RE: "Religion will become as unacceptable as racism" (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


njlauren -> RE: "Religion will become as unacceptable as racism" (3/13/2014 9:34:14 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

Not gay marriage... I am talking about gays in general...Homophobia is NOT exclusive to those who are spiritual.

Butch

Polls and studies show that that those who claim to be more religious/religious conservative tend to be a lot more homophobic, and i am not talking about same sex marriage. I am talking in attitudes towards gays, whether they thing gays for example deserve protection under civil rights laws, should be allowed to teach children, etc. Keep in mind that in 35 states it is perfectly legal to fire someone simply for being gay, for example, and most of those opposing extending protections to sexual orientation are also religious conservatives. No, you don't need to be religious to be homophobic, but religious belief is directly corellated to higher rates of anti gay feeling than among the more liberal/casual religious believers or non believers.




Musicmystery -> RE: "Religion will become as unacceptable as racism" (3/13/2014 9:43:23 PM)

nm




njlauren -> RE: "Religion will become as unacceptable as racism" (3/13/2014 9:45:42 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: njlauren

However, if you look at the roots of the holocaust and how it was carried out, religions role stands out like a sore thumb....

The Nazis were primarily engaged in a program of ethnic/racial cleansing. In support of that effort they promulgated a long list of alleged grievances against the Jews, but these were mainly political and economic grievances in which Jewish communists and banksters featured prominently.

quote:

ORIGINAL: njlauren

you think that the anti semitism that was fanned by religion and church over 19 centuries wasn't involved in them looking the other way or not caring?

Anti-semitism was not "fanned by religion," it was fanned by the remnants of a virulent brand of Christianity. On the subject of sore thumbs, however, I do agree that something here stands out like one.

K.


Sorry, Kirata, I suggest you read the book of Matthew before saying that, reading the section of the Passion....Anti semitism was fanned by religion, because Matthew puts the blame of the death of Jesus squarely on the shoulder of the Jews, and that was used as justification for what happened to Jews. You can claim "that isn't religion' but that is mental masturbation and rationalization. Religion comes from many things, and between the New Testament, the good friday Homilies that re-inforce the idea of Jews as Christ killers and worse, the blood libel that was promulgated openly in churches, especially in Eastern Europe and Russia, it was done in sermons and yes, it was done by church leaders. The Catholic Church, even after the horrors of the holocaust, only in 1965 with Vatican II, finally said that the Jews were not collectively responsible for the death of Christ..which means that before 1965, they taught they were...you think a group of people accused of deicide is not 'fanned by religion'. It was fanned by religious belief, and denying that religion played a key role in the holocaust is off the deep end, anti semitism, though it is not 'official church teaching', was practiced by the Catholic Church and by protestant churches like the Lutherans, all of them shared disdain for the Jews. Then of course, the fact that the churches for the most part did very little to nothing to try and protect the Jews, Goldhagen in "A moral reckoning" lays out the case quite well, that even in the face of absolute knowledge of what was going on, most churches did nothing, and it was because with anti semitism so common, they couldn't bring themselves to try and help.




njlauren -> RE: "Religion will become as unacceptable as racism" (3/13/2014 9:50:54 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery


quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel


quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

Not gay marriage... I am talking about gays in general...Homophobia is NOT exclusive to those who are spiritual.

Butch


You're right it's not completely exclusive, it's just almost completely exclusive to the religious.

Yeah, Neo-Nazis are known for their religious devotion.

[8|]

Umm, Neo Nazis see themselves as protectors of White, Christian America....take a look at some of their writings....




tweakabelle -> RE: "Religion will become as unacceptable as racism" (3/13/2014 9:59:23 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

Religion is a belief or series of related beliefs that attempt to explain the totality of our relationships with the world/universe around us.

In that case, I would like to propose a religion based on the belief that the Universe was created by a noodle and that a good relationship with the world around us requires us to conduct ourselves with a sufficient degree of social vinegar in order that we don't become stuck together (some people may already believe in this religion), with garlic bread dipped in marinara sauce as its sacrament.

Damn, now I'm hungry.

K.


Sure. Why not?

Is that any more or any less sensible (or, if you prefer, trivial) than some of the extravagant tales offered by various religions today? [:D] ......like an omnipotent being was bored so decided to create a Universe to amuse themselves. Then they invented a set of living creatures and set them up to fail in a luxurious setting, which incurred the Divine's anger so, in a petulant fit, the Divine cursed them (rather un-divinely, as it was all the Divines own fault in the first place). Need I go on ....?

I could have inserted the phrase 'non-trivial' into my suggestion but - silly me! - I thought it un-necessary.

Care to try again this time incorporating the spirit of 'non-trivial' in your response?




Kirata -> RE: "Religion will become as unacceptable as racism" (3/13/2014 10:06:03 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: njlauren
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

Anti-semitism was not "fanned by religion," it was fanned by the remnants of a virulent brand of Christianity. On the subject of sore thumbs, however, I do agree that something here stands out like one.

Sorry, Kirata, I suggest you read the book of Matthew before saying that, reading the section of the Passion.... Anti semitism was fanned by religion, because Matthew puts the blame of the death of Jesus squarely on the shoulder of the Jews, and that was used as justification for what happened to Jews.

Here's a news flash: The word religion does not mean "Christianity." Here's another one: There is nothing in Matthew that calls for the persecution of Jews. And here's one more: There is no functional difference between using the bad actions of the Sanhedrin to justify bashing Judaism and Jews and using the bad actions of the Church to justify bashing religion and the religious.

K.




Kirata -> RE: "Religion will become as unacceptable as racism" (3/13/2014 10:48:41 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

Care to try again this time incorporating the spirit of 'non-trivial' in your response?

Sure.

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

a workable definition or understanding must be capable of explaining both good and bad religon

A definition is not obligated to "explain" something to which it does not pertain. The only thing required of a definition of religion is that it be capable of distinguishing between what is religion and what is not. That we are currently forced to speak of "bad" religion (which implicitly suggests that it's not really what we want to mean by religion) is just more evidence of an inadequate definition.

By contrast, we don't imagine there to be a "good" kind of sportsmanship and a "bad" kind of sportsmanship. When we say that something was "bad" sportsmanship, we mean that it wasn't sportsmanship at all. But our definition of religion doesn't allow us this clarity, and the definition that you proposed fails to solve the problem, as will any definition that equates religion with belief.

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

Religion is a belief or series of related beliefs that attempt to explain the totality of our relationships with the world/universe around us.

K.




BitYakin -> RE: "Religion will become as unacceptable as racism" (3/14/2014 12:03:31 AM)

last I heard no church makes ANY LAWS
I never said they did, did I?? no so quit with the strawmen

actually YESSS yes you did

I said THEY (religious groups) don't tie you down and force you

you replied "when THEY make christian based laws ..... yes....which is why church and state should be separate."
or were you referring to some OTHER THEY? if so it would have been nice of you to point out you meant a DIFERANT THEY

"are you saying the Christian population shouldn't be allowed to VOTE? I didnt say that either or anything close to it "

actually AGAIN yesss you did say something CLOSE TO IT

you said THEY make Christian based laws, with the CLEAR IMPLICATION they shouldn't be allowed to. when in actuality THEY vote for people who make laws they like, which you CLEARLY IMPLIED shouldn't be allowed

soo yeahhh ya KINDA DID!

there's really NO POINT in me replying though is there, you'll just point out that I am STUPID so my thoughts should be dismissed

personally I believe whole heartedly in the concept of seperation of church and state, I just get sick of people like you constantly SLAMMING THEM and INSULTING THEM and implying they should be wiped of the face of the earth, showing the VERY INTOLERANCE you claim they have




Kirata -> RE: "Religion will become as unacceptable as racism" (3/14/2014 1:22:50 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel

You get that you are hurting homosexuals by denying them equal rights don't you?

Minors and siblings excepted, the law gives every man the right to marry the woman of his choice, every woman the right to marry the man of her choice, and every gay has exactly the same right. So stuff the "equal rights" bullshit. I get that they don't want to, but if there was a right to marry "the one you love" we'd have people marrying minors, siblings, sheep, refrigerators, and possibly several of each.

There are very good arguments for allowing gay adults to marry, but "equal rights" isn't one of them. Unlike minors, they are legally capable of giving consent and entering into contracts; the concerns that bear on sibling unions are moot; unlike refrigerators, they are capable of participating in a mutually rewarding relationship; and the establishment clause blocks objections from religious doctrine. Bingo!

Sheep, of course, raise a more delicate question. [:)]

K.





thishereboi -> RE: "Religion will become as unacceptable as racism" (3/14/2014 4:47:12 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

Well I can't speak on Islam because I have never studied it, but I have been to a lot of christian churches and none of them taught us to be apart from nature or hate our neighbors so I am not sure where you are getting that.

Also, he didn't dictate anything, He gave his opinion. I know because he said so in the very beginning.


This has been discussed extensively in other threads, but the main gist is that if you combine monotheism with an obligation to convert then you have created a religion that is not tolerant of the religion of others.

Christians and Muslims the world over do not peacefully co-exist with others because it is an important part of their religion to save other people by converting them. What exactly do you think Christian missionary work is??

Yes this has been discussed and since you seem to want to group all missionary work into one group I am not seeing the point in bringing it up again.

To not respect someone else's religion "sets people against their neighbor" to use Kirata's words.

Buddhists, Hindus, Jains, Sikhs, Jews NEVER contact me trying to convert me. Christianity and Islam are quite different. As someone who comes from a Hindu background I don't enjoy having other religions tell me I will go to their version of hell because I don't believe in their god. Sorry, but this is NOT tolerant. Not to mention, on a separate note, that most forced conversions historically have been the result of either Christianity or Islam. How does and of this square with tolerance, live-and-let-live, etc? It doesn't really. [sm=2cents.gif]

I am really sorry you have had such negative encounters with religious folk that you feel the need to paint them all as intolerant. There are some real assholes out there.






tweakabelle -> RE: "Religion will become as unacceptable as racism" (3/14/2014 6:36:00 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

a workable definition or understanding must be capable of explaining both good and bad religon

A definition is not obligated to "explain" something to which it does not pertain. The only thing required of a definition of religion is that it be capable of distinguishing between what is religion and what is not. That we are currently forced to speak of "bad" religion (which implicitly suggests that it's not really what we want to mean by religion) is just more evidence of an inadequate definition.

By contrast, we don't imagine there to be a "good" kind of sportsmanship and a "bad" kind of sportsmanship. When we say that something was "bad" sportsmanship, we mean that it wasn't sportsmanship at all. But our definition of religion doesn't allow us this clarity, and the definition that you proposed fails to solve the problem, as will any definition that equates religion with belief.

K.
[/font][/size]

WBC and Al Quada would both qualify as 'bad religion' in my book, but there is no way that means they are not 'religious'. On the contrary both would assert they are highly religious, devotedly religious.

I must say that I am having difficulty trying to imagine a religion where belief is not a central or defining feature. Such religions may exist for all I know, but how does one distinguish all the various sects of say Christianity except by their various belief systems? Faith is a another central feature of religions, but how can faith exist without a belief to have faith in?

It may be the case that taking belief out of religion is tantamount to taking the religion out of religion. The remainder might not amount to very much.




GotSteel -> RE: "Religion will become as unacceptable as racism" (3/14/2014 7:26:01 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice
For me, a key question is why you think gay marriage isn't "oksy."


I don't think gay marriage is oksy which is why I don't get gay married. However I see absolutely no reason why my personal sexual and lifestyle preferences should be impossed on other people. Hence I'm for gay marriage for anybody who doesn't squick at the idea of being gay married. It's just part of that respect for others that chatter was claiming but not doing.




fucktoyprincess -> RE: "Religion will become as unacceptable as racism" (3/14/2014 7:29:06 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BitYakin

I was raised Catholic, attended catholic schools my entire educational period, and at NO TIME was I ever told there was an OBLIGATION to CONVERT ANYONE EVER...

the SAD part of this is, that you think because someone feels strongly about something and wants to SHARE IT WITH YOU, it means they are FORCING IT ON YOU



What you describe above is not forced conversion and I never said it was. Here is a history lesson for you from Wiki. When you've finished reading it please explain to me why the following is not related to Christianity.

End of Roman empire
Forced conversion was a major way for the Christianization of the Roman Empire. In 392 Emperor Theodosius I decreed that Christianity was the only legal religion of the Roman Empire, and forbidding pagan practices by law:
It is Our will that all the peoples who are ruled by the administration of Our Clemency shall practice that religion which the divine Peter the Apostle transmitted to the Romans....The rest, whom We adjudge demented and insane, shall sustain the infamy of heretical dogmas, their meeting places shall not receive the name of churches, and they shall be smitten first by divine vengeance and secondly by the retribution of Our own initiative" (Codex Theodosianus XVI 1.2.).[1]
Medieval era
During the Saxon Wars, Charlemagne, King of the Franks, forcibly Roman Catholicized the Saxons from their native Germanic paganism by way of warfare and law upon conquest. Examples include the Massacre of Verden in 782, during which Charlemagne reportedly had 4,500 captive Saxons massacred upon rebelling against conversion, and the Capitulatio de partibus Saxoniae, a law imposed on conquered Saxons in 785 which prescribes death to those that refuse to convert to Christianity.[2]
Pope Innocent III pronounced in 1201 that even if torture and intimidation had been employed in receiving the sacrament, one nevertheless:
...does receive the impress of Christianity and may be forced to observe the Christian Faith as one who expressed a conditional willingness though, absolutely speaking, he was unwilling. ... [For] the grace of Baptism had been received, and they had been anointed with the sacred oil, and had participated in the body of the Lord, they might properly be forced to hold to the faith which they had accepted perforce, lest the name of the Lord be blasphemed, and lest they hold in contempt and consider vile the faith they had joined.[3]
From The Crusades, by Bernard Hamilton[4] “In 1309 the Teutonic Order moved its headquarters to Marienburg in Prussia. It had a papal license to wage perpetual war against the pagans and used this to launch annual crusades against Lithuania. These expeditions were very popular with the nobility of northern Europe: campaigns were held twice a year, in the summer and in the winter when the order laid on special Christmas festivities for visiting crusaders.” “The excuse for men who enjoyed fighting and to lay waste large parts of Lithuania in the name of Christ was removed in 1386 when the King of Lithuania, Jagiello, married Queen Jadwiga of Poland and received Catholic baptism. The two kingdoms were united under Christian rulers and the Teutonic Knights no longer had any justification for crusading against pagans there.”
Spanish Inquisition
After the end of the Islamic control of Spain, Muslims and Jews were expelled from Spain in 1492 and from Portugal in 1497.[5] After the Reconquista, so called "New Christians" were those inhabitants (Sephardic Jews or Mudéjar Muslims) during the Middle Ages and the Early Modern Era who were baptized under coercion and in the face of murder, becoming forced converts from Islam (Moriscos, Conversos and secret Moors) and forced converts from Judaism (Conversos, Crypto-Jews and Marranos). Then the Spanish Inquisition targeted primarily forced converts from Judaism who came under suspicion of either continuing to adhere to their old religion or of having fallen back into it. Jewish conversos still resided in Spain and often hiddenly (cryptically) practiced Judaism and were suspected by the "Old Christians" of being Crypto-Jews. The Spanish Inquisition generated much wealth and income for the church and individual inquisitors by confiscating the property of the persecutees or selling them into slavery. The end of the Al-Andalus and the expulsion of the Sephardic Jews from the Iberian Peninsula went hand in hand with the increase of Spanish-Portugal influence in the world, as exemplified in the Christian conquest of the Americas and their aboriginal Indian population. The Ottoman empire, the Netherlands, and the New World absorbed much of the Jewish refugees.[6]
Goa Inquisition
Main article: Goa Inquisition
Religious persecution took place by the Portuguese in Goa, India from 16th to the 17th century. The natives of Goa, most of them Hindus were subjected to severe torture and oppression by the zealous Portuguese rulers and missionaries and forcibly converted to Christianity.[7][8][9][10][11][12]
In 1567, the campaign of destroying temples in Bardez met with success. At the end of it 300 Hindu temples were destroyed. Enacting laws, prohibition was laid from December 4, 1567 on rituals of Hindu marriages, sacred thread wearing and cremation. All the persons above 15 years of age were compelled to listen to Christian preaching, failing which they were punished. In 1583, Hindu temples at Assolna and Cuncolim were destroyed through army action. "The fathers of the Church forbade the Hindus under terrible penalties the use of their own sacred books, and prevented them from all exercise of their religion. They destroyed their temples, and so harassed and interfered with the people that they abandoned the city in large numbers, refusing to remain any longer in a place where they had no liberty, and were liable to imprisonment, torture and death if they worshipped after their own fashion the gods of their fathers." wrote Filippo Sassetti, who was in India from 1578 to 1588. An order was issued in June 1684 for suppressing the Konkani language and making it compulsory to speak the Portuguese language. The law provided for dealing toughly with anyone using the local language. Following that law all the non-Christian cultural symbols and the books written in local languages were sought to be destroyed.[13]
Methods such as repressive laws, demolition of temples and mosques, destruction of holy books, fines and the forcible conversion of orphans were used.[14]
Native American boarding schools
The government paid religious societies to provide education to Native American children on reservations. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) founded additional American Indian boarding schools based on the assimilation model of the Carlisle Indian Industrial School.
Children were usually immersed in European-American culture through appearance changes with haircuts, were forbidden to speak their native languages, and traditional names were replaced by new European-American names. The experience of the schools was often harsh, especially for the younger children who were separated from their families. In numerous ways, they were encouraged or forced to abandon their Native American identities and cultures.[15] The number of Native American children in the boarding schools reached a peak in the 1970s, with an estimated enrollment of 60,000 in 1973. Especially through investigations of the later twentieth century, there have been many documented cases of sexual, physical and mental abuse occurring at such schools.[16][17] Since those years, tribal nations have increasingly insisted on community-based schools and have also founded numerous tribally controlled colleges. Community schools have also been supported by the federal government through the BIA and legislation. The largest boarding schools have closed. In some cases, reservations or tribes were too small or poor to support independent schools and still wanted an alternative for their children, especially for high school. By 2007, the number of Native American children in boarding schools had declined to 9,500.




Zonie63 -> RE: "Religion will become as unacceptable as racism" (3/14/2014 7:39:53 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

a workable definition or understanding must be capable of explaining both good and bad religon

A definition is not obligated to "explain" something to which it does not pertain. The only thing required of a definition of religion is that it be capable of distinguishing between what is religion and what is not. That we are currently forced to speak of "bad" religion (which implicitly suggests that it's not really what we want to mean by religion) is just more evidence of an inadequate definition.

By contrast, we don't imagine there to be a "good" kind of sportsmanship and a "bad" kind of sportsmanship. When we say that something was "bad" sportsmanship, we mean that it wasn't sportsmanship at all. But our definition of religion doesn't allow us this clarity, and the definition that you proposed fails to solve the problem, as will any definition that equates religion with belief.

K.
[/font][/size]

WBC and Al Quada would both qualify as 'bad religion' in my book, but there is no way that means they are not 'religious'. On the contrary both would assert they are highly religious, devotedly religious.

I must say that I am having difficulty trying to imagine a religion where belief is not a central or defining feature. Such religions may exist for all I know, but how does one distinguish all the various sects of say Christianity except by their various belief systems? Faith is a another central feature of religions, but how can faith exist without a belief to have faith in?

It may be the case that taking belief out of religion is tantamount to taking the religion out of religion. The remainder might not amount to very much.


As far as what makes a religion "bad," I never really thought it was due to any actual belief, faith, or even the religion itself. To me, I don't see how it's possible to single out religion and say that it's bad or unacceptable while not taking the same view with political or philosophical beliefs. Religion and politics have a great deal in common, especially when it comes to fanatical zeal and their practical applications in imposing an ideology on the masses. Any belief can be twisted by a fanatic, no matter if it's religious or non-religious.

I don't know if the problem lies in the belief itself, or in some inherent flaw of human nature which causes some people to go off the deep end with their beliefs. There may not be any bad religion, just bad people.

I'm not sure what would make anyone "religious" or otherwise qualify extreme and/or terror groups as "religious." They might claim to be "religious," but then again, if they don't even follow the edicts and principles of their own stated belief system, then they might be more like political opportunists - using religion for their own personal gain.

Of course, one can also find similar opportunists within secular political ideologies as well, so there's really no difference between religion and politics in that regard.




chatterbox24 -> RE: "Religion will become as unacceptable as racism" (3/14/2014 7:45:47 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel


quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice
For me, a key question is why you think gay marriage isn't "oksy."


I don't think gay marriage is oksy which is why I don't get gay married. However I see absolutely no reason why my personal sexual and lifestyle preferences should be impossed on other people. Hence I'm for gay marriage for anybody who doesn't squick at the idea of being gay married. It's just part of that respect for others that chatter was claiming but not doing.


I have many reasons for my choices and beliefs, and not all are Christian or spiritual. They are based on other things, what some call rational based. I am doing no one any harm. I have no desire to go back and forth, and exchanging hidden or blatant disrespect. What I do find, on the other hand, the opposite from a few opposing individuals. If I have offended anyone, I am sorry. Always evolving, but some things my mind will never change on.




GotSteel -> RE: "Religion will become as unacceptable as racism" (3/14/2014 8:32:17 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BitYakin
last I heard no church makes ANY LAWS, now if the MAJORITY of voters elect someone based on the premise they will push for laws they like, well I THINK that's called DEMOCRACY
are you saying the Christian population shouldn't be allowed to VOTE?



quote:

ORIGINAL: Thomas Jefferson
A democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one percent of the people may take away the rights of the other forty-nine.


If you take a moment to see what the founding fathers thought of democracy you'll find a great deal of scathing condemnation. This is why we live in a republic where a body of laws constrain the will of the people.


quote:

ORIGINAL: BitYakin
CHILL OUT, do they TIE YOU DOWN and FORCE you to listen?


Yes, creationism in public schools is a classic example of this. It's also why judges keep tossing creationism out of schools.




GotSteel -> RE: "Religion will become as unacceptable as racism" (3/14/2014 8:45:45 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24
I have many reasons for my choices and beliefs, and not all are Christian or spiritual.

By all means tell us about that. We've been waiting for pages to find out what "medical research" means.

quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24
They are based on other things, what some call rational based.

Such as?

quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24
I am doing no one any harm. I have no desire to go back and forth, and exchanging hidden or blatant disrespect. What I do find, on the other hand, the opposite from a few opposing individuals. If I have offended anyone, I am sorry. Always evolving, but some things my mind will never change on.

Of course you're harming people. Imagine for a moment if the rest of us got together and outlawed christian marriage. Would that be harmful to no one?

Any time you take a group of people and make them second class citizens you are harming them.




Kirata -> RE: "Religion will become as unacceptable as racism" (3/14/2014 8:55:04 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

I must say that I am having difficulty trying to imagine a religion where belief is not a central or defining feature... It may be the case that taking belief out of religion is tantamount to taking the religion out of religion.

Well to give some context to what I originally said (here), in my view theology and philosophy stand to religion and yoga as theory stands to practice. I think it a rather commonplace observation that a person's "real religion" (potential sarcasm) isn't to be found in what they claim to "believe," it is found in what they do; what they actually practice in life.

K.





VideoAdminGamma -> RE: "Religion will become as unacceptable as racism" (3/14/2014 9:16:06 AM)

Fast Reply

I have removed some posts for violating community standards. I have also removed the string of replies. Please refrain from making personal attacks or hijacking the topic with back and forth sniping.

If you have any questions please contact me or Chi. Do not reply to this post.

Thanks for being a part of CollarMe,
Gamma




chatterbox24 -> RE: "Religion will become as unacceptable as racism" (3/14/2014 9:35:45 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel


quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24
I have many reasons for my choices and beliefs, and not all are Christian or spiritual.

By all means tell us about that. We've been waiting for pages to find out what "medical research" means.

quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24
They are based on other things, what some call rational based.

Such as?

quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24
I am doing no one any harm. I have no desire to go back and forth, and exchanging hidden or blatant disrespect. What I do find, on the other hand, the opposite from a few opposing individuals. If I have offended anyone, I am sorry. Always evolving, but some things my mind will never change on.

Of course you're harming people. Imagine for a moment if the rest of us got together and outlawed christian marriage. Would that be harmful to no one?

Any time you take a group of people and make them second class citizens you are harming them.


I see. I do not agree and now we will make it appear I am making people second class citizens. You are doing no harm correct? No one is, by disrespecting others religions, their deity? The quest is a good one?
You can build your world of hate or lies about me or others, build the walls high, but it shall never have a roof. I fear God, some never will. I respect that and am stepping away so you may continue as scheduled. Say what you will, it is out of my hands.




Page: <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875