Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage Ban=-


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage Ban=- Page: <<   < prev  13 14 [15] 16 17   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/29/2014 6:05:25 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel

When you're trying to ignore a problem that's quite clear to 90% of non-christians and 80% of young-christians I suspect not being able to find your ass with both hands becomes imperative.

Your previously posted link reports only the perceptions (emphasis on perceptions) of an undisclosed number of 16-29 year olds, selected by undisclosed means, who were polled in 2007. Even using both hands, "perceptions" offer nothing that supports the claims being made. While 60% of Americans are accepting of homosexuality, that number rises to 65% among white mainline Protestants and to 70% among Catholics. You can't argue perceptions against facts.

K.


< Message edited by Kirata -- 6/29/2014 6:51:32 PM >

(in reply to GotSteel)
Profile   Post #: 281
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/29/2014 6:36:16 PM   
Raiikun


Posts: 2650
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel


quote:

ORIGINAL: Raiikun
Of course the unnecessary and misplaced English lesson does nothing to refute anything.


It explains how njlauren both is and is not saying roots. Two different meanings of the word. Heaven forbid people have an elementary grasp of their own native language.



Nope, still not refuting anything.

(in reply to GotSteel)
Profile   Post #: 282
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/29/2014 6:38:13 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:


ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1
Interesting that you compare Wiki (a well know source of misinformation and often incorrect) to such an authorative and internationally accepted source such as Merriam Websters International Dictionary and take the former misquote over the latter's definition.


There are definitions of the term 'contextomy' all over the net, FD. The Wiki article got it right. Besides, this is comparing apples and oranges - context to grammar.

quote:

However, in my book, nj's meaning of the first sentence, backed up by the following example given, was absolutely crystal clear to me. The rest of the paragraph, and indeed the majority of the rest of the post and following posts, were just religious waffle attempting to justify the original statement; namely, that the root of non Christian homophobia has its roots in Christianity.
The whole context of subsequent posts appears to try and justify that particular PoV.


It's too much effort to take apart the entire text of Lauren's comment to show you how you've got that wrong. Just one thing, though: it would a really, really stupid thing to say that Christianity is the root of all homosexuality across the world. Other religions - including Islam - blameless (despite the abundance of evidence in the news recently). Pre-Christianity - no. I mean, does Lauren really strike you as that stupid? Given that we *are* now all talking about context - as you're doing yourself in the last line of your comment, above?



_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 283
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/29/2014 7:16:07 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

Your example doesn't illustrate the point you're trying to make. The question is still whether your sentence is literal or figurative, and the paragraph doesn't clarify that, but only lists your reasons, psychopathic though they be.


Why have we come over all strict-grammarian here, MM? It's clear what the context is - in both NJLauren's case and in my own - and for the same reason. You simply read the rest of the paragraph, use some wits, and recognise what each of us is talking about as a result. You get all the sense - the feeling, the intent, the motive, the *meaning*, from the rest of that paragraph. That is what context is. This is why I'm not waiting for the police to turn up. It's only if you deliberately *don*t use your wits , the better to further your own argument, that you can claim that you don't get the context of what either I or Lauren said.

quote:


Further, if your students have sentences that don't measure up, you absolutely should call them on it, or you're doing them a disservice.


I'll let my bosses know your kind advice, MM. I shall return it with advice to you on how to play chopsticks on the piano.


Well dude, since I teach professional writing to professional writing majors, I'm pretty sure I'm on top of this.

If the standards are so poor where you teach, perhaps consider changing employers.

"Overly strict grammarian"? YOU brought it up...and now you want to complain about the nit-picking?

Facts are--the dwarf nailed you; your take on sentences is far off the mark, and leaves language meaning whatever you wish it means to support your subjective take. It doesn't work that way. You, and nj, are in error on this one.

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 284
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/29/2014 7:17:32 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer
I mean, does Lauren really strike you as that stupid?



"That stupid," no. That blinded by personal bias, yes.

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 285
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/29/2014 7:27:45 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

Well dude, since I teach professional writing to professional writing majors, I'm pretty sure I'm on top of this.


Then, sunshine, you should check your sources better. In particular, look up 'contextomy'. That is a matter of philosophy, which *I* happen to have taught. At postgraduate level. So whatever you feel 'on top of' - I suggest you swivel on it.

quote:


If the standards are so poor where you teach, perhaps consider changing employers.


I'm an examiner, not a teacher. But you should consider telling your employers to lose one of their less competent employees, in my opinion.

quote:


"Overly strict grammarian"? YOU brought it up...and now you want to complain about the nit-picking?


No, actually Kirata brought up. And then you and Freedomdwarf joined in without, I suspect, checking on the source of his quote from Lauren. That's why you missed the bleeding obvious. And FD cited a dictionary, of all things, to show that it was OK to use a point of grammar in order to pretend not to have understood her post.

quote:


Facts are--the dwarf nailed you; your take on sentences is far off the mark, and leaves language meaning whatever you wish it means to support your subjective take. It doesn't work that way. You, and nj, are in error on this one.


Nup. Like I said, check your sources. Your subjective take on Lauren's comment was akin to believing, subjectively, that day was night. You and FD are in error here, I'm afraid.

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 286
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/29/2014 7:41:34 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
Rant away.

But you still don't get to redefine what a sentence is or does, and the paragraph it's in doesn't change its meaning.

Thanks for bring personal attacks into this. Kind of shows where you are on the "logic" scale of things. And no, philosophical approaches don't change the meaning of sentences either.

Nor are you using contextomy correctly either, since you choose to get huffy about it. The sentence is not being changed in its meaning from being lifted out of context -- which is what contextomy actually means. You're trying to claim the context changes its meaning, and your example didn't demonstrate that principle whatsoever. Instead, mj is making an assumption that doesn't necessarily hold true. Period. That's the fallacy here, as others have already noted.

Pointing to the weak point of an argument isn't contextomy -- it's counterargument.

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 287
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/29/2014 7:50:02 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Rant away.

But you still don't get to redefine what a sentence is or does, and the paragraph it's in doesn't change its meaning.

Thanks for bring personal attacks into this. Kind of shows where you are on the "logic" scale of things. And no, philosophical approaches don't change the meaning of sentences either.

Nor are you using contextomy correctly either, since you choose to get huffy about it. The sentence is not being changed in its meaning from being lifted out of context -- which is what contextomy actually means. You're trying to claim the context changes its meaning, and your example didn't demonstrate that principle whatsoever. Instead, mj is making an assumption that doesn't necessarily hold true. Period. That's the fallacy here, as others have already noted.

Pointing to the weak point of an argument isn't contextomy -- it's counterargument.


MM, the balloon that is your head has just been burst. I'm sorry about that - but you did bring it on yourself. You tried an appeal to authority, too .... Well, I guess once bitten, twice shy.

I didn't need to redefine a sentence. I only had to point out what the sentence implied, given its context. This is you insisting that I play within the narrow parameters of grammar - which is exactly what I've been arguing against with FD. And, yes, contextomy does include lifting a sentence out of context in that manner.

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 288
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/29/2014 8:03:39 PM   
njlauren


Posts: 1577
Joined: 10/1/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1


quote:

ORIGINAL: njlauren
quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1

I don't honestly believe that the "roots" of homophobia are in christianity at all.

As you have clearly stated, it existed long before christianity.
When christianity was 'invented', along with many other existing religions and newer ones (Islam etc), they deliberately emphasized, propagated and enshrined the general acceptance of the practice in order to encourage more followers into the fold.
During the following centuries, it was even more galvanized into the roots of the religion to the point where those 'not of the faith' were persecuted and slaughtered just for not following the faith or it's miopic teachings. Islam is still in these dark ages depite what some 'enlightened' clerics are telling us - as evidenced in recent tortuous killings of the gay community within those cultures.

As Kirata said, it is still rigidly enforced in some well-known "Atheist" states like Russia and China.

You can bang your drum all you like and espouse passages from the bible, but in reality the christians (and Islamics and other similar religions) just magnified the original roots which go waay beyond the origins of the religions. Ergo: The religions are not the roots of homophobia; just exascerbated and amplified tangents of the original general doctrine.



ETA: Simple logic should tell you that if homophobia was in evidence before the religion, then the religion cannot be its roots



I didn't say the roots of it were in Christianity... <snip>



Are you denying you said this -
quote:

ORIGINAL: njlauren
The reality of non Christian homophobia is that its roots are in Christianity.
In post #118 which Kirate called bullshit on in post #222????




You are snipping stuff out of context, there is a difference in roots and origination and speaking about the main influences on the other hand. I don't think homophobia originated with Christianity or Judaism, I think that homophobia was something that probably caused people to be uncomfortable before those religions were created.

That said, though, what Judaism and then Christianity did was to take that bias/fear/whatever you want to call it, and ensconced it within the dogma and scripture of their faith, it became a part of their belief, their preaching, whatever, they didn't create it, but they certainly helped spread it and magnify it, and only someone willfully blind would argue elsewhere. Take a look at the breath and scope of Christianity, it dwarfed Judaism, and as an influence it spread from western Europe to Eastern Europe , to Asia Minor and so forth. In western Europe the prevalence of Christianity was such until fairly recent times that the world Atheist, until almost the 20th century, meant someone who didn't believe the traditional christianity of the trinity and such, they couldn't comprehend someone not believing, and Christianity was not only the dominant religious faith, it was also until fairly recent times the cultural norm, too. You can point out that atheists can be homophobes, and of course they can, but if you listen to them talk, you hear the same language that the religious use,and that isn't a coincidence, when they talk about marriage being about creating children, when they call gays degenerates or deviants, it is actually the same language the religions and their leaders and adherents have used for centuries. Christianity didn't create homophobia, any more than Christianity created anti semitism, but they are analogs to each other, in that Christianity taught and re-inforced for centuries both anti semitism and homophobia, to the point that anti gay and anti semitic thought and belief became part of the common background of society;casual anti semitism was not limited to Nazi Germany, and casual homophobia was part of society and it was largely there because of what Christian churches said about gays, preached about them and so forth. Put it this way, before about 30 years ago, there were relatively few Christian churches that taught that being gay was normal, 98% of them preached it was a sin and gays, disordered and worse. The quakers were one of the few, and some congregationalist churches and other relatively small liberal churches, so it isn't like the churches others have cited have been gay positive, most have 'come around' in the last 20-25 years.....so you think that 1980 years or so of preaching gays were evil, sinners, etc, didn't cause massive damage? Think about this one, homophobia is more strongest in the oldest, those who grew up when homophobia was the de facto position of all but a tiny fraction of churches, you think that is coincidence? And that the youngest, those under 30, grew up when churches finally started coming around?

Christianity didn't create homophobia, but it most certainly made it the de facto 'background' belief of western society for all but the relatively last several decades, much the same way that anti semitism wasn't created by Christianity but was made a background belief that really wasn't eradicated in a general way until the horrors of the holocaust made anti semitism very, very unpopular.

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 289
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/29/2014 8:15:50 PM   
njlauren


Posts: 1577
Joined: 10/1/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: njlauren

What Kirata and the others, who obviously are practicing Christians, are upset about is...

You really are a piece of work. I'm not a "practicing Christian," and I'm not defending Christianity. I'm shooting down your shit-for-brains claims because in my opinion that's what they are, and this notion that only a "practicing Christian" would attack your views is just another confirmation of the bias that gives rise to them.

K.





I call Bullshit, no one who isn't a practicing Christian would get upset at what I have written, what I have written is backed up by history. You can sit and pretend that the Catholic Church loves gays and that its leadership "loves the sinner but hates the sin" but that is bulshit. You are like far too many, who for whatever reasons insist that Christianity had nothing to do with ills like homophobia or anti semitism and fanning the fires of these, you want to pretend that that kind of religious belief is only with "nutjob Islam" and the like. All I have to say is every attempt at securing gay rights was fought viciously against by most Christian churches, and while a large percentage of Catholics are pretty good around gay issues these days, the leadership of the church in the US and the Vatican is not,and if you think evangelical Christianity or churches like the Mormons have nothing to do with things, think again. The Mormons and Catholic Groups like the Knights of Columbus spent close to 50 million dollars trying to get proposition 8 passed in California, you think that is gay affirming? You make homophobia appear to be a 'natural reaction' or something encoded in our DNA, what I am saying is that in Western Civilization, the casual homophobia that left gays in the closet, ashamed and in fear, was fostered and taught and magnified by Christianity, you can deny it all you want, but pick up a history book on the history of lGBT people and you will see that Christianity for most of its history was the primary fomenter of anti gay belief and the proof is out there. It is true that the USSR was not particularly gay friendly, but since the RUssian Orthodox church has come back into power in Russian Society, the plight of gays has gone from bad to being horrible....and likewise, since Christianity has been rapidly dying in the period after WWII, as the Catholic Church and other churches became non factors in Europe, the plight of gays improved tremendously. In this country, outside the bible belt with its virulent evangelical Christian nonsense, gay rights blossomed as the Catholic Church and mainline protestant churches withered in influence and numbers, if you charted the rise of gay rights against the decline of church going in this country, they tally almost perfectly.


I don't have to make anything up, the evidence is there.

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 290
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/29/2014 8:24:22 PM   
njlauren


Posts: 1577
Joined: 10/1/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1

It's a complete sentence ending in a Period, so it stands as a statement on it's own.

It is further qualified by the immediately following example: "Just because John Q homophobe doesn't go to church, claims not to be religious and so forth doesn't mean that Christianity is not at the root of his homophobia." which is empgasising the underlined bit.
That makes it pretty clear to me (and Kirata) that is precisely what they meant.

So, even in context, nj is actually saying exactly that and backing up the assertion by example.
By denying it in the respose to my post makes them look foolish.

No, because you and Kirata are making the foolish assumption that if someone claims they are atheist that ipso facto their homophobia has nothing to do with Christianity or Christian belief..what you are leaving out is that the homophobia common in western society was created by the Christian churches. Waht you and Kirata leave off is that until recent times, really post WWII, almost everyone went to church, almost everyone was taught by those churches that gays were sinners and deviants and worse, you don't simply pull 1900+ years of religion being the dominant force in western civilization all that fast. The homophobic atheist chances are was raised in a church, or at the very least was raised by parents who were raised in a church, that was the reality. And if you want to deny it, then explain this to me, explain to me why with attitudes towards LGBT people the more religious someone considers themselves, the more homophobic their attitudes are........and then think about the fact that Christianity in many ways was the dominant influence on western societal attitudes until pretty much the end of WWII, when people saw the holocaust, the horrors of WWII among supposedly civilized "Christian" people and starting rejecting the church..and the proof is that enlightening attitudes towards gays has happened as Christian churches have declined precipitously, and i is only in places like he Bible belt, where Christian churches are still very influential, that attitudes towards gays has improved a lot more slowly....you can claim that homophobia is hardwired into people, but the fact that the young, those under 30, who have mostly rejected traditional Christianity (as someone posted, most people under 30, something like 91%, say that in their experience Christianity is an anti gay faith) are the most supportive of gays says where homophobia had its greatest support and amplificiation.

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 291
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/29/2014 8:29:58 PM   
njlauren


Posts: 1577
Joined: 10/1/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: njlauren

What Kirata and the others, who obviously are practicing Christians, are upset about is...

You really are a piece of work. I'm not a "practicing Christian," and I'm not defending Christianity. I'm shooting down your shit-for-brains claims because in my opinion that's what they are, and this notion that only a "practicing Christian" would attack your views is just another confirmation of the bias that gives rise to them.

K.





I'm not a christian either - practicing or otherwise!!


Then why do you care about my views of CHristianity? if you and Kirata are not Christian, what difference do my views make or not make? The fact that you two are spending so much time denying what I am saying, while you offer pretty much zero evidence to refute what I have said, makes me question that statement. Someone who is not Christian or not practicing wouldn't care....

And I'll call you, you claim that Christianity is not predominantly responsible for the casual homophobia that existed in western society until fairly recent times..okay, so if it wasn't Christianity/Christian teaching in the churches, what was it? THat it is in our DNA? That there is some "homophobic' gene that naturally makes people dislike gays? And are you going to show proof that Christian churches in fact were not homophobic, that its leaders loved gay people and only wished the best for them? This should be interesting.If you and Kirata are going to call Bullshit, then you damn well better come up with a thesis and evidence to prove it..I have cited evidence, that the less religious someone is the less likely they are to be homophobic, or that the rise of gay rights has happened as the Christian churches have become less and less influential, roughly since WWII...going to be interesting.

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 292
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/29/2014 8:43:36 PM   
njlauren


Posts: 1577
Joined: 10/1/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Your example doesn't illustrate the point you're trying to make. The question is still whether your sentence is literal or figurative, and the paragraph doesn't clarify that, but only lists your reasons, psychopathic though they be.

Sorry, but the dwarf is right on this one. Yes, paragraphs add context, but they don't change the meaning of the sentence itself.

Further, if your students have sentences that don't measure up, you absolutely should call them on it, or you're doing them a disservice.

nj's error is assuming events that coincide are necessarily casual, and assuming the direction of those coincident events, ignoring that possibility that the culture itself evolved the attitudes which were then incorporated as religious ones, equally as possible as the reverse process argued. The causal link is claimed, but not established.

A more accurate claim would be that historically, churches have opposed homosexuality, as one causal source, but not to the exclusion of other possible causes.

nj also mistakenly attributes motives of defending Christianity, while posters have clarified explicitly that such is not the case, but only an additional erroneous assumption.




Music-
Like Kirata and others, you are confusing creation of homophobia, the origins of it, with what made it as dominant a bias as it has been. I never said that homophobia was created by Christianity, and I for one totally agree that those writing the bible or Paul were putting their own bias into the Bible,one of the challenges of reading any scripture is figuring out what is man made and what is inspired...

That said, you cannot argue that Christianity was not the dominant reason why homophobia became such a major bias in western civilization,the evidence is there of causality and causation. The fact that the more religious someone says they are is correlated with how homophobic they are is proof; the fact that those under 30 are overwhelmingly supportive of gays are also the least religious is proof; that among Catholics, the 80% who are cafeteria catholics are overwhelmingly positive about gays, whereas the Orthodox Catholics who follow church teachings are strongly homophobic. Likewise, in the US, gays enjoy better protections in the states where people tend to be least religious, whereas the bible belt is a place where gays face all kinds of problems. There have been serious studies of homophobia, and every analysis of the subject shows that the more someone is an orthodox Christian, the more homophobic they tend to be..and oh, yes, among atheists or those proclaiming themselves to be non religious but who show homophobic beliefs, most of them grew up in households that were very religious.......

The thing you and Kirata and others also want to duck is that Christian teaching has been such a dominant part of the broader culture for so long (it basically lost its grip starting in the 19th century roughly, and really accelerated after WWII), that what you see in the broader, ostensibly secular, culture cannot be dismissed as being 'societal', since the line between societal and religious had been nonexistent for a long time. It was much like anti semtism, the Catholic Church to this day still mostly denies that they were routinely anti semitic and therefore didn't have any blame over the conditions that led to the holocaust, but most Christian denominations in the reflections after the war admitted that they helped fan the flames of anti semitism for many many centuries and it helped lead to what happened in the holocaust, they acknowledged that the anti semitism they preached informed societal beliefs about Jews and led to what happened, and it is much the same way with homophobia. Put it this way, do you think it would have been as bad for gays had let's say the anti gay stuff in the bible didn't exist and if the Catholic Church and others Christian churches did not preach it as being a sin and so forth?

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 293
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/29/2014 8:55:20 PM   
njlauren


Posts: 1577
Joined: 10/1/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel

When you're trying to ignore a problem that's quite clear to 90% of non-christians and 80% of young-christians I suspect not being able to find your ass with both hands becomes imperative.

Your previously posted link reports only the perceptions (emphasis on perceptions) of an undisclosed number of 16-29 year olds, selected by undisclosed means, who were polled in 2007. Even using both hands, "perceptions" offer nothing that supports the claims being made. While 60% of Americans are accepting of homosexuality, that number rises to 65% among white mainline Protestants and to 70% among Catholics. You can't argue perceptions against facts.

K.



Hey, Kirata, you do realize that the 70% of Catholics who support gays are Cafeteria Catholics who do not follow the teachings of the church rigidly, and that among the roughly 30% of Catholics who follow the teachings of the church literally, most of them are anti gay? Likewise, those white mainline protestant churches you talk about have changed their teachings on homosexuality within the last 20-25 years, most of the mainline protestant churches no longer teach that gays are deviants or are sinners, and with the change in those teachings you see the difference in attitudes towards gays.

As far as what the young people feel about Christianity, while it doesn't always statistically pan out, those perceptions do show what unfortunately the public face of Christianity is. When you see discussions of CHristians and homosexuality, what do you see? The white, mainline protestants kindly saying they support gays, or do you see the hateful evangelical Christians of the Bible belt? When you see discussions of it, you see the Catholic Bishops spewing their crap about gays, not the 70% that support gays. And I can't blame them, either, when an entire political party gave power to the holy rollers and actually had the balls to propose amending the constitution to ban same sex marriage, which btw is still a plank of the GOP to this day..and they see states like North Carolina, that not only banned same sex marriage, but also banned any rights of marriage for same sex couples,a nd we won't even talk about Texas.......and they also saw the speaker of the house, Mr Suntan I am so sleazy I should be a used car salesman Boehner, refuse to even bring a federal anti disrimination bill covering gays to a vote, and it was directly because he was pandering to "Christians"...

And sadly, while many Christians these days are pro gay, whether or not their leadership is, most of them tend to remain very silent, they give you all kinds of bullshit like they don't want to criticize fellow Christians, they explain away the evangelicals and such as misguided and shit, and what the young people see is that the Christians who do support gays don't do very much to fight the assholes, or to let the GOP especially know that their catering to the asshole bible thumpers is going to hurt them.....the young people actually follow through, less than 30% of those same young people id with the GOP, and most of them say that the GOP being owned by the asshole evangelicals is one of the prime reasons why, and quite honestly, looking at the picture they are seeing, I can't blame them, because the "Good Christians" are silent for the most part, they support gays, but do very little to try and help them.

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 294
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/29/2014 8:59:00 PM   
njlauren


Posts: 1577
Joined: 10/1/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:


ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1
Interesting that you compare Wiki (a well know source of misinformation and often incorrect) to such an authorative and internationally accepted source such as Merriam Websters International Dictionary and take the former misquote over the latter's definition.


There are definitions of the term 'contextomy' all over the net, FD. The Wiki article got it right. Besides, this is comparing apples and oranges - context to grammar.

quote:

However, in my book, nj's meaning of the first sentence, backed up by the following example given, was absolutely crystal clear to me. The rest of the paragraph, and indeed the majority of the rest of the post and following posts, were just religious waffle attempting to justify the original statement; namely, that the root of non Christian homophobia has its roots in Christianity.
The whole context of subsequent posts appears to try and justify that particular PoV.


It's too much effort to take apart the entire text of Lauren's comment to show you how you've got that wrong. Just one thing, though: it would a really, really stupid thing to say that Christianity is the root of all homosexuality across the world. Other religions - including Islam - blameless (despite the abundance of evidence in the news recently). Pre-Christianity - no. I mean, does Lauren really strike you as that stupid? Given that we *are* now all talking about context - as you're doing yourself in the last line of your comment, above?



Nope, I don't think I am stupid......what Kirata and the others are doing is trying to muddle the picture, they are trying to claim I said that Christianity created homophobia, which I did not. Homophobia existed before Christianity, there is no doubt of it, and of course Islam (which shares common roots with Christianity) is homophobic as hell....but what they are leaving out is I was talking about western civilization, and that given the unique power Christianity held for so long, to the point that the term atheist before about 1850 meant someone who didn't believe traditional CHristian belief, they couldn't conceive of someone not believing in God or Christ, that its homophobic teachings and preachings created the widespread homophobia, the virulence of it, and that with the loss of power of Christian churches in the west, you see the rise of gay rights.

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 295
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/29/2014 9:09:43 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: njlauren
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata
quote:

ORIGINAL: njlauren

What Kirata and the others, who obviously are practicing Christians, are upset about is...

You really are a piece of work. I'm not a "practicing Christian," and I'm not defending Christianity. I'm shooting down your shit-for-brains claims because in my opinion that's what they are, and this notion that only a "practicing Christian" would attack your views is just another confirmation of the bias that gives rise to them.

I call Bullshit, no one who isn't a practicing Christian would get upset at what I have written...

Three of the people who disagree with you have told you that they're not practicing Christians, and you call bullshit? I don't know what you paid for your turban and plastic beads, but you got robbed.

quote:

ORIGINAL: njlauren

what I have written is backed up by history.

What you have written is backed up by nothing but your anti-religious bias. Churches can teach whatever they like, people will still do what they want. Catholic prelates have been preaching against contraception for fucking ever, and 82% of Catholics ignore them (source). With abortion it's the same story: 70% of women getting abortions are Christian, and while more Protestant women get abortions overall, the abortion rate is higher among Catholics (source).

K.


< Message edited by Kirata -- 6/29/2014 10:09:10 PM >

(in reply to njlauren)
Profile   Post #: 296
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/29/2014 9:43:00 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: njlauren

they are trying to claim I said that Christianity created homophobia, which I did not.

quote:

ORIGINAL: njlauren

its homophobic teachings and preachings created the widespread homophobia

That's a very thin hair to split, and there is approximately zero evidence for it. Christianity has preached "Love your Neighbor" for more than a millennium with little discernible effect. It has never even succeeded in keeping its own fucking priests chaste, no pun intended. But you want us to believe that in the singular case of homosexuality it has somehow wielded an uncanny power that directed the course of history.

Yeah, right. Post something useful. Give us some winning lottery numbers.

K.


< Message edited by Kirata -- 6/29/2014 10:21:31 PM >

(in reply to njlauren)
Profile   Post #: 297
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/30/2014 2:12:29 AM   
GotSteel


Posts: 5871
Joined: 2/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: njlauren
Then why do you care about my views of CHristianity? if you and Kirata are not Christian, what difference do my views make or not make? The fact that you two are spending so much time denying what I am saying, while you offer pretty much zero evidence to refute what I have said, makes me question that statement. Someone who is not Christian or not practicing wouldn't care....


Just because you can't conceive of a reason why someone else would care doesn't mean they can't. For instance we have posters who will defend Islam despite not being Muslim, tweak comes to mind. That's always a problem with informing other posters what their position is and when they disagree with you about what their position is it should be a giant red flag in your head that you're wrong.

(in reply to njlauren)
Profile   Post #: 298
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/30/2014 2:55:49 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: njlauren


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: njlauren

What Kirata and the others, who obviously are practicing Christians, are upset about is...

You really are a piece of work. I'm not a "practicing Christian," and I'm not defending Christianity. I'm shooting down your shit-for-brains claims because in my opinion that's what they are, and this notion that only a "practicing Christian" would attack your views is just another confirmation of the bias that gives rise to them.

K.





I call Bullshit, no one who isn't a practicing Christian would get upset at what I have written, what I have written is backed up by history. You can sit and pretend that the Catholic Church loves gays and that its leadership "loves the sinner but hates the sin" but that is bulshit. You are like far too many, who for whatever reasons insist that Christianity had nothing to do with ills like homophobia or anti semitism and fanning the fires of these, you want to pretend that that kind of religious belief is only with "nutjob Islam" and the like. All I have to say is every attempt at securing gay rights was fought viciously against by most Christian churches, and while a large percentage of Catholics are pretty good around gay issues these days, the leadership of the church in the US and the Vatican is not,and if you think evangelical Christianity or churches like the Mormons have nothing to do with things, think again. The Mormons and Catholic Groups like the Knights of Columbus spent close to 50 million dollars trying to get proposition 8 passed in California, you think that is gay affirming? You make homophobia appear to be a 'natural reaction' or something encoded in our DNA, what I am saying is that in Western Civilization, the casual homophobia that left gays in the closet, ashamed and in fear, was fostered and taught and magnified by Christianity, you can deny it all you want, but pick up a history book on the history of lGBT people and you will see that Christianity for most of its history was the primary fomenter of anti gay belief and the proof is out there. It is true that the USSR was not particularly gay friendly, but since the RUssian Orthodox church has come back into power in Russian Society, the plight of gays has gone from bad to being horrible....and likewise, since Christianity has been rapidly dying in the period after WWII, as the Catholic Church and other churches became non factors in Europe, the plight of gays improved tremendously. In this country, outside the bible belt with its virulent evangelical Christian nonsense, gay rights blossomed as the Catholic Church and mainline protestant churches withered in influence and numbers, if you charted the rise of gay rights against the decline of church going in this country, they tally almost perfectly.


I don't have to make anything up, the evidence is there.


He likes to trot out that bullshit when he gets called on getting all huffy when his defense of his faith gets too obvious. It's not the first time.

(in reply to njlauren)
Profile   Post #: 299
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/30/2014 3:10:24 AM   
crazyml


Posts: 5568
Joined: 7/3/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery
Yes, paragraphs add context, but they don't change the meaning of the sentence itself.



What an odd thing to say, given the impact that context has on meaning.

_____________________________

Remember.... There's always somewhere on the planet where it's jackass o'clock.

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 300
Page:   <<   < prev  13 14 [15] 16 17   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage Ban=- Page: <<   < prev  13 14 [15] 16 17   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125