Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage Ban=-


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage Ban=- Page: <<   < prev  11 12 [13] 14 15   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/26/2014 1:12:42 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
And again, they're in the posts that say "these assumptions here."

Since that's readily apparent, you're just being a dick. Play that game alone.

(in reply to GotSteel)
Profile   Post #: 241
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/26/2014 4:10:49 PM   
GotSteel


Posts: 5871
Joined: 2/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery
It's ridiculous. When a poster says, "The problem is your assumption that......and here's why....." it's not a mystery.


For the rest of us there is a mystery, whether you're being dishonest or delusional.

It's hard to know whether you actually believe this self serving nonsense you've made up about other peoples assumptions, thoughts, feelings and motivations. My money's on dishonest since if you were under the delusion that you were at any point arguing against assumptions I actually held I'd expect you to be able to produce at least one. That you've spent so many words simply to avoid naming a single one of my assumptions doesn't make much sense if you thought you had a leg to stand on.

So what's up, did somebody tip your sacred cow?

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 242
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/26/2014 4:34:45 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
By "the rest of us" you mean a couple of people.

You're mystified by the English language. Perhaps get a tutor.


(in reply to GotSteel)
Profile   Post #: 243
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/26/2014 5:39:15 PM   
GotSteel


Posts: 5871
Joined: 2/19/2008
Status: offline
There's that innumeracy again, it's five people. And out of how many, what is it these days less than 20? Keep this up and maybe you can alienate everybody by the end of the month. I'm certainly done with you, welcome to my blocked list.

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 244
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/26/2014 7:51:52 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
Whatever does it for you, Steel.

I welcome the peace.

(in reply to GotSteel)
Profile   Post #: 245
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/26/2014 8:08:32 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

I welcome the peace.

Don't count on getting much. One of his favorite pastimes is sniping at people who can't respond because he has them blocked.

K.


(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 246
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/26/2014 9:01:45 PM   
njlauren


Posts: 1577
Joined: 10/1/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: njlauren

The reality of non Christian homophobia is that its roots are in Christianity.

What a crock of bullshit. Neither homophobia nor the cruel punishments for homosexuality recited in Leviticus were invented by Christianity. But more to the point, they weren't invented by Judaism either. You can't blame religions for attitudes that predate them, and you can't claim that those attitudes don't predate religion without arguing that religions weren't created by people. If you were ranting against the claim that there is anything "immoral" about homosexuality, I'd be happy to support you. But you're not. You're just using that as a cudgel with which to bash religion, Christianity in particular, in service of your anti-religious agenda.

K.


I don't have an anti religious agenda, I have an agenda against the bigotry and stupidity that religion has helped promulgate through the centuries.Did homosexual bias exist before Christianity or Judaism? Yes. Was the anti homosexual line in the bible based on human bigotry? Yes.

However, what you are leaving out is something that Christians love to throw around when it suits their purpose, but deny it when it doesn't. Christianity with anti homosexual bigotry was like a 40 mile an hour wind blowing flames in a wildfire. What you leave out is that Christianity, unlike Judaism, or even local bias, became a global church in the west, and its influence cannot be ignored or avoided. Those promulgating 'Christian' society and so forth will tell you all the things the church did, how people were religious, how the US was meant to be a Christian country, for example, because pretty much all the people were, people Crow about how powerful the Catholic Church was and its influence on western civilization because of the immense reach it had (which is true), but it also was a prime fanner of ills like homophobia and anti semitism. This was true of the protestant churches that sprang from the RC.....it is disingenuous to claim that religion had all this influence on society then deny it did with the bad things. The point being that Christianity has been the dominant religion in the western world, and it is only since WWII that its influence has waned, and given how pervasive it was for almost 2000 years, ya think maybe, just maybe, that their teachings end up reflected in common society? You think maybe someone who claims not to be religious who thinks a gay person is a deviant or whatnot wasn't influenced by people around him, many of whom were influenced by religious teaching? And all I will add is take a look at the leadership of the Catholic Church in the US, who unlike their members have turned the church in large part into being anti gay and anti abortion.....and they represent the church as it was for thousands of years, both protestant and Christian....and you want to deny that their preaching, their teaching, for all that time, with the power they held until fairly recent times, was not a major influence?


Put it this way, when the defenders of prop 8 went in front of Scotus, they admitted the fight against same sex marriage was based almost entirely on religious belief.......QED.

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 247
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/26/2014 9:05:02 PM   
njlauren


Posts: 1577
Joined: 10/1/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: njlauren

The reality of non Christian homophobia is that its roots are in Christianity.

What a crock of bullshit. Neither homophobia nor the cruel punishments for homosexuality recited in Leviticus were invented by Christianity. But more to the point, they weren't invented by Judaism either. You can't blame religions for attitudes that predate them, and you can't claim that those attitudes don't predate religion without arguing that religions weren't created by people. If you were ranting against the claim that there is anything "immoral" about homosexuality, I'd be happy to support you. But you're not. You're just using that as a cudgel with which to bash religion, Christianity in particular, in service of your anti-religious agenda.

K.


BTW, Christians cite leviticus all the time, it is the one major citing against homosexuality they all cite..and it happens to be that the OT is part of the Christian Bible. Christians threw away almost everything in leviticus as being "Jewish Cultural Law" yet they actively cite Leviticus in demeaning gays, which means they made the willful decision to keep that as part of their teachings, which means they fully embraced it. They rejected the dietary laws, the laws on planting, the jubilee years, the clothing, no metal against the skin (shaving), etc, but kept that one thing........

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 248
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/26/2014 9:57:58 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: njlauren

I don't have an anti religious agenda...

Sorry, no cigar. Homosexuals suffered persecution in the Soviet Union and Communist China, both officially Atheist states. But you brush that off, and demonstrate the emptiness of your denial with this:

quote:

ORIGINAL: njlauren

I have an agenda against the bigotry and stupidity that religion has helped promulgate through the centuries.

Just the bigotry that religion has helped promulgate? Seriously? Face it, homosexuals have been persecuted by people of different religions, ideologies and cultures, because they are all created by people. The common element is human bigotry, and you yourself admit it:

quote:

ORIGINAL: njlauren

Did homosexual bias exist before Christianity or Judaism? Yes. Was the anti homosexual line in the bible based on human bigotry? Yes.

If you were really against bigotry instead of just religion, you wouldn't limit your focus to only one manifestation of it.

K.


< Message edited by Kirata -- 6/26/2014 10:20:36 PM >

(in reply to njlauren)
Profile   Post #: 249
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/26/2014 11:15:05 PM   
freedomdwarf1


Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012
Status: offline
I don't honestly believe that the "roots" of homophobia are in christianity at all.

As you have clearly stated, it existed long before christianity.
When christianity was 'invented', along with many other existing religions and newer ones (Islam etc), they deliberately emphasized, propagated and enshrined the general acceptance of the practice in order to encourage more followers into the fold.
During the following centuries, it was even more galvanized into the roots of the religion to the point where those 'not of the faith' were persecuted and slaughtered just for not following the faith or it's miopic teachings. Islam is still in these dark ages depite what some 'enlightened' clerics are telling us - as evidenced in recent tortuous killings of the gay community within those cultures.

As Kirata said, it is still rigidly enforced in some well-known "Atheist" states like Russia and China.

You can bang your drum all you like and espouse passages from the bible, but in reality the christians (and Islamics and other similar religions) just magnified the original roots which go waay beyond the origins of the religions. Ergo: The religions are not the roots of homophobia; just exascerbated and amplified tangents of the original general doctrine.



ETA: Simple logic should tell you that if homophobia was in evidence before the religion, then the religion cannot be its roots


< Message edited by freedomdwarf1 -- 6/26/2014 11:48:34 PM >


_____________________________

If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.
George Orwell, 1903-1950


(in reply to njlauren)
Profile   Post #: 250
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/27/2014 4:33:23 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

I welcome the peace.

Don't count on getting much. One of his favorite pastimes is sniping at people who can't respond because he has them blocked.

K.



Yeah, it's a kid's trick -- unblocking to read posts is simple.

But it's clearly going to be easier for him than to actually examine the assumptions of his arguments.

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 251
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/27/2014 4:47:26 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
Utah and Indiana also say banning gay marriage is unconstitutional
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/06/25/gay-marriage-ruling_n_5531670.html?utm_hp_ref=gay-voices&ir=Gay%20Voices

YAYYYYYYYY
and yet, theres a long way to go...
another dick suggests....WASHINGTON -- A North Carolina lawmaker tried to convince his colleagues Tuesday that if they want to prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, they're going to be protecting people who practice incest, bestiality and pedophilia as well.

During a debate over a charter school bill, the North Carolina House considered an amendment that would have included protections for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender individuals, and banned schools from discriminating on the basis of gender identity or sexual orientation.

During the proceedings, state House Speaker Pro Tem Paul "Skip" Stam (R) distributed a handout to his colleagues that asked, "What Is Sexual Orientation?" and listed 30 categories, including heterosexuality, homosexuality and bisexuality, as well as coprophilia, exhibitionism, apotemnophilia and necrophilia.

tammy duckworth
The list of so-called sexual orientations Stam handed out to his colleagues. (See the image full-size, along with the second page, at QNotes.)
"Sexual orientation is not defined anywhere. I have here 30 different types of sexual orientation," Stam said on the House floor, adding that he thought it was necessary to specify and "exclude pedophilia, masochism, and sadism, which are sexual orientations."

"Many, many sexual orientations are not ones you want to have teaching kids in school. You may think you know what you mean by this, but you don't. I encourage you to vote against this amendment," he said.

Stam did not return a request for comment from The Huffington Post.

The list he handed out came from a version of the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders that was published in 2000. At the time, the APA didn't even list these 30 categories as sexual orientations, but instead classified them as disorders. What's more, the manual was updated in 2013, and the new version clearly defines sexual orientation as follows:

Sexual orientation refers to the sex of those to whom one is sexually and romantically attracted. Categories of sexual orientation typically have included attraction to members of one’s own sex (gay men or lesbians), attraction to members of the other sex (heterosexuals), and attraction to members of both sexes (bisexuals). While these categories continue to be widely used, research has suggested that sexual orientation does not always appear in such definable categories and instead occurs on a continuum (e.g., Kinsey, Pomeroy, Martin, & Gebhard, 1953; Klein, 1993; Klein, Sepekoff, & Wolff, 1985; Shiveley & DeCecco, 1977) In addition, some research indicates that sexual orientation is fluid for some people; this may be especially true for women (e.g., Diamond, 2007; Golden, 1987; Peplau & Garnets, 2000).
State Rep. Marcus Brandon (D), who is the legislature's only openly gay member, told local TV station WRAL that he was sick of LGBT people being treated like "second-class citizens" in North Carolina. The state has no law prohibiting workplace discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. (There is also no such law at the federal level, although many states have enacted their own statutes.)

"Pedophilia is not a sexuality, and we cannot continue in this body to keep calling things something [they're] not. It's offensive to a whole group of people," Brandon said. "It is a disease and a problem that has to be addressed outside of this body."

State House Speaker Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), who is running for U.S. Senate, told WRAL that Stam's actions were "not helpful."

In 2011, Stam spoke out against the legalization of same-sex marriage, saying it would lead to polygamy.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/06/25/paul-stam-sexual-orientation_n_5529497.html?utm_hp_ref=gay-voices&ir=Gay%20Voices



_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 252
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/27/2014 4:51:45 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline
You can claim you don't have an anti religious agenda all you want. Your posts speak for themselves and tell a different tale.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to njlauren)
Profile   Post #: 253
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/27/2014 4:57:40 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
^ This.

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 254
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/28/2014 6:29:53 AM   
GotSteel


Posts: 5871
Joined: 2/19/2008
Status: offline
You're clearly talking about an instance of social conformity and not claiming Christianity invented homophobia and K's smart enough to know that.

Here's the thing the deniers can try to sweep this problem under the rug by calling us anti religious and making stuff up about our positions and motivations, but it's not going away. Unless they plan on calling 80% of young Christians anti religious they're going to need to come up with a better obfuscation in the not too distant future to deny this problem.

quote:

ORIGINAL: https://www.barna.org/barna-update/teens-nextgen/94-a-new-generation-expresses-its-skepticism-and-frustration-with-christianity#.U3JRsld9dbU
Today, the most common perception is that present-day Christianity is "anti-homosexual." Overall, 91% of young non-Christians and 80% of young churchgoers say this phrase describes Christianity. As the research probed this perception, non-Christians and Christians explained that beyond their recognition that Christians oppose homosexuality, they believe that Christians show excessive contempt and unloving attitudes towards gays and lesbians. One of the most frequent criticisms of young Christians was that they believe the church has made homosexuality a "bigger sin" than anything else.

(in reply to njlauren)
Profile   Post #: 255
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/28/2014 10:20:48 PM   
njlauren


Posts: 1577
Joined: 10/1/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1

I don't honestly believe that the "roots" of homophobia are in christianity at all.

As you have clearly stated, it existed long before christianity.
When christianity was 'invented', along with many other existing religions and newer ones (Islam etc), they deliberately emphasized, propagated and enshrined the general acceptance of the practice in order to encourage more followers into the fold.
During the following centuries, it was even more galvanized into the roots of the religion to the point where those 'not of the faith' were persecuted and slaughtered just for not following the faith or it's miopic teachings. Islam is still in these dark ages depite what some 'enlightened' clerics are telling us - as evidenced in recent tortuous killings of the gay community within those cultures.

As Kirata said, it is still rigidly enforced in some well-known "Atheist" states like Russia and China.

You can bang your drum all you like and espouse passages from the bible, but in reality the christians (and Islamics and other similar religions) just magnified the original roots which go waay beyond the origins of the religions. Ergo: The religions are not the roots of homophobia; just exascerbated and amplified tangents of the original general doctrine.



ETA: Simple logic should tell you that if homophobia was in evidence before the religion, then the religion cannot be its roots



I didn't say the roots of it were in Christianity, I said that religion, primarily Christianity in the west, was the reason that anti homosexual bigotry and discrimination flourished to the levels it did. While anti homosexual bigotry predates Christianity and Judaism and Islam, Christianity and Islam because of the size and scope of their influence magnified it and promoted it in ways it never happened before. It is funny how people who with one breath can claim all these things religion did to create western civilization, but when it comes to the darker side of that, they deny it did anything (for example, that the routine anti semitism of much of the way Christianity was taught and preached for almost 2000 years was one of the major factors of why the holocaust happened and how poor the response was to it in the western world). I just saw a documentary on the case to repeal proposition 8, and the whole argument against allowing same sex marriage came down to religious belief, every argument, whether it was marriage was sacred, that it was meant to be between a man and a woman, that it was for 'regulating procreation' all boil down to religious belief, and given that the US is and always has been culturally and otherwise a Christian majority country, it doesn't take a genius to figure out what the influences were.

Human being have natural biases against things that are different, whether it is skin color or height or disfigurement or someone of another belief or a same sex couple, but when it comes to gays religion magnified that effect, especially a faith like Christianity that preached a universal faith and dogma. If you look at the reasons people give for anti gay bias, close to 100% of it can be traced back to the way Christianity described gays......

As far as China and Russia goes, be careful. Yes, the USSR was atheist, but revolution happened in 1917, and Christianity had been in Russia for many hundreds of years before that, dating to the late medieval period, and again, you can't claim that the revolution 'cut that off', it was in the culture..likewise, China for many hundreds of years before the 1949 revolution was flooded with Christian missionaries, and from what I am led to believe from Chinese friends, the puritanical notions of sex and sexuality were largely from that influence (it is much the same in India, traditional Hindu teachings gave us the Kama Sutra, the British with their screwed up Anglican/Victorian attitudes towards sex destroyed that image of sex, including attitudes about homosexuality). To argue that Russia or China were atheist leaves out the background before their revolutions. More importantly, all I need to add is that the USSR is dead now 25 years, and Russia has grown more anti homosexual by leaps and bounds, and it shouldn't come as a big shock that it has happened along with the Russian Orthodox Church flourishing, one of the most anti gay churches around (as well as anti semitic, which also has exploded since the end of the USSR).

To claim that religion wasn't the cause of much of the anti homosexual furor is like saying that fire doesn't start with gasoline, it starts with a match being struck. Anti homosexual bias predated Christianity, but Christianity was the gasoline that accelerated it and kept it burning furiously for almost 2000 years in the west, with the church pouring on fresh supplies of gasoline (anti gay preaching and teaching) all that time. I also will note that the gay rights movement took off after WWII, once the churches started experiencing their precipitous decline. By the time of the stonewall riot in 1969, the churches had already experienced rapid erosion of their influence and power, and the growth of gay rights on the upside can be correlated to the staggering decline in religious power in Europe and the US, and be directly tied to it. The one exception is fundamentalist Christianity and it becoming a major part of the GOP base, they became the primary promulgators of anti gay thought, and politicians , either in the GOP figuring the boobs would believe them that they wanted a "Christian State', or democrats afraid they would lose votes if they stuck their necks too far out about gay rights, gave these bozos a bully pulpit, and allowed for an anti gay backlash that called for among other things, calls for a constitutional amendment to ban same sex marriage that the GOP still has in its operational planks........the only problem is that as the older generations die off, and along with that the largest group that cared about religion, this has proven to be a blip on the radar of the trend, as much as the conservative Christians churches, the RC leadership or or the fundy/evangelical idiots beat their bibles, they have lost, the younger generations have rejected that kind of religion in huge percentages and as a result, are gay friendly, in large part because they reject the religious BS, as something like 80% of Catholics do.

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 256
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/28/2014 10:49:57 PM   
njlauren


Posts: 1577
Joined: 10/1/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel

You're clearly talking about an instance of social conformity and not claiming Christianity invented homophobia and K's smart enough to know that.

Here's the thing the deniers can try to sweep this problem under the rug by calling us anti religious and making stuff up about our positions and motivations, but it's not going away. Unless they plan on calling 80% of young Christians anti religious they're going to need to come up with a better obfuscation in the not too distant future to deny this problem.

quote:

ORIGINAL: https://www.barna.org/barna-update/teens-nextgen/94-a-new-generation-expresses-its-skepticism-and-frustration-with-christianity#.U3JRsld9dbU
Today, the most common perception is that present-day Christianity is "anti-homosexual." Overall, 91% of young non-Christians and 80% of young churchgoers say this phrase describes Christianity. As the research probed this perception, non-Christians and Christians explained that beyond their recognition that Christians oppose homosexuality, they believe that Christians show excessive contempt and unloving attitudes towards gays and lesbians. One of the most frequent criticisms of young Christians was that they believe the church has made homosexuality a "bigger sin" than anything else.



Nicely put, Got Steel, the spin doctors that Christianity is and always has been this loving, wonderful religion and the problem with homosexuality is bad old humans is a cop out, pure and simple. What Kirata and the others, who obviously are practicing Christians, are upset about is that Christianity has been tarred by the brush of being anti gay bigots, and they are doing what Catholics who though they don't like what the Bishops in this country are doing, claim 'Catholic Bashing" when people criticize the Bishops and the church over its handling of the priest abuse scandal, it is the older dodge in the book, if someone points out the King is wearing no clothes, saying the person saying that is 'out to get the king' and so forth.


The reason young people associate Christianity with being anti gay is because in their lifetime, they see the opposition to gays, and they see where it is coming from...and more importantly, they see that the so called liberal churches, who do try to be open and affirming, also have remained amazingly silent about the churches that are out there saying all these vile things. Kids aren't stupid, they are tuned in, and they know that with proposition 8 in california that those that got it passed were the religious, and they saw all the vile, horrible things being said about gays, the lies, the horrible claims, and also saw that the 'good christians' did nothing. There is an old expression, if liberal Christians want to really, really prove they aren't anti gay, then they need to get off their asses and do something....part of the problem is the liberal churches explain away the evangelicals, the morons down in the bible belt, they make 10,000 excuses for them,they say they are uneducated (true), they don't know any better, they have been raised that way, but want to know something, that is bullshit. If Fred Phelps and crew protest at a dead gay person's funeral, the 'good christians' should be out there in force protesting fred phelps.....When Obama had Rick Warren preach at his inauguration, the "Good Christians' should have flooded Obama's people with all kinds of objections, given how anti gay Warren is. When Romney was running for president and kept talking about 'family values' and made clear he was against same sex marriage, liberal churches should have taken a page out of the conservative playbook and told their parishioners that voting for a candidate who was anti gay because he promised them a tax cut was inconsistent with their claim of being pro gay. Something like 60% of Catholics support same sex marriage, and like 80% of them favor laws making discrimination against gays illegal, yet they do jackshit when the nasty old white men who run the church have made being anti gay one of the two main tenets of the faith it seems (that, and being anti abortion), they don't do anything, despite being themselves supportive of gays (what could they do? If the priest preaches anti gay stuff, refuse to pay their tithe or leave the church; if their local bishop is a bigot, refuse to allow any of their money to go to the diocese or broader church, and more importantly, speak out......one of the reasons anyone listens to the Catholic Bishops is because they claim their followers vote along with what they teach; if those 60% of 80% made clear they wouldn't vote for an anti gay candidate, you can bet the Bishops would lose out, big time).

For all its claims of being liberal, the Episcopal Church has fallen flat in my eyes......yeah, they now have a same sex blessing that churches can use, but they still don't accept same sex marriage as being the same as straight marriage...and the reason they do this isn't because they aren't liberal, they do it because they are afraid of offending the conservative churches in the us in the EC (note, under EC law, no church would have to accept gay marriage in their church, so a conservative church could refuse to recognize it or do it), and worse, they refuse to do so because they are afraid of offending the stupid, ignorant jackasses in the anglican churches in Africa, so they throw their gay members under the bus (meanwhile, the US supplies significant money to run churches in Africa as well as significant mission programs and the like...).

For all the 'liberal' Christian churches, they have let the Catholic leadership, and the evangelicals and the like, define Christianity, and they are paying the price for it. When gay issues come up, the young people see all the usual suspects on the other side, and want to know something? The liberal Christian churches and their members are nowhere to be found. It is all great and good that Christian churches now march in pride parades, but they have some big work to do to convince young people that not all Christians or Christian churches are as bad as the Rick Warrens of the world, or worse, the GOP, who have proclaimed themselves the party of the faithful and to this day, as a party, are the voice of anti gay behavior in this country. Put it this way, John Boehner wouldn't even let ENDA come to a vote (the law that would protect gays from discrimination in the workplace, housing, etc) and despite his claim it was it would invite frivilous lawsuits or was not needed, everyone knows he was afraid of the religious right, not to mention that he himself is a big time bible thumper, or so he claims.....where were all the liberal Christian churches protesting him doing this? Where was the outrage? Plenty of the holy roller and the like types spoke out decrying ENDA, but where were the liberal churches? If Christianity is not anti gay, where is the outrage? Where are the people calling for good Christians to vote Boehner out of office (personally, how anyone could elect a man like him befuddles me, his creep factor is way, way up there).....if the religious are upset that their church is called bigoted and anti gay, then maybe, just maybe, they aren't as pro gay as they think, inclusive language and hoisting a rainbow flag is all well and good, but as Burke once said, for evil to triumph, all good men have to do is nothing. More important, when 'the good guys' don't speak out, when they let the 'bad guys' have the floor, what ends up happening is the 'good guys' look like they support the 'bad guys'.

(in reply to GotSteel)
Profile   Post #: 257
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/29/2014 11:32:30 AM   
Raiikun


Posts: 2650
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: njlauren on this page

I didn't say the roots of it were in Christianity



quote:

ORIGINAL: njlauren on previous page

The reality of non Christian homophobia is that its roots are in Christianity.

(in reply to njlauren)
Profile   Post #: 258
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/29/2014 11:53:08 AM   
GotSteel


Posts: 5871
Joined: 2/19/2008
Status: offline
Words often have more than one meaning, this has been a constant source of confusion for our mouth breathing members, but I assure you that it's the case. However, you don't have to take my word for it, check out this elementary guide on how to learn english:

quote:

ORIGINAL: Learn English
Many English words have more than one meaning. If you only know one meaning, it is easy to get confused!

For example: Sweet.

1 - "Sarah is such a sweet little girl, she’s always looking after her brother." - kind and friendly.
2 - "This tea is too sweet for me to drink! How much sugar is in it?" - a taste similar to sugar.


This property of our language gives rise to the ability to perform a dishonest trick. njlauren can use a word to express that Christianity does effect broader culture and K can use another meaning of the word to pretend njlauren was claiming Christianity invented homophobia.

< Message edited by GotSteel -- 6/29/2014 11:54:26 AM >

(in reply to Raiikun)
Profile   Post #: 259
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/29/2014 12:19:49 PM   
Raiikun


Posts: 2650
Status: offline
Of course the unnecessary and misplaced English lesson does nothing to refute anything.

< Message edited by Raiikun -- 6/29/2014 12:20:10 PM >

(in reply to GotSteel)
Profile   Post #: 260
Page:   <<   < prev  11 12 [13] 14 15   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage Ban=- Page: <<   < prev  11 12 [13] 14 15   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.141