Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Are we born….Good?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Are we born….Good? Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Are we born….Good? - 2/13/2014 6:54:14 PM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline
New research as reported HERE seems to show babies as young as three months know the difference between good and bad and given a choice will choose good. Otherwise humans are born good.

Does it seem strange to anyone else that this would be true. I would think if Darwin and natural selection were to be true then bad would be the safest choice rather than good. Otherwise as in nature and natural selection the fittest is the survivor… not the one who would share and make a moral selection.

I do not see morality being a survival technique in nature…so why is it instilled in humans from birth.

Why do you think…if the research is valid…this would be?

Butch

_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Are we born….Good? - 2/13/2014 7:21:09 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline 		Human's are social animals. Our survival has always been oriented towards survival as part of the group. So "moral" behavior is behavior that benefits the social group so it does provide a fitness benefit and will be selected for..

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Are we born….Good? - 2/13/2014 7:25:22 PM   
Tkman117


Posts: 1353
Joined: 5/21/2012
Status: offline 		Maybe morality isn't a is a survival technique by nature, but cooperation is in many animals since they realize that when others of their kind succeed they also succeed.

Plus negativity is never a good thing, people don't inherently want to make a decision which will be bad for them or others. Negativity doesn't feel good, even if it benefits one person over another, there will still be guilt, and what biological reasoning exists there is likely the idea of passing on genes. An animal who is sociable and can achieve their standing among a pack of their fellow kind will be more likely to find a mate than one that is selfish and fends for themselves. Animals like that only last so long, and don't usually succeed to pass on their genes, which in my opinion is pretty logical. If evolution favoured animals that are more sociable, more "good" in regards to the impacts on themselves and others, then it is entirely possible to state that we are born good.

As charlie chaplain said in the great dictator; "we want to live by each others happiness - not by each others misery"


(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Are we born….Good? - 2/13/2014 7:34:18 PM   
epiphiny43


Posts: 688
Joined: 10/20/2006
Status: offline 		There are dozens of examples in human and animal biology where individual survival is sacrificed for group/genetic/family survival, to the benefit of the group and species. If a relative survives when a warrior sacrifices himself, the common genes survive. If the warrior and the relative die, the gene dies. Genes are selected by Darwinian selection, not individuals.

The postulates in post #3 assume (quite incorrectly, if history is to be acknowledged) fully socialized individuals. Sociopaths are far too common to make any assumptions of universal socialization, just look around. And it's quite obvious that environmental factors (Ice addiction being the most notable?) are very corrosive to existing socialization.

(in reply to Tkman117)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Are we born….Good? - 2/13/2014 7:39:21 PM   
Calentra


Posts: 1
Joined: 1/7/2014
Status: offline 		It is not the bad that survive, as we can see, through greed, and anger, and fear, we are warring and continually killing eachother.
Now good does not necessarily mean weak, but to share, to live for others, this is the only way to save the race as a whole.
The difference between us and anmials (darwin) is that we have consciousness and an advanced means of communication. That changes everything

(in reply to epiphiny43)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Are we born….Good? - 2/13/2014 8:14:47 PM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline 		Ken I can't see where being moral would having anything to do with socialization...after all the Hitler's of this world used society to further their desires and we seem to go from one Hitler to another. Yet overall we as humans are good even when the powerful, which should be the dominant type as it is in all of nature, fail... because... of our very goodness and innate, evidentially, morality.

Butch

_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Are we born….Good? - 2/13/2014 8:17:24 PM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline 		But in nature it is not the "good" animal that survives ... it is the strong. It is survival of the fittest not the moral. It seems that only humans are moral from birth... we are special in that trait.

Butch

< Message edited by kdsub -- 2/13/2014 8:24:34 PM >

_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to Tkman117)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Are we born….Good? - 2/13/2014 8:24:42 PM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline 		Again why would morality give an advantage just because of our ability to communicate. We could just as easily NOT be born moral and have a civilization where the strong always dominate and constantly take advantage of the weak and have the same cognitive abilities.

Just me but I do not see an advantage of one behavior over the other...both could work just as well... It would be a different world but still work just as well...In fact if we matched the rest of nature then being good would be a disadvantage.

Butch

_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to Calentra)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Are we born….Good? - 2/13/2014 8:43:41 PM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline 		Notice how man always seems to organize himself AND his religion to match a set of rules and guides that are moral. These guides will not provide shelter...food... protection...they will not enable the formation of societies or give an advantage to a society based on morality over one based on strength. This is not a technique that would ensure or give advantage to one group over another from the beginning and over time become innate. If this were a  successful survival trait then would not other animals be born with morality?

Of course perhaps other animals are born moral and we have just not researched this or figured out how to measure it.

Butch


< Message edited by kdsub -- 2/13/2014 8:47:03 PM >

_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Are we born….Good? - 2/13/2014 8:46:28 PM   
slavekate80


Posts: 362
Joined: 7/4/2013
Status: offline 		We're genetically programmed for propagating our own genes. This leads to a mix of natural tendencies, some of which are very selfish and could be considered bad in many cultures, and some of which appear altruistic and "good." There are multiple ways to increase the chance of your genes getting passed on to another generation - destruction of rivals, investing time and energy into raising the young members of your family, stealing resources, cooperating to ensure group survival. Not only do YOU have your genes, but so do your relatives and to a lesser extent other close group members, and we're naturally inclined to increase our own DNA copying not just by living and reproducing, but also helping others, especially relatives, do the same.

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Are we born….Good? - 2/13/2014 8:52:46 PM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline 		You are correct in everything you said... now how would being moral provide a distinct advantage so powerful as to become innately part of our nature.

Destruction of rivals... nothing to do with morals
Time in raising young... no morality needed there
stealing resources... certainly not moral
Cooperating... no morality needed for that.
Helping is the same as cooperating...and again morality is not needed for that.

Of your examples none would require morality and in fact some would be opposite of moral.

Butch 

< Message edited by kdsub -- 2/13/2014 8:57:58 PM >

_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to slavekate80)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Are we born….Good? - 2/13/2014 9:11:28 PM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline 		I have always had faith in the belief that man was basically good and now science is seemingly proving it. Rather than survival techniques why could it not be that our soul, or what makes us sentient , if you prefer, is predisposed to be moral. Perhaps it is just a previously unknown law of the universe when it comes to awareness. Not so far fetched...we do not know how or why the laws of the universe were written the way they were... this could just be another.

Yea I know the above will invite the anti religious into the conversation but understand I am not specially claiming a God created this morality but perhaps it is just the law and nature of life.

Butch

< Message edited by kdsub -- 2/13/2014 9:30:56 PM >

_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Are we born….Good? - 2/13/2014 10:37:15 PM   
JeffBC


Posts: 5799
Joined: 2/12/2012
From: Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub
New research as reported HERE seems to show babies as young as three months know the difference between good and bad and given a choice will choose good. Otherwise humans are born good.

I find the assertions of what is "good" and "bad" and "moral" to be rather arbitrary. I see this more as balance between selfish & selfless which is sort of mandatory for any social species to have. You're guestimates about what natural selection would "choose" are not well aligned with actual research. Chimps, for instance, have been very clearly demonstrated to have a sense of fair play. Doesn't that make sense when you are part of some social group?

In the succinct words of David Weber, "for if my claws guard not your back, whose claws shall guard mine?"

_____________________________

I'm a lover of "what is", not because I'm a spiritual person, but because it hurts when I argue with reality. -- Bryon Katie
"You're humbly arrogant" -- sunshinemiss
officially a member of the K Crowd

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Are we born….Good? - 2/14/2014 2:24:42 AM   
MasterJimmi


Posts: 20
Joined: 2/9/2014
Status: offline 		Most humans eat dismembered corpses on a daily basis without thinking about how the animal was treated and that the animal probably would have preferred to live. Even when they are told about how animals are mistreated they continue to buy dismembered corpses and thereby supporting mass murder. No we are not born good! We are born with both good and evil tendencies.

< Message edited by MasterJimmi -- 2/14/2014 2:26:46 AM >

(in reply to JeffBC)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Are we born….Good? - 2/14/2014 2:33:13 AM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJimmi (Emphasis by DaddySatyr)

Most humans eat dismembered corpses on a daily basis without thinking about how the animal was treated and that the animal probably would have preferred to live. Even when they are told about how animals are mistreated they continue to buy dismembered corpses and thereby supporting mass murder. No we are not born good! We are born with both good and evil tendencies.



Two thoughts come to mind:

1) YUM!
2) As it should be.





_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to MasterJimmi)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Are we born….Good? - 2/14/2014 3:26:41 AM   
evesgrden


Posts: 597
Joined: 6/9/2012
Status: offline 		FR

We are born to survive, multiply and in advanced cases help our offspring survive. Anything above and beyond that comes from abundance. A well fed lion doesn't hunt. Nobody steals leaves that have fallen on your lawn in the fall.

The concept of good and bad can pretty much only occur within the concept of limited resources.

_____________________________

What you permit, you promote.

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Are we born….Good? - 2/14/2014 4:41:08 AM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline 		FR:
Almost all human behaviour is learned rather than instinctive, so whatever three year olds do isn't really very useful as a guideline. It's a bit like arguing that labradors are useless as guide dogs because you've seen a puppy that isn't house trained yet.


_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to evesgrden)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Are we born….Good? - 2/14/2014 4:54:02 AM   
MasterJimmi


Posts: 20
Joined: 2/9/2014
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

FR:
Almost all human behaviour is learned rather than instinctive, so whatever three year olds do isn't really very useful as a guideline. It's a bit like arguing that labradors are useless as guide dogs because you've seen a puppy that isn't house trained yet.



The babies were only three months old. Not three years.

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: Are we born….Good? - 2/14/2014 5:41:43 AM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub


New research as reported HERE seems to show babies as young as three months know the difference between good and bad and given a choice will choose good. Otherwise humans are born good.

Does it seem strange to anyone else that this would be true. I would think if Darwin and natural selection were to be true then bad would be the safest choice rather than good. Otherwise as in nature and natural selection the fittest is the survivor… not the one who would share and make a moral selection.

I do not see morality being a survival technique in nature…so why is it instilled in humans from birth.

Why do you think…if the research is valid…this would be?

Butch



Simple. Cooperation has a higher adaptive value than being a lonely douchebag.

_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: Are we born….Good? - 2/14/2014 6:08:59 AM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

But in nature it is not the "good" animal that survives ... it is the strong. It is survival of the fittest not the moral. It seems that only humans are moral from birth... we are special in that trait.

Butch

Do not confuse 'strong' with 'adapted.' They are not necessarily the same thing. The fastest zebra on the African plain may be the 'fittest' for survival.

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Are we born….Good? Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094