fucktoyprincess
Posts: 2337
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Kirata quote:
ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess My point was at the time that Hendrix went outside, Westbrook was NOT on the porch. So why does Hendrix need to go outside at the point. If he could have waited 5 minutes, Westbrook probably would have just wandered off. I really feel some patience would have resulted in one less senseless death. I don't entirely disagree with you, and I'd have stayed inside too under different circumstances, by which I mean if I was alone. But having my wife or child in the house changes the calculation. I don't know who this guy is, I don't know if he's armed, I don't know what his intentions are, but if something's going to happen I damn well want it to happen outside, not inside. K. So you step outside thereby running the risk that the other person SHOOTS YOU FIRST, and then goes and attacks your wife and child????? Sure, that makes a lot of sense. The safest place for Hendrix and for you would be TO STAY IN THE HOUSE AND WAIT FOR THE POLICE. I am not oblivious to the risks involved here, but the most prudent thing to do is to stay in the locked house and wait for the police. That is what I would have done. And if I had others with me, it would be what I would encourage everyone else to have done, too. Why would I leave the safety and comfort of my home at 4 a.m. to confront someone who might be armed and if they are a better shot than me, shoots me first. How exactly does that keep me and my family safe. The only way Hendrix could have felt he was safer to go outside leaving his gf alone in the house is probably being aware that the man was old and unarmed. Otherwise, no rational person should leave the safety of the house when they are aware that professional armed help is on the way. Leave the determination of the danger of this individual (and the risk of error) to the police. Why take it on yourself when there is no need and it actually makes things less safe for your family???
_____________________________
~ ftp
|