DomKen
Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004 From: Chicago, IL Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri quote:
ORIGINAL: DomKen quote:
ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri quote:
ORIGINAL: DomKen quote:
ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam quote:
ORIGINAL: DomKen The part where it violates the civil rights act. A business cannot deny access to any class of people. The bolded part is totally incorrect. The civil rights acts only protect certain "Protected classes" Among those are race, color, age, gender, family status, religion, creed, disability and veteran status. I naively assumed you were aware of that as you saw yourself well enough informed to argue the point. I was quite clear that "as long as you don't violate any of the civil rights acts" in my original post on the subject. Please show me where someone belongs to a protected class based upon their state of residence. They don't. Therefore a shop owner can refuse to sell to those who are out of state. Game, Set, Match. You left out one of the protected classes. Place of origin. You seem to have watched the serve go by. Riiiiiight, place of origin means where you are residing. So, if a guy born in Mississippi currently lives in Alabama, is it discriminating against his "place of origin" if he isn't allowed to buy a gun in GA? You're welcome to litigate it. I don't think you'd like the out come. Blanket refusal to serve people has not done well in the courts. Great non-answer, Ken. Not selling a gun to a guy that is from a different state isn't the same as not selling a gun to everyone that is from a different state. You're confusing a refusal to an individual to a blanket refusal. But, you keep rolling along as you do. BamaD claimed the gun dealer could not sell to anyone from another state. quote:
ORIGINAL: BamaD I was in a gun store where they said they couldn't sell because the buyer was from out of state. Which even BamaD has admitted was incorrect.
|