JeffBC
Posts: 5799
Joined: 2/12/2012 From: Canada Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: BenevolentM State another way, you rebelled against God and are in rebellion. This, however, is a circular argument. You can't be in rebellion against something you don't believe in. You might be wrong, but you can't be "in rebellion". This, fundamentally, is the issue with all religion. The entire construct is circular and starts with "faith" -- that is to say -- the unsupported belief that something is true. Some of us prefer facts... you know... real hard cold measurable and objective facts... the scientific method... which brought us the internet we are using right now. You have "the advantage of having decoded the bible". What advantage, exactly, does that confer upon you other than the ability to claim moral superiority for no particular reason? What prediction can you make from this "decoded bible" that couldn't be made without it? If I wanted to verify some of this secret information you have, how would I go about doing that? Oh, and why on god's green earth would god encode the bible to start with? Generally when we encode things we are trying to keep it a secret. I had sort of thought the play here was to get people saved not to make some sort of maze for the rats to run through. What sort of secrets would an omnipotent and omniscient being need (when you factor in why we have secrets to start with)? The whole thing just reeks of ... well ... blatant manipulation in a very cynical and very secular power grab.
_____________________________
I'm a lover of "what is", not because I'm a spiritual person, but because it hurts when I argue with reality. -- Bryon Katie "You're humbly arrogant" -- sunshinemiss officially a member of the K Crowd
|