quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

"Still unable to accept that you got busted I see. Whining won't change the facts and hurling insults won't either."

And neither will your silly game of inventing what I said. Talking to the Voices in your head doesn't equal what anyone here says.

Talk to someone who "stands for reality," and perhaps he/she will be able to explain it to you.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery



Since I was quoting your own post, this seems particularly relevant:

"the phrase "tone trolling" itself can be used to excuse verbally abusing one's opponents, so be careful who you accuse of doing it."

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

You think attacking the people who stand for reality is a good idea?

Surely you can't be referring to yourself.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

Anytime you actually want to put my intelligence to the test...

I think we've already done that.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

*psst....Ken .....you already tried that bullshit. No one bought it . . . *

And again, since you're objecting to something you yourself said, this is just the same circus with the same clown.

Amusing . . . but not much more.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

Lmfao........ I always took you as patronising but never as completely stupid...until now.

You would benefit more from taking a look in the mirror.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

Are you really suggesting your link At least in part now equates to you claim Underlying cause

The dynamics of repression and reaction formation have been observed in clinical settings for decades, and the available evidence confirms repressed homosexual arousal as the underlying cause of primary homophobia. It perhaps bears recalling that in the first study cited it was only the homophobes who responded with arousal to the homosexual stimuli.

A secondary form of homophobia can arise when children and youth internalize a fear and loathing of homosexuals communicated to them by significant caretakers and respected leaders. But while these internalized attitudes can be ameliorated through social pressure, as we are seeing today, ego-defenses tend to be refractive to influence.

In the final analysis, it is social pressure that produces both kinds of homophobes. But in the atheistic Soviet Union, the penal code required that "sexual relations between men" be punishable "by prison terms of up to five years,” whereas in the United States today the majority of mainline Protestants and Catholics are accepting of homosexuality.

So the point is, we are dealing here with the usual anti-religious bigots whose cranky blame-religion chorus is nothing more or less than a clown act fueled by ignorance and bile.

K.

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
I simply return what he delivers. You don't like it, too fucking bad.

If my posts offend you so much put me on hide. I will not change my posting style to satisfy you.

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi
You are so right. That would be as bad as claiming all religion is bad because some people use it to do bad things or all republicans are racist because I heard some of them say really shitty things or even all liberals are lazy because some of them would rather sit on welfare than hold down a job.

quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
I simply return what he delivers. You don't like it, too fucking bad.

If my posts offend you so much put me on hide. I will not change my posting style to satisfy you.

We talked last time about you're not going to change k's position and your justification for not blocking him was something along the lines of informing other people. How does this work toward achieving that goal? From where I'm standing it looks like these multiway flame wars muddy the water as opposed to illuminating anything.

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
I simply return what he delivers. You don't like it, too fucking bad.

If my posts offend you so much put me on hide. I will not change my posting style to satisfy you.

We talked last time about you're not going to change k's position and your justification for not blocking him was something along the lines of informing other people. How does this work toward achieving that goal? From where I'm standing it looks like these multiway flame wars muddy the water as opposed to illuminating anything.

So now I should block MM? I don't see the logic.