you dear?

Kirata -> RE: Should the United States annex Canada? (2/2/2014 4:20:03 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic who would do such a terrible thing:) Probably only a few yobs. [:)] K.

Politesub53 -> RE: Should the United States annex Canada? (2/2/2014 4:25:37 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic who would do such a terrible thing:) Not me......... nice arse btw. [8D]

freedomdwarf1 -> RE: Should the United States annex Canada? (2/2/2014 4:35:24 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Kirata quote: ORIGINAL: Politesub53 hey, you already have our laws and our language [;)] I can think of a few Brits on here who might quibble about the language claim. [:D] K. Most "Americans" don't speak English, they speak and spell American. They don't even have the same phonetic alphabet as the rest of the world. As for the laws, they discarded most of the laws they fled from and invented their own. I'm not just speaking of the English pilgrims but also the French and Spanish. So yeah, it's vaguely English(ish) and the constitution was borrowed from us originally. But since then, they've screwed up the language, the spelling, the constitution, the imperial measurement system, etc etc etc..... You name it, they changed it. That's why the "American Dream" is no more than a nightmare these days. The land of gold, honey, and opportunity of 2 centuries ago is now a land of fires, tornado's, drought, governmental bickering, and a mentality still stuck in the wild west era. Not to mention those dying of disease and bad health due to greedy profiteers and 'the American system' that bolsters it. I'd better get off my [sm=soapbox.gif]...... [sm=goodnight.gif]

crazyml -> RE: Should the United States annex Canada? (2/2/2014 4:43:42 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Tantriqu Ho, ho, ho. First off: we burnt down your first White House, and we'd do it again. #2: Most of your army are from your southern states, and as we just saw in Atlanta, you would be Walking Dead in no time. #3: We are HUGE; you couldn't even handle teensy little northern countries like Korea or Vietnam. #4: 10% of us are First Nations: who do you think yours would support? #5: We know metric. 'Member that satellite that was lost forever 'cuz you couldn't figure out metres? Dumbasses. #6: The full might of the Commonwealth would be behind us; ANZACs on your west coast, Celtic Bravehearts ravening over the pole and taking out Alaska, and India would boycott all helpdesk functions: you'd be paralysed in no time. #7: Hey, Mexico! Now's your chance! #8: Imagine a hockey fight without rules: gloves're off, eh? #9: Five words: Commander-in-Chief Chris Hadfield and #10: You can't handle real beer. There ya go! Quoted for wonderfulness and good humour.

crazyml -> RE: Should the United States annex Canada? (2/2/2014 4:47:16 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: kdsub I propose a truce...lets join forces and invade Sweden instead. Butch Now that's a proposal I can get behind. Dirty pickled fish eating, stylish furniture making, rollneck sweater wearing fuckers.

freedomdwarf1 -> RE: Should the United States annex Canada? (2/2/2014 5:01:28 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: crazyml quote: ORIGINAL: kdsub I propose a truce...lets join forces and invade Sweden instead. Butch Now that's a proposal I can get behind. Dirty pickled fish eating, stylish furniture making, rollneck sweater wearing fuckers. Have you seen or even met some of those wonderful blonde Swedish girls who are sexually open? Maaann.... thems girls are great. And no inhibitions! I can put up with the pickled fish.... even the stylish furniture. The sweaters don't stay on when you're in the sauna with them! [:D] I guess I've just made a good excuse to go get those Swedish fuckers! [:)] Count me in!

crazyml -> RE: Should the United States annex Canada? (2/2/2014 5:12:58 AM)
Now you mention it.... Yes, I have. My accusations against the swedes were merely a cover for my tail chasing motivation. Swedish women are, in my experience, the most sexually assertive women on the planet. Awesome.

Blonderfluff -> RE: Should the United States annex Canada? (2/2/2014 5:39:36 AM)
I'm Swedish. In general, we are not so much sexually assertive as we are very comfortable expressing our sexuality.

crazyml -> RE: Should the United States annex Canada? (2/2/2014 5:42:44 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Blonderfluff I'm Swedish. In general, we are not so much sexually assertive as we are very comfortable expressing our sexuality. Yes, forgive me - You are absolutely right, and I should have phrased it better.

Blonderfluff -> RE: Should the United States annex Canada? (2/2/2014 5:45:43 AM)
It's all good! I will add. We really like to be naked. :)

Page: << < prev 4 5 [6] 7 8 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875